Understanding by Design An Overview by Eduardo M. Valerio, Ph.D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 May 29, 2012.
Advertisements

Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 October 15, 2012.
Performance Assessment
Understanding by Design Stage 3
Backward Design Stages Identify Student Learning Expectations/ Targets Determine acceptable Evidence of student learning. Plan Learning Experiences & Instruction.
Assessment In P.E. A Backward Design.
Bringing it all together!
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design Ensuring Learning through Lesson Design
Ackward esign. Teachers are designers. The effectiveness of their designs corresponds to whether they have accomplished their goals for the end users.
Understanding by Design Planning Instruction Stage Three Prepared for Mercer University EDUC621 by Sherah B. Carr, Ph.D Information adapted from training.
An approach to curriculum designed to engage students in inquiry and uncovering ideas.
Stage 1: Identify desired results. Stage 2: Determine acceptable evidence. Stage 3: Plan learning experiences and instruction. Wiggins, G & McTighe. J,
Developing a Rubric for the Design of Learning Spaces: Starting Points
1 Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics Based on Understanding by Design By Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe.
The mere imparting of information is not education. Above all things, the effort must result in helping a person think and do for himself/herself. Carter.
Understanding by Design
BACKWARD MAPPING: Beginning with the end in mind
Understanding By Design
ED 3501: Curriculum and Instruction Section GHI - Fall Understanding by Design Understanding and Creating Effective Instructional Design.
Redding Elementary School Integrated Learning Experiences Summer 2011 Presentation created by Christopher Wermuth 2011.
SATURDAY, JANUARY 9, 2010 MARCIE TAYLOR-THOMA World History Writers’ Training.
Baldwin-Whitehall School District
UBD Backward Planning Understanding by Design - The Backward Planning Model Based on the work of Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe Plan Backwards!
Shifting to a Standards- Based Mindset Through Quality Assessments and Backwards Design LMS Department Everett High School October 10, 2014.
Design Down Curriculum Planning & Cooperative Learning Douglas Gosse, PhD Nipissing University, Office H120 TEL: ,
Understanding by Design
USING BACKWARD DESIGN FOR UNIT AND LESSON PLANS * Based on the thinking that if everyone has a clear picture of where they are going before they start,
UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Assessment: What? Why? How? Barb Wilkins and Julie Phelps eLearning Community of Practice April 18, 2012.
Paul Parkison: Teacher Education 1 Articulating and Assessing Learning Outcomes Stating Objectives Developing Rubrics Utilizing Formative Assessment.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 3: Quality Instructional Design.
Using Understanding by Design
Backward Design Learning with a purpose. Today’s Essential Question How do teachers create student-centered standards-based thematic units that engage.
PLANNING for INQUIRY Backward Design Information to Knowledge Journey Wiggins and McTighe, Kuhlthau, Todd.
Understanding by Design From the work of Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe The 3 Stages of UBD Developing a Common Language - What is a Unit.
The Backward Design Process
Adapted From the Work and Wisdom of Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe, UBD 08/2002 Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD.
Narrowing the Challenge: Revisiting Understanding by Design Cherie McCollough VaNTH-PER Professional Development June 1, 2004.
Matthew Birtel EDUC 503 FALL 2012 November 27, 2012.
Designing Cooperative Learning Applications Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota  Felder & Brent B Course Design  Wiggins & McTighe B Understanding.
Understanding By Design
Understanding By Design Stage 1 BestPrep TIW Monday, July 30, 2012 What is UbD?
Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD Copyright: 2002, Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe.
Understanding by Design, UbD - based on work by McTighe and Wiggins.
Understanding by Design Developed by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe Published by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) A.K.A.
UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN
Session One  Backward Design is a process of lesson planning created by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe and introduced in Understanding by Design (1998).
Understanding by Design grant wiggins & jay mctighe
A framework for redesign Adapted from Wiggins & McTighe, 2006 Understanding by Design.
Backward Mapping... beginning with the end in mind... NSW Department of Education & Training NSW Public Schools – Leading the Way With.
Adapted From the Work and Wisdom of Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe, UBD 08/2002 Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD.
Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 Session VI.
EDUC 410 Fall, “Teachers are designers. An essential act of our profession is the crafting of curriculum and learning experiences to meet specified.
“To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination. It means to know where you’re going so that you better understand.
Understanding by Design DESIGNING CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION.
Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity
Assessment In P.E. A Backward Design.
University of Minnesota – Duluth
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design
Assessment In P.E. A Backward Design.
Understanding By Design by Wiggins & McTighe
Understanding by Design Ensuring Learning through Lesson Design
Design & Implementation of Problem-Based Cooperative Learning
Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics
Backward Mapping beginning with the end in mind . . .
Instructional Program Alignment
Presentation transcript:

Understanding by Design An Overview by Eduardo M. Valerio, Ph.D.

