County of Fresno Shaver Lake Water and Sewer Presentation 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wakulla County Sewer Project Eutaw Utilities Presentation April 7, 2011.
Advertisements

Sanitary Sewer System Rate Study September 2012 Keystone Municipal Services.
PROPOSITION 218 IMPACTS ON UTILITY USER FEES Case Study City of Dixon Sewer Rate Repeal of 2007.
Taking the Mystery out of Economic Development Tools Chris Eng, Chisago County HRA-EDA.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DECEMBER 11, 2012 CELEBRATION POINTE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
 Why  Project Status  Future Course Lime Sludge Biosolids Water/Wastewater System Life Cycle Raw Water Wells (12) Water Treatment Plant Storage Tanks.
KINGWOOD UDGET PRESENTATION TOWNSHIP OF KINGWOOD 2012 BUDGET PRESENTATION.
CITY OF MERIDIAN FY08 BUDGET HEARING Mayor – Tammy de Weerd Council President – Joe Borton Council Vice President – Charlie Rountree Council – Keith Bird.
Chapter 3: Budgetary Accounting for General and Special Revenue Funds
SCHOOL FINANCE EA756. Finance The budget is one of the most important legal documents of a school district. It is not a static document, but rather a.
Essentials of Accounting for Governmental and Not-for-Profit Organizations Chapter 3 Budgetary Accounting for the General and Special Revenue Funds McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Accounting Details We show transfers as a separate line below personnel, operating expense, and capital outlay so true cost of the department before transfer.
CITY OF MERIDIAN FY07 BUDGET HEARING Mayor – Tammy de Weerd Council President – Shaun Wardle Council Vice President – Joe Borton Council – Keith Bird Council.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Safe Drinking Water Permit and Capacity Requirements Developer Services Summit November 16, 2010 Engineering - Asset Planning Vince Monaco.
Cleveland Municipal School District Fiscal Year 2009 Budget Overview.
Sunshine Coast Regional District Development Cost Charges July 3, 2014 Infrastructure Services Committee Bob Twerdoff.
Annexation Issues in Eden A History of Annexation in Eden Since 1968 NC Annexation History Current Annexation Issues in Eden January 2010.
1 Riverwood Community Governance Forum March 7, 2011 Cal Teague Riverwood C.D.D. District Manager.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
2006 ANNUAL CONFERENCE CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING FOR SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE Sam Sperry,
Eastmark No.1 Community Facilities District (CFD) - Tax Rate Update June 15,
Short and Long Range Water Supply Planning and Aquifer Performance Test (APT)
Mott Community College Board of Trustees Committee of the Whole Meeting June 27, 2011 BUDGET RESOLUTIONS.
MOSHANNON VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSED BUDGET
Village of Almont WATER, SEWER, AND SSO RATES 2012 – 2013 FISCAL YEAR.
1 1 City Commission Workshop for the DRAFT Basis of Design Report December 14, 2015 CRAVEN THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Interlocal Agreement – Transportation Impact Fees City Council Meeting July 16, 2013.
Road Map to the Future: The Consolidation of Sewer Infrastructure in Rutherford County, NC November 16 th, 2015.
© 2016 OnCourse Learning California Real Estate Finance Fesler & Brady 10th Edition Chapter 12 Construction Loans.
Proposed MMWD Rate Restructure MCOE District Business Officials November 4, 2015.
Borrego Water District Revenue Workshop. Potential Revenue Sources  Background  Service Area Relatively Small  Largely Undeveloped  Absentee Owners.
FEBRUARY 22, 2016 FY 2017 County Administrator’s Recommended Budget.
Water System Master Plan & Rate Study City of DeKalb, Illinois City Council Presentation May 16, 2015.
SUMMARY OF FY2016 PROPOSED BUDGET July 21,
FY PROPOSED BUDGET  A "Target Level" expenditure base was established for all departments six- months’ worth of operations (July 1, 2016 – December.
May 18, 2004 City Bond Election. MAY 2004 BOND ELECTION General Election May 18, 2004 Elections City Mayoral Election City Council Election City Bond.
April 26, 2016 PRESENTER: Doug Green, Vice President.
City of Joliet 2016 Proposed Budget November 30, 2015.
Fiscal Year 2015/16 Proposed Budget - Recap City of Barstow June 15, 2015 Barstow City Council The crossroads of opportunity… where the best is yet to.
“State Road 100 MPC Lots” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing November 17, 2015.
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
PUBLIC WORKS FY 2012 Proposed Budget May 24, 2012.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA FINANCIAL FORECAST AND CAPITAL FACILITIES FEES ANALYSIS Prepared in Conjunction With the Utility System Revenue.
Lake Ashton and Lake Ashton II Community Development Districts CDD ORIENTATION CLASS February 28, 2011.
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
1.  Quick Overview of the History and Need  What is Planned for the Fire Department  What is Planned for the Police Department  Financial Details.
1 Budget Presentation Fiscal Year 2011 May 10, 2010.
PROPOSED CITY OF STOCKTON WATERFORD ESTATES EAST PHASE II ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PUBLIC HEARING Stockton City Council January 6, 2004.
Jefferson County Planning Commissioners Hearing June 26, 2013 Case No SV Foothills Metropolitan District Service Plan Case Manager: Russell D.
Loan Programs.  What is the PFA?  How does PFA financing work?  What is the Capital Financing Program?  What is the State Revolving Fund Program?
DEVELOPER WORKSHOP October 17, :00 p.m.
Jefferson County Planning Commissioners Hearing June 26, 2013
Water & Wastewater Capacity Charge Work Shop
City of Rialto Midyear Changes Budget-Fiscal Year 2012/2013
City of Sisters, OR 2017 Water & Sewer Rate Study
Tax Abatement Bonds Presentation City of Marshall, Minnesota
PROPOSED MARCH LANE / HOLMAN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
Valley & Third Streets Redevelopment
Non-Residential Customer Non- Residential - Capacity Evaluation Borough of Conshohocken Authority Customer Informational Meeting June 20, East.
ELECTRIC REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS SERIES 2016A
Idyllwild Water District
PUBLIC HEARING Stockton City Council June 6, 2006
Property Tax Levy – Taxes Payable 2019
Delta Water Supply Project
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES AB 1600 UPDATE
Agenda FYE June 30, 2020 Operating Budget
Agenda FYE June 30, 2020 Operating Budget
Gothenburg Public Schools
Presentation transcript:

