The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Implementation Guide for Teacher Evaluation 6-28-13.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
PORTFOLIO.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Illinois Educator Code of Ethics Training
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Unpacking the Rubrics and Gathering Evidence September 2012 Melrose Public Schools 1.
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation Regulations, Mandatory Elements & Implementation MTA Center for Education Policy and Practice August 2014.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
ETT 429 Spring 2007 Technology Standards. NETS-T Background International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) created National Educational Technology.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
Differentiated Supervision
The New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation System Natick Public Schools.
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
COLLEGE-READY LEARNER CRITICAL THINKER ADAPTABLE & PRODUCTIVE LEADERRESPONSIBLE DECISION MAKER SKILLED COMMUNICATOR HISD.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
NAPS Educator Evaluation Spring 2014 Update. Agenda Evaluation Cycle Review Goal Expectations and Rubric Review SUMMATIVE Evaluation Requirements FORMATIVE.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
1-Hour Overview: The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation September
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
New Teacher Introduction to Evaluation 08/28/2012.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION New Regulation adopted on June 28, 2011.
Word Generation and Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation August 5, 2013 Presenter: Sophia Boyer Documents 1 and 2 adopted from Catherine.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Educator Evaluation Information Edward Everett School Laura Miceli, Principal September 24, 2014.
Educator Evaluation Regulations, Mandatory Elements & Next Steps Prepared by the MTA Center for Education Policy and Practice January 2012.
Educator Evaluation 101: A Special Overview Session for Educator Preparation Programs May 2013.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
1 Handout #1 INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT (Language Arts)  Performance Indicator Progression  Scope and Sequence  Instructional Guide  Language.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
The District Management Council 70 Franklin Street Boston MA, Tel: 877.DMC Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective.
Monomoy Educator Evaluation System Training
Springfield Effective Educator Development System (SEEDS)
 Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence National Institute April 12 and 13, 2012.
Part I Educational Technology1 INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT (Educational Technology) Performance Indicator Progression Scope and Sequence Instructional.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
 Teachers 21 June 8,  Wiki with Resources o
Strategic Plan Proposal The Challenge This strategic plan identifies what must be done, pre- school through grade 12, over the next three.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 1: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Supporting Effective Teaching: An Introduction to Educator Performance Evaluation Introduction to Educator.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Supporting Effective Teaching: An Introduction to Educator Performance Evaluation.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Professional Growth Through Self-Assessment and Goal Writing September 2012.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Unpacking the Rubric for Educators Winter 2012.
Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective Educator Development System Overview for Educators.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Objectives for today If we have done our job today, you will:
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Colorado Department of Education
Presentation transcript:

The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Implementation Guide for Teacher Evaluation

DESE Training Steps: Training SessionDateTimeLocation Orientation Workshop 1: Unpacking the Rubric Workshop 2: Self-Assessment Workshop 3: S.M.A.R.T. Goals

Agenda for 6/28/13 PD Day 7:45 – 8:15Check in and refreshments 8:15 – 9:00Refresher on New Evaluation Tool and Overview of Day 9:00 – 10:00SMART Goals 10:15 – 10:30Intro to the Rubric 10:30 – 11:15Elementary-Longleaf/Secondary- Lunch 11:15 – 12:00Elementary-Lunch/Secondary- Longleaf 12:15 – 1:15Work on Rubric 1:30Wrap up back in Auditorium

The Law On June 28, 2011, the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education adopted new regulations for the evaluation of all Massachusetts educators. The regulations, which apply to both administrators and teachers throughout the state, are designed to:regulations Promote growth and development amongst leaders and teachers Place student learning at the center, using multiple measures of student learning, growth, and achievement Recognize excellence in teaching and leading Set a high bar for professional teaching status Shorten timelines for improvement. -Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 603 CMR Evaluation of Educators

Teachers will be assessed on: 1.Goals Professional Practice Goal(s) Student Learning Goal(s) 2.Performance Standards Standard I: Curriculum, Planning, and Assessment Standard II: Teaching all Students Standard III: Family and Community Engagement Standard IV: Professional Culture Utilizing Four Ratings: Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Exemplary

