Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology AFTA Coronagraph Recommendation Process Gary Blackwood, Exoplanet Exploration Program Manager.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Program Annual Technology Reports (PATRs) Technology Capability Gap Identification and Prioritization Process PhysPAG Meeting at AAS January 5, 2014 Mark.

Advertisements

Preliminary management plan for PACE SDT What are the Goals of PACE? The goals of the PACE mission are: 1-Extend key climate data records on ocean color.

CMB Decadal Study: What We Did Activities funded by NASA proposal: PI Steve Meyer + entire CMB community Workshops: The Path to CMBPOL: Upcoming Measurement.

Roadmap Integration Concept Mark Craig March 2, 2005.

1 Briefing to the CAA on the Terrestrial Planet Finder (TPF): Finding and Characterizing Earth-like Planets Zlatan Tsvetanov, NASA Program Scientist Charles.

Build to Cost Directions & Guidelines Peter Wizinowich SSC Meeting November 3, 2008.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology NASA Exoplanet Science Institute Design-a-Mission.

WMKO Next Generation Adaptive Optics: Build to Cost Concept Review Peter Wizinowich et al. December 2, 2008 DRAFT.

The Technical Community Understanding the Procurement Cycle LaShawn Davis Professional Intern Program Level II Presentation.

Technical Performance Measures Module Space Systems Engineering, version 1.0 SOURCE INFORMATION: The material contained in this lecture was developed.

Westminster City Council and Westminster Primary Care Trust Voluntary Sector Funding 2009/10 Voluntary Sector Funding Eligibility, Application Form Funding,

National Aeronautics and Space Administration 1 Traub Exoplanets: Astro2010 Survey Results, ExEP Proposed Community Actions (Joint presentation with Alan.

September 4, 2012 Michael Moore Program Executive Astrophysics Division Science Mission Directorate Princeton Astrophysics Community Meeting.

FY2010 PEMP Notable Outcomes October 15, FRA, LLC Board of Directors 10/15-16/2009 Office of Quality and Best Practices Performance Evaluation Management.

Program Status Physics of the Cosmos Program (PCOS) Cosmic Origins Program (COR) M. Ahmed Briefing to the PhysPAG January 8, 2012 AAS Meeting, Austin Texas.

Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology EXOPLANET EXPLORATION PROGRAM ANALYSIS GROUP #8, Denver CO Exoplanet Exploration Program Overview.

Toward an Exoplanet Roadmap. ExoPAG 8 Meeting Denver, CO October 5+6, 2012 Scott Gaudi.

Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.

Exoplanet Exploration Program Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer (LBTI) Operational Readiness Review (ORR) PI: Phil Hinz, UA PS: Rafael Millan-Gabet,

Roles and Responsibilities

1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Team Procedures Overview Guide Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health.

Activities of and Prospective Issues before the Committee on Astronomy and Astrophysics Report by David Spergel, CAA Co-Chair Disclaimer: These slides.

Exoplanet Exploration Program Starshade and Coronagraph Technology Gaps and Paths to Close Them Peter Lawson and Nick Siegler Jet Propulsion Laboratory,

Potentially Hazardous Asteroids: Characterization, Atmospheric Entry and Risk Assessment 9 July 2015 Ames Research Center Moffett Field, California IAWN.

Commitment Process Presented by Edward B. Luers October 2008 Interplanetary Network Directorate Deep Space Network.

Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology LBTI Meeting Goals Gary Blackwood Program Manager, Exoplanet Exploration Program Steward Observatory,

Surveillance Planning Team Initial Team Meeting January 9-10 NASA Headquarters Team Introduction Revision A Tom Whitmeyer - OSMA Jeff Cullen - Procurement.

Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology EXOPLANET EXPLORATION PROGRAM ANALYSIS GROUP #9, National Harbor, MD Exoplanet Exploration.

NMP EO-1 TECHNOLOGY WORKSHOP Section 2 Meeting Objectives.

Early Market Briefing Proposed tender for the Australia-Timor-Leste Partnership for Human Development (ATLPHD) 14 September 2015, Dili.

Proposal to Establish the Transportation/Land Use Connection Program Ronald F. Kirby Director of Transportation Planning October 18, 2006 Item 14.

BAD Building Technical Assistance Grant Program Overview Luke Elser Northern WV Brownfields Assistance Center January 16 th, 2015.

Modern Universe Space Telescope Visions 2003 Proposal Dennis Ebbets Ball Aerospace UV Optical Space Telescope Workshop STScI February 26, 2004.

John Peoples for the DES Collaboration BIRP Review August 12, 2004 Tucson1 DES Management  Survey Organization  Survey Deliverables  Proposed funding.

SOFIA 2 nd Generation Instrument Plans & Technology Development Paul Hertz SOFIA Program Scientist & SMD Chief Scientist SOFIA Science Steering Committee.

B. Review Board Charter and ORR Success Criteria Muthu Jeganathan Project Manager, JPL.

Physics of the Cosmos Program Analysis Group John Nousek Penn State University International Workshop on Astronomical X–Ray Optics Prague, Czech Republic.