County of Fresno Shaver Lake Water and Sewer Presentation 2012

Order of Presentation Water Sewer Community Facilities District Water/Sewer Operations & Maintenance

Shaver Lake Sewer and Water Master Plan Shaver Lake Sewer and Water Master Plan (SWMP) was adopted by the Board of Supervisors on June 24, 1985 Established a 2,000 equivalent dwelling unit (EDU) limitation on groundwater in Township 10 Obtaining a Surface Water Allocation is necessary to allow development above the 2,000 unit limitation

Watershed Study Kenneth D. Schmidt, March 1977 Sustainable Volume 300 Acre Feet – SWMP/Actual/State recommendation – 0.177/0.30/0.50 gpm is equal to 1,695/1,000/600 EDUs Maximum Volume 500 Acre Feet – SWMP/Actual/State recommendation – 0.177/0.30/0.50 gpm is equal to 2,825/1,667/1,000 EDUs

Shaver Lake Township 10 Water Unit Allocation EDUs Limit based on SWMP2,000 Recorded Lots -1,579 Tentatively Approved (TPM, SPR, TTM) -384 Balance 37 Tentatively approved w/spec conditions 83 Applications in Process 156* *If approved Tract 5990 & 5991 will request a transfer from your Board of 119 EDUs from previously approved development with no net impact to chart above.