I. Curriculum, Planning, & Assessment II. Teaching All Students III. Family & Community Engagement IV. Professional Culture A.Curriculum and Planning 1.Subject Matter Knowledge 2.Child and Adolescent Development 3.Rigorous Standards-Based Unit Design 4.Well-Structured Lessons B. Assessment 1.Variety of Assessment Methods 2.Adjustments to Practice C. Analysis 1.Analysis and Conclusions 2.Sharing Conclusions with Colleagues 3.Sharing Conclusions with Students A.Instruction 1.Quality and Effort of Work 2.Student Engagement 3.Meeting Diverse Needs B. Learning Environment 1.Safe Learning Environment 2.Collaborative Learning Environment 3.Student Motivation C. Cultural Proficiency 1.Respects Differences 2.Maintains Respectful Environment D. Expectations 1.Clear Expectations 2.High Expectations 3.Access to Knowledge A. Engagement 1.Parent/Family Engagement B. Collaboration 1.Learning Expectations 2.Curriculum Support C. Communication 1.Two-Way Communication 2.Culturally Proficient Communication A.Reflection 1.Reflective Practice 2.Goal Setting B. Professional Growth 1.Professional Learning and Growth C. Collaboration 1.Professional Collaboration D. Decision-making 1.Decision-Making E. Shared Responsibility 1.Shared Responsibility F. Professional Responsibilities 1.Judgment 2.Reliability and Responsibility

The Educator Plans

Five-Step Cycle of Continuous Improvement Step 1: Self Assessment Step 2: Analysis, Goal Setting & Plan Development Step 3: Implementation of Plan Step 4: Formative Assessment/ Evaluation Step 5: Summative Evaluation

The Typical Cycle: SeptemberCycle Step 1: Self-Assessment By October 15thCycle Step 2: Analysis, Goal Setting, and Educator Plan Development Throughout School Year Cycle Step 3: Plan Implementation and Collection of Evidence Mid-year (or end of 1 st year if on 2 year cycle) Cycle Step 4: Formative Assessment/ Evaluation No later than ten (10) days before the end of school Cycle Step 5: End-of-Cycle Summative Evaluation

Educator Plan Unannounced Observation (Minimum 10 minutes) Announced Observations (Pre, post, minimum 30 minutes) Announced Observations (Pre, post, full class period) Two-Year Self-Directed Plan 6 ( over two years ) * N/A One-Year Self-Directed Plan3 * N/A Directed Growth Plan (1 Year)31N/A Improvement Plan less than 6 months2 * 1 Improvement Plan (no more than 1 year) 4 * 1 Developing Educator Plan (Year 1 Non- PTS Educators) 4N/A1 Developing Educator Plan (Year 2 Non- PTS Educators) 31N/A Developing Educator Plan (Year 3 Non- PTS Educators) 4 * N/A

Plymouth Public Schools Strategic Plan MISSION STATEMENT In partnership with parents and the community, the Plymouth Public Schools is committed to providing a comprehensive educational experience that is high quality, challenging, and enables each student to develop and maximize individual potential. Our schools will foster a positive and collaborative environment that encourages and affirms academic achievement and personal excellence and inspires all students to make a positive contribution to society. GOALS VISION STATEMENT The Plymouth Public Schools will be recognized nationally as an outstanding school district. Our goal is to graduate confident, critical thinkers, productive and creative lifelong learners, and socially responsible, engaged citizens capable of adapting to change in a technologically advanced and multicultural society. CORE BELIEFS We believe that every student should become a (an): Effective Communicator Independent Thinker Problem Solver Responsible Citizen Self-Directed, Life-Long Learner Valuable Collaborator Goal 1: Enhance student social and emotional growth, health and welfare, and demonstration of civic responsibility Goal 2: Increase family and community engagement Goal 3: Enhance academic achievement of all students at all levels Goal 4: Provide strong district and school leadership

Agenda for 6/28/13 PD Day 7:45 – 8:15Check in and refreshments 8:15 – 9:00Refresher on New Evaluation Tool and Overview of Day 9:00 – 10:00SMART Goals 10:15 – 10:30Intro to the Rubric 10:30 – 11:15Elementary-Longleaf/Secondary- Lunch 11:15 – 12:00Elementary-Lunch/Secondary- Longleaf 12:15 – 1:15Work on Rubric 1:30Wrap up back in Auditorium

Part 1: Analysis of Student Learning, Growth, and Achievement Briefly summarize areas of strength and high-priority concerns for students under your responsibility for the upcoming school year. Cite evidence such as results from available assessments. This form should be individually submitted by educator, but Part 1 can also be used by individuals and/or teams who jointly review and analyze student data. Part 2: Assessment of Practice Against Performance Standards Citing your district’s performance rubric, briefly summarize areas of strength and high-priority areas for growth. Areas may target specific Standards, Indicators, or elements, or span multiple Indicators or elements within or across Standards. The form should be individually submitted by educator, but Part 2 can also be used by teams in preparation for proposing team goals.

