XTCAV X-Band Transverse Deflecting Cavity Project Overview Patrick Krejcik Yuantao Ding, Joe Frisch

Layout of the Undulator to Dump Beam Line

OTRDMP Simulation example - Yuantao Ding low charge 20pC soft x-rays head FEL ON FEL OFF X-ray “measurement” Current “measurement”

XTCAV Proposed Location PenetrationPenetration to B921

Conceptual sketch of the x-band structure and waveguide on the beam line.

Structure Fabrication One structure built and tested Second structure Support stand, beam line and vacuum installation ~$390k ItemShop labor Direct laborM&S Program supportIndirectsTotal Fab 2nd deflector structure$98,448$16,800$10,000$1,680$61,743$188,671 1 m

B921 and undulator tunnel elevation view showing penetration for waveguide to the XTCAV

Excerpt from the floor plan of B921 with proposed modulator and klystron locations

B921 floor space for modulator and klystron Penetration

B921 cross-section showing available elevation with respect to cable trays and ceiling

Commercially available Modulator installation housing the SLAC XL4 klystron. Much better pulse stability than SLAC modulator: 30 ppm versus 100 ppm Complete system houses klystron, magnet, oil tank and output transformer EPICS controls interface “turn-key” system purchase price ~$650k LCLS motivated to evaluate this modulator for other applications e.g. L1S Also purchased by LLNL, Trieste, CLS, CERN …

Output from the klystron goes through a mode converter to circular waveguide for lower power loss Fabrication and installation of waveguide components: including converters splitters, couplers, loads and vacuum components, all based on existing SLAC X- band designs ~$365k

LLRF Phase reference – Share the low-noise 476 MHz heliax from the linac with the beam phase monitor – Beam based feedback corrects slow drifts 476 MHz Cavity XTCAV

EPICS Controls LLRF - (next slide) Vacuum - status of new pumps, gauges and valves Profile Monitor OTRDMP - present camera is only 10 Hz (upgrade?) Feedback – orbit at BPMUE1, BPMUE2 and BPMUE3 after the XTCAV to stabilize the RF phase of cavity and keep the bunch at the zero phase crossing PPS – Modulator interlocked to Access state – Review to show existing BTMs give adequate coverage BCS – New spoiler at end of XTCAV – Review to show existing PICs give adequate coverage MPS – Set threshold of MPS BLMs lower than BCS PICs

Why PPS, BCS and MPS are important Beam at the wrong phase can be kicked by up to 10 mrad – Lowest energy beam, highest amplitude RF, phase at crest Beam leaves the beam pipe within the XTCAV already Existing safety systems have large acceptance angle.e.g. BTMs

LLRF EPICS Controls Use LCLS PADs and PACs with EPICS IOC and BSA Use either MKSU II for klystron and modulator interlocks, or Scandinova integrated controls In the linac CAMAC PDU still provides timing to the modulator via the PIOP module Consider the LLRF control system as a whole: – The XTCAV will be the first stand-alone RF station with EPICS-only controls – There are choices of platforms on which to implement EPICS Linac Phase I upgrade with EPICS driver for CAMAC Replace CAMAC modules with VME modules and EPICS timing, similar to existing EPICS architecture. Develop a new mTCA platform – Need to be able to this in < 2 years – The choice we make here will set a precedent for the LCLS-2 injector project

Cost Summary SystemEstimated Cost Including Indirects Fabrication of second XTCAV structure $126,928$188,671 Mechanical and vacuum installation$390,240 Waveguide system$365,200$564,900 Klystron and focusing magnet$492,227$690,675 Modulator and klystron tank$745,000$855,000 Electrical AC Service$115,000$168,130 Cooling systems$128,000$157,564 LLRF Drive system$271,500$334,295 LLRF controls$352,000$505,027 PPS, BCS and MPS$100,000$150,000 Profile Monitor$20,000$30,000 Total$3,106,095$4,034,502 Including 25% Contingency $5,043,128