1 District Insight on Supporting Principal Effectiveness What Are We Learning?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Advertisements

Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Purpose of Instruction
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Developing Principals One State’s Initiative Dr. Sharon Brittingham RTTT Project Director, Development Coaches Dr. Jacquelyn Wilson Director, Delaware.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
District Accreditation February 20, 2015 Colleen Rohowsky Office of the Director, DoDDS-Europe,
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
District Insight on What We Are Learning SCEE webinar, June 12, 2012 Principal Effectiveness.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
1 Council of the Great City Schools October 27, 2012 Succession Planning and Leadership Development.
Succession Planning Hosted By: John Nori NASSP Consultant.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Next Generation Professionals Opportunities, Practice & Outcomes Opportunities, Practice & Outcomes Interim Joint Committee on Education July 12, 2010.
Effective Principals in Our Schools Takes Commitment and Focus American Association of School Administrators Ann Clark, Deputy Superintendent March 29,
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Missouri Integrated Model Mid-Year Meeting – January 14, 2009 Topical Discussion: Teams and Teaming Dr. Doug HatridgeDonna Alexander School Resource SpecialistReading.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
Learning Together to Develop More Effective Principal Supervisors Will Miller President, The Wallace Foundation Principal Supervisor Initiative Bidders’
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Presented by: Barbara A. Deane–Williams, Superintendent Christopher Marino, Teacher Leader Susan Streicher, Principal Strengthening Teacher & Leader Effectiveness.
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
New Employee Induction Program
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,
Principal Supervision and Support Hosted By: John Nori Associate Director of Program Development, NASSP.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
0 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Focus groups conducted: ▪ Teachers ▪ Board of education members ▪ Principals ▪ Union leaders ▪ Parents ▪ BPS.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
SCHOOL LEADERS AS HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGERS Tony Milanowski & Steve Kimball University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
Effective Professional Learning Communities (PLC) Where do we begin at Myers Middle School? (Adapted from Professional Learning Communities at Work Robert.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Identifying and Developing Future Principal Supervisors September 29, 2015 Ben Fenton Gina Ikemoto.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building an Effective Evaluation System May 11-13, 2016 Jackie O. Wilson, Interim Director, Professional Development.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
From SAM to Principal an Organic Leadership Pipeline Presented By Rebecca Crawford and Shane F. Lis.
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Jackie Wilson Gary Bloom Jill Baker Kelly An Damaries Blondonville
Targeted District Review Report
Collaborative Leadership
STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE Board of Education May 2018
Presentation transcript:

1 District Insight on Supporting Principal Effectiveness What Are We Learning?

In 2011, The Wallace Foundation launched a $75-million five-year initiative to help six urban school districts develop a much larger corps of effective school principals and to determine whether this improves student achievement across the district, especially in highest needs schools. The six districts are Charlotte- Mecklenburg; Denver; Gwinnett County; Hillsborough County; New York City; and Prince George's County. The Initiative focuses on four key parts of the pipeline: 1.Defining the job of the principal and assistant principal. 2.High-quality training for aspiring school leaders. 3.Selective hiring. 4.Leader evaluation and on-the-job support. The Wallace Foundation Principal Pipeline Initiative 2

Almost every state and district in the country is attempting to develop effective systems that evaluate teachers and school leaders in order to improve instructional and leadership practice and increase student learning. Developing effective evaluation systems are, in fact, a high priority of both the field and the federal government. The key role of the principal in teacher evaluation is one of the most important lessons from the first generation of Wallace work. However, today’s principals are struggling to find the tools, time, resources, and capacity to effectively teachers and be strong instructional leaders. If districts hope to develop effective evaluation systems, then what kind of tools, processes, organizational structures and practices are available that can help principals effectively evaluate teachers and be strong instructional leaders? Problem Statement 3

Project The first step of this project was to better understand the contexts, promising practices and challenges related to the role of the leader in teacher evaluation. The main data source were pipeline district leaders who completed a 47-question survey and participated in post-survey interviews during January and February of Participants included Directors, Chief Technology and Information Officers, and their staffs. 4

Project Additional data included: CCSSO sent a 6-question survey to 24 states in the State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness during January and February of 2012 and received 13 responses. National SAM Innovation Project (NSIP) distributed a 17- question survey at the 5 th Annual SAM’s Conference in January 27-30, 2012 to 249 principals and received 105 responses. Interviews were conducted with Jackie Wilson, Delaware Academy For School Leadership and Carol Seid, Representative on the NAESP and NASSP Committee on Principal Evaluation. 5

