Countywide Rule Amendment Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Category Planners Advisory Committee September 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preliminary Draft Countywide Rule Amendment Special Designation Transit Oriented Development Corridors Pinellas Planning Council July 2010.
Advertisements

Pinellas by Design: A Blueprint for Updating the Countywide Plan Pinellas Planning Council May 18, 2011.
Proposed Land Use & Development Regulations Public Hearing Month Day, 2012.
Board of County Commissioners November 19, Study Area CR-491 Corridor Planning Study Planning and Development Department.
Board of Trustees Meeting Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments Process Monday, April 2, 2012.
Twin Cities Case Study: Northstar Corridor. ●By 2030, region expected to grow by nearly 1 million, with 91% to 95% of new growth forecast to be located.
Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.
Proposed Modification of Policies for Rural Employment Centers Policy 6.3 of the Future Land Use Element of the Alachua County Comprehensive plan CPA
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood TODs & Complete Streets Unit 6: Station Design & Access.
Citrus County Planning Division Evaluation and Appraisal Report Citrus County Comprehensive Plan.
Neighborhood Preservation and Revitalization Division Board of County Commissioners March 10, Neighborhood Improvement Plan.
Transit-Related Land Use Public Hearing for Proposed Countywide Plan Amendments Pinellas Planning Council June 16, 2010.
Tampa Comprehensive Plan Housing Element Affordable Housing Policies.
1. 2 VIA Long Range Plan  Vision for High-Capacity Transit across VIA service area by 2035  From extensive public and stakeholder input  Prioritization.
Zoning The legislative division of an area into separate districts with different regulations within each district for land use, building size, and the.
SEATTLE LIGHT RAIL STATION AREA PLANNING City of Seattle Station Area Planning in Seattle SEATTLE LIGHT RAIL STATION AREA PLANNING.
2030 Long-Range Transportation Plan Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation Council Public MeetingFernando de Aragón TCPL October 15, 2008Staff Director.
Multimodal Corridor Plan BCC Discussion Item Transportation Planning Division August 19, 2014.
Linda K. McCarthy, Executive Director Missoula Downtown Association Missoula, Montana
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City Council June 3, 2014.
Community Development & Planning Grant Pre-Application Meeting April 17,
Availability of suitable space for expansion Lack of flexibility in allowed uses.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT MAJOR COMMUNITY ISSUES RELATED TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Board of County Commissioners/ Local Planning Agency Joint Meeting.
Transit Oriented Development Using TOD Principles to Guide Future Land Use.
AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 – 8:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback on purpose, needs, and alternatives  Sign up for list  Fill.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
Transit Revitalization Investment Districts Planning and Implementation of Act 238 of 2004 July 2006 Getting to TRID Lynn Colosi Clear View Strategies.
Application LU-MIN Small-Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Twenty Fingers Property May 2007 PLDRB.
CPA-14-08: Transfer of Development Rights Large Scale Text Amendment Adoption Hearing Board of County Commissioners September 23, 2008.
On the Road to a New Metropolitan Transportation Plan Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health April 25, 2013.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
Amherst County Comprehensive Plan (Update)
A New TOD Policy for Regional Transit Expansions Steve Heminger Executive Director March 11, 2005.
Eastside Activity Center Zoning Overlay District and Amended Land Development Regulations.
Community Development Department Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Development of Regional Impact Settlement Agreements & Remedial Amendments.
JUNE 27, 2013 ARB INFORMATIONAL UPDATE: ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS’/ METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY.
Jefferson County Agricultural Preservation and Land Use Plan Jefferson County’s Comprehensive Plan: Process and Strategies Presented to: Dane County Officials.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion: Transportation Concurrency April 24, 2012 Growth Management Legislative Discussion: Transportation Concurrency.
NOVEMBER 19, 2015 STUDY SESSION R IDGEFIELD J UNCTION S UBAREA P LAN DRAFT NOVEMBER 2015.
SEATTLE PLANNING COMMISSION Thursday, August 13, :00 – 5:05 pm City Hall, Room L280 REVISED AGENDA Chair’s Report & Minutes Approval3:00 - 3:10 PM.
200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation VDRPT Route 1 Multimodal Alternatives Analysis: Recommendations for Next Steps Board Transportation.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion June 19, 2012 Growth Management Legislative Discussion June 19, 2012.
International Speedway Boulevard Stakeholders Task Force (STF) Meeting 1 Wednesday, May 19, 2010.
Board of County Commissioners Second Public Hearing August 10, /10/
Regional Transportation Council Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments November 12, 2015.
1 Regional Activity Centers and Clusters Presentation to National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Paul DesJardin Department of Human Services,
EASTSIDE ACTIVITY CENTER DRAFT MASTER PLAN Board of County Commissioners January 22, 2008.
EASTSIDE ACTIVITY CENTER MASTER PLAN PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA Board of County Commissioners Hearing May 13, 2008.
Neighborhood Planning Process Lacoochee/Trilby Neighborhoods.
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
The Concept for City Center – The Power of TOD TOD Advisory Committee Meeting 3 December 10, 2009 The Premier Place for a Premier City.
A Strategic Agenda for Pinellas County’s Future Growth Whit Blanton, FAICP Pinellas Planning Council & Pinellas Metropolitan Planning Organization August.
Highlights  Describe Our Missoula Growth Policy Project  Relationship to Rattlesnake Neighborhood Plan  Next Steps.
Updated Subgroup Recommendations on draft Housing Goals & Objectives October 20, 2004 Subgroup Members: Don Eggert, Marianne Morton, Phil Salkin, & Alex.
City Council – Project Update September 14, 2015.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
Downtown Stockton Housing Strategy Stockton City Council/ Stockton Redevelopment Agency Draft Report August 28, 2007.
City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission Design Recommendation LU MS Conway’s NW.
Public Hearings D10, E11, F12 March 26, Today’s Public Hearings D C-TRAN-2 Comprehensive Plan amendment adoption E C-TRAN-1 Comprehensive.
City of Pierce Welcome and Follow Up.
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Growth Management Amendments Land Use & Transportation
New Comprehensive Zoning By-law December 12, 2016.
Zoning Ordinance Update Study
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
Community Design Advisory Committee
Planning Commission Meeting: August 3, 2016
Status Report on Rochester’s DMC Transportation Plan
Presentation transcript:

