Creating Coherence Work Session: Part 1 Copyright © 2013 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Connecting Teacher Evaluation and Support.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Content Side of the ACPS Professional Learning Plan (PLP)
Advertisements

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Social and Emotional Learning in the Daily Life of Classrooms: Work Session—Part 1 Connecting Teacher and Student Social and Emotional Learning to Professional.
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
West Virginia Achieves Professional Development Series Volume II Standards-Based Curriculum.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Research Simulation Task in CTE Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous.
Professional Learning Communities in Schools Online Workshop.
Presented by Gayle Box, Associate Kentucky Adult Education.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Literacy Collaborative Achievement for Every Student.
Facilitators: Teresa Roe English Language Arts Division Manager, TDS Latahshia Coleman English Language Arts Instructional Facilitator, TDS Session Outcomes.
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
MYP Training Session 3 Design: Planning & Preparation
Session Materials  Wiki
Seeing the Destination So We Can Direct Others to It
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Connecting the Common Core State Standards and TPEP 1.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Experiences and requirements in teacher professional development: Understanding teacher change Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Ph.D. The University of Texas at.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
Expeditionary Learning Elementary School Meeting June 10,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Instruction aligned to Iowa Core: What does it look like? #CCSS.
TPEP and Washington State Learning Standards: Creating Coherence 1.
Student Learning Objectives: Considerations for Teachers of Career and Technical Education Courses Name Title Date 1 Copyright © 2014 American Institutes.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Utilizing the School Restructuring Resources Lauren Morando Rhim & Bryan C. Hassel Public Impact For Center on Innovation and Improvement.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.
Preparing to Teach a Module Session 2 August 2014 NTI.
Creating Coherence Work Session: Part 2 Copyright © 2013 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Connecting Teacher Evaluation and Support.
Measuring Educator Effectiveness: Implications for Improving Teacher Preparation Programs Lynn Holdheide, Deputy Director Office of Special Education Program’s.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
The College Board Standards for College Success CCSSO – SEC State Collaborative Alignment Study CCSSO-SEC Meeting and Content Analysis Workshop San Diego,
Creating Coherence: The ELA Common Core and the Instructional Frameworks Michelle Lewis and Terese Emry Puget Sound ESD
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
WELCOME WASHINGTON STATE FELLOWS! September 22, 2015 Jessica Vavrus, Assistant Superintendent of Teaching and Learning, OSPI Cindy Duncan, Assistant Superintendent.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, February 2014 NTI.
Building Curriculum: What does a Leader Need to Know? Principal Session.
Model Curriculum Units in Literacy and Humanities Strengthening curriculum, instruction, and assessment 2012 Curriculum Summit November 13 and 14, 2012.
PIIC/PLN UPDATES AIU3 Coaches’ Workshop September 11, 2014.
Elementary [166] K-8 [36] Middle [37] Secondary [1] High School [52] K-12 [1] Manhattan [53] Brooklyn [40] Bronx [18] Queens [176] Staten Island [6] 293.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Activity 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
PA Core Instructional Frameworks How and Why the Frameworks were Developed.
Kentucky Core Academic Standards Pike County Schools.
Equitable Access Implementation Support Copyright © 2015 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Using the Implementation Playbook to Support.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
SEA Strategies for Promoting Equity: SEA/IHE Collaboration on Teacher Preparation Lynn Holdheide, Center on Great Teachers and Leaders & Collaboration.
Year 2. 1.Name 2.What you teach 3.Hope or Fear Who makes up this Curriculum Team?
SIOP Implementation in Manatee County A Title I and Title III Partnership Presented by: Debra Estes, ESOL Coordinator.
Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool Making the Shifts in Classroom Instruction Ignite 2015 San Diego, CA February 20, 2015 Sandra
Curriculum that Brings the Common Core to Life Session 1 Elementary
Aligning Efforts to Improve Capacity
The Year of Core Instruction
Mentor Professional Learning, Development, and Assessment
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
OTL:NGP:EA:1217.
Designing Programs for Learners: Curriculum and Instruction
Mentor Professional Learning, Development, and Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Creating Coherence Work Session: Part 1 Copyright © 2013 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Connecting Teacher Evaluation and Support Systems to the Common Core [Facilitator Name(s)] [Month Year]

The mission of the Center on Great Teachers and Leaders (GTL Center) is to foster the capacity of vibrant networks of practitioners, researchers, innovators, and experts to build and sustain a seamless system of support for great teachers and leaders for every school in every state in the nation. Mission 2

 Overview  Activity 1: Who’s in the Room?  Activity 2: Four Corners  Introducing the Core Instructional Practices  Activity 3: Diving Into the Core Instructional Practices  Teacher Evaluation Framework and Professional Learning  Activity 4: Team Systems Review  Activity 5: District Huddle  Wrap-Up of Part 1 Agenda for Part 1 3