Strong Voices “Think about what’s going to have the most impact on teaching and learning… What is really going to get to the heart of what that teacher is doing every day in the classroom with students.” (School District Administrator) “…the strengths include a grassroots effort involving teachers, principals, superintendents, parents, and education partners coming together to establish guiding principles, common language and understanding, as well as collective agreement on the purpose and intent of the effectiveness system.” (State Agency Administrator) “Throughout, what we have done is reversed the way we’ve always done business.” (School District Administrator) “You can’t fire your way to excellence, you have to develop it and our evaluation system lends itself to doing that.” (School District Administrator) 6

7 The System Matters! Compelling Vision Of Evaluation Stakeholder Collaboration Organizational Support Leadership Skills Instructional Leadership Time PLC Hierarchy of Evaluation Needs* Promising Practices, Challenges, and Ways To Overcome Those Challenges Exist At Every Level OF The System * With Apologies And Thanks To Abraham Maslow

The System Matters Theme #1: Develop A Compelling Vision Of What Good Evaluation Is And Why It Is Important A common understanding of the purpose of the new evaluation system Clear focus on teacher and leader effectiveness and student growth Strong integration between teacher evaluation and teacher and leader professional development Use of multiple measures, including increased formative assessments Utilize tools that increase the time that principals spend assessing instruction and developing teachers Adapt state evaluation instruments to the context of each district Collect student artifacts and student data as part of the evaluation Work with teachers to identify practices and behaviors in the classroom that make a difference 8

The System Matters Theme #2: Establish Clear Communication And Strong Collaboration Among All Stakeholders Include everyone (teachers, principals, community) in the design of the evaluation system Take time to pilot, obtain feedback, and engage in continual improvement Keep feedback loops open between principals, teachers, district, and other stakeholders Increase state and district collaboration so that districts have the local flexibility to recognize context and encourage innovation Work with universities to develop instructional leadership skills in the pipeline for aspiring principals 9

The System Matters Theme #3: Ensure Organizational Structures of Schools & Districts Support Principals Realign central office to support principals and protect principal time Increase the effectiveness of principal coaches and supervisors Streamline and make the evaluation process as efficient as possible Move some administrative duties to the central office Push school-based budgets to principals to give them more flexibility to focus the resources on their priorities Identify ideal ratio of principal/assistant principal to teacher to conduct evaluations 10

The System Matters Theme #4: Develop and Implement Effective Ways To Strengthen Leadership Skills Increase the effectiveness of principal coaches and supervisors Implement effective professional development for principals including strong learning communities and networks Provide on-going support rather than one-time training Develop common language of effective practices (shared framework and rubrics) Focus on calibration of observations so that there is strong inter-rater reliability across principals Ensure that principal coaches work with the principal in every stage of the evaluation, including providing teacher feedback For large school districts, train principals in small groups or networks Start small by focusing training on just a few indicators within the framework used to evaluate teachers 11

The System Matters Theme #5: Help Principals Manage Their Time Effectively Using the SAM process to successfully provide time and conditions for teacher to improve teacher practice Use tools and technology to make the evaluation process more efficient (e.g. Lawson, iPads, Truenorthlogic, Dashboards) Theme #6: Instructional Leadership 12

Leading Change In Evaluation: Need-By-Need Using this Framework of Evaluation Needs helps us begin to understand more about how states, districts and principals view the promising practices, challenges and ways to overcome those challenges at every level of the system. Clearly, there is much more we need to know about the promising practices and challenges throughout the system. 13

Three Main Challenges 14 The Lack Of A Compelling Vision Of Evaluation The Need For Stronger Leadership Skills Not Enough Time Lack of clarity and distrust about the purposes of evaluation Some principals do not know what effective instruction looks like Principals have large case loads and new evaluations are time-intensive How to measure student growth with validity & reliability in all grades/subjects Inadequate time paid to instructional leadership Principal’s time as instructional leaders is disrupted by management responsibilities and central office duties. Lack of alignment between state and district evaluation frameworks Implementing new evaluation and common core standards are over-whelming principals Training for principals on new forms of evaluation is time-consuming

