Planning Committee November 30, 2012. Water/Sewer Consolidation The Legislative Research Commission (LRC) recommended in April 2012, the consolidation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
USG Housing P3 Initiative
Advertisements

Capital Improvement Plan Financial Options September 12, 2013 Presented by: City Administration Finance Department.
Summary of $475 million Bond Issue and Capital Financing Options Practiced By the State System of Higher Education in Oklahoma Practiced By the State System.
Economic and Level of Service Impacts Resulting from the Annexation by SMUD of PG&E’s Service Territories in Yolo County April 5, 2006.
Commercial-type activities of a government, such as public utilities:  Water and sewer authorities—either fully independent or component units of local.
City of Farmersville, Texas Water and Wastewater Rate Study February 2011.
January 7, 2011 Overview of Governor’s Introduced Amendments to the Direct Aid to Public Education Budget (and other Public Education Funding)
Revised FY 2007 & Proposed FY 2008 Operating & Capital Budgets Retail Rates Committee January 4, 2007.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Department of Finance Debt Policy and Debt Profile Overview Finance Committee/City Council August 9, 2010.
CSO Strategies & Financial Management Mayor Gregory A. Ballard City of Indianapolis December 9, 2010.
2015 Municipal Budget Overview Borough of Montvale April 14, 2015.
Budget Work Session Fiscal Year July 27, 2010.
City Of Phoenix Water Rates June 30, 2011 Denise Olson Deputy Finance Director Finance Department.
Municipal Tax Increment Financing
2014 Budget Department Presentations Infrastructure Funding Options.
Imagine the result Impact Study on MSD Rate Payers of Proposed Consolidation/Merger Phase II – Towns of Biltmore Forest, Montreat and Weaverville Presentation.
1 TOWN OF LOCKPORT FINANCIAL REVIEW Focus on the Sewer Plant and Sewer Collection Service.
Reporting and Analyzing Off-Balance Sheet Financing
FY Budget April 24, 2014 Personnel and Debt Prepared by: Dana P. Hlavac, Interim Budget Manager and David Felix, Finance Manager.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Biennial Budget Budget Message Presented by Chris Jordan, City Manager April 27, 2009.
Wilderness Rim Association Water Rate and Reserve Study Board Meeting April 23, 2014 Presented By: Chris Gonzalez, Project Manager.
Cleveland Municipal School District Fiscal Year 2009 Budget Overview.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
When is it Debt? NCGFOA 2011 Annual Summer Conference July 18, 2011.
1 Why Budgeting Matters NC Local Government Budget Conference Wilmington, NC July 2007.
Life Cycle Cost Model Update Preliminary Report Joint Legislative Audit & Review Committee January 4, 2007 Stephanie Hoffman and Keenan Konopaski.
Convention Center Authority Republican Policy Group Presentation February 23 rd 2015.
Finance Department Presentation to the City of Houston Budget and Fiscal Affairs Committee First Quarter Review General Fund Five Year Scenario and FY2012.
Treasurer’s Report UNOS Board of Directors Meeting June 25-26, 2012.
Financial Impact of Drought March 5, 2008 Updated 3/17/08.
APPA’s Financial Planning for Municipals Mark Beauchamp, CPA, CMA, MBA September 27, 2005 Business & Finance Workshop.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASIBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Budget Message Fiscal Year Presented by Kelly Muzzey.
CITY OF MONROE FISCAL YEAR BUDGET PRESENTATION EDWARD SELL, FINANCE DIRECTOR.
CFW Caldwell Flores Winters, Inc. Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration Bond Issuance Considerations February 14, 2014 St. Helena.
FEBRUARY 22, 2016 FY 2017 County Administrator’s Recommended Budget.
Town Council/School Committee FY Initial Budget Hearing December 7, 2015.
1. FY Proposed Budget Jamie Justice, Town Manager & Piet Swart, Finance Director April 26, 2016 Fiscal Year Proposed Budget 2.
INDIAN CREEK GOLF CLUB Post Flood Analysis September
1 New Territory Municipal Utility Districts Strategic Partnership Agreement Discussions With the City of Sugar Land.
Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2017 Presentation to the County Commission May 4, 2016 FY16 Proposed Budget Presentation.
Presented By: Budget & Research Department Karen Rhodes-Whitley FY STATUS REPORT & THREE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST SUMMARY FISCAL YEARS
Chapter 36 Financing the Business Section 36.1 Preparing Financial Documents Section 36.2 Financial Aspect of a Business Plan Section 36.1 Preparing Financial.
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
City of East Point FY 2012 Budget Presentation. Comparison of FY11 vs. FY12 Budget Policies Proposal FY 11 TotalFY12 O&M Changes FY11 Current Budget 94,652,326.
Operating Efficiencies Costs to operate and maintain the water and sewer system have not varied significantly during the first 5 years of operation.
City of Rosenberg DEBT SERVICE FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET JULY 28,
MWRA WATER SOURCE TOWN MEETING OCTOBER 05, :30 PM NR HIGH SCHOOL PERFORMING ART CENTER.
Richland Creek Water Supply Program Status Update Paulding County, Georgia Board of Commissioners Work Session January 26, 2016.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA FINANCIAL FORECAST AND CAPITAL FACILITIES FEES ANALYSIS Prepared in Conjunction With the Utility System Revenue.
1 City of Cocoa Michael Burton - President Andrew Burnham - Senior Vice President Ashley Venturoni – Project Consultant Presented by: FY 2013 Water, &
FY 2016 Budget Workshop June 11, 2015 Brian Maxwell, City Manager Dan Buckley, Deputy City Manager Mike Loftin, Finance Director 1.
Financial and Capital Highlights Fiscal Year Second Quarter Charles Turner, Director of Finance
Presented By: Budget & Research Department FY STATUS REPORT & THREE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST SUMMARY (FY )
BOARD MEMBER’S GUIDE TO CAPITAL FACILITY PLANNING OPTIONS FOR A SCHOOL DISTRICT 1.
CITY SERVICES INSTITUTE
Queen Anne’s County Commissioners FY2018 Proposed Budget April 24, 25, 26, 2017 Gregg A. Todd, County Administrator Jonathan R. Seeman, Director,
Accounting for State and Local Governments (Part 2)
Annual School Board Budget Presentation to the Town Council
City of Sisters, OR 2017 Water & Sewer Rate Study
ELECTRIC REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS SERIES 2016A
Housing Authority of the City of Alameda Budget Presentation For FY
City of Fernley City Council Meeting
2015 Municipal Budget Overview
City Council September 17, 2018 Item 16
Davidson County FY County Manager’s Proposed Budget
Agenda FYE June 30, 2020 Operating Budget
Agenda FYE June 30, 2020 Operating Budget
Presentation transcript:

Planning Committee November 30, 2012

Water/Sewer Consolidation The Legislative Research Commission (LRC) recommended in April 2012, the consolidation of Public Water System for Asheville area with MSD. The LRC recommendation stated that they would consider a local solution if a good faith effort was under way prior to them developing legislation for the session beginning in January Additional recommendation was made that the other water systems in the region be considered.

Water/Sewer Consolidation The MSD Board of Directors, in response to this directive, determined that an impact study of the proposed consolidation was needed. Malcolm Pirnie/Arcadis, a national firm experienced in water and sewer utility mergers was selected to conduct an impact study with the first phase addressing the Asheville system to be complete by November. The draft study is complete and was presented to the Board which indicated that savings could be realized from the merger.

Water/Sewer Consolidation Legislators are now beginning to develop legislation for the upcoming session. The MSD Board at its last meeting instructed staff to develop a proposal for the merger in a good faith effort to forge a local solution. The following is a proposal crafted to facilitate a local solution to the LRC recommended consolidation.

Water/Sewer Consolidation Proposal 1.MSD to retain all current Water Department employees. 2.MSD to assume and pay off all outstanding Water Capital Indebtedness - $71 Million as of June MSD to fully fund the City’s newly increased 10 year CIP of $107 Million. 4.MSD to officially oppose privatization of assets and of operational control. 5.Water to be eligible for same MSD financial incentives and partnerships for new public and private development currently available for sewer.

Water/Sewer Consolidation Proposal 6.The City of Asheville to retain title to Bee Tree and North Fork Reservoir watersheds less areas underlying water operation facilities. A.MSD will lease for 199 years, the watershed properties from the City for the sole purpose of providing clean, safe drinking water. Compensation for this lease is included within the compensation for total capital assets. B.MSD will operate, maintain and expand if necessary all water production facilities on the watershed properties. MSD to own property underlying water production facilities. C.MSD will have operational control over watershed properties and maintain them in accordance with the 1996 Conservation Easement as may be amended by the City of Asheville.

Water/Sewer Consolidation Proposal 7. Water System Asset Compensation LRC Recommendation: A.Water Assets remain public. B.Water Customers already paid for assets. C.Assets and asset value stay with customers who paid for them. Customers should not pay for them twice.

