HIGH GRADIENT MAGNETIC ALLOY CAVITIES FOR J-PARC UPGRADE Chihiro Ohmori, Osamu Araoka, Eizi Ezura, Keigo Hara, Katsushi Hasegawa, Akihiro Koda, Yasuhiro.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MA CAVITIES Chihiro Ohmori (KEK) 2009/7/1PRISM College1.
Advertisements

EMMA Upgrade: Slow Acceleration with Low-Frequency Cavity J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory 12 March 2010.
ISIS Accelerator Division
Muon Coalescing 101 Chuck Ankenbrandt Chandra Bhat Milorad Popovic Fermilab NFMCC IIT March 14, 2006.
Proton / Muon Bunch Numbers, Repetition Rate, RF and Kicker Systems and Inductive Wall Fields for the Rings of a Neutrino Factory G H Rees, RAL.
C. Ohmori ( KEK) 2009/7/2PRISM FFAG College.
Masahito TOMIZAWA and Satoshi MIHARA Accelerator and proton beam.
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura On behalf of PRISM Target Group Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
RF Cavity of CIS Xiaoying Pang Mar. 12 th, 2007 IUCF.
Development of new power supplies for J-PARC MR upgrade Yoshi Kurimoto (KEK) for J-PARC accelerator group.
Development of Superconducting Magnets for Particle Accelerators and Detectors in High Energy Physics Takakazu Shintomi and Akira Yamamoto On behalf of.
PAMELA Contact Author: CONFORM is an RCUK-funded Basic Technology Programme PAMELA: Concepts Particle Accelerator for MEdicaL Applications K.Peach(JAI,
Sergey Antipov, University of Chicago Fermilab Mentor: Sergei Nagaitsev Injection to IOTA ring.
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
FFAG-ERIT R&D 06/11/06 Kota Okabe (Kyoto Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.
The EMMA Project Rob Edgecock STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory & Huddersfield University.
The EMMA Project Rob Edgecock STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory & Huddersfield University *BNL, CERN, CI, FNAL, JAI, LPSC Grenoble, STFC, TRIUMF.
RF System for Bunch Rotation C. Ohmori ( KEK). Bunch Rotation in Longitudinal Phase Space Direction of Beam Momentum Injection to FFAG Large  p/p Apply.
Design of electrostatic septum for slow extraction from J-PARC main ring 2005, March 2nd ICFA septa workshop 2005 Acc. Lab., KEK M. Tomizawa, Y. Arakaki,
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy AGS Upgrade and Super Neutrino Beam DOE Annual HEP Program Review April 27-28, 2005 Derek I. Lowenstein.
FFAG-Workshop 2006, Kumatori, Osaka, Japan Injection study for 6-sector PRISM FFAG by using pulsed alpha particles Yasushi Arimoto, Toshiyuki Oki, Makoto.
1 C-Band Linac Development Satoshi Ohsawa 2004.Feb.19LCPAC.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
Y. Mori Kyoto/KEK FFAG C. OH FFAG: Fixed Field Alternating Gradient Strong focusing(AG focusing, phase focusing) Like synchrotron, but fixed field Moving.
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK)
Virtual Accelerator at J-PARC 3 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron H. Harada*, K. Shigaki (Hiroshima University in Japan), H. Hotchi, F. Noda, H. Sako, H. Suzuki,
KEK Participation in the LHC Injector Upgrades C. Ohmori, KEK/J-PARC M. Paoluzzi, CERN 10 PSB cavitiesPS Damper cavities.
Limits of MA cavity C. Ohmori KEK. What kind of limit? Voltage Field Gradient Temperature (cooling) –below 200 deg. C for long term (Hitachi Metal Co.).
1 Status and Plans at J-PARC Linac Kazuo Hasegawa J-PARC Center/Japan Atomic Energy Agency Collaboration meeting between CERN and J-PARC December 18, 2013,
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, 2001 Polarized Proton Acceleration and Collisions Spin dynamics and Siberian Snakes Polarized proton acceleration.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