Countywide Rule Amendment Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Category Planners Advisory Committee September 2010

Background Concept and preliminary draft of Countywide Rule amendment reviewed with local government staff on June 8 th Follow-up individual meetings with local government staff in June Preliminary draft reviewed with TBARTA and PSTA staff on June 29th

Background Revised draft reviewed at PAC meeting on July 12 th Advance copy of proposed ordinance sent to PAC members and PSTA and TBARTA staff on August 19 th Proposed ordinance reviewed with PAC today PPC public hearing scheduled for September 15 th

Background The proposed Rule Amendment contains: Characteristics of TOD category Required Transit Station Area Plans (TSAPs) Process by which TOD category is used

Plan Classification: Special Designations Subclassifications: Transit Corridors Transit Station Areas Characteristics of TOD Category

Transit Corridor – A linear area which is served by transit, generally extending a quarter-mile in either direction from the centerline of a transit route, which connects transit stations and transit centers. Subclassifications: Primary Corridors – routes identified by Alternatives Analysis Secondary Corridors – routes identified by PSTA Enhanced Bus Network

Alternatives Analysis Study Area

Hypothetical Example of Primary Corridors Based on Alternatives Analysis Results (Locally Preferred Alternative)

PSTA’s Enhanced Bus Network

Hypothetical Example of Secondary Corridors Based on Enhanced Bus Network

Characteristics of TOD Category Transit Corridor Standards (utilization requires TSAP): Both Primary & Secondary Corridors  Used as an overlay – modifies underlying Countywide Plan Map categories  Max units per acre and max nonresidential FAR of underlying Countywide Plan Map categories are both permitted (no proportionate share) Primary Corridors  25 percent density/intensity bonus

Why address corridor planning? FTA rating guidelines: “Local agencies should demonstrate substantial progress on developing and adopting the required regulatory changes and incentives necessary to promote transit-supportive land use patterns in the transit corridor and station areas.” -- Federal Transit Administration, Guidelines and Standards for Assessing Transit-Supportive Land Use, p. 16

Why address corridor planning? FTA rating guidelines: “The transit corridor planning process should include a significant component focusing on land use planning.” -- Federal Transit Administration, Guidelines and Standards for Assessing Transit-Supportive Land Use, p. 20

Why address corridor planning? FTA rating guidelines: “The supporting factors used to evaluate the transit- supportive corridor policies factor include:  Plans and policies to increase corridor and station area development;  Plans and policies to enhance transit-friendly character of corridor and station area development;  Plans to improve pedestrian facilities, including facilities for persons with disabilities; and  Parking policies.” -- Federal Transit Administration, Guidelines and Standards for Assessing Transit-Supportive Land Use, p. 21

Characteristics of TOD Category Transit Station Area – An area generally encompassing a half-mile radius from the center of a transit station or transit center.