MATT Report Feb. 20, Philip Christensen (Chair) Lars Borg (ND-SAG Co-Chair) Wendy Calvin (MSO SAG Chair) Mike Carr Dave Des Marais (ND-SAG Co-Chair)

1 Rita Sambruna Lia LaPiana NASA HQ NASA HQ The Science Definition Team for the astrophysics-focused use(s) of the Telescope Assets.

1 LCROSS Site Selection Workshop Introduction to Workshop and Overview of Process Dr. Jennifer L. Heldmann NASA Ames Research Center / SETI Institute.

Geospatial LoB: Lifecycle WG Update November 3, 2009.

Constellation Space Transportation Planning Office July 30, 2009.

ANN HORNSCHEMEIER Chief Scientist, Physics of the Cosmos Program NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 NMP 2-1 EW M ILLENNIUM P ROGRA NNMM Program Overview Dr. Christopher Stevens Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of.

Technical Standards NPR Presented to Technical Standards Working Group June 11, 2007.

1 Douglas Hudgins Exoplanet Exploration Program Scientist Presentation to ExoPAG#8, Denver Colorado October 5, 2013.

New Products from NASA’s Software Architecture Review Board

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology ExoPlanet Exploration Program Report on KISS.

National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee & Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Action Planning Workshop January 2007.

1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.

SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration February 27, 2013 Defining Potential HEOMD Instruments for Mars 2020 A Work in Progress... NOTE ADDED BY.

Mitigation & Education (MES) Subcommittee Update Chris Jonientz-Trisler, FEMA Co-Chair.

Export Compliance Laboratory Outreach Practices Rachel Skinner Office of Export Compliance Jet Propulsion Laboratory

ExoPAG 9: Introduction and Motivation ExoPAG 9 Meeting Washington, DC January 4+5, 2014 Scott Gaudi (ExoPAG EC Chair)

PCOS/PhysPAG Town Hall AAS-HEAD, Monterey Richard Griffiths PCOS Program Scientist April 9, 2013 NASA HQ Perspective.

IPSAG Telecon April 21, 2011 Shaul Hanany. Agenda Greetings ( 5 minutes) Background for IPSAG and connection to PhysPAG and APS (Shaul Hanany, 10 minutes)

MEPAG Meeting February 27, 2013 web meeting David Des Marais, MEPAG Chair NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This content has not been approved or adopted by,

A new College & Career Readiness Assessment for Nevada Recommendations from the evaluation of proposals received for RFP 3132.

Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Decision Process: Presentation to the STDT for the LUVOIR Surveyor Gary Blackwood Manager,

IV&V Facility 7/28/20041 IV&V in NASA Pre-Solicitation Conference/ Industry Day NASA IV&V FACILITY July 28, 2004.

Workshop on Science Associated with the Lunar Exploration Architecture - Earth Science Subcommittee Theme: A Lunar-Based Earth Observatory Science Observations.

5/8/2013 p. 1 10/25/13 Olivier Guyon, University of Arizona Ruslan Belikov, NASA ARC AFTA-WFIRST Coronagraph Fabrication and Specifications Plan Architecture:

& Eric P. Smith HST/JWST Program Scientist Astrophysics Division NASA Headquarters.

Preparing for the Future: NASA's Planning for the Decadal Survey

Preliminary Recommendations to the Tribal/Interior Budget Council

Implementing the Transportation/Land Use Connection Program

Coronagraph for NRO-WFIRST: A Way Forward

Instrument PDR Summary of Objectives

APS Meeting, Washington DC July 14, 2011 James Kasting, ExoPAG Chair

Presentation transcript:

Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology AFTA Coronagraph Recommendation Process Gary Blackwood, Exoplanet Exploration Program Manager Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology EXOPLANET EXPLORATION PROGRAM ANALYSIS GROUP #8, Denver CO October 5, Copyright 2013 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged

ExoPlanet Exploration Program AFTA Coronagraph Recommendation Why: In response to NASA Administrator’s guidance, and Astrophysics Director’s Implementation plan, AFTA must produce a compelling and viable mission concept including coronagraph within guideline budget and schedule for 2015 Mid-decadal review FY17 potential new mission start What: Use limited funds to focus design and technology investments Technology funds for AFTA will be directed not competed Choose primary and backup coronagraph technology 2 AFTA = Astrophysics-Focused Telescope Asset

ExoPlanet Exploration Program Background January : ExoPAG#7 endorses coronagraph for AFTA May: Steering Group formed by Program Office to anticipate possible follow- up actions to Administrator briefing May 30: NASA Administrator gives permission for AFTA pre-formulation activities including a coronagraph June 20: AFTA Coronagraph Working Group (ACWG) Charter signed by NASA Headquarters, identifying Members. July 23-25: AFTA Coronagraph Workshop (ACW)#1 held in Princeton Aug-September: Instrument Team builds analysis tools for comparative analysis. Advocates produce designs September 9,10: AFTA Science Definition Team (SDT) meeting September 16: Initial briefing by Program and Study Office to Technology Analysis Committee (TAC) September 25-27: ACW#2 held at JPL –Preliminary science requirements and evaluation criteria established October 5: Briefing to ExoPAG#8 on AFTA Coronagraph by Program Office 3

