Draft By Hilary H. Main Paul T. Roberts Sonoma Technology, Inc. 1360 Redwood Way, Suite C Petaluma, CA 94954 Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Air Quality and Health Scenario Stefan Falke, Rudy Husar, Frank Lindsay, David McCabe.
Advertisements

AREP GURME Section 1 Acknowledgments. AREP GURME 2 Section 1 – Acknowledgments The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) welcomes comments, suggestions,
Directive 2008/50/EC of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe These slides do not provide a complete description of the requirements.
Draft STI DWB By Hilary H. Main Paul T. Roberts Sonoma Technology, Inc Redwood Way, Suite C Petaluma, CA Prepared for the U.S.
Rider 8 Technical Workgroup Development. Introduction - Rider 8 Program for Ozone 74 th State Legislative Session authorized and budgeted to assist areas.
Causes of Haze Assessment Mark Green Desert Research Institute Marc Pitchford, Chair Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum.
An Update on the Activities of the Western Regional Air Partnership ‘WRAP v2.0’ Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. NW-AIRQUEST June, 2011.
Status of 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Program in Clark County Presentation to Air Quality Forum May 10, 2005.
1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
EPA PM2.5 Modeling Guidance for Attainment Demonstrations Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS February 20, 2007.
Attribution of Haze Phase 2 and Technical Support System Project Update AoH Meeting – San Francisco, CA September 14/15, 2005 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource.
Relevance of Transport Measures to Abate Air Pollution in Cairo Alan Gertler Division of Atmospheric Sciences Desert Research Institute Reno, NV.
Web-Based Decision Support Systems: Supporting Air Quality Monitoring Networks, Science, and Regulations Bret A. Schichtel, National Park Service Rudolf.
Satellite and Above-Boundary Layer Observations for Air Quality Management Workshop Jim Szykman (ORD/NERL), Scott Jackson (Region 8) and Terry Keating.
Ozone transport network Guoxun Tian CS 790G Fall 2010.
BRAVO - Results Big Bend Regional Aerosol & Visibility Observational Study Bret Schichtel National Park Service,
WRAP Technical Support System for Air Quality Planning, Tracking, & Decision Support Tom Moore, Western Regional Air Partnership, Western Governor’s Association.
The Visibility Information Exchange Web System (VIEWS): An Approach to Air Quality Data Management and Presentation In a broader sense, VIEWS facilitates.
IMPROVE Network Assessment Plans. IMPROVE Network Assessment Motivation: –EPA’s air quality monitoring budget is not growing, but their requirements are.
Adam N. Pasch 1, Ashley R. Russell 1, Leo Tidd 2, Douglas S. Eisinger 1, Daniel M. Alrick 1, Hilary R. Hafner 1, and Song Bai 1 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc.,
THE REGENTS PARK AND TOWER ENVIRONMENTAL EXPERIMENT REPARTEE 2006 & 2007 Roy M. Harrison University of Birmingham.
Introduction to Air Pollution John Atkinson and Dr. Mark Rood Environmental Engineering and Science Program Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
1 An Update on EPA Attainment Modeling Guidance for the 8- Hour Ozone NAAQS Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS/EMAD/AQMG November 16, 2005.
Ozone Overview John Koswan July 11, OZONE SIP DEVELOPMENT: TASKS COMPLETED TO DATE.
Effects of Pollution on Visibility and the Earth’s Radiation Balance John G. Watson Judith C. Chow Desert Research Institute Reno,
1 WRAP Policy Fire Tracking Systems Draft December 9, 2002 FEJF Meeting December 10-11, 2002 Jackson, WY.
Oil and Gas Workgroup Summary October 21-23, 2009 Denver.
” Particulates „ Characterisation of Exhaust Particulate Emissions from Road Vehicles Key Action KA2:Sustainable Mobility and Intermodality Task 2.2:Infrastructures.
MODELS3 – IMPROVE – PM/FRM: Comparison of Time-Averaged Concentrations R. B. Husar S. R. Falke 1 and B. S. Schichtel 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
The Use of Source Apportionment for Air Quality Management and Health Assessments Philip K. Hopke Clarkson University Center for Air Resources Engineering.
RPO Monitoring Issues by Marc Pitchford, Ph.D. WRAP Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Co-chair.
1 Neil Wheeler, Kenneth Craig, and Clinton MacDonald Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma, California Presented at the Sixth Annual Community Modeling and.
