M. Ferianis feb UCLA Overview of FERMI Diagnostics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update of RTML, Status of FNAL L-band and CLIC X-band BPM, Split SC Quadrupole Nikolay Solyak Fermilab (On behalf of RTML team) LCWS2010 / ILC 10, March.
Advertisements

Christopher Gerth, Michael Röhrs, Holger Schlarb DESY Hamburg Optics for Diagnostic Section BC1 in the European XFEL.
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
ILC RF phase stability requirements and how can we demonstrate them Sergei Nagaitsev Oct 24, 2007.
Patrick Krejcik LCLS April 29, 2004 Breakout Session: Controls Physics Requirements Overview P. Krejcik.
P. Emma, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P. Emma LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector Commissioning September Injector Commissioning Plans C.Limborg-Deprey Gun exit measurements.
SLAC XFEL Short Bunch Measurement and Timing Workshop 1 Current status of the FERMI project (slides provided by Rene Bakker) Photoinjector laser system.
P. Emma, SLACICFA XFEL July 29, 2004 Electron Bunch Measurements with a Transverse RF Deflector P. Emma ICFA XFEL 2004 Workshop July 29, 2004 ICFA.
Bob Lill Undulator Cavity BPM System April 16, 2007 Undulator Cavity BPM Status.
Stefan Simrock 3 rd LC School, Oak Brook, IL, USA, 2008, Radio Frequency Systems 1 Timing and Synchronization S. Simrock and Axel Winter DESY, Hamburg,
Siegfried Schreiber, DESY The TTF Laser System Laser Material Properties Conclusion? Issues on Longitudinal Photoinjector.
Review of the European XFEL Bunch Compression System Summary Torsten Limberg.
TESLA Test Facility TTF II Review Meeting, Salzau, January 2003 Introduction to the Electron Beam Diagnostic Session Dirk Nölle DESY, MPY
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
SPPS, Beam stability and pulse-to-pulse jitter Patrick Krejcik For the SPPS collaboration Zeuthen Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-ray FEL’s August.
XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Christopher Gerth, Michael Röhrs, Holger Schlarb DESY Hamburg Optics Layout of the Diagnostic Sections.
LCLS Accelerator SLAC linac tunnel research yard Linac-0 L =6 m Linac-1 L  9 m  rf   25° Linac-2 L  330 m  rf   41° Linac-3 L  550 m  rf  0°
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
Measurements of the X-ray/pump laser pulse timing Valery Dolgashev, David Fritz, Yiping Feng, Gordon Bowden SLAC 48th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop.
Winni Decking Summary of the 1 st Beam Line Review Meeting Injector ( ) Review the status of: beam dynamics understanding and simulations.
P. Krejcik LINAC 2004 – Lübeck, August 16-20, 2004 LCLS - Accelerator System Overview Patrick Krejcik on behalf of the LCLS.
Lessons Learned From the First Operation of the LCLS for Users Presented by Josef Frisch For the LCLS March 14, 2010.
김 귀년 CHEP, KNU Accelerator Activities in Korea for ILC.
What did we learn from TTF1 FEL? P. Castro (DESY).
X-band Based FEL proposal
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
Applications of transverse deflecting cavities in x-ray free-electron lasers Yuantao Ding SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory7/18/2012.
B. Marchetti R. Assmann, U. Dorda, J. Grebenyuk, Y. Nie, J. Zhu Acknowledgements: C. Behrens, R. Brinkmann, K. Flöttmann, M. Hüning,
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
Summary of SPARC first-phase operations
Beam dynamics for an X-band LINAC driving a 1 keV FEL
Robert Bosch, Kevin Kleman and the WiFEL team
Status of the MAX IV Short Pulse Facility
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
Slice Parameter Measurements at the SwissFEL Injector Test Facility
Timing and synchronization at SPARC
WP11: electron and proton beam testing
6D Characterization of Witness Beam before Injection in LWFA
Paul Scherrer Institut
Electronics requirements for special diagnostics for the XFEL
WG2 Summary: Diagnostics, measurements, and commissioning
Revised Commissioning Strategy
UCLA/ATF chicane compression experiments
Experience with diagnostics
F. Villa Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati - LNF On behalf of Sparc_lab
Re-circulating Linac Option
What did we learn from TTF1 FEL?
Electron Source Configuration
Diagnostics overview and FB for the XFEL bunch compressors
UCLA/ATF chicane compression experiments
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
FEL-Beam-Dynamics Group
LCLS RF Stability Requirements
Linac/BC1 Commissioning P
Linac (WBS 1.2.2) Vinod Bharadwaj April 23, 2002
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
Linac Diagnostics Patrick Krejcik, SLAC April 24, 2002
Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P
Breakout Sessions SC1/SC2 – Accelerator Physics
LCLS FEL Parameters Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL April 23, 2002
LCLS Injector/Diagnostics David H. Dowell, SLAC April 24, 2002
Breakout Session SC5 – Control Systems
Diagnostics RF and Feedback
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
Undulator Cavity BPM Status
Diagnostics overview Beam profile monitors Cherenkov radiators Summary
Proposal for Smith-Purcell radiation experiment at SPARC_LAB
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
Electron Optics & Bunch Compression
Presentation transcript:

M. Ferianis feb UCLA Overview of FERMI Diagnostics

M. Ferianis feb UCLA ELETTRA

M. Ferianis feb UCLA FERMI footprint

M. Ferianis feb UCLA FERMI main parameters

M. Ferianis feb UCLA FERMI layout (...work in progress) Laser heater X-band linearizer spreader Energy/  H, V collimators dump

M. Ferianis feb UCLA  accurate photo-injector characterisation: emittance, charge profile, energy spread  seeded FEL scheme: whole bunch / fresh bunch (bunch core) calls for slice measurements: longitudinal charge profile, emittance, energy spread  transverse and longitudinal overlap between e - beam and laser high resolution BPM and bunch arrival monitors shot-to-shot feedbacks  stability of output FEL radiation  mm to sub-mm bunch length; currently two options: medium bunch: L B = 0.21mm (700fs)short FEL pulse long bunch: L B = 0.57mm (1.9ps)long FEL pulse Guidelines of diagnostics for FERMI

M. Ferianis feb UCLA Some relevant beam parameters for diagnostics *calculated assuming a normalized emittance of 1.2 mm mrad Medium Bunch Energy [MeV] Charge [nC] Bunch Length [ps / mm, FWHM] Transverse Size* 3x  x, v [mm] Entrance BC / Exit BC / Entrance BC / Exit BC / Long Bunch Entrance BC / Exit BC / Entrance BC / Exit BC /

M. Ferianis feb UCLA  Injector diagnostic beamline  BC1 diags  1 st RF 220MeV (down-stream BC1)  BC2 diags  2 nd RF 1.2 GeV  pre-FEL diagnostic station (downstream the spreader)  post-modulator diagnostic station  intra-radiator diagnostics (multipurpose pop-ins)  post radiator diagnostic station (FEL diags) Guidelines of diagnostics for FERMI

M. Ferianis feb UCLA Currently addressed issues on Diagnostics  review of FERMI parameters for diags.  the ELETTRA: dynamically growing...  overview of main FERMI diagnostics and associated measurements  integration of diagnostics into the machine, i.e. defining: dedicated machine optics vacuum chamber x-sections alignment strategy RF power needs for diags optical clock (laser pulse)  Conceptual Design Report write-up

M. Ferianis feb UCLA GunS0A/B Laser Heater X LINAC1 BC1 BC2 LINAC2 LINAC3LINAC4 SPRD FEL1 FEL2 Gun / injector Diagnostics Gun: Energy/energy spread Charge Spot size Position Bunch length Thermal emittance

M. Ferianis feb UCLA GunS0A/B Laser Heater X LINAC1 BC1 BC2 LINAC2 LINAC3LINAC4 SPRD FEL1 FEL2 Laser heater based diagnostics 775 nm seed laser derived from 1550 nm timing signal 120 kW, 10 ps Cross-polarized 5-period undulators Matching quads into heater Matching quads into linac YAG scree n, BPM Laser Heater : Electron beam timing relative to optical pulse Electron beam current profile Slice emittance W.Graves, MIT S.Spampinati, ELETTRA

M. Ferianis feb UCLA Energy, Energy jitter, Vertical slice emittance: BMP –collimator -screen Bunch length monitor: CSR output power detection to feedback loop Micro-bunching: CSR output for detection by THz spectrometer. Bunch arrival time measurements: fs Streak camera (ref pulse) wide band ring electrode with EO acquisition Bunch length, compressor tuning: BC1:1 st RF Deflector, streak camera for OSR BC2:2 nd RF deflector, EO sampling GunS0A/B Laser Heater X LINAC1 BC1 BC2 LINAC2 LINAC3LINAC4 SPRD FEL1 FEL2 BC1 & BC2 Diagnostics