Student Learning S.M.A.R.T. Goal Check whether goal is individual or team; write team name if applicable. Professional Practice S.M.A.R.T. Goal Check whether goal is individual or team; write team name if applicable. Individual Team: ________________ Individual Team: _______________

SchoolRoom/Area Mt PleasantRoom 138 A FFESRoom 135 CSESRoom 130 A HESTeachers Dining - Café IBESBand Room MESRoom 134 NMESChorus Room SESGym WESRoom 133 PCISLecture Hall (2nd floor) PSMSLibrary PNHSCafé PSHSPerforming Arts Center Morning Room Assignments (with Principal - by school)

Agenda for 6/28/13 PD Day 7:45 – 8:15Check in and refreshments 8:15 – 9:00Refresher on New Evaluation Tool and Overview of Day 9:00 – 10:00SMART Goals 10:15 – 10:30 Intro to the Rubric 10:30 – 11:15Elementary-Longleaf/Secondary- Lunch 11:15 – 12:00Elementary-Lunch/Secondary- Longleaf 12:15 – 1:15Work on Rubric 1:30Wrap up back in Auditorium

I. Curriculum, Planning, & Assessment II. Teaching All Students III. Family & Community Engagement IV. Professional Culture A.Curriculum and Planning 1.Subject Matter Knowledge 2.Child and Adolescent Development 3.Rigorous Standards-Based Unit Design 4.Well-Structured Lessons B. Assessment 1.Variety of Assessment Methods 2.Adjustments to Practice C. Analysis 1.Analysis and Conclusions 2.Sharing Conclusions with Colleagues 3.Sharing Conclusions with Students A.Instruction 1.Quality and Effort of Work 2.Student Engagement 3.Meeting Diverse Needs B. Learning Environment 1.Safe Learning Environment 2.Collaborative Learning Environment 3.Student Motivation C. Cultural Proficiency 1.Respects Differences 2.Maintains Respectful Environment D. Expectations 1.Clear Expectations 2.High Expectations 3.Access to Knowledge A. Engagement 1.Parent/Family Engagement B. Collaboration 1.Learning Expectations 2.Curriculum Support C. Communication 1.Two-Way Communication 2.Culturally Proficient Communication A.Reflection 1.Reflective Practice 2.Goal Setting B. Professional Growth 1.Professional Learning and Growth C. Collaboration 1.Professional Collaboration D. Decision-making 1.Decision-Making E. Shared Responsibility 1.Shared Responsibility F. Professional Responsibilities 1.Judgment 2.Reliability and Responsibility

Standard I: Curriculum, Planning, and Assessment. The teacher promotes the learning and growth of all students by providing high-quality and coherent instruction, designing and administering authentic and meaningful student assessments, analyzing student performance and growth data, using this data to improve instruction, providing students with constructive feedback on an ongoing basis, and continuously refining learning objectives. Indicator I-A. Curriculum and Planning: Knows the subject matter well, has a good grasp of child development and how students learn, and designs effective and rigorous standards-based units of instruction consisting of well- structured lessons with measurable outcomes. I-A. Elements ProficientExemplars I-A-1. Subject Matter Knowledge Demonstrates sound knowledge and understanding of the subject matter and the pedagogy it requires by consistently engaging students in learning experiences that enable them to acquire complex knowledge and skills in the subject.

Agenda for 6/28/13 PD Day 7:45 – 8:15Check in and refreshments 8:15 – 9:00Refresher on New Evaluation Tool and Overview of Day 9:00 – 10:00SMART Goals 10:15 – 10:30Intro to the Rubric 10:30 – 11:15 Elementary-Longleaf/ Secondary-Lunch 11:15 – 12:00 Elementary-Lunch/ Secondary-Longleaf 12:15 – 1:15Work on Rubric 1:30Wrap up back in Auditorium

Agenda for 6/28/13 PD Day 7:45 – 8:15Check in and refreshments 8:15 – 9:00Refresher on New Evaluation Tool and Overview of Day 9:00 – 10:00SMART Goals 10:15 – 10:30Intro to the Rubric 10:30 – 11:15Elementary-Longleaf/Secondary- Lunch 11:15 – 12:00Elementary-Lunch/Secondary- Longleaf 12:15 – 1:15Work on Rubric 1:30Wrap up back in Auditorium