Merle H. Bishop, FAICP President Florida Chapter American Planning Association.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Concurrency Management. What is Concurrency? Chapter , F.S. requires Comprehensive Plans to adopt a concurrency management system,
Advertisements

March 2012 Ports and Cities Conference Newcastle Dorte Ekelund, Executive Director Major Cities Unit Department of Infrastructure and Transport
How to Write Goals, Objectives and Policies EAR-Based Amendment Forum Presented by the Pinellas Planning Council September 14, 2006.
The National Context for Smart Mobility John V. Thomas, PhD US EPA Smart Growth Program.
House Community & Military Affairs Subcommittee Presented by: Mike McDaniel, Chief of Comprehensive Planning, Division of Community Development Tuesday,
Washington State Department of Commerce Comprehensive Planning: the Context and Basics City of Tacoma Short Course February 20, 2013 Edward G. McGuire.
Transportation’s Relation to Growth Management `.
DRIs After 360. Transportation Methodology § (7) PREAPPLICATION PROCEDURES.— The levels of service required in the transportation methodology shall.
Citrus County Planning Division Evaluation and Appraisal Report Citrus County Comprehensive Plan.
KING COUNTY CRITICAL AREAS ORDINANCE Harry Reinert King County Department of Development and Environmental Services.
1 ORANGE COUNTY BCC, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA School Concurrency Discussion Item Orange County, Florida School Concurrency Discussion Item Orange County,
1. 2 VIA Long Range Plan  Vision for High-Capacity Transit across VIA service area by 2035  From extensive public and stakeholder input  Prioritization.
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
REGIONAL FORUM FOR BEVERLY, DANVERS AND SALEM DECEMBER 8, 2010 North Shore Regional Strategic Planning Project.
SB 360 and Multi-Modal Impact Fees & Efficiently Managing a Street Lightning System.
Planning for a Vibrant Community. Introduction Planning is a process that involves: –Assessing current conditions; envisioning a desired future; charting.
Sector Planning Process Alachua County Commission July 8 th,
Sustainable Emerald Coast Advisory Committee Susan Poplin, Florida Department of Community Affairs November, 2006.
What is Legacy? Current Comprehensive Plan for Forsyth County and Winston-Salem. Adopted in 2001 by Forsyth County and its 8 municipalities. Focuses on.
Community Development Department Neoga Lakes – Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Master Planned Development (MPD) Rezoning Application.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City Council June 3, 2014.
Compact for a Sustainable Ventura County A project of the Ventura County Civic Alliance and the Ventura Council of Governments.
Forestry-related Ordinances in Florida What are the potential influences of county and municipal ordinances on forest land retention and sustainability?
Planning for Smart Growth in Rural New Hampshire SWRPC Southwest Region Planning Commission.
From Mandate to Smart Growth: The Evolution of Growth Management in the United States Jesse J. Richardson, Jr. Department of Urban Affairs and Planning.
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT MAJOR COMMUNITY ISSUES RELATED TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Board of County Commissioners/ Local Planning Agency Joint Meeting.
Community Development Department ISLAND WALK MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION #2648.
City of Palm Coast Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) City Council Meeting Presentation December 7, 2010.
Oregon and Washington: A Comparison of State Mandated Land Use Planning Programs Presented by: Richard H. Carson, director Clark County Department of Community.
1 CITY DEVELOPMENT WORLD AFRICA 2006 Johannesburg, South Africa November 6-9, 2006 TEAMWORK: WHY METROPOLITAN ECONOMIC STRATEGY IS THE KEY TO GENERATING.
Evaluation and Appraisal Comprehensive Plan Amendments City Council Workshop December 9, 2014.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
Wisconsin’s Forests and the Comprehensive Planning Law Preserving forests in the wilderness of Smart Growth.
Miami-Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning - pg 1 Evaluation and Appraisal Report 2010.
Capital Improvements Element (CIE) Annual Update Adoption Public Hearing April 5, 2011.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
City of Palm Coast EAR Public Input Process Update Prepared for the Palm Coast City Council By The FCRC Consensus Center November 24, 2009 Update Prepared.
Amherst County Comprehensive Plan (Update)
“Connecting People and Places” REGIONAL MOBILITY PLAN Future Scenarios October 19, 2009.
Planning under the Growth Management Act
Session Two Perspectives on Smart Growth. American Planning Association Core Principles of Smart Growth A.Recognition that all levels of government, and.
Presentation by Jon Laria, Chair to the Maryland Association of Counties Winter Conference January 6, 2011.
The Smart Growth Strategy/ Regional Livability Footprint Project… Policies Shape Reality Alex Amoroso Principal Planner Association of Bay Area Governments.
Planning and Sustainability Paul Farmer American Planning Association M6: Protecting the Urban Environment and Historical and Cultural Heritage.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion: Transportation Concurrency April 24, 2012 Growth Management Legislative Discussion: Transportation Concurrency.
200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.
Orange County’s Comprehensive Policy Plan Adoption Public Hearing May 19, 2009 Orange County’s Comprehensive Policy Plan Adoption Public.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion June 19, 2012 Growth Management Legislative Discussion June 19, 2012.
Snohomish County Planning Commission Briefing August 26,
San Diego Regional Comprehensive Plan Presentation to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee February 8, 2005.
Regional Planning CCRPC Board Training March 21, 2012.
2060 Florida Transportation Plan Florida Model Task Force Meeting November 10, 2009.
Mobility Strategy Update Work Session November 17, 2009 Mobility Strategy Update Work Session November 17, 2009.
Steve Horenstein CASE STUDIES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSES AND RESULTS : Comprehensive planning as an economic development tool; Striking the right.
DUVALL 2015 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE and SURVEY RESULTS 9:00 – 10:30 AM Survey Results 30 minutes (Lara) Comprehensive Plan, Density and Capacity, and.
Community Development Department Neoga Lakes Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Amendment.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 1 – ANNEXATION, PLANNING AREA, AND DENSITIES 11/07/2013.
Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.
ULI Symposium: Central City Commercial Development 1988.
CP-TXT Amendment to the Capital Improvements Element (Annual Update) September 25, 2007.
Buena Park General Plan Update Overview Presentation.
Growth Management Amendments Land Use & Transportation
Themes in History of California Planning, 1970s-today
Florida and Reclaimed Water
Marriott-Slaterville, Utah March 2018
Louisville Metro Comprehensive Plan
NATIONAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING FRAMEWORK (NUDHF)
CP-TXT Amendment to the Capital Improvements Element & Public School Facilities Element (Annual Update) October 2008.
St. Augustine Comprehensive Plan 2040 Mapping Our Future
Presentation transcript:

Merle H. Bishop, FAICP President Florida Chapter American Planning Association

Major Legislative Changes – What is Eliminated? Rules 9J-5 and 9J are repealed – many of the provisions of 9J-5 are incorporated into Ch. 163 Financial feasibility for capital improvement plans – back to pre-2005 status. Twice per year plan amendment limitation. Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) sufficiency review and mandatory plan updates. Energy efficiency & greenhouse gas reduction provisions (added in 2008 by HB 697)

Major Legislative Changes – What is Eliminated?  Use of the State Comprehensive Plan for local plan compliance determination.  State mandated concurrency for transportation, schools and parks & recreation facilities (now a local option).  State mandated Public School Element.

Major Legislative Changes – What is Changed? Large scale plan amendments: changed to Expedited Review Process with few exceptions (ACSC). Small Scale Map/Plan Amendments: total cumulative acreage increased (80 to 120 acres); no more density cap; no more ownership/distance limit. Text amendments: if associated with small scale, may be included with it. EAR: Localities required to review local Plan once every 7 years; must determine if State requirements necessitate any amendments and notify the State.

Major Legislative Changes – What is Changed? The State Planning Agency’s review of comprehensive plan amendments is limited to issues of state-wide interest. Other Changes included: Sector Planning Rural Land Stewardship Developments of Regional Impact Permit extensions

Concurrency If a local government decides to not maintain concurrency for transportation, parks &/or schools, then it must amend the comprehensive plan to remove the concurrency provisions. The amendment is not subject to State review, but it does require public hearings. Note: School Facility Elements can be retained with or without level of service standards & school concurrency.

Concurrency If a local government elects to retain concurrency for transportation, schools &/or parks, then the local Plan must comply with specified requirements in new Act; many are similar to or same as current Plan requirements. Implementing the new statutory requirements will not require immediate action for all localities but changes are expected at the time of next scheduled EAR. New plan amendments affecting these concurrency issues must comply with the Act’s statutory concurrency requirements.

If Public School Concurrency is retained:  Comprehensive plans must include specific guidelines and standards relating, including adopted levels of service (as they do now).  When a County plus one or more of the cities representing at least 80% of the total, county-wide population elects to maintain school concurrency, then the failure of one or more of the (other) municipalities to adopt concurrency does not preclude its implementation within the school district.

 No longer a maximum need based strictly on population projections but should allow the operation of real estate markets to provide adequate choices for permanent and seasonal residents and businesses  Accommodate a minimumof 10 years growth based on BEBR medium population projections

urban sprawl Section (51), F.S. defines urban sprawl as a development pattern characterized by low density, automobile-dependent development with either a single use or multiple uses that are not functionally related, requiring the extension of public facilities and services in an inefficient manner, and failing to provide a clear separation between urban and rural uses

The amendment must be analyzed to determine whether it incorporates a development pattern or urban form that achieves four or more of the following eight criteria  Directs growth and development to areas of the community in a manner that does not adversely impact natural resources  Promotes the efficient and cost effective provision or extension of public infrastructure and services

 Promotes walkable and connected communities and provides for compact development and a mix of uses at densities and intensities that support a range of housing choices and a multimodal transportation system  Promotes conservation of water and energy  Preserves agricultural areas and activities  Preserves open space and natural lands and provides for public open space and recreation needs

 Creates a balance of land uses based on demands of residential population for the nonresidential needs of an area  Would remediate an existing or planned sprawl development pattern or provides for an innovative development pattern such as transit oriented development or new towns

We must communicate the importance and value of comprehensive planning and smart growth with effective involvement of all interested and affected persons and groups.  Livability  Sustainable Community  Jobs  Economic Recovery and Development  Health  Water Resources  Mobility

“For most of Florida's history, up until the mid-1960s, our state was treated like a commodity. If you didn't like it, you changed it: land into water; water into land. The business of the state was business, and our enormous natural resources were just another input. The quality and safety of our coasts, fresh waters, open lands and the Everglades were regularly and enthusiastically sacrificed on the altar of growth.” “Florida is not a commodity but a treasure which we have the privilege of enjoying with the responsibility to preserve and enhance that treasure for future generations.” Senator Bob Graham

National Support for Sustainable Communities Ford Foundation, Smart Growth America and Collective Strength poll

 Comprehensive Planning is still required by Florida Law.  Florida and Polk’s potential for economic growth and prosperity, protection of valuable environmental resources and improved quality of life will be determined by how well we plan for the future. Local Planning Choices:  Ensure a future place where people want to live, work and play;  Adopt policies and strategies that address mobility, education & recreation for existing and future residents;  Recognize that infrastructure needs will continue to be critical to building and sustaining a livable community.

If you are not a place where people want to live, then you are not a place where people will want to invest.