Transit station vs. transit center? Definitions appear on pages 15 and 16 of proposed ordinance, and were suggested by PSTA Distinguishes between higher and lower levels of transit service, infrastructure, and amenities (e.g., light rail vs. express bus) Descriptive only – transit stations and transit centers are treated equally

Characteristics of TOD Category Transit Station Area Subclassifications: Type IType IIType IIIType IV HighestLowestdensities/ intensitiesintensities* * But still denser and more intense than most non-transit-oriented areas of the county

Characteristics of TOD Category Transit Station Area Standards (utilization requires TSAP): Applicable Corridor Subclassification Type IType IIType IIIType IV Primary Primary or Secondary

Characteristics of TOD Category Transit Station Area Standards (utilization requires TSAP): Density/intensity requirements are expressed by all- encompassing FAR, which includes both residential and nonresidential square footage Type IType IIType IIIType IV FAR* FAR FAR FAR * Floor Area Ratio. Maximum FAR may be waived within an eighth-mile radius from the center of a Type I transit station area

Characteristics of TOD Category Transit Station Area Standards (utilization requires TS AP): Additional recommended targets for residential density included as a guideline Type IType IIType IIIType IV upa* per project 25 upa areawide upa per project 20 upa areawide upa per project 15 upa areawide upa per project 10 upa areawide * Units per acre

Characteristics of TOD Category Transit Station Area Standards (utilization requires TSAP): Comparison to TBARTA typologies included as a guideline Type IType IITypes III & IV Downtown – Urban Core Regional – Urban Center Regional – Mixed Use Suburban Center Regional – Commercial/ Employment Center Community Center – Urban Neighborhood Center Park and Ride

Why not just use TBARTA typologies? Smaller number of broader categories creates a more flexible countywide framework Allows tailoring at the local level to meet the needs of each community Recognizes the diverse local TOD planning efforts already underway – while demonstrating to FTA that we are coordinating our planning

Characteristics of TOD Category TOD category can be used as either an overlay or a category in transit station areas Must be an overlay in transit corridors

Characteristics of TOD Category Transit Station Area Standards (utilization requires TSAP): When used as TOD category, permitted uses are limited to those allowed in the Residential, Mixed Use, Commercial, and Public/Semi-Public Plan Classifications When used as an overlay, uses are guided by underlying Countywide Plan Map categories

Remains as Overlay in Transit Corridor Used as Overlay in Transit Station Area Used as Category in Transit Station Area

Required Transit Station Area Plans Transit Station Area Plans (TSAPs) are the means by which local governments will customize TOD planning for their communities Transit station area planning is required to win FTA funding Topics and strategies to be addressed are based on TBARTA guidance

Required Transit Station Area Plans Refers to Countywide Plan Position Statements/Strategies: 4.1: Improved transit options 4.2: Transit station area planning 4.3: Densities and intensities to support transit 4.4: Building and site design in transit station areas 4.5: Streetscapes in transit station areas 4.6: Open space in transit areas 4.7: Multimodal street design 5.3:Pedestrian/bicycle planning in transit station areas 7.2: Parking in transit station areas 14.3:Transit-related economic development

Why refer to the Countywide Plan? TBARTA’s guidance on meeting FTA requirements is copied verbatim in the Countywide Plan position statements and strategies Easier to refer to relevant sections of Countywide Plan than reprint or paraphrase Accepted TOD best practices – what communities need to do to win federal funding and create successful transit systems

Required Transit Station Area Plans A TSAP must address at least one transit station area (generally ½ mile radius from transit station or transit center) A TSAP may also address transit corridors that extend outside of the transit station area Can extend to other transit station areas

Required Transit Station Area Plans Less rigorous review process than Special Area Plans Sufficiency rather than approval Allows flexibility for local TOD planning

Required Transit Station Area Plans Change to language in proposed ordinance to clarify intent (p. 14): Local Action Required. Following the PPC staff’s sufficiency review, the transit station area plan shall be approved, and corresponding amendment(s) to the local future land use map shall be made, by official action of the legislative body of the local government.

Process for TOD Category Use Step 1 Initial amendment of Countywide Plan Map will be based on results of Alternatives Analysis (Primary Corridors) and PSTA Enhanced Bus Network (Secondary Corridors) Initial overlay will be placed: –¼ mile distance from transit corridors –½ mile radius from transit stations or centers But TOD category standards cannot be used until a TSAP is adopted by the local government

1 Mile 1/2 Mile Hypothetical Example of Initial Transit Station Area and Transit Corridor

Process for TOD Category Use Step 2. Local governments will prepare TSAPs Step 3. Local governments will submit TSAPs to PPC for sufficiency review Step 4. Local governments will adopt TSAPs and amend local FLUMs –Anticipated that ¼ and ½ mile distances will be altered based on parcel lines and local context which will refine boundaries of TOD category Step 5. TSAP received/accepted; TOD boundaries adjusted on Countywide Plan Map – not a map amendment

Hypothetical Example of Adjusted Transit Station Area and Transit Corridor

Questions?