Causes of Haze Assessment Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.
1 The FASTNET Project Presented by: Sean Raffuse 1 Rudy Husar 2 Rich Poirot and Gary Kleiman 3 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc. 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
An Integrated Systems Solution to Air Quality Data and Decision Support on the Web GEO Architecture Implementation Pilot – Phase 2 (AIP-2) Kickoff Workshop.
Regulatory Requirements For Modeling. Air Quality Model Estimates Developing Air Pollution Control Plans Assessment of Environmental Impacts Projecting.
FASTNET Event Report: July4Haze, July 6, 2004 July 4, 2004 Aerosol Pulse Event Summary by the FASTNET Community Please send PPT slides or comments.
A)How is satellite imagery currently used in air quality research and management? a) who are the data users b) what data is used c) how is the data used.
Community Resources Assessment Training 4-1. Community Resources Assessment Training 4-2.
An Overview of EPA’s Quality Assurance Guidance for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data Data Analysis and Interpretation February 12 – 14, 2008, Tempe,
Current and Future Air Quality Issues Facing the States Bart Sponseller Air Management Bureau Director Joseph Hoch Regional Pollutants Section Chief NASA.
Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
OZONE CHARACTERIZATION STUDY Contractor Technical & Business Systems, Inc. Environmental Research Associates.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Portland August 2006 Suggested Changes to IWG Section 308 SIP Template.
Exceptional Events and Fire Policy Presented by Don Hodge, U.S. EPA Region 9 Interagency Air and Smoke Council meeting May 2, 2012 Disclaimer: Positions.
MARAMA/NESCAUM/LADCO Project: MARAMA/NESCAUM/LADCO Project: Source Apportionment of Air Quality Monitoring Data: Paired Aerosol / Trajectory Database Analysis.
Using GIS Technology for Emission Inventory and Air Quality Applications Prepared by: Tami H. Funk Lyle R. Chinkin Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma, CA.
Why PM Data Analysis by States? These are fragments that may be used somewhere in the Introduction section of the Workbook. PM Data Analysis Workbook:
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
Attribution of Haze Report Update and Web Site Tutorial Implementation Work Group Meeting March 8, 2005 Joe Adlhoch Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
1 RPO Data Analysis/Monitoring Grant Guidance Review Extracted from the EPA’s 3/5/02 RPO 4 th Year Policy, Organizational & Technical Guidance.
1 The Exceptional Events Rule (EER) Overview Tom Link EPA – OAQPS Geographic Strategies Group Westar Meeting, San Francisco, February 25, 2009.
Concepts on Aerosol Characterization R.B. Husar Washington University in St. Louis Presented at EPA – OAQPS Seminar Research Triangle Park, NC, April 4,
Application of NASA ESE Data and Tools to Particulate Air Quality Management A proposal to NASA Earth Science REASoN Solicitation CAN-02-OES-01 REASoN:
The Federated Data System DataFed R. Husar, K. Hoijarvi, S. Falke, DaFed Community EPA Data Summit, Feb. 12, 2008, RTP Non-intrusive data integration infrastructure.
The FAIRMODE PM modelling guide Laurence ROUIL Bertrand BESSAGNET
Concepts on Aerosol Characterization R.B. Husar Washington University in St. Louis Presented at EPA – OAQPS Seminar Research Triangle Park, NC, April 4,
Key Findings from May & July 2008 WRAP Technical Workshops September 30, 2008 Steve Arnold, Colorado DPHE & Bob Kotchenruther, EPA R10 (Co-Chairs, WRAP.
October 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Glossary1 Glossary and Acronyms This section provides definitions of acronyms and terms used in the workbook. A.
CPUC/CEC Adaptation Working Group Guido Franco Kristin Ralff-Douglas Team Lead Senior Policy Analyst Energy Commission Public Utilities Commission Climate.
Developing a Tribal Implementation Plan
Emerging Science EPA’s ORD Supports Regional Haze Program
Current and Future State of the IMPROVE Website
WESTAR Recommendations Exceptional Events EPA response
AoH Phase 2 Update AoH Meeting – San Diego, CA January 25, 2006
September Workshop and Advisory Board Meeting Presenter Affiliation
Tom Moore (WESTAR and WRAP) and Pat Brewer (NPS ARD)
A New Tool for Evaluating Candidate PM FEM and PM2.5 ARM Monitors
WRAP Overview and Role of Dust Forum
Presentation transcript:

Draft By Hilary H. Main Paul T. Roberts Sonoma Technology, Inc Redwood Way, Suite C Petaluma, CA Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park, NC February DWB PM 2.5 DATA ANALYSIS WORKBOOK

February 2001PM Data Analysis Workbook: Front Matter Disclaimer This report was prepared as a result of work sponsored, and paid for, in whole or part, by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the EPA. The EPA, its officers, employees, contractors, and subcontractors make no warranty, expressed or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this report. The EPA has not approved or disapproved this report, nor has the EPA passed upon the accuracy of the information contained herein. The mention of commercial products, their source, or their use in connection with material reported herein is not to be construed as actual or implied endorsement of such products. ii

February 2001PM Data Analysis Workbook: Front Matter Preface This workbook is a work-in-progress. As more data are available, analyses performed, reports reviewed, etc., the workbook presentations could be expanded and enhanced. The EPA welcomes reviewer’s comments, suggestions, and any example analyses, new databases, or additional references that could enhance the discussions. The reviewer should keep in mind that this workbook provides a framework from which to begin to perform analyses of PM 2.5 data and a launching point for new ideas concerning PM 2.5 data; it is not meant to show the only way in which to perform analyses. In addition to the hardcopy version of the workbook, the EPA is supporting a collaborative website located at to explore relevant analyses of the PM 2.5 data to be collected by the new National and State monitoring networks. The goals of this collaboration are to foster an environment for the sharing of ideas and to develop a “living” workbook detailing useful analyses of the PM 2.5 mass and speciated data. The website is a forum for the free exchange of fine particle data and information in support of these goals. The virtual community that shares this website consists of individuals from the federal EPA, regional, state and local air pollution agencies, industry and other groups. The hardcopy workbook represents a snapshot in time of the website. PM 2.5 data analysts are encouraged to visit the website frequently (and submit new items) for the most up-to-date information and analyses. Revisions to the hard copy workbook and the web site occur as funding is available. The dynamic part of the web site will be new postings of analyses by the user community. The web site is also accessible at. iii

February 2001PM Data Analysis Workbook: Front Matter Acknowledgments The EPA contractors for this workbook, Hilary Main and Paul Roberts of Sonoma Technology Inc. (STI), thank the many people who have contributed their comments, ideas, and data analysis examples to all versions of this workbook. Lara Autry, Jim Szykman, Bob Wayland, and Mark Schmidt (EPA); Rich Poirot (VT); and Rudy Husar and Bret Schichtel (CAPITA) were instrumental in pulling together and implementing the virtual workgroups, website, and workbook outline. Other major contributors to the workbook contents and review include:  Lyle Chinkin, Tami Funk, Pat Ryan, Cynthia Green, Nicole Hyslop, and Fred Lurmann (STI)  Lee Ann Byrd, Tom Coulter, Bill Cox, Shelly Eberly, Terence Fitz-Simmons, Peter Frechtel, Jim Homolya, Charles Lewis, and Ned Meyer (EPA)  Judy Chow (Desert Research Institute); Stefan Falke (CAPITA); John Graham (CT DEP); and Peter Scheff (University of Illinois, Chicago  and other members of the Status and Trends and Source Attribution work groups in iv

