Updating the National Hydrography Data for the Twin Cities with Local Subsurface Drainage Information NHD Stewardship Conference Lakewood, Colorado April.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mn Governors Council on Geographic Information End of Year Committee Reports.
Advertisements

Hydro Networks in GIS Network model Flow on Networks Hydrologic networks Linear referencing on networks Some slides in this presentation were prepared.
Providing Geography for Topology; A Schematic View of the National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) James E. Mitchell, Ph.D. IT GIS Manager Kurt L. Johnson.
Urban Watershed Challenge Storm Sewers & Watershed Models.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Action Plan for the Development of Watershed and Sub-Watershed Boundaries for northwestern Mississippi.
2012 NHD/WBD Stewardhsip Conference – 3/29/2012.  Provide framework for appropriate levels of rigor, consistency and cooperation  Report by Stewards.
Moving from 1:100K NHD to 1:24K Resolution: Case Studies Paul Andrews (presenter), Peter Ilieve, Ken Gilland, Bill Cooter (RTI International) Bill Kramer,
The Delaware DataMIL A Pilot Project for The National Map July 25, 2002 State of Delaware Council of Geographic Names Authorities (COGNA)
Indiana 2011 – 2013 Statewide Local-Resolution National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Project MINI – WORKSHOP Thanks to… Susan Phelps, AECOM ; Jeff Simley,
National Hydrography Data Use and Applications.
Technology Overview Geographic Information Systems.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS National Hydrography Dataset Stewardship in West Virginia George Heleine USGS NHD POC Region.
Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1, 15 January 2007, Pages Biological integrity in.
NHD Watershed: Tools and Applications
The NHD and the Future of Stream Mapping in West Virginia Jackie Strager Natural Resource Analysis Center Evan Fedorko Kevin Kuhn Kurt.
Advisory Committee on Water Information Status report: Subcommittee on Spatial Water Data Herndon, VA September 10, 2003.
Hydro Networks in GIS Network model Flow on Networks Hydrologic networks Linear referencing on networks Some slides in this presentation were prepared.
Managing Data Interoperability with FME Tony Kent Applications Engineer IMGS.
The NHD and the Future of Stream Mapping in West Virginia Evan Fedorko West Virginia GIS Technical Center Jackie Strager Natural Resource.
Adem.alabama.gov GIS for Water Management: Flow Data Flow Building a Framework for Alabama.
The NHD and the Future of Stream Mapping in West Virginia Evan Fedorko West Virginia GIS Technical Center Jackie Strager (NRAC)
1:2,400 Scale Hydrography Data Integration with NHD
Authors: James Rineer, RTI International (presenter) Anne Marie Miller, RTI International (presenter) Michael Plastino, US EPA, Office of Water Thomas.
GIS Tools for Watershed Delineation Public Policy Perspectives Teaching Public Policy in the Earth Sciences April 21, 2006 Gary Coutu Department of Geography.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey DEM Preparation Using the New England Method Streamstats Data Preparation Workshop Pete Steeves.
National Hydrography Dataset U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Bill Smith NHD Maintenance Training.
Coordination of Indiana GIS through dissemination of data and data products, education and outreach, adoption of standards, and building partnerships Using.
State of New Jersey NHD / WBD Stewardship Conference NJ State Steward Report By: Craig Coutros, NJDEPApril 15, 2009.
Flow Time Time Series Hydro FeaturesHydro Network Channel System Drainage System ArcGIS Hydro Data Model.
ACWQ Austin Canopy & Water Quality Progress Report: Austin Tree-Canopy Resource, Phase II Spring 2012, Geography 4427, Texas State University April 2,
Introduction National Hydrography Dataset Plus (NHDPlus) Version 2.
ArcHydro – Two Components Hydrologic  Data Model  Toolset Credit – David R. Maidment University of Texas at Austin.
GIS in Watershed Analysis. Why watershed Analysis with GIS? Concepts Important datasets Analysis Tools.
Project Cooperators: Mark Olsen, MPCA Susanne Maeder, LMIC Tommy Dewald, USEPA/OW Building a Repository to Share Hydrologic Event Data Creating the Minnesota.
NHD Products and Applications InterMountain GIS 2014 NHD Workshop April 7, 2014.