Some Promising Practices 15 Compelling Vision Of Evaluation A strong emphasis on teaching practice and support Includes observation tools, protocols, rubrics In-depth feedback to teachers Includes measures of student growth Includes multiple measures of teacher effectiveness

Some Promising Practices 16 Leadership Skills Extensive, comprehensive and timely professional development for principals In-person and virtual support to principals Training and support for principal coaches and supervisors Supporting principals with strong learning communities and professional networks

Some Promising Practices 17 Time Use technology to help with evaluation Remove management duties to allow focus on instructional leadership Differentiated schedule for teachers receiving evaluations Implement the SAM process

Hillsborough County Public Schools Organizational SupportLeadership Skills Hire and train principal coaches to support and develop principals Provide weekly coaching with a released “full time” coach for first and second year principals Train principal supervisors in effective supervision to include professional development and evaluation of principals Provide monthly leadership institutes with new principals as part of a 2-year induction program Create an administrative support center to field calls to free up time for principal supervisors to be in schools and to help principals solve parental concerns Implement four development programs as part of our principal pipeline (Future Leader Academy, AP Induction, Preparing New Principals, and Principal Induction) with a focus on instructional leadership Plan regular calibration exercises for all observersMonthly Principal PLCs to discuss and learn from problems of practice Include central office in observation training to provide support to principals and use on-line system for capturing observation data Provide prescriptive professional development aligned with evalaution results and principal professional development plans 18

Charlotte-Mecklenburg School District Compelling Vision of Evaluation Leadership SkillsTime Multiple measures of teacher effectiveness being designed by teachers for implementation Content Pedagogy Hard to staff schools and subjects Professional Learning Community Student Learning Objectives Student Survey Teacher Observation Teacher Work Product Value Added Model Principal Induction Program for principals in their first five years Consultant Coach Education Leadership Institute Innovation Institute Leadership Capstone Strategic Coach for principals who need additional support Zone Support Consultant to help principals establish strategic plans that align with their evaluation SAM process implementation 19

Conclusions 20 We need to know more about the promising practices, challenges, and ways to overcome those challenges at every level of the system. We need to find strategies, tactics and tools to help strengthen the communication among states, districts, principal, teachers and others involved in evaluation. The perspectives of principals is crucial and we need to find ways to increase their participation in these conversations.

21 The Leader & Teacher Evaluation PLC NameTitleDistrict/Organization AnthonyDouglasDirector Office of Human Capital ManagementPrince George's County Public Schools BriggsKerriDirector of Education ReformGeorge W. Bush Presidential Center CanoleMary C.Consultant/FacilitatorCCSSO CannonJoanna Chief Strategic Officer for The Division of Talent, Labor, and Innovation New York City Department of Education ChapinFlorenceExecutive Director, Office of School Leader EffectivenessNew York City Department of Education CoplandMichaelSenior Program OfficerBill & Melinda Gates Foundation DavisFrancesChief Human Resources OfficerGwinnett County Public Schools EleusizovAieshaConsultantThe Wallace Foundation EversonKeithDirector of Employee Evaluation SystemsGwinnett County Public Schools GrossmanTabithaProgram Director, Education Division National Governors Association Center for Best Practices HendeeRoberta "Bert"IL Coordinator, SAMsAssistant Director, LUDA

22 The Leader & Teacher Evaluation PLC NameTitleDistrict/Organization JobeMaryAnnDirector, Leadership Development American Association of School Administrators LoeraPatriciaSenior Program OfficerBill & Melinda Gates Foundation MartinAnneDirector, School Leader EffectivenessNew York City Department of Education MorganRashidahDirector of Leadership StrategyCharlotte-Mecklenburg Schools ShellingerMarkDirectorNational SAM Innovation Project SteeleDavid Assistant Superintendent for Information and Technology Hillsborough County Public Schools SternJenniferExecutive Director, Teacher Performance ManagementDenver Public Schools VuKyProgram OfficerBill & Melinda Gates Foundation WinogradPeterFacilitatorNYC Leadership Academy

Implications for Your Work Small Group Discussions: Each group will spend 15 minutes reacting to what we just heard using the following guiding questions: 1.To what extent do you agree with the promising practices? Are there any you would add? 2.To what extent do you agree with the challenges? Any to add? 3.Do you have additional suggestions for ways to overcome the challenges? 23