February 2001PM Data Analysis Workbook: Front Matter Table of Contents (1 of 5) FRONT MATTER Disclaimer ii Preface iii Acknowledgmentsiv INTRODUCTION1 Introduction2 PM Data Analysis Workbook Design Goals4 Why PM Data Analysis by Individual States5 Workbook Content7 Workbook Preparation Strategy8 Using the Workbook10 Motivating Examples12 Summary28 References29 BACKGROUND1 Emissions that Contribute to PM Mass2 Properties of PM7 PM Formation in the Atmosphere21 Atmospheric Transport of PM32 Objectives of the PM Monitoring Program 40 Critical Issues for Data Interpretation48 Summary50 References51 ENSURING HIGH QUALITY DATA1 The Importance of Data Validation2 Data Validation Procedures and Tools4 Data Validation Levels 5 Information to be Provided with PM Sampler Data 27 Are Measurements Comparable? 28 SubjectPage v

February 2001PM Data Analysis Workbook: Front Matter Table of Contents (2 of 5) ENSURING HIGH QUALITY DATA (Cont’d) National Contract Lab Responsibilities29 Data Access30 Sample Size Issues32 Summary33 References34 QUANTIFYING PM NAAQS ATTAINMENT STATUS1 Overview of the Standard2 Guidelines on Data Handling and Computation4 Tools for Design Value Computation and Forecasting15 Exceptional Events16 Network Design Issues17 Summary18 References19 CHARACTERIZING AMBIENT PM CONCENTRATIONS AND PROCESSES1 Overview 2 Temporal Patterns of Primary and Secondary PM Components5 Spatial Patterns30 Compositional Patterns49 Natural PM Events: Dust and Smoke52 Methods and Tools58 Summary64 References65 SubjectPage vi

February 2001PM Data Analysis Workbook: Front Matter Table of Contents (3 of 5) QUANTIFYING THE CONTRIBUTION OF IMPORTANT SOURCES TO PM CONCENTRATIONS1 Overview2 What is a “Source”?3 PM and Precursor Emissions6 Source Apportionment 12 Discerning Among Sources60 Discerning Among Source Regions67 Discerning Among Specific Source Influences69 Network Design Issues70 Decision Matrix for Source Apportionment71 Summary73 References74 SubjectPage QUANTIFYING TRENDS IN PM AND ITS PRECURSORS1 Overview of Trend Analysis2 Selecting Indicators3 Assessing Uncertainties in Trend Analyses4 Adjusting for Meteorology5 Discerning Trends12 Spatial Trends in PM19 Ambient and Emission Inventory Trends21 Tools and Methods for Trend Analysis22 Handling Missing Data24 Summary25 References26 vii

February 2001PM Data Analysis Workbook: Front Matter Table of Contents (4 of 5) EVALUATING PM AND PRECURSOR EMISSION INVENTORIES1 Introduction2 The Importance of Emission Inventory Evaluation3 Emission Inventory Development5 Emission Inventory Evaluation Tools and Methods 9 Using Engineering Judgment10 Bottom-up Evaluation12 Multivariate Techniques15 Top-down Emission Inventory Evaluation19 The Process of Evaluation27 Available Methods and Data28 Summary31 References32 SubjectPage viii IDENTIFYING CONTROL STRATEGIES TO MEET NAAQS FOR PM Overview2 Model Applications and Evaluation4 Applying a Modeled Attainment Test23 Using Weight of Evidence to Demonstrate Attainment25 What to Include in a PM 2.5 Attainment Demonstration26 Summary27 References28 USING PM DATA TO ASSESS VISIBILITY 1 Historical Prospective on Visibility2 Why is Visibility Information in the PM Workbook?3 Why is Visibility Important?4 What is the Definition of Visibility?6 SubjectPage

February 2001PM Data Analysis Workbook: Front Matter Table of Contents (5 of 5) USING PM DATA TO ASSESS VISIBILITY (Cont’d) Visibility Impairment and Regional Haze8 Visibility Measurements11 Relationship Between Light Scattering and PM What Pollutants Contribute to PM 2.5 and Light Extinction on Days when Visibility is Impaired?16 Long-term Trends and Seasonal Patterns in Visibility22 Identifying Sources Contributing to Visibility Impairment29 Transport and Transformation of Atmospheric Particles and Gases Affecting Visibility30 Available Methods and Tools32 Available Visibility Data33 Summary34 References35 SubjectPage ix GLOSSARY AND ACRONYMS1 REFERENCES1 SubjectPage