M. Ferianis feb UCLA Diagnostics station at the end of linac : Vertical and Horizonthal RF deflecting cavity: Slice emittance CSR effect on horizonthal emittance Slice Energy Spread EOS bunch arrival time monitor: Bunch arrival time Arrival time jitter Bunch length Features: single shot (SLAC spatial convertion scheme, 100fsec resolution, MLO or SEED laser pulses as a probe) Overview of Elattra Diagnostics GunS0A/B Laser Heater X LINAC1 BC1 BC2 LINAC2 LINAC3LINAC4 SPRD FEL1 FEL2 DIAGS

M. Ferianis feb UCLA FEL 1&2 : Entrance of modulators: X,Y position and divergence: high precision cavity BPM Intra - radiators: e-beam and FEL radiation position and spot size: pop-in station with YAG screens e-beam X,Y position: cavity or button BPM microbunching and power growth: OTR/CTR monitorinig during operation CDR Exit of last radiator FEL radiation: (under development by user group): Single shot Spectral distribution monitor FEL radiation arrival time by respect to user laser determined by cross correlation techniques (De Silvestri) and advanced streak cameras. Overview of Elattra Diagnostics GunS0A/B Laser Heater X LINAC1 BC1 BC2 LINAC2 LINAC3LINAC4 SPRD FEL1 FEL2 DIAGS

M. Ferianis feb UCLA E B = 240 MeV;  n =1.5 mm mrad; a=20 mm  v g /c= (  L=1m =100ns) a=12.5 mm;  v g /c=0.0123(  L=1m =270ns) f RF =2.998 GHz;  D =45 m;  S =45 m;  =90 deg; Traveling wave deflector performances for low energy case Long bunch: 1.5 mm Short bunch: 0.4 mm L def =2m

M. Ferianis feb UCLA E B = 1.2 GeV;  n =1.5 mm mrad; a=20 mm,  =1   F =0.85  s a=12.5 mm,  =1   F =1.0  s f RF =2.998 GHz;  D =45 m;  S =45 m;  =90 deg; Standing wave deflector: performances for high energy case

M. Ferianis feb UCLA Cavity BPM in collaboration with M Poggi, INFN PD Beam pipe radius: to be defined according to Vacuum & Z beam current value R=6mm; ID gap (vacuum side) calls for R=3.5mm Extraction waveguide radial position: to be checked with simulation Optimum position for the RF connecotr on the waveguide Signal amplitude dependance on Q bunch (analytical eval.) Achievable mechanical accuracy on prototype: 10  m Setting up the RF test bench (Network BPM rigidly fixed to support coaxial moving wire, over ±1mm, acuracy and reproducibility <2  m prototype issues: no UHV, flanged + RF sliding contacts, equipped with SMA connectors (DC to 18 GHz)

M. Ferianis feb UCLA Principle: Isolated impedance-matched Ring Electrode installed in a „thick Flange“ Broadband, Position independent Signal One installed after the Gun, each magnetic Chicane (both BCs, the Collimator + before Undulator) BC´s: Energy Fluctuations -> Phase Fluctuations TOF Measurement: Resolution ≈ 0.2° or 0.4 ps Fast timing signals with sub ps resolution Very simple design of pickup Two output signal provided (left & right) ~550 mV/ps Phase Monitor Phase monitor (collaboration with Desy) Courtesy: H. Schlarb, F.Löhl

M. Ferianis feb UCLA EO acquisition of the wide band ring electorde signal ~ 1.3 GHz DAC DOOCS Master Laser Oscillator piezo- fiber- stretcher piezo- controller ~ ~ ~ 1.3 GHz10 GHz 200 MHz ~ ~ ~ 81 MHzlimiter ADC 100 MHz 12 / 14 Bit clock trigger DOOCS phase monitor EOM 200 MHz bias- voltage 10 kHz VM Courtesy: H. Schlarb, F.Löhl ~550 mV/ps 12 dB MLO RF master BPhM Mach-Zehnder interferometer Later: limiter

M. Ferianis feb UCLA Impact from vacuum chamber sections TypeDimensions LinaccircularD=30 mm CompressorsrectangularW=60mm, H=30mm UndulatorellipticalH=7mm W= tbd (vacuum)

M. Ferianis feb UCLA Timing and Synchronization