The Authors Grant Wiggins Grant Wiggins Grant Wiggins, Ed.D., is the President and Director of Programs for Relearning by Design, a not-for-profit educational organization in Pennington, NJ.

The Authors Jay McTighe Jay McTighe provides consulting services to schools, districts, regional service agencies and state departments of education. He is an experienced educator and noted author who also makes effective presentations at conferences. Jay McTighe Jay McTighe provides consulting services to schools, districts, regional service agencies and state departments of education. He is an experienced educator and noted author who also makes effective presentations at conferences.

Using WHERE Designing lessons “backward” from standards… Designing lessons “backward” from standards…

Using WHERE

“W” stands for students knowing Where they are heading, Where they are heading, Why they are heading there, Why they are heading there, What they know, What they know, Where they might go wrong in the process, and Where they might go wrong in the process, and What is required of them. What is required of them.

Using WHERE H stands for Hooking the students on the topic of study Hooking the students on the topic of study

Using WHERE E stands for students Exploring and Exploring and Experiencing ideas and being Experiencing ideas and being Equipped with the necessary understanding to master the standard being taught. Equipped with the necessary understanding to master the standard being taught.

Using WHERE R stands for providing opportunities for students to Rehearse, Rehearse, Revise, and Revise, and Refine their work. Refine their work.

Using WHERE Estands for student Evaluation Evaluation Resource: Backwards Design from Standards to Lesson Plans Also available on course homepage: Course Info, Current Semester, Articles for LANG 313, Understanding by Design Articles and Resource Links, Using WHERE to Create Lesson Plans

Backward design is… Compatible with other programs or approaches and should be considered a framework that can be used to assist teachers in designing or redesigning teaching materials to enhance learning understanding. Compatible with other programs or approaches and should be considered a framework that can be used to assist teachers in designing or redesigning teaching materials to enhance learning understanding.

Stages of Backward Design IdentifyStage 1 desired desired results results

Stages of Backward Design Determine Stage 2 acceptable acceptable evidence evidence

Stages of Backward Design Stage 3 Stage 3 Plan learning experiences and instruction and instruction

Thinking through Stage 1 First, decide the field of possible content (topics, skills, and resources) valuable for study

Thinking through Stage 1 Sharpen choices to specify important knowledge students must know…

Thinking through Stage 1 Big ideas and important understandings that students should retain beyond the details they studied Anchors…

Filtering Decisions in Stage 1 Does the idea, topic or process represent a “big idea” (endures beyond the details) Does the idea, topic or process represent a “big idea” (endures beyond the details) …Can you relate your idea, topic or process that will “anchor” it to something meaningful? BIG IDEA

Filtering Decisions in Stage 1 Does the idea, topic or process reside at the heart of the discipline? (relevance, authenticity, centrality) Does the idea, topic or process reside at the heart of the discipline? (relevance, authenticity, centrality)

Filtering Decisions in Stage 1 To what extent does the idea, topic or process require “uncoverage?” (Additional information or background to avoid misconceptions or errors in thinking) To what extent does the idea, topic or process require “uncoverage?” (Additional information or background to avoid misconceptions or errors in thinking)(bullfighting)

Filtering Decisions in Stage 1 To what extent does the idea, topic or process offer potential for engaging students? To what extent does the idea, topic or process offer potential for engaging students? Bring textbook study to life through inquiry, simulation, debate or other kinds of inherently engaging experiences.

Filtering Decisions in Stage 1 To what extent does the idea, topic or process offer potential for engaging students? To what extent does the idea, topic or process offer potential for engaging students? Consider moving away from the textbook— using it to guide content or topics, but not “following” the textbook and the exercises as a prescription for language learning.