1 Muon Acceleration and FFAG II Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC NuFact06 Summer School August 20-21, 2006.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
1 Design of Proton Driver for a Neutrino Factory W. T. Weng Brookhaven National Laboratory NuFact Workshop 2006 Irvine, CA, Aug/25, 2006.
1 Flux concentrator for SuperKEKB Kamitani Takuya IWLC October.20.
Recent RF Development at Fermilab Weiren Chou and Akira Takagi Fermilab, U.S.A. July 7, 2003 Presentation to the FFAG03 Workshop July 7-12, 2003, KEK.
Muon Beams for Particle Physics Ajit Kurup Winter Seminar March 2010.
Acceleration System Comparisons S. Machida ASTeC/RAL September, 2005, ISS meeting at CERN.
PSB C04 RF system Consolidation or upgrade? M. Paoluzzi – CERN BE-RF 11/23/20151.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Radioactive Ion Beams CW 0.5 MW (for protons) 1 GeV (for protons) p to U Chiara, Manuel, Adam, HuiMay 2011, CAS, Bilbao.
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
WG2 (Proton FFAG) Summary G.H. Rees. Proton Driver Working Group  Participants: M. Yashimoto, S. Ohnuma, C.R. Prior, G.H. Rees, A.G. Ruggiero  Topics:
J-PARC Accelerator and Beam Simulations Sep. 7th, SAD2006 Masahito Tomizawa J-PARC Main Ring G., KEK Outline of J-PARC Accelerator Characteristics of High.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
RF 1/33 ALBA RF system why, how and other questions Francis Perez.
Jan Low Energy 10 Hz Operation in DRFS (Fukuda) (Fukuda) 1 Low Energy 10Hz Operation in DRFS S. Fukuda KEK.
Early Beam Injection Scheme for the Fermilab Booster: A Path for Intensity Upgrade Chandra Bhat Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DPF2015, ANN ARBOR,
COMET Task Force 16/Oct/2008 J-PARC PAC meeting Satoshi MIHARA.
LLRF Activities at KEK/J-PARC Zhigao Fang 1 SuperKEKB 2 cERL (compact Energy Recovery Linac) 3 STF (Superconducting RF Test Facility) 4 J-PARC LLRF workshop.
J-PARC Accelerator Status and Plan  Introduction  Linac  RFQ and 400MeV energy upgrade  RCS  MR  1st step, achieve design performance (0.75MW) 
RF System for Bunch Rotation C. Ohmori ( KEK). Contents PRISM RF –Introductions –Present status –RF for 6 cell ring –Upgrade plan High Duty RF system.
ICFA mini-Workshop on Beam Commissioning for High Intensity Accelerators Yasuhiro Watanabe (J-PARC / JAEA) Tracking between bending and quadrupole families.
Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK J-PARC Upgrade Plan for Future and Beyond T2K.
Presenter : Yang Wu McMaster University Work conducted at IHEP.
FFAG Studies at BNL Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG’06 - KURRI, Osaka, Japan - November 6-10, 2006.
PSI, Zurich February 29 – March Session classification : Accelerator Concepts Tuesday, March 1, 2016 Summary Vyacheslav Yakovlev Fermilab, USA.
Horn and Solenoid options in Neutrino Factory M. Yoshida, Osaka Univ. NuFact08, Valencia June 30th, A brief review of pion capture scheme in NuFact,
A Compact FFAG for Radioisotope Production D. Bruton R. Barlow, R. Edgecock, and C.J. Johnstone.
PSI, Zurich February 29 – March Session classification : Accelerator Concepts Tuesday, March 1, 2016 Introduction Vyacheslav Yakovlev Fermilab,
High power beam operation at J-PARC: status and future
Considerations on RF systems of SPPC collider and its injector chain
Wideband, solid-state driven RF systems for PSB and PS longitudinal damper.
Electron Source Configuration
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
Parameters Changed in New MEIC Design
Presentation transcript:

HIGH GRADIENT MAGNETIC ALLOY CAVITIES FOR J-PARC UPGRADE Chihiro Ohmori, Osamu Araoka, Eizi Ezura, Keigo Hara, Katsushi Hasegawa, Akihiro Koda, Yasuhiro Makida, Yasuhiro Miyake, Ryotaro Muto, Kusuo Nishiyama, Masahiro Nomura,Toru Ogitsu, Hirokatsu Ohhata, Koichiro Shimomura, Akira Takagi, Taihei Shimada, Alexander Schnase, Koji Takata, Fumihiko Tamura, Kazuhiro Tanaka, Makoto Toda, Masanobu Yamamoto, Masahito Yoshii, Tomoya Minamikawa* J-PARC/KEK & JAEA *Fukui University

Contents Motivations to develop high gradient RF Development of high impedance core Next Steps – Plan of high power test – Design of high gradient cavity Summary 2011/9/82IPAC11

Upgrade Scenario of J-PARC Achieved to deliver; – 3 GeV 200 kW to MLF – 30 GeV 145 kW to FX( ) – 30 GeV 5 kW to SX We use 11 MA (Magnetic Alloy ) cavities for RCS, 6 for MR. – These cavities can generate higher field gradient than ferrite-loaded cavity. Machine stops by the earthquake. We plan to restart accelerator in this year. Key issues to increase beam power, – RCS: Linac upgrade to 400 MeV – MR: Linac +RCS upgrade, intensity-up and rep. rate To increase rep. rate of MR, upgrade of RF system is required. – Rep. time: 3 sec -> 1.2 sec – RF Vol.: 210 kV -> 500 kV+200 kV (2 nd ) – # of cavity: 6 -> 12 But, available spaces for RF are limited ! 12 systems. We need >50 % higher gradient compared to present MA cavity. 2011/9/83IPAC11

What is Magnetic Alloy (MA) ? Casting & fast quenching 2011/9/8IPAC114 In J-PARC, we use nano-crystalline Fe-based soft magnetic material, not amorphous. It has two advantages – Higher saturation field -> higher RF voltage, higher field gradient – Wide band (low Q) -> frequency sweep w/o tuning, simplifying LLRF Amorphous ribbons SiO2 coating for acc. use Making a large-size core Annealing (Crystallization) Production Procedure of MA

Contents Motivations to develop high gradient RF Development of high impedance core Next Steps – Plan of high power test – Design of high gradient cavity Summary 2011/9/85IPAC11

Improvements of Magnetic Alloy Characteristic of MA depends on Material – Mixture of nano-crystalline and amorphous – Behavior of nano-crystalline – Magnetically stable axis (easy magnetized axis) vs. RF flux Thickness – Core is formed by winding thin ribbon. – Thinner ribbon reduces the eddy current loss Packing factor – Usually 70 % – Space between ribbons. Insulation – To reduce eddy current loss If easy-magnetized axis of crystalline is perpendicular to RF flux, 2011/9/86IPAC11 Good characteristics ! If easy-magnetized axis of crystalline is parallel to RF flux, it is bad for RF use. Problem : There was no place to make a large-size high-impedance core. It was not sure if large core has same characteristics (Size Effects). 10 cm diameter core Ordinary MA

Development of High Impedance Core If no place to make large-size core, DIY.  We need;  Large-size oven to anneal  Large dipole magnet to install oven  High energy experiment uses large-size magnets. “Rental” Magnet for proof-of-principle.  In June and July after the earthquake, large size MA(FT3L) cores with high impedance were produced in J-PARC. MA(FT3L) core for RCS ( O.D. 85cm ) 2011/9/87IPAC11

Production System of Large Core  Cores were produced using old cyclotron Magnet in J-PARC hadron experiment Hall.  12 MA(FT3L) cores were produced in June and July (one core/ day) The area was controlled for safety First annealed MA(FT3L) Core for MR and support frame IPAC112011/9/88