Mark Olsen Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Information Systems Office Susanne Maeder Minnesota Dept. of Administration Minnesota Geospatial Information.
Introduction to the National Hydrography Dataset InterMountain GIS 2014 NHD Workshop April 7, 2014 Many slides and figures in this presentation were adapted.
David Nail USGS Geospatial Liaison to Indiana March 13 th, 2007 Update on National Hydrography Data.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Geospatial Liaisons - Supporting NHD Stewardship NHD Workshop April 14, 2009.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey GNIS/ Vector Integration: Jerry Ornelas (NGTOC –Denver) NHD Stewardship Conference April 13-17,
The NHD and the Future of Stream Mapping in West Virginia Evan Fedorko West Virginia GIS Technical Center Jackie Strager (NRAC)
SSWD Advisory Committee on Water Information Status report: Subcommittee on Spatial Water Data Herndon, VA September 15, 2004.
NHD Pilot Project and Stewardship for Colorado. How Did We Get Here?  CDWR Has Been on The Hook for Awhile  Fall of High Resolution Available.
Section 5. New England SPARROW River Reach Network Assembling the stream network Generation of reach catchments Estimation of Stream-flow and velocity.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Conflation Lessons In Iowa Using the NHDGeoConflationTool.
National Elevation Dataset - Hydrologic Derivatives (NED-H) Kris Verdin EROS Data Center
NHD Tools for the Evaluation of Watershed Condition and Management Performance Authors: William Cooter (presenter) Peter Ilieve. Tim Bondelid Mark Bruhn.
…..Kansas Department of Revenue – Property Valuation Division – Kansas GIS Policy Board - DASC ….. Statewide Tax Units Database A collaborative partnership.
NHD Stewardship in Minnesota NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, Colorado April 24, 2007.
Gary Darling - GISP Office of the State CIO Acting Deputy Geographic Information Officer Melody Baldwin Division of Flood Management JOC –FOC GIS Unit.
Introduction to GIS in Water Resources David R. Maidment Director, Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin CRWR.
Spatial Water Data Subcommitte Update to the FGDC CAG
Stewardship of the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) 2010 West Virginia GIS Conference Huntington, West Virginia – June 9, 2010 Dave Arnold NHD Partner.
Data Stewardship and Maintenance for the National Hydrography Dataset USGS/INEGI Cross-Border Integration Project Cross-Border Integration Project U.S.
Indiana National Hydrography Dataset Improvement and Application Workshop Indiana State GIS Conference March 1, 2011.
Data Stewardship and Maintenance for the National Hydrography Dataset USGS/INEGI Cross-Border Integration Project Cross-Border Integration Project U.S.
Natural Resource Information Systems Stewardship of the NHD in the US Forest Service NHD/WBD Stewardship Conference April 14-17, 2009 Denver, CO Brian.
Report prepared for the Water Policy Interim Committee September 13, 2011.
Minnesota Hydrography: Progress Through Partnerships Mark Olsen Minnesota Pollution Control Agency St. Paul, MN
Minnesota Hydrography Land of 10,000 Lakes (or so) Mark Olsen Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road N. St. Paul, MN 55155
Iowa Rivers Information System Inventory, Modeling, and Evaluation of Basin, In-Stream Habitat, and Fishery Resource Relationships Kevin Kane, Iowa State.
The Future of NHDPlus 2009 NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, 2009 Tommy Dewald.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Stewardship of the National Hydrography Dataset Elizabeth McCartney National Geospatial Technical.
Indiana GIS Local Resolution NHD Applications for Surveyors ISPLS State Conference January 18, 2013 (12:45 pm – 3:30 pm)
Section 5. Chesapeake Bay Network Generation CB watershed –~ 64,000 square miles –~ 166,000 square kilometers Constructed 3 models Version I –ERF1, ~1300.
Using the NHDPlus for drainage area delineation and site matching Kirsten Cassingham, NC Water Science Center Silvia Terziotti, NC Water Science Center.
Data Stewardship and Maintenance for the National Hydrography Dataset Gladys Conaway USGS National Geospatial Technical Operations Center III.
Key Concepts from Exercise 4
National Hydro Data Programs
IGIC Waters Workgroup Update
Presentation transcript:

Updating the National Hydrography Data for the Twin Cities with Local Subsurface Drainage Information NHD Stewardship Conference Lakewood, Colorado April 15, 2009

What is NHD? NHD is a digital spatial dataset that describes the location, extent, and relationships of surface water features for the entire nation NHD is a digital spatial dataset that describes the location, extent, and relationships of surface water features for the entire nation Uses Uses –Mapping water resources –Sharing/reporting of monitoring data (reach ID) –Incorporated into watershed models

The Problem NHD primarily includes streams and ditches NHD primarily includes streams and ditches Lacks feature density in urban areas Lacks feature density in urban areas NHD for ex-urban area NHD for urban area (with storm sewers)

Twin Cities Storm Water Pilot Project Phases Phase I: Acquire and Assemble Subsurface Drainage Data from Local Governments Phase I: Acquire and Assemble Subsurface Drainage Data from Local Governments Phase II: Extract Significant Features and Integrate into NHD Phase II: Extract Significant Features and Integrate into NHD

Phase I: Acquiring and Assembling Local Data Acquire local data Acquire local data –Mostly CAD format Import into GIS Import into GIS Georeference Georeference Integrate into a single database Integrate into a single database There were many challenges! There were many challenges!

Georeferencing Spatial adjustment tool used to fix georeferencing problem

Georeferenced Data

Connectivity Interrupted by other feature types Interrupted by other feature types –maintenance access holes Not ConnectedConnected

Connectivity Interrupted by missing surface water feature Interrupted by missing surface water feature –Ditch –Pond

Directionality Line features not digitized with directionality Line features not digitized with directionality Not DirectionalDirectional

Attributes Inconsistent attributes between sources Inconsistent attributes between sources Typically limited attributes Typically limited attributes Attributes may be as graphical annotation Attributes may be as graphical annotation

Phase I: Summary of Challenges Unknown coordinate systems Unknown coordinate systems Overlapping jurisdictions Overlapping jurisdictions Lack of directionality Lack of directionality Lack of connectivity Lack of connectivity Inconsistent and sparse attributes Inconsistent and sparse attributes Lack of metadata Lack of metadata

Intermediate Storm Sewer Layer Results It was possible to assemble an intermediate storm sewer layer. It was possible to assemble an intermediate storm sewer layer. Geo-referenced storm sewer data for 38 communities (> 200,000 pipes) Geo-referenced storm sewer data for 38 communities (> 200,000 pipes) Only a tiny fraction will be incorporated into the NHD drainage network Only a tiny fraction will be incorporated into the NHD drainage network Could be the beginning of regional storm sewer GIS Could be the beginning of regional storm sewer GIS Several significant issues Several significant issues

Phase II: Incorporate into NHD Select major storm water features to add to NHD (Feature Thinning Analysis) Select major storm water features to add to NHD (Feature Thinning Analysis) Complete directionality Complete directionality Create feature subset Create feature subset Use NHDGeoEdit Tools to update NHD Use NHDGeoEdit Tools to update NHD

Feature Thinning Analysis Factors Factors –Area drained  Pipe Size > 30-in  Path length –Connectivity to currently mapped NHD features

Area Covered – New Features Added 1078 linear drainage features (588 km) Added 1078 linear drainage features (588 km) Features were pipelines, ditches, connectors, artificial paths Features were pipelines, ditches, connectors, artificial paths Represent 6000 individual pipe features Represent 6000 individual pipe features Connected 363 NHD waterbodies to drainage network Connected 363 NHD waterbodies to drainage network

Storm Water Features – St. Paul

Network Tracing – St. Paul

Hydrologic Unit Redelineation Watersheds Watersheds –Updated major and minor watershed boundaries for the Twin Cities (Mississippi) major watershed –Lake watershed boundaries for 113 lakes –Added attribute code to define upstream and downstream relationships Drainage network Drainage network –Enhanced network with hundreds of new features

Example: Boundary Disagreement Local hydrologic modifications may cut across the height of land boundary

DEM Reconditioning “Burn-in” the storm sewer drainage “Burn-in” the storm sewer drainage Adjust elevation of the digital elevation model based on input line features Adjust elevation of the digital elevation model based on input line features

Revised Delineation

Conclusions It is possible (and useful) to use local subsurface drainage data for update the NHD It is possible (and useful) to use local subsurface drainage data for update the NHD NHD is a good surface water model for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area NHD is a good surface water model for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area NHD update capability was a key feature NHD update capability was a key feature NHD update tools complex to learn; docs need improvement NHD update tools complex to learn; docs need improvement There were many difficulties with the base data (multiple sources); improving base data would improve NHD There were many difficulties with the base data (multiple sources); improving base data would improve NHD Questionable data were not added. Questionable data were not added.

Challenges of Base Data Multiple jurisdictions Multiple jurisdictions Unknown coordinate systems Unknown coordinate systems Overlapping jurisdictions Overlapping jurisdictions Lack of directionality Lack of directionality Lack of connectivity Lack of connectivity Inconsistent and sparse attributes Inconsistent and sparse attributes Lack of metadata Lack of metadata

Solution Develop CAD and GIS data standards for storm sewers Develop CAD and GIS data standards for storm sewers Collaborative effort Collaborative effort Publish and promote the standards Publish and promote the standards –Guidance –Template –Training –Block grants

Minnesota Storm Water Standards Working Group Develop Exchange Standard for Digital Storm water System Data Develop Exchange Standard for Digital Storm water System Data –MPCA: MS4 Reporting & Emergency Response Work through Governor’s Council on Geographic Information Work through Governor’s Council on Geographic Information –Submit to Standards Committee –Hydrography Committee Review How does storm water guideline interact with surface water features? How does storm water guideline interact with surface water features? –Reference Existing Surface Water Data Sets

Credits Project Credits: - Metropolitan Council: -Steve Kloiber -Jennifer Hinz with assistance from: USGS: Paul Kimsey Ron Wencl LMIC: Sandi Kuitunen Jim Krumrie Susanne Maeder Presentation Credits: Steve Kloiber – MN Department of Natural Resources (formerly Metropolitan Council) Susanne Maeder – MN Land Management Information Center (LMIC) Project Funding: United States Geological Survey

Questions?