Water/Sewer Consolidation Proposal Although the LRC recommends a straight public transfer, the MSD Planning Committee asked Staff to evaluate a proposal that might include compensation as a “good faith” measure that would facilitate a local solution. MSD Staff evaluated options in this regard after consulting with the NC Institute of Government Environmental Finance Center.

N.C. Utility System Transfers with no compensation FY 2006City of Raleigh and Town of Wake Forest Fixed Assets transferred $29,895,570 City of Raleigh and Town of Knightdale Fixed Assets transferred $ 8,247,891 Town of Cary and Town of MorrisvilleFixed Assets transferred $ 39,385,583 FY 2007 City of Raleigh and Town of ZebulonFixed Assets transferred $16,475,521 City of Raleigh and Town of WendellFixed Assets transferred $ 8,742,124 FY 2008Cape Fear Public Authority and City of Wilmington and Hanover CountyFixed Assets transferred $422,336,652 FY 2011 MSD and Avery’s Creek Sanitary DistrictFixed Assets transferred $ 2,056,471 FY 2012 City of Asheville and Buncombe CountyFixed Assets transferred Source: Municipal Units CAFRS

Valuation Methods Method Type of Transaction Cost Approach: Replacement Cost NewPrivate Sale Reproduction Cost / Fair Market ValuePrivate Sale Original Cost Sale of a Regulated Utility Income Approach: Discount Cash Flow Public/Private Sale

Discounted Cash Flow Assumptions 1.Based on cash flows from the October 24, 2012 model provided by the city. City Projected Rate Increases Future Debt Needs Operating Expenses and Overhead Allocation Current and Future Debt Service CIP Needs 2.30 year T-Bill Rate was used as the discount rate.

Discounted Cash Flow Results

Original Cost Assumptions Original cost less accumulated depreciation as of June 30, 2012 Less Outstanding Debt as of June 30, 2012 Less Contributed Capital since 2004 Less amounts transferred to the General Fund since 1981 Water Agreement Sullivan Act

Original Cost Results Equates to 10 Years of additional 30,000 feet of water line replacements at $80 per lineal foot

Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Rehabilitation of Water System While the above ground water assets are of sufficient service level, the underground assets(pipes) are not. Earlier Engineering reports conducted by the City recommended that water line rehab./replacement work be stepped up on a continuous basis. Typical goal for rehab/replacement is 1% per year. For Asheville area this would amount to 85,000 feet per year. For previous 5 years the City has replaced approximately 34,000 feet per year. The previous $40 Million Bond Issue Projects are included in this footage. Replacement levels for previous years were significantly less. The last 10 years should have included at least an additional 30,000 feet/year of water line replacements (approx. $24 Million over the 10 years).

Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Rehabilitation of Water System Currently City of Asheville approved CIP is 5 year $36 Million. New Draft CIP from the City Staff is 10 year $121 Million ($107 million exclusive of Sullivan Act/Community Development funding). This does not include Main Transmission Line Replacement/Rehab. that is currently under investigation. The level of water line replacement in the increased CIP appears adequate and should be greater than 60,000 feet per year on average.

Water/Sewer Consolidation Proposal MSD Compensation Proposal: A.Water Assets remain public. B.MSD to pay the City of Asheville the Book Value $169 Million for all water assets. This figure will be adjusted for outstanding debt, developer contributed assets, and cash transfers to General Fund needed for rehab. This cost is estimated at $57 Million to be paid over 50 years. C.Merger savings are estimated to be positive, inclusive of this payment.

Water/Sewer Consolidation Proposal Anticipated Results of Proposal Operational Savings due to the merger, mitigating rate increases. Increased Water Line Replacement Program by over 75% to an average of 60,000 feet per year. Including all Water Dept. Employees and adjusting salary ranges to market levels. Providing compensation to the City of Asheville to mitigate impact to general fund.

Summary of Water/Sewer Consolidation Proposal 1.MSD to retain all current Water Department employees. 2.MSD to assume and pay off all outstanding Water Capital Indebtedness - $71 Million as of June MSD to fully fund the City’s newly increased 10 year CIP of $107 Million. 4.MSD to officially oppose privatization of assets and of operational control. 5.Water to be eligible for same MSD financial incentives and partnerships for new public and private development currently available for sewer. 6.The City of Asheville to retain title to Bee Tree and North Fork Reservoir watersheds less areas underlying water operation facilities. 7.MSD will pay the City of Asheville $57 Million over 50 years.