ED Studies P & T Review & Modifications of Procedures of Procedures.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing an NCATE/IRA Program Report
Advertisements

Cathy Jordan, PhD Associate Professor of Pediatrics Director, Children, Youth and Family Consortium University of Minnesota Member, Community Campus Partnerships.
Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
CLA RTP amendments 1. Align with December 10 vote to allow up to 2 members of same academic area to serve at different ranks 2. Specify that two members.
Education Unit The PPA Evidence Binder Resources for assistance and support Your Supervising Practitioner Your University Supervisor Practicum Handbook.
Proposed Revisions to Section 5 (Review & Evaluation of Faculty Performance) of the Faculty Handbook Spring, T&P Oversight Committee Office.
Faculty Affairs presents:. PPCs  Consist of 3 or 5 members  Are selected based on Program Personnel Standards (i.e. one per program or one per faculty.
Writing an Effective Proposal for Innovations in Teaching Grant
Promotion & Tenure Workshop The Dossier. What the Committee Looks for: I nnovation I nitiative I mpact.
The Student Teaching Handbook Ms. Staci Fuqua Director of Field Placements UT Martin.
Review of Appendix 16 FA Purpose –Review Appendix 16 for compliance with the Collective Bargaining Agreement Changes –Compliance –Removing.
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
QEP Update CFCC Planning Retreat June 19, QEP Update Mid-Term Report Global Outcomes 1.Measurable improvement of students’ critical thinking skills.
Yanling Sun, Ph.D Carolyn Masterson, Ed. D. Implementing ePortfolio among Pre-service Teachers and Interns Montclair State University.
New Annual Faculty Assessment... after the Beta.
Emporia State University Phil Bennett (Some Slides by Dr. Larry Lyman) Teacher Work Sample The Teachers College.
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion Grand Rapids Community College Faculty Evaluation System.
Three Levels of Assessment: Portfolio Data, Curriculum Inventory, Standardized Assessment Results Dr. Kathleen DaBoll-Lavoie, PhD Department of Inclusive.
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion
STUDENT TEACHING Professionals Influencing Lives.
The Student Teaching Handbook Staci Fuqua, Director Education Student Services UT Martin.
Faculty Evaluation Committee Workshop. Overview Evaluation Timeline Portfolio as a Whole Portfolio Organization –Teaching –Service (Students, College,
Presented by the Faculty Affairs Office September 2013.
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion Grand Rapids Community College Faculty Evaluation System.
Faculty Affairs presents:. PPCs  Consist of 3 or 5 members  Are selected based on Program Personnel Standards (i.e. one per program or one per faculty.
CBPA Criteria For Faculty Teaching Graduate Courses 4/10/09.
Department of Reading and Language Arts WEDNESDAY OCT. 12, :00 - 7:00.
Promotion & Tenure The Dossier: The Vita. Vita Preparation STRATEGY n Keep your Curriculum Vita (CV) up-to-Date and base your P&T vita on it n Prepare.
Faculty Evaluations Fall 2015 YFA perspective Contract quick tour.
Reviewer Training Welcome & Introductions Co-Chairs.
Inter-professional Collaboration Teacher Vistas. What is a Teacher Vista? A Teacher Vista may be a variety of submissions by educators Teacher Vistas.
Practicum Supervision What College Supervisors and Students Need to Know about the Practicum.
edTPA Retakes Judi Wilson, Associate Professor
Overview of Policies and Procedures University of Missouri-Kansas City.
Consequential? Yikes!: Organization and time management can be the key to a passing score on the edTPA Billi L. Bromer, Ed. D. Brenau University National.
Mara Barbosa Alejandra Carrillo-Muñoz.  You will…  Identify appropriate and effective strategies to present evidence of teaching effectiveness.  Plan,
Welcome The Mid-Cycle Evaluation Workshop. Background and History of MCE NWCCU emphasis on outcomes Review of Year Seven Self-Evaluations – Needing more.
PACT - Elementary Literacy PACT Implementation Conference 2008 Ann Lippincott UCSB.
Lecture 9 ASSESSING YOUR STUDENT’S PROJECTS DR. REGINA STONE-HERNANDEZ EDU 250 UNIVERSITY OF MOUNT OLIVE.
Promotion and Tenure. Quick overview of P&T Requirements Each of these areas has a defined standard/benchmark that faculty are expected to achieve (below-meet-exceed)
University Supervisors Meeting November 10, 2014.
University p&t forum Introductions April 24, 2017.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Reappointment, Tenure and Promotion (RTP) Processes and Procedures
Instructional Leadership for a Professional Learning Culture:
Eastern’s Assessment System
SPE 512 STUDY creative knowledge /spe512study.com
USC Salkehatchie Education program Info session
The UIS Faculty Personnel Process
The Student Teaching Handbook
SPE 512 Competitive Success-- snaptutorial.com
SPE 512 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
SPE 512 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Professor Salary Incentive Program
Distinguished Teacher Award
Promotion/Tenure Portfolio
Faculty Promotions Information Meeting
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion
Dr. W. Robert Ashurst Faculty Research Committee Chair
Doctoral Field Study Orientation
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
Faculty Workshop on Promotion and Tenure
Tenure and Promotion: Article 6
Distinguished Teacher Award
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
Promotion and Tenure.
Non-Tenure Track Promotion Workshop
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
Tenure and Promotion: Crossing the Finish Line
Presentation transcript:

ED Studies P & T Review & Modifications of Procedures of Procedures

ED Studies P & T Procedures Service Scholarship Teacher Effectiveness PTPI Target Score of 100 2

Overview Teacher Effectiveness (approximately 70%) Teacher Effectiveness (approximately 70%) Peer Evaluation Peer Evaluation Face-to-Face Instruction Face-to-Face Instruction Online Course Instruction Online Course Instruction Teaching Materials Teaching Materials Student Evaluation Student Evaluation Self-Evaluation Self-Evaluation Interview by P&T Committee Interview by P&T Committee Additional Evidence Additional Evidence 3

Overview Scholarship (approximately 20%) Scholarship (approximately 20%) Priority I Priority I Priority II Priority II Priority III Priority III Priority IV Priority IV Service (approximately 10%) Service (approximately 10%) Standard of performance increases moving from Associate Professor to Tenure to Full Professor. Standard of performance increases moving from Associate Professor to Tenure to Full Professor. Target Score for all three is 100. Target Score for all three is

Scholarship & Service Scholarship and Service credit can be estimated by using the PTPI Spreadsheet. Scholarship and Service credit can be estimated by using the PTPI Spreadsheet. PTPI Spreadsheet PTPI Spreadsheet PTPI Spreadsheet PTPI Spreadsheet See documents W and X on the CD that you received last Fall. See documents W and X on the CD that you received last Fall. 5

Teacher Effectiveness Each of the six subscores is scored with a rubric describing how the evidence supplied by the candidate will be evaluated. Each of the six subscores is scored with a rubric describing how the evidence supplied by the candidate will be evaluated. Teaching Materials Rubric Teaching Materials Rubric Teaching Materials Rubric Teaching Materials Rubric Suggestions for scoring the rubric are provided for each rubric. Suggestions for scoring the rubric are provided for each rubric. For Teaching Materials it is Document I on the CD. For Teaching Materials it is Document I on the CD.Document IDocument I 6

Most Important Change How can you help the P&T Committee better understand the evidence supplied in the portfolio? How can you help the P&T Committee better understand the evidence supplied in the portfolio? Submission of Materials as per the Faculty Handbook will continue. Submission of Materials as per the Faculty Handbook will continue. BUT expanded documentation with respect to the ED Studies P&T procedures must be undertaken to guarantee the validity of your evidence. BUT expanded documentation with respect to the ED Studies P&T procedures must be undertaken to guarantee the validity of your evidence. 7

Example Teaching Materials Rubric has five sub- categories: TM-1, TM-2, TM-3, TM-4, TM-5. Teaching Materials Rubric has five sub- categories: TM-1, TM-2, TM-3, TM-4, TM-5. Teaching Materials Rubric Teaching Materials Rubric The P&T Committee must assign a score for each of these. The P&T Committee must assign a score for each of these. If they can’t find the evidence in your portfolio that addresses that sub- category, the rubric score will be low. If they can’t find the evidence in your portfolio that addresses that sub- category, the rubric score will be low. 8

Recommendations 1.Make sure you provide evidence for every sub-category. 2.Follow the suggestions that the P&T Committee will be using to evaluate each sub-category. Document I. Document I Document I 3.Label each piece of evidence. Use a color-coding system. (Example: Dr. Hewitt’s promotion materials) (Example: Dr. Hewitt’s promotion materials) 9

Recommendations 4.The same strategy could be used in artifacts submitted in the scholarship category. A reprint of an article published in a national journal (I-S4) should be labeled so the P&T Committee knows at what level of scholarship you think the artifact represents. A reprint of an article published in a national journal (I-S4) should be labeled so the P&T Committee knows at what level of scholarship you think the artifact represents. A different color code could be used for II-S4 or III-S2, etc. A different color code could be used for II-S4 or III-S2, etc. 10

Another Important Change The Peer Review Rubric requires visits by your peers to “observe” your instruction. The Peer Review Rubric requires visits by your peers to “observe” your instruction. Face-to-face (Document B) Face-to-face (Document B)Document BDocument B Online Instruction (Document C) Online Instruction (Document C)Document CDocument C Arrangements must be made for the “peer observations” (especially if they involve observations made by “peers” from off- campus) to be made during the Fall semester (ASAP). Arrangements must be made for the “peer observations” (especially if they involve observations made by “peers” from off- campus) to be made during the Fall semester (ASAP). 11

Minor Modifications There are some other minor modifications that may need to take place between now and the next round of promotion and tenure deliberations early next semester. There are some other minor modifications that may need to take place between now and the next round of promotion and tenure deliberations early next semester. The ED Studies P&T procedures are ever evolving, and your suggestions are always welcome. The ED Studies P&T procedures are ever evolving, and your suggestions are always welcome. 12