CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leaders in the design, implementation and operation of markets for electricity, gas and water. Portfolio Generation Investment Under Uncertainty Michael.
Advertisements

A Lower-Cost Option for Substantial CO 2 Emission Reductions Ron Edelstein Gas Technology Institute NARUC Meeting Washington DC February 2008.
CO 2 Capture and Storage (CCS). Contents The Need for CO 2 Capture and Storage 4 Reliance on Fossil Fuels 5 Largest CO 2 Emitters 7 Addressing the Challenge.
EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposed Rules for Reducing GHG Emissions from Power Plants Presentation to ACPAC June 16,
OPTIONS FOR ADDRESSING THE CO 2 PROBLEM How can we avoid doubling of CO 2 ? “Stabilization wedges”: Pacala and Sokolow (2004) DOE CDIAC.
NARUC 2015 Winter Meeting February 16, 2015 Combined Heat and Power and the Clean Power Plan Bruce Hedman Institute for Industrial Productivity.
California GHG policy and implications for the power sector APEX Sydney Conference October 13, 2008 Anjali Sheffrin, PhD.
Electricity Technology in a Carbon-Constrained Future February 2007 Steven Specker President and CEO.
CERAWEEK ® 2007 Technology Needs for a Carbon-Constrained World Jeff Sterba Chairman, President, CEO PNM Resources, Inc. February 15, 2007.
Toward a Sustainable Future Name of Conference, Event, or Audience Date Presenter’s Name | ©2011 Synapse Energy Economics Inc. All.
1.  Purpose  To present Staff’s Preliminary Findings on the 2012 Integrated Resource Plans of:  APS – Arizona Public Service Company  TEP – Tucson.
Don’t Call It a Renaissance Until They’ve Shown You a Masterpiece
Regional Emission-free Technology Implementation (RETI): Diversifying the U.S. Electricity Portfolio Marc Santos 2008 ASME WISE Intern University of Massachusetts.
Environmental Sustainability in the Extractive Industry: The Case for Climate Change Mitigation Dr Uwem E. Ite.
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy operated by the Alliance for Sustainable.
Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation IPCC WORKING GROUP 3.
Georgia Power and Energy Planning Julie Paul Environmental Affairs Georgia Power Company January 14, 2013.
Arguments Against Nuclear Power Development in Iran May, 2003.
Alexander Voice 24 November  Motivation for the development of CCS technology  Climate change  Energy profile and outlook  Public perception.
An Introduction to the Role of Carbon Capture and Storage in Ukraine Keith Whiriskey.
Challenges to the Development and Commercialization of CCS Cheyenne A. Alabanzas 2009 ASME Intern University of Alaska – Anchorage.
Climate Change: An Opportunity for a Bi-Lateral Approach Driving Technology Innovation Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Canada Institute.
WORKSHOP ON TECHNOLOGY PATHWAYS FORWARD FOR CARBON CAPTURE & STORAGE ON NATURAL GAS POWER SYSTEMS April 22, 2014 Revis W. James Director, Generation R&D.
Dr. Fatih Birol Chief Economist Head, Economic Analysis Division International Energy Agency / OECD WORLD ENERGY INVESTMENT OUTLOOK.
Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies Stephen W. Pacala and Robert Socolow Science Vol. 305.
Can CCS Help Protect the Climate?. Key Points Climate Protection requires a budget limit on cumulative GHG emissions. Efficiency, Renewable Electric,
© OECD/IEA 2010 Cecilia Tam International Energy Agency Martin Taylor Nuclear Energy Agency The Role of Nuclear Energy in a Sustainable Energy Future Paris,
Carbon markets An international tool for cost-effective GHG mitigation.
UK Renewable Energy Policy with particular reference to bioenergy
Financial Executives Institute Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Canadian Environmental Policy This presentation includes forward-looking statements. Actual.
A Balanced Energy Plan for Alaska’s Railbelt Opportunities for End-Use Efficiency/Conservation and Renewable Energy Prepared for the Alaska Clean.
1 Status of and Outlook for Coal Supply and Demand in the U.S. Imagine West Virginia Spring 2010 Board of Governors Meeting April 13, 2010 Scott Sitzer.
Climate Change and Renewable Heat; The Importance of Biomass Use Green Heat Wood Fuel for the Construction Industry.
Utility Perspective on Climate Change Frank Prager January 22, 2008 Frank Prager January 22, 2008.
Technology options under consideration for reducing GHG emissions SUSTAINABLE ENERGY ROUNDTABLE SERIES: Next Steps Post-Kyoto: U.S. Options January 13,