Shaver Lake Water Criteria Initially developments were approved based on the SWMP source capacity requirement of 0.17 gallons per minute –per EDU In early 2000 the County recognized the 0.17 was insufficient to meet demand and adjusted the requirement based on actual data being collected that reflected 0.30 gallons per minute - per EDU. The State Department of Public Health issued the District’s revised water permit on September 2010 which recommends to increase the requirement to 0.5 GPM per EDU for future development

Shaver Lake Township 10 Projected Water Demands Of the 2,000 unit limitation 251 units are located in the Sierra Cedars Community Service District (an independent special district) The balance of the remaining 1,749 units reside within the system operated by Waterworks District 41 or County Service Area 31

Shaver Lake Township 10 Projected Water Demands At full development of the 1,749 units there will be an estimated deficit of 49 gallons per minute during peak hours under normal operating conditions and average precipitation years There are two existing County owned wells that may be modified to produce an estimated additional 45 – 75 gallons per minute. During multiple drought years the estimated deficit at full development of the 1,749 units may reach up to 114 gallons per minute during peak hours under normal operating conditions

Shaver Lake Development in Township 10 Average new connections from 2004 to 2011 were 14 per year. May take up to 6 decades for all remaining lots to connect During 2005 – 2006 there was a peak in connections at 101. Based on the peak year, it may take up to a decade for all remaining lots to connect

WATER Questions????

EXHIBIT F

Sewer Treatment and Disposal In 2009 the Department conducted an evaluation of the treatment and disposal capacity. The study indicated a deficit based on theoretical demand in capacity of 12,125 GPD (summer) and annual avg. deficit of 79,125 GPD for the 1,425 connected EDUs. However, the District has not experienced any overcapacity issues due to lower actual demands than theoretical demands.

Sewer Treatment & Disposal Capacity loss when wastewater pond #6 washed out due to floods in PW&P contacted State CAL-EMA office to obtain funding since the storms occurred during a State declared emergency, however CAL-EMA never approved the funding request. Increases to the treatment capacity may be realized by adding additional aerators to District ponds. Increases to disposal capacity can be realized by adding ponds or spray fields. Staff is currently working with development community to develop a disposal master plan. On May 3, 2011 your Board authorized WWD 41 to purchase 148 acres adjacent to the existing WWTP to be used for spray fields and/or ponds to address this issue.

WWD41 Existing Facilities & Newly Acquired Land

Sewer Treatment & Disposal Capacity

SEWER Questions????

Community Facilities District No. 1 Background On April 9, 1985 your Board adopted a Resolution of Intention to form a Community Facilities District (CFD No. 1) for approximately 2,530 acres in the Shaver Lake area Formed at the request of five developer property interests to obtain bond funding authorization for development related infrastructure Originally contemplated as a method of financing major facilities which were necessary but not feasible to be constructed incrementally or by one land owner Infrastructure was to be consistent with the Board adopted Shaver Lake Sewer and Water Master Plan, County General Plan, and all applicable Specific Plans

Community Facilities District No. 1 Background Project area consisted of approximately 2,530 acres with an anticipated full build out of roughly 4,560 dwelling units Project area involved five major land holdings and included : – Timberwine – Wildflower Village – Bretz Mountain – Undeveloped Sierra Cedars, Inc. properties within the Sierra Cedars Community Services District – Kenneth B. Seibert property south of Sierra Cedars Land was identified in the CFD No. 1 at Shaver Lake Final Project Report presented to your Board June 24, 1985 as representing virtually all of the remaining developable land in the Shaver Lake Area in 1985

Community Facilities District No. 1 Background CFD No. 1 provided financing for facilities by allowing the County to sell increments of bonds as determined by the Board County would then levy a Special Tax on the property to repay the principal and interest No bonds have been sold to date but authorization remains intact

Community Facilities District No Master Implementation Agreement Implementation document for CFD No. 1 Mechanism for collection of fees for infrastructure or facilities shared equally by all land owners (Proportionate Facilities) Outlined criteria for bond issuance and reimbursement Established $800 water system development fee Established $1,000 sewer system development fee

Community Facilities District No. 1 Proportionate Facilities Board adopted Final Project Report identified infrastructure to be constructed including: – Shaver Lake supplied surface water system – Regional wastewater treatment facility expansion – Construction of a collector road along the State adopted freeway corridor from Cressman Road to Bretz Road – Fire protection facilities – School facilities Final Project Report also included Cost Estimates for each improvement area, Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax and Legal, Property Appraiser and Financial Consultant’s Reports