Filtering Decisions in Stage 1 To what extent does the idea, topic or process offer potential for engaging students? To what extent does the idea, topic or process offer potential for engaging students? Design lessons to provoke student interest by asking questions, discussing issues or problems.

Filtering Decisions in Stage 1 To what extent does the idea, topic or process offer potential for engaging students? To what extent does the idea, topic or process offer potential for engaging students? Design one question or discussion to serve as a gateway to other ideas or topics.

Filtering Decisions in Stage 2 Determine Acceptable Evidence How will we know if students have achieved the desired results and met the standards? How will we know if students have achieved the desired results and met the standards? What will we accept as evidence of student understanding and proficiency? What will we accept as evidence of student understanding and proficiency?

Filtering Decisions in Stage 2 Determine Acceptable Evidence Think in terms of the collected assessment evidence— not just content to be covered or a series of learning activities… Think in terms of the collected assessment evidence— not just content to be covered or a series of learning activities…

Filtering Decisions in Stage 2 Determine Acceptable Evidence Continuum of Assessment Methods…  Informal checks for understanding  Observation/Dialogue  Quiz/Test  Academic Prompt ( stimulates critical thinking… )  Performance task/Project

Filtering Decisions in Stage 2 Determine Acceptable Evidence Use assessments appropriately to evaluate student achievement among the three levels of instruction in Stage 1 See Chapter 1 figure 1.5

Filtering Decisions in Stage 3 Plan Learning Experiences and Instruction Once clearly identified results have been identified (enduring understanding and appropriate evidence), consider how to plan instructional activities to produce learner language skills and cultural understanding that can be demonstrated. Once clearly identified results have been identified (enduring understanding and appropriate evidence), consider how to plan instructional activities to produce learner language skills and cultural understanding that can be demonstrated.

Filtering Decisions in Stage 3 Plan Learning Experiences and Instruction What enabling knowledge (facts, concepts, and principles) and skills (procedures) will students need to perform effectively to achieve desired results? What enabling knowledge (facts, concepts, and principles) and skills (procedures) will students need to perform effectively to achieve desired results?

Filtering Decisions in Stage 3 Plan Learning Experiences and Instruction What activities will equip students with needed knowledge and skills? What activities will equip students with needed knowledge and skills?

Filtering Decisions in Stage 3 Plan Learning Experiences and Instruction What will need to be taught and coached, and how should it best be taught, in light of performance goals? What will need to be taught and coached, and how should it best be taught, in light of performance goals?

Filtering Decisions in Stage 3 Plan Learning Experiences and Instruction Is the overall design coherent and effective? Is the overall design coherent and effective?

Big Picture of a Design Approach Key Design Question Design Considerations Filters (Design Criteria) What the Final Design Accomplishes Stage 1 What content is worthy? National and State Standards… Enduring ideas AuthenticRelevant… Unit framed around worthy knowledge… Stage 2 What is evidence? Six facets of understanding Continuum of Valid. Reliable. Sufficient. Authentic… Unit anchored in credible evidence of … Stage 3 What learning experiences… Research- based repertoire… WHERE Hook the students… Coherent learning experiences…

Big Picture of a Design Approach The complete graphic for this table is available at the end of Chapter Two in Understanding by Design The complete graphic for this table is available at the end of Chapter Two in Understanding by Design As you scroll down, review all the figures up to this point…

Goal Work to develop understanding, which is fundamentally different from knowledge and skill. Work to develop understanding, which is fundamentally different from knowledge and skill. You can use these principles to guide you into effective unit building and directing curriculum elements toward greater learning and student engagement You can use these principles to guide you into effective unit building and directing curriculum elements toward greater learning and student engagement

Integrated Performance Assessment Interpretive Task(Feedback) Interpretive Task(Feedback) Interpersonal Task(Feedback) Interpersonal Task(Feedback) Presentational Task(Feedback) Presentational Task(Feedback)

Integrated Performance Assessment This type of effective “backward design” teaching plan is described in the Annenberg Library video on Assessment Strategies (#3) … This type of effective “backward design” teaching plan is described in the Annenberg Library video on Assessment Strategies (#3) …

End of presentation