Characteristics of high impedance core  Q f is given by core impedance divided by a core form factor /9/8IPAC11

Contents Motivations to develop high gradient RF Development of high impedance core Next Steps – Plan of high power test – Design of high gradient cavity Summary 2011/9/810IPAC11

Next Step High Power Test of Cores. – FT3L cores will be processed for cut core configuration – Cores will be installed in a present cavity for high power test Engineering Design of High Gradient Cavity – 3 Gaps to 4 Gaps – Core thickness from 35 mm to 25 mm – Re-design cavity to fit thinner cores Mass production scenario To understand mechanism 2011/9/811IPAC11

Field Gradient of RF Cavity for Proton/ion acceleration Development of FT3L large-size cores for accelerators will help to develop and improve other proton/ion rings. 2011/9/812IPAC11 Upgrade by FT3L RCS achieved two times higher field gradient than other RCS cavities MA cavity for MR

Cavity Upgrade Scenario  Core thickness: 35 mm->25mm  Impedance is 40 % higher  Present 3 Cell- cavity->4 Cell  Direct water cooling  Flexible cooling scheme. 2011/9/813IPAC11

Alternative design of RCS Cavities 2011/9/8 Direct water cooling scheme is used for J- PARC RF. Alternative design using forced air cooling becomes possible by high impedance cores. “Air cooling” cavity also fits present space. Air cooling scheme 14IPAC11

Scenario for mass production “Rental” Period of Cyclotron Magnet ended! – Production system was disassembled. Another magnet has been arrived to KEK. Magnet will be modified and mass production system will be assembled in J-PARC next FY to fit J-PARC upgrade scenario. 2011/9/815IPAC11

460 o C 470 o C 480 o C 490 o C 500 o C Temperature while annealing Curie Temperature of amorphous Not Magnetic Magnetic Trapped in magnetic field of nano-crystal Precession freely Transition from amorphous to nano-crystal μ beam Magnet FB collimator sample PMT Spectrometer μSR (muon spin rotation, relaxation, resonance) As the direction of decayed positron depends on muon spin, forward/backward asymmetry of PMT indicates muon spin in target material Muon makes precession if B-field applied. 2011/9/816IPAC11

Mechanism of High Impedance  FT3L : Annealed in B-field ⇒ Easy-magnetized axis is aligned  Easy-magnetized axis is across RF field.  Nano-Crystal makes an oscillation around easy-magnetized axis ⇒ Low loss  FT3M : Used for present cavity. Without B-field.  Easy-magnetized axis of some crystal parallel to RF field ⇒ Magnetic field in Nano- crystal repeat flips. Amorphous phase Crystallization Nano-crystalline RF ON Oscillate around easy- Mag. Axis B-field in crystal flips FT3L FT3M Direction of easy-magnetized axis is random RF B-field Turn B-field OFF Productionfinished 2011/9/817IPAC11

Summary We successfully made large-size high-impedance MA(FT3L) cores for RF cavities. Using these cores, a higher gradient cavity is designed. High gradient cavity is necessary to achieve design intensity of J-PARC. We will use 6 old and 6 FT3L cavities for 1.2 sec MR cycle. Replacement of 1-2 old cavities of RCS will be helpful for 1 MW. These high impedance cores might be also useful to upgrade other proton machines and/or to built new compact accelerators. 2011/9/818IPAC11

Limitation of RF voltage In Proton machine, RF voltage is limited by characteristics of magnetic material loaded in cavity. For a ferrite-loaded cavity, saturation of magnetic cores and heat loss were the main problems. For a Magnetic Alloy-loaded cavity, heat loss is the main problem. Using MA cavity, RCS becomes compact ! For high-rep. MR, high-gradient MA cavity can solve shortage of space. To increase RF voltage, improvement of material is effective ! 2011/9/819IPAC11