How the Measures of Effective Teaching Project has Informed Denver’s Teacher Support and Evaluation System.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.
Calera Intermediate School Parent – Culture Survey.
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Overview of the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System KY Council of Administrators of Special Education Summer Conference July 9th, 2013.
Teacher Practice in  In 2012, the New Jersey Legislature unanimously passed the TEACHNJ Act, which mandates implementation of a new teacher.
Teacher Evaluation Model
Denver Public Schools LEAP: Leading Effective Academic Practice American Youth Policy Forum: 3/14/
Educator Effectiveness from A to Z in a Small District CASE Presentation July 2014.
Preparing for End of Year (April 2013). School leaders will: Practice scoring Professionalism Understand the EOY Data Reports Understand available support.
DPS Educator Effectiveness: Stakeholder Engagement Lessons Learned February 6, 2013.
PROPOSED MULTIPLE MEASURES FOR TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS
LEAP Logistics. Essential Questions How does LEAP connect with other DPS initiatives? What instruments will be used during the LEAP pilot?
Developing and Supporting Highly Effective Teachers in Every Classroom Leaders of Learning Implementation Norman Public Schools Date.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
Individual Professional Development Plan
Philip Parker Administrator Training and Certification.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
SCPS is…  We are a high-performing district  We are focused on student achievement  We are committed to achieving excellence and equity through continuous.
NEW TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS CONNECTING TEACHER PERFORMANCE to ACADEMIC PROGRESS.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Making Student Growth Meaningful in the Elementary Classroom Bonnie Humphries & Carmen Gullion, Gallatin County Upper Elementary School.
June 19 th – PLC Day June 19 th – PLC Day Year In Review – Year In Preview District Road Map District Road Map TPEP Early Release Collaboration Early Release.
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
Recognizing Effective Teaching Thomas J. Kane Professor of Education and Economics Harvard Graduate School of Education.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
August 28, 2015 Long Island Independent and Peer Evaluation: Making the Work Matter.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation Pilot (TPEP). Objectives & Agenda What we’re going to learn General Pilot Details …. Who, What, How, What Then Explore.
Effective Instructional Feedback Mike Miles July 2009.
What is the Educator Development Suite? Provides teachers with the results of classroom observations and student perception surveys Suggests contextualized.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
Lake County Schools LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA. About Our District Lake County is a medium size district 40,000 students 2,700 teachers Mixture of rural, urban.
Transition to Smarter Assessment January Why did Delaware need new academic standards?
TAPCo. Full Staff Mtg March 17 th Agenda ● ADVANCE ● Regents.
EVALUATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Ohio TIF and OTES.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Council of Great City Schools, October 28, 2011 Dr. David Lussier Austin Independent School District 1 Redesigning the Teacher Appraisal System in Austin.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
July 2012 Session 12: LEAP Logistics. Essential Questions 2 What is the plan for LEAP in and how can I support the implementation? What are the.
Teacher SLTs General Format for Teacher SLTs with a District-wide Common Assessment The percent of students scoring proficient 1 in my 8 th.
FLEXIBILITY and the DENVER PLAN Objectives for today: Understand DPS’ future direction related to academic supports. Understand DPS’ approach to.
Teacher Evaluation Systems 2.0: What Have We Learned? EdWeek Webinar March 14, 2013 Laura Goe, Ph.D. Research Scientist, ETS Sr. Research and Technical.
Professional Growth Plan Committee Information Session January, 2008 Expectations for Classroom Observations by School Leaders.
SchoolNet Observation Tool Training Presented by Nicole Wolden and Stacey Sheehan-Block.
NYSED Network Team and Teacher and Principal Evaluator Training Kate Gerson -Senior Fellow Ken Slentz -Associate Commissioner June 2,
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Achievenj in 2016 and beyond
Public Consulting Group - PCG Education Helping Florida Charter Schools Successfully Transition to the Florida Standards 1.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
Sustainable Educator Evaluation and Compensation Supported by the Teacher Incentive Fund Improved educator performance = Increased student growth seec.nefec.org.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
Teacher SLTs
Teacher SLTs
Family Engagement Coordinator Meeting July 25, 2018
District Assessment System
KSDE Board Presentation Educator Evaluation Systems Update
Evaluating the Quality of Student Achievement Objectives
Teacher SLTs
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Teacher SLTs
Why do we have to change? Every student is taught by an effective teacher and every school is led by an effective principal. Fair and equitable statewide.
Teacher SLTs
The Teacher Work Sample: An Authentic Assessment
Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession EHHS Conceptual Framework
Presentation transcript:

How the Measures of Effective Teaching Project has Informed Denver’s Teacher Support and Evaluation System

1.Choose an observation instrument that sets clear expectations. High-Quality Observations

Use the Framework as a tool to strategically connect and focus on our district priorities – new standards, English Language Learners, and educator effectiveness. High-Quality Observations Student Behaviors ELLs New Standards Teaching Practices

2.Require observers to demonstrate accuracy before they rate teacher practice. July / August training Baseline and Mid-Year Inter-Rater Reliability Tests Upcoming: Observer Certification Process High-Quality Observations

3.When high-stakes decisions are being made, multiple observations are necessary. 4 Observations in the ’10-’11 Spring Pilot 3 Observations ’11-’12 Pilot Varies by teacher type in the ‘12-’13 Pilot High-Quality Observations

Observation Model Teacher Group School LeaderPeer ObserverTotal Probationary Teachers 1 Full + Partials & Walkthroughs 2 Full + Support for novice teachers 3 Full; Partials / Walkthroughs as needed Non- Probationary Teacher “Group 1”* - PO optional 1 Full + Partials & Walkthroughs Opt in for 1 or 2 Full (teacher or principal request) 1-3 Full; Partials / Walkthroughs as needed Non- Probationary Teacher “Group 2”* - PO included 1 Full + Partials and Walkthroughs - OR - Partials & Walkthroughs only and elect to utilize PO full observation data 2 Full 2-3 Full; Partials / Walkthroughs as needed * Group 1 and Group 2 rotates annually.

4.Track system-level reliability by double scoring some teachers with impartial observers. High-Quality Observations

5.Combine observations with student achievement gains and student feedback. High-Quality Observations

6.Regularly verify that those with stronger observation scores also have stronger student achievement gains on average. High-Quality Observations

Theress Pidick Director of Teacher Effectiveness Danielle Ongart MET/LEAP Project Manager Contact Information

Thoughts from a LEAP Pilot Teacher “I took the LEAP and I like that my observer saw me in an authentic state of real-life teaching. I truly enjoy the process of being reflective in my practice and I found that having someone in my room, unexpected, is a great way to do this. My involvement gave me the opportunity to share my experience with my observer, be more deliberate in my practice and take away from it some ideas that will help me become a more effective educator.” - DPS Pilot Teacher