ExoPlanet Exploration Program Approach to Recommendation Objective: Recommend a primary and backup coronagraph architecture to focus design and technology development leading to mid-decadal review and new mission start Recommendation by ExEPO and ASO based on inputs from –SDT: Sets the science requirements –ACWG: Delivers technical FOMs and technology plans > Aim for the positive: a consensus product > SDT delivers science FOMs –TAC: Analysis of technical FOM, TRL readiness plans, and risks ExEPO and ASO recommendation to APD Director based on: –Technical and Programmatic –Musts (Requirements), Wants (Goals), and Risks –Distinguish description from evaluation APD Director will make the decision 4 ACWG = representatives of ExEPO, ASO, SDT, Community How do we define a successful outcome? FOM = Figure of Merit TAC: Alan Boss (Carnegie Mellon) Joe Pitman (EXSCI) Steve Ridgway (NOAO) Lisa Poyneer (LLNL) Ben Oppenheimer (AMNH) TAC: Alan Boss (Carnegie Mellon) Joe Pitman (EXSCI) Steve Ridgway (NOAO) Lisa Poyneer (LLNL) Ben Oppenheimer (AMNH)

ExoPlanet Exploration Program ACWG Membership These represent Program, Study Office, SDT, and Community: Additional consultants participate at request of Steering Group 5 Members: Jeremy Kasdin (Princeton U) Mark Marley (NASA ARC) Marc Clampin (NASA GSFC) Olivier Guyon (UofA) Gene Serabyn (NASA JPL) Stuart Shaklan (NASA JPL) Remi Soummer (STScI) John Trauger (NASA JPL) Marshall Perrin (STScI) Feng Zhao (NASA JPL) Rick Lyon (NASA GSFC) Dave Content (NASA GSFC) Mark Melton (NASA GSFC) Cliff Jackson (NASA GSFC) John Ruffa (NASA GSFC) Jennifer Dooley (NASA JPL) Mike Shao (NASA JPL) Workshop Organizers: Gary Blackwood (NASA JPL) Kevin Grady (NASA GSFC) Peter Lawson (NASA JPL) Steering Group: Scott Gaudi (OSU) Neil Gehrels (NASA GSFC) Dave Spergel (Princeton U) Tom Greene (NASA ARC) Chas Beichman (NExScI) Jeff Kruk (NASA GSFC) Karl Stapelfeldt (NASA GSFC) Wes Traub (NASA JPL) Bruce MacIntosh (LLNL) Charter

ExoPlanet Exploration Program Recommendation Criteria: Defining a Successful Outcome MUSTS (Requirements): Go/No_Go 1.Science: Does the proposed architecture meet the baseline science drivers? 2.Interfaces: For the baseline science, does the architecture meet telescope and spacecraft requirements of the observatory as specified by the AFTA project (DCIL 1 ) 3.Technology Readiness Level (TRL) Gates: For baseline science, is there a credible plan to be at TRL5 at the start of FY17 and at TRL6 at the start of FY19 within available resources? 4.Is the option ready in time for this selection process? WANTS (Goals): Relative to each other, for those that pass the Musts: 1.Science: Relative strength of science beyond the baseline 2.Technical: Relative technical criteria - See details 3.Programmatic: Relative cost of plan to meet TRL Gates RISKS and OPPORTUNITIES - See details 6 1 DCL = Dave Content Interface List

ExoPlanet Exploration Program Option Space Six architectures being considered: 1.Shaped PupilKasdin 2.PIAACMCGuyon/Belikov 3.Hybrid LyotTrauger 4.Vector VortexSerabyn 5.Visible Nuller – DAVINCIShao 6.Visible Nuller Coronagraph– Phase-OccultedLyon Some hybrids may emerge through the design process – in order to best satisfy the success criteria 7

ExoPlanet Exploration Program Evaluation Criteria 8

ExoPlanet Exploration Program Product of ACWG: Comparative Analysis 9 Coronagraph Advocates ASO Coronagraph Instrument Team ExEPO Chief Technologist SDT Designs Technical FOM Science FOM TRL Assessment Technology Plans Sensitivities / Other Optical Model Science Baseline Requirements SDT TAC ExEPO ASO APD DD Decision FOM = Figure of Merit ASO = AFTA Study Office ExEPO = Exoplanet Exploration Program Office You Are Here Technology Manager Technology Description Plan Viability

ExoPlanet Exploration Program Top-Level Schedule 10

ExoPlanet Exploration Program Acknowledgements This work was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. © All rights reserved. 11

ExoPlanet Exploration Program BACKUP 12The technical data in this document is controlled under the U.S. Export Regulations, release to foreign persons may require an export authorization.

ExoPlanet Exploration Program AFTA Coronagraph Workshop (ACW) Series Charter 13

ExoPlanet Exploration Program AFTA Coronagraph Workshop (ACW) Series Charter 14