Participants will:  Build a shared understanding and language for addressing professional learning for the Common Core State Standards.  Elucidate and strengthen the connections between the Common Core; district teacher evaluation systems; and school and district professional development plans, offerings, and structures.  Identify any gaps in support for teachers’ instruction, and discuss concrete steps to address those gaps. Outcomes 4

Toward Coherent Instructional Support 5

[Insert selected questions for individual participants or teams from the Creating Coherence Facilitator’s Guide, pages 4–5.) Activity 1: Who’s in the Room? 6

 As statements are read out loud, move to the corner that best describes how you feel about that statement.  Once in your corner, discuss why you picked that corner. Activity 2: Four Corners 7

Statement 1  In my district, implementing the Common Core State Standards is like…. Activity 2: Four Corners 8

Statement 2  In my district, implementing the teacher evaluation system is like…. Activity 2: Four Corners 9

Question 1  What are some common themes, big ideas, key words, or terms that are associated with the Common Core State Standards? Teaching to the Common Core 10

Question 2  What do teachers need to do to get their students to meet the Common Core State Standards? Teaching to the Common Core 11

Question 3  How do teachers outside of English language arts (ELA) and mathematics integrate the Common Core State Standards into their practice and content area? Teaching to the Common Core 12

 Drafted by content experts from American Institutes for Research  Reviewed by an external committee of: Teachers Teacher educators Curriculum and assessment developers Introducing the Core Instructional Practices 13

Core Instructional Practices 14  Are a set of content-specific teaching practices that, if enacted by teachers or teams of teachers, should help all students attain mastery of the Common Core State Standards by the end of Grade 12.  Are based on research and practice.  Are developed in collaboration with teachers, curriculum experts, teacher educators, assessment developers, and other experts.  Are meant for use in systems-alignment work.

Core Instructional Practices 15  Are not a comprehensive set of professional teaching standards.  Are not the specific-learner “mathematical practices” or ELA/literacy “anchor standards” detailed in the Common Core.  Are not meant to be a checklist or one-size-fits-all strategy or prescribed approach to pedagogy.  Are not inclusive of all important teaching practices, competencies, skills, performances, and dispositions—such as organizing and managing classrooms, reflecting on or analyzing instruction for the purpose of improving it, building relationships with students, or collaborating with colleagues.

 Choose whether you are going to focus on Core Instructional Practices in ELA/literacy or mathematics.  Use a pen to underline key words or terms in the Core Instructional Practices.  Use a highlighter to indicate alignment between the words that the group just generated and the terms in the Core Instructional Practices. Activity 3: Diving Into the Core Instructional Practices 16 Handout 1: Common Core Connections

The Creating Coherence Workbook takes you step-by-step to find direct and indirect connections between the Core Instructional Practices, teacher evaluation, and the Common Core State Standards. Creating Coherence Workbook 17

1.Review your professional practice (teacher evaluation) framework. Identify direct or explicit connections. Identify indirect or implicit connections. 2.Review your professional learning plans, structures, initiatives, or offerings. Identify direct supports. Identify clear gaps. 3.Answer the three Questions for Consideration, and jot down any other thoughts in the Additional Notes. Creating Coherence Workbook: Steps in the Systems Review Process 18

Core Instructional Practice Professional Practice Framework Professional Learning Initiatives, Offerings, Programs, Supports MCIP-1Explicit Connections: Danielson Components: 1a and 1c Direct Supports  Common planning time across subject areas for teachers  State-sponsored online workshops that focus on designing lessons for particular Standards  Ongoing professional learning communities to review assessment data Implicit Connections : Danielson Component: 1f Example of Systems Review 19

 In your Creating Coherence Workbook, choose four Core Instructional Practices (two in ELA/literacy and two in mathematics) to review. For ELA/Literacy, see pages 5–18. For mathematics, see pages 19–28.  Complete the System Review pages for each chosen Core Instructional Practice. Activity 4: Team Systems Review 20

 In your district team, take 5 minutes to determine: One strong connection between each Core Instructional Practice and the district’s teacher evaluation framework or professional learning initiatives One potential gap between each Core Instructional Practice and the district’s teacher evaluation framework or professional learning initiatives Immediate next steps to complete the workbook (see page 31)  Choose a team member to share out with the whole group (10 minutes). Activity 5: District Huddle and Wrap-Up of Part 1 21

Read this brief for more in-depth information on creating meaningful coherence across three interdependent education reforms: Common Core State Standards, teacher evaluation, and professional learning. Available online: Creating Coherence Special Issues Brief 22

Advancing state efforts to grow, respect, and retain great teachers and leaders for all students More questions? Contact the GTL Center! 1000 Thomas Jefferson Street NW Washington, DC | 23