Opting for “Long Term Operations” Technical, economic and regulatory considerations MARC Conference June 8, 2010 Sean Bushart, EPRI Sr. Program Manager.
Eco-efficiency and EU legislation. Eco-efficiency in cities What kind of urban sprawl What kind of architecture What kind of transport What kind of waste.
Spain: Can we give up any of the primary energy sources? Alejo Vidal-Quadras Roca Vice-President of the European Parliament Member of the Industry, Energy.
EU ETS & European Energy Market Dr Bill Kyte OBE Advisor, Sustainable Development, E.ON AG Chairman, UK Emissions Trading Group Ltd Chairman, Eurelectric.
Selecting Renewable Projects at Colorado Springs Utilities APPA Conference John Romero GM Acquisition, Engineering and Planning October, 2009.
Taking the Lead: State Innovations to Reduce Greenhouse Gases Bill Becker STAPPA/ALAPCO February 28, 2002.
Investing in America’s Electric Future Morry Markowitz Group Director, External Affairs New Mexico Utility Shareholders Alliance October 7, 2009.
Game Changers. Technology Game Changer Barriers Many technologies are capable of significant deployment as “Game Changers” (energy efficiency, CH&P, renewables,
Global Warming: Emissions Sources and Solutions J. Drake Hamilton Science Policy Director Fresh Energy October 17, 2015.
Preliminary Results with the Regional Portfolio Model Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generation Resource Advisory.
1 Synergies Between Climate Change Financing Mechanisms: Options for China The PCF/CC Synergy Workshop.
A Brave New World Cathy Woollums, SVP, Environmental and Chief Environmental Counsel NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting – June 2, 2014.
American Public Power Association Pre-Rally Workshop February 28, 2006 Washington, D.C. Climate Change: Making Community-Based Decisions in a Carbon Constrained.
Meeting Future Demands for Energy In A World Facing Climate Change.
Generation Technologies in a Carbon-constrained World Steve Specker President & CEO October 2005.
Allocation of CO 2 Emission Allowances in RGGI Dallas Burtraw, Karen Palmer, Danny Kahn Resources for the Future Presentation to RGGI Stakeholder Meeting.
Transition of the Generation Fleet in a Carbon-constrained World American Public Power Association October 17, 2006 Barbara Tyran Director, Washington.
© 2008 UNDP. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. Proprietary and Confidential. Not For Distribution Without Prior Written Permission. Climate Change Mitigation.
 Cap and Trade Application: Global Warming 6. 2.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Technology: Stationary Sources and Demand-Side Management Session Two Air Pollution as Climate Forcing: A Workshop Honolulu,
Consumer Cost Effectiveness of Carbon Mitigation Policies in Restructured Electricity Market Jared Moore and Jay Apt (adviser) CMU Engineering and Public.
Carbon Sequestration A Strategic Element in Clean Coal Technology Presentation to: Mid-America Regulatory Conference (MARC) Columbus, Ohio, June 20, 2006.
Energy Choices: Non-fossil vs. Fossil The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 Senate Energy Committee February 6, 2007 V. John White, Executive.
EnergyTour November Copenhagen Energy Summit Energy Tour District Heating in Denmark Mr Jan Elleriis, Vice President, Metropolitan Copenhagen Heating.
Carbon Capture and Storage Potentials and Barriers to Deployment.
Coal in a Carbon-Constrained World Ernest J. Moniz, Cecil and Ida Green Professor of Physics and Engineering Systems Director, MIT Energy Initiative Baker.
© OECD/IEA Do we have the technology to secure energy supply and CO 2 neutrality? Insights from Energy Technology Perspectives 2010 Copenhagen,
Viability of Carbon Capture and Sequestration Retrofits for Existing Coal- fired Power Plants under an Emission Trading Scheme CEDM Annual Meeting May.
R ENEWABLE ENERGY IN S COTLAND By Eilidh, Caireen, Louisa and Eva.
04/16/ Planning New Generation APPA Operations & Engineering Conference April 10, 2006 Jay Hudson, PE Manager, Environmental Management.
CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENERGY POLICY ANALYSIS Abhishek Chaudhary, Tim C
Australian Energy Scenarios Predicting Uncertainty
Energy Technology Perspectives 2008
Coal – security of coal supply considerations of EURACOAL
New England Economic Partnership James Daly Vice President Energy Supply Energy Market Perspectives Reliable Energy, Competitive Prices and.
Presentation transcript:

CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. Copyright (c) 2006 Standard & Poor’s, a subsidiary of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Credit Impact of Climate Change on the Power Sector Swami Venkataraman, CFA Director Standard & Poor’s July 16, 2007

2. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. Climate Change – The Major Credit Drivers The “Cap-and-Trade” Mechanism Sectoral sensitivity and the emissions reduction burden – Autos vs Power Long-term Efficacy and Contingent Liability Excess profits from credit allocations Price Certainty benefits of a carbon tax Economic Cost of Compliance A study based on a dispatch of US power markets under two model legislations Portfolio Characteristics Fuel on the margin and the change thereof

3. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. The Cost of Compliance Ratio Of 2026 To 2007 EBITDA (%)BaseGHG1GHG2 Fossil-Heavy Portfolios Company Company Company Company Diversified Portfolios Company Company Company Carbon-light portfolios Company Company Company

4. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. The Cost of Compliance Fuel Share Of EBITDA Under GHG2 – Diversified Portfolios Company 5Company 6Company 7 (%) Coal Nuclear Gas Other

5. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. Emissions and Carbon Prices

6. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. The Cost of Compliance Fuel Mix Changes (%) BaseGHG1GHG2 Coal Gas Nuclear Water8666 Wind1166 IGCC0003 Geothermal1000 Other (mostly biomass, landfill gas, wood, fuel cells)2333 Residual oil3000 Energy efficiency0058

7. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. Hours on the Margin in 2026: Boxer/Sanders minus Base Case (%) ZoneCoalGas CCGas CTGas STHydroNuclearOilOther ERCOT-North15.6(13.7)0.4(2.2)0.0 FRCC (0.9)0.0 (8.8)0.0 ISO-NE-Boston (2.6)0.10.0(1.0)(10.2)(3.6) ISO-NE-North Ex-Boston0.97.5(2.0)(0.6)0.04.1(12.5)2.7 ISO-NE-Norwalk+SW CT(0.6) (24.7)(5.1) NYISO East(0.8)14.2(1.9)0.0 (5.1)(6.5) NYISO Zone J (NYC)0.0(13.9) (0.0) RFC-AEP33.7(32.0)(0.6) (0.4)(1.2) RFC-Cinergy14.3(13.2)(0.7)(0.2)0.0 (0.1) PJM-East28.9(22.9) (3.3)(3.0) PJM-West29.1(28.2)(0.7) (0.3)(0.0) SERC-Entergy (6.0)0.0 (0.7)(3.3) SERC-South16.1(12.8)(1.7)(0.9)0.0 (0.7)(0.1) SERC-TVA19.0(17.0)(2.2) (0.3) NP-150.8(8.8)(1.3)(8.3)0.0 (0.1)14.7 SP-159.3(4.3)(0.7)(8.1) WECC-Wyoming46.1(50.9) (0.1)(1.4) Average13.1(8.3)(0.1)(1.4)0.00.2(3.5)(0.2)

8. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. State of the Markets Well established need for baseload capacity starting in the next decade Past capacity additions displayed clear trends – Preponderance of Coal, Nuclear or Gas in different times Today, several forces are pulling in different directions Volatility in gas prices => nuclear and coal Concerns over global warming => natural gas, nuclear and renewables Rising utility Bills => energy efficiency National Security => coal, ethanol Sharply Rising Construction Costs Equipment costs are rising due to global demand Labor availability is scarce EPC Contract terms are less favorable

9. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. Technology Cost Comparison CO 2 transportation ($/ton)6 CO 2 storage ($/ton)4 Market price of gas ($/MMBtu)7 Market price of Eastern coal ($/MMBtu)1.8 Market price of PRB coal ($/MMBtu)1.0 Capital Recovery Period30 years Average Cost of capital10% (12% for nuclear) Global Assumptions

10. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. Technology Cost Comparison PCIGCC-EIGCC-PNuclearNGCCWindSolarBiomass Total Plant Cost ($/KW) Capacity factor85%80% 85%65%33%43%85% Heat Rate (MMBtu/Mwh) Variable O&M ($/Mwh) Fixed O&M ($/Kw-yr) Carbon Capture Assumptions Capital Cost ($/KW) Operating Cost ($/Mwh)83303 Energy penalty to capture CO225%15% 013% Ton/MWh CO2 emitted rate (before) Ton/MWh CO2 emitted rate (after) Technology Cost Assumptions

11. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. Technology Cost Comparison $/MWH PCIGCC-EIGCC-PNGCCNuclearWindSolarBiomass Plant Capital Cost Plant Fuel Cost Plant O&M Production Costs Carbon Capture Assumptions CO 2 capture capital cost CO 2 Energy penalty CO 2 other costs CO 2 Related Costs Cost of Power with CCS Cost of CCS/ton of CO Cost of power given ability to buy credits CO2 at $10/ton CO2 at $30/ton

12. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. Climate Change – The Major Credit Drivers Other Credit Issues Energy Efficiency – Decoupling mechanisms Permitting and LT Liability Issues of Carbon Sequestration

13. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. Questions?

14. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. Climate Change – The Big Picture Scientific CO2 target of 450 – 550 ppm 50-yr timeframe is appropriate Developing countries modeled to grow by 60-80%

15. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. Climate Change – The Big Picture What does one wedge mean? Efficient baseload coal plantsProduce twice today’s coal power output at 60% instead of 40% efficiency (compared with 32% today) Fuel Switching to Gas from coalReplace 1400 GW coal plants with gas plants (four times the current production of gas-based power) Capture CO2 at baseload power plantIntroduce CCS at 800 GW coal or 1600 GW natural gas (compared with 1060 GW coal in 1999) Capture CO2 at coal-to-synfuels plantIntroduce CCS at synfuels plants producing 30 million barrels a day from coal (200 times Sasol), if half of feedstock carbon is available for Capture Geological storageCreate 70 Sleipners (0.3 mill tons of CO2) a year for 50 years Nuclear power for coal powerAdd 700 GW (twice the current capacity) Wind power for coal powerAdd 2 million 1-MW-peak windmills (50 times the current capacity) “occupying” 30 mill ha, on land or offshore (size of Wyoming) Biomass fuel for fossil fuelAdd 50 times the combined Brazil and U.S. ethanol production, with the use of 250 mill ha (one-sixth of world cropland)

16. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. Portfolio Components – Credit Factors Energy Efficiency Efficiency will be a key component Expectations for up to 2 wedges California’s per capita usage is about 50% of national average Decoupling tariff essential to protect credit – present only in California Compensation for lost opportunities? Renewable Energy RPS Targets will likely be fully met in a carbon-constrained world Wind will be largest beneficiary, subject to transmission and integration costs Biomass is expected to be economic – permitting; fuel availability Solar not likely economic – Govt and state support essential

17. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. Portfolio Components – Energy Efficiency CA saves 40,000 Gwh of electricity per year Or about 40 million tonnes of CO2 emissions

18. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. Aggregate Heating Degree Days

19. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. Aggregate Cooling Degree Days

20. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. Portfolio Components – Solar Power

21. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. Portfolio Components – Solar Power

22. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. Portfolio Components – Carbon Capture and Sequestration Three capture methods – pre-, post- and oxyfuel combustion Only pre-combustion is commercially proven Cheaper in other industries – Gas E&P, Ammonia, Ethylene Storage OptionRelative Capacity Relative CostStorage Integrity Technical Feasibility Active oil wells (EOR)SmallVery LowGoodHigh Coal bedsUnknownLowUnknown Depleted oil/gas wellsModerateLowGoodHigh Deep aquifersLargeUnknown Mined caverns/ salt domesLargeVery HighGoodHigh Source: MIT white paper of carbon capture and sequestration, January 1997 Key Credit risks arise from regulatory and legal issues Federal vs state regulation; Is CO2 hazardous waste? Transparent regulatory process with public support is key Who will bear the long-term liability? Pipeline Infrastructure?

23. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. Hours on the Margin in 2007: All Cases (%) ZoneCoalGas CCGas CTGas STHydroNuclearOilOther ERCOT-North FRCC ISO-NE-Boston ISO-NE-North Ex-Boston ISO-NE-Norwalk+SW CT NYISO East NYISO Zone J (NYC) RFC-AEP RFC-Cinergy PJM-East PJM-West SERC-Entergy SERC-South SERC-TVA NP SP WECC-Wyoming Average

24. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. Hours on the Margin in 2026 under Boxer/Sanders Scenario (%) ZoneCoalGas CCGas CTGas STHydroNuclearOilOther ERCOT-North FRCC ISO-NE-Boston ISO-NE-North Ex-Boston ISO-NE-Norwalk+SW CT NYISO East NYISO Zone J (NYC) RFC-AEP RFC-Cinergy PJM-East PJM-West SERC-Entergy SERC-South SERC-TVA NP SP WECC-Wyoming Average

25. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. Hours on the Margin in 2026 under Base Case Scenario (%) ZoneCoalGas CCGas CTGas STHydroNuclearOilOther ERCOT-North FRCC ISO-NE-Boston ISO-NE-North Ex-Boston ISO-NE-Norwalk+SW CT NYISO East NYISO Zone J (NYC) RFC-AEP RFC-Cinergy PJM-East PJM-West SERC-Entergy SERC-South SERC-TVA NP SP WECC-Wyoming Average

26. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s. Analytic services and products provided by Standard & Poor’s are the result of separate activities designed to preserve the independence and objectivity of each analytic process. Standard & Poor’s has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of non-public information received during each analytic process.