CDOs – the flightdeck perspective Captain Spencer Norton AOA Environment Conference 28 th April 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Course Schedule three Assessment Scenarios Discussion Groups Discussion Groups.
Advertisements

Contribution of planning fuel burn off to reduce pollution.
Critical Pts & Pts of No Return
Stabilized Constant Descent Angle NPA’s
VFR Navigation The Standard Closing Angle Technique
Continuous Climb Operations ( CCO )
Lecture X: Wind Factors
Continuous Descent Operations ( CDO )
April 22, 1994 Bluefield, WV n EMS Bell 412 n IFR n 2 pilots n Impacted terrain 7 mi. southwest of BLF n 4 fatal.
Lecture 3: Take-off Performance
AIRCRAFT HANDLING Part 6 General Flying.
#4908.If, while in level flight, it becomes necessary to use an alternate source of static pressure vented inside the airplane, which of the following.
Performance ATC Chapter 2.
Continuous Climb Operations ( CCO )
Instrument Ground Training Module 4 & 5
Class #10 E6B Flight Computer. Content of lesson w Time-distance problems w Fuel consumption w Statute-to-nautical conversion w True Airspeed w True Altitude.
Approach Charts and Procedures
Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.
SEARCH PLAN VARIABLES CG Addendum Section H.5.
Predicting Performance
Airport Approach Simulation
Aircraft Performance Charts Private Pilot Ground School
TCAS Basics Capt Craig Hinkley. 2 TCAS HISTORY  Two planes collided over the Grand Canyon  Alternative airborne version using transponders.
Aerodynamic Theory Review 3
Property of Lear Siegler. NAVIGATIONAL COMPUTER SLIDE RULE.
Rasta – Dec 05 Straight-Ins Abeam VFR Entry “CS, Request Straight-In” Clear for Instrument Approaches “Below 150, Gear Clear” Lower Gear and Flaps “Physically.
Stabilized Constant Descent Angle NPA’s
AIR NAVIGATION Part 2 Distance Speed & Time.
Lecture 7: DESCENT PERFORMANCE
En Route Performance CPL Performance.
The Triangle of Velocities
Rob Eagles Director ASIA PACIFIC Safety, Operations & Infrastructure.
Lecture 5: Climb PERFORMANCE
Property of Lear Siegler
Right Triangles and Trigonometry
Lecture 3: Air Traffic Control Tower
Navigation Ground School CI Pesto. Topics of Discussion Today Time, Speed, and Distance Calculations Solving TVMDC Questions 1 in 60 Rule E6B Calculations.
knots WIND DESIRED TRACK HEADING HEADING VS TRACK.
AIR FORCE ADVANCED INSTRUMENT SCHOOL Procedures & Techniques I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e.
Circling Pattern (Left Side Camera) Worksheet Target Coordinates______________ Altitude__________ Airspeed________ Time of Day___________________ Weather______________________.
E6B Flight Computer VECTORS
Navigation.
Measures and Models of Aviation Display Clutter June, 2009 NASA LaRC | NC State University | APTIMA.
SQUARES, TANGENTS, and Mountain Operations Richard Pearl.
Review Chapter 4-8. Departure and Arrival Charts DPs, STARs and visual approaches are routinely assigned by ATC DPs and STARs are issued to simplify clearance.
NAV 2 FLIGHT PLANNING. WEATHER TERMINOLOGY IFR: less than 1000 ft3 miles MVFR: ft3-5 miles VFR: greater than 3000 ftbetter than 5.
NAV 5 Vectors, Enroute, CRFI. GIVEN: Wind 30 Kts. Track 273º True Airspeed 124 Kts. FIND: Heading ____________ Ground Speed ____________ Practice.
Aircraft Speeds & Units
Meteorology 6. MINI – REVIEW - first 15 slides – E6B TRIANGLE of VECTORS – FLIGHT PLANNING – AIRCRAFT POH TABLES – DRIFT – WINDS / CORIOLIS – UPPER WIND.
Lecture 6: CRUISE PERFORMANCE
Lecture 11: Flight Management System (FMS)
Performance Charts.
Potential Safety Benefits of RNP Approach Procedures
AIR NAVIGATION Part 4 Magic Numbers.
Search Effort. The Balancing Act Limited Resources Limited Resources Planning Time in Search Area – how much time does it take to complete a search assignment?
VNY FSDO FAASTeam Representative
Arrival Charts and Procedures
XC 2: Flying Further and Faster. The Plan The polar curve and performance Flying Further – maximising the glide Flying faster – in theory In practice.
Distance Measuring Equipment (DME)
Distance Measuring Equipment (DME)
“CR-3 or E6-B Flight Computer”
Final approach Instrument landing system
3.07 E6B 1: Flight calculations
Aircraft Performance Charts Private Pilot Ground School
Data Link Advanced Operations
Your friend, Mr. E6B.
777 Neptune Flight Planning.
Continuous Climb Operations ( CCO )
Flight Planning Contributions
Continuous Climb Operations ( CCO )
Presentation transcript:

CDOs – the flightdeck perspective Captain Spencer Norton AOA Environment Conference 28 th April 2014

Why not all the time? CDOs/CDAs are beneficial in terms of noise and fuel efficiency Pilot needs to consider 3 things: 1. Height vs track miles 2. Speed reduction vs track miles 3. Rate of Descent vs track miles

Using our 3 times table Height vs track miles 8000ft x 3 = 24nm 7000ft x 3 = 21nm 6000ft x 3 = 18nm 5000ft x 3 = 15nm 4000ft x 3 = 12nm

Reducing our speed We need to reduce our speed – we need distance to do this 1nm per 10 knots reduction of speed For example: To reduce from 250kts to 220kts Δ 30kts 1x3 = 3nm required

Rate of Descent Dependent on speed A very ‘general’ rule of thumb: 1. Indicated speed – add a zero (220kts = 2200) 2. Divide this number by 2 (2200/2 = 1100fpm) Example 2: IAS = 160kts 1600/2 = 800fpm

Let’s put you in the hot-seat

Indicated Airspeed AltitudeGroundspeed Wind Runway (EGPH 24) Aircraft