Community Facilities District No Interdeveloper Agreement Funding mechanism to provide reimbursement for certain infrastructure construction of those improvements from bond authorization and fee payment under the agreement. Intended for construction of those improvements that are shared by two or more Landowners but not shared equally by all. Understood that if improvement ultimately cost more then estimated, no reimbursement in excess of the agreed upon amount would be made Identified as disproportionate infrastructure

Community Facilities District No Amended Interdeveloper Agreement Funding mechanism to provide reimbursement for construction of those improvements that are shared by two or more Landowners. Implementation of the 1991 Agreement was through an amendment to the original to cause establishment of a fund for the purpose of receiving, holding and disbursing the fees, costs and reimbursements. Fees are collected at the close of escrow for the first transfer of ownership of a lot or condominium. Fees required to be increased annually by an inflation figure of 3% per the Agreement

Community Facilities District No Master Implementation Agreement Amendment Amended to incorporate First Amendment to the 1985 Intradeveloper Agreement Established a process to release the Intradeveloper Agreement and Master Implementation Agreement as a lien against the property upon payment of applicable fees

Community Facilities District No. 1 Accumulated Funds Partial list of accumulated funds under the Master Implementation Agreement for proportionate infrastructure and facilities: – Shaver Lake Surface Water System Construction: $2,177,902 – Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion: $1,028,853 – Collector Road along State adopted freeway corridor: $1,270,466 – Snow Removal Facilities (snow removal equipment): $243,766 – Fire Protection Facilities (fire station, fuel breaks): $152,178 – School Facilities (per agreement with school district): $14,460 Funds are collected for infrastructure infrastructure or facilities shared equally by all land owners

Community Facilities District No. 1 Accumulated Funds Partial list of accumulated funds under the Intradeveloper Agreement for disproportionate infrastructure and facilities: – (Water) Phase 2 Northeast Reservoir: $19,762 – (Water) Phase 1 Southeast Reservoir: $37,023 – (Water) Water line from Southeast Reservoir to WF Village: $78,121 – (Road) Littlefield Road thru Wildflower Village: $199,560 – (Road) Road Improvements thru Seibert Property: $102,809 – (Sewer) Upgrade to Existing Interceptor: $30,354 Funds are collected for infrastructure or facilities shared by two or more Landowners but not shared equally by all.

Community Facilities District No. 1 Development Fee Areas CFD No. 1 is divided into five development fee areas – CFD 1-A (Timberwine) – CFD 1-B (Wildflower) – CFD 1-C (Bretz Mt. Village) – CFD 1-D (Seibert) – CFD 1-E (Sierra Cedar) Funds are collected at the close of escrow for the first transfer of ownership of a lot or condominium Includes funds for both the proportionate and disproportionate infrastructure and facilities Vary depending upon geographical area due disproportionate infrastructure

Community Facilities District No. 1 Summary Formed in 1985 at the request of five developer property interests Mechanism to provide reimbursement for construction of certain infrastructure and facilities required by development Infrastructure and Facilities are consistent with the Board adopted Shaver Lake Sewer and Water Master Plan, County General Plan, and all applicable Specific Plans

Current Water Funding Available at end of FY WWD 41 Water Reserves$2,440,800 CFD 1 (Surface Water) $2,177,902 CFD 1 (Water Storage) $ 179,660 CFD 1 (GW Development)$ 77,422 Total Water Reserves $4,875,784* *Dollars have area use restrictions.

Current Sewer Funding Available at end of FY WWD 41 Sewer Reserves$ 594,732 CSA 31B Reserves$ 151,515 CFD 1 (Sewer Component) $1,059,209 Total Sewer Reserves $1,805,456* *Dollars have area use restrictions.

Community Facilities District No. 1 Questions????

Operation and Maintenance

Salary Comparison of Field Labor Name the Counties and Cities (Ask Michele May on S&B)

Salary & Benefits Comparison of Field Labor

Salary Comparison of Counties/Cities

Comparison to other Jurisdictions Sewer Facility Fresno City Clovis CitySKFSanger Shaver- Township 9 Shaver- Township 10 Miles of Pipes1, Lift Stations Elevation Use Rate (Total) (Summarized as Monthly Cost to user)$25.75$25.36$23.27$37.71 $45.18$21.79 Est. Population Served505,47995,63140,00025,000 1,7251,300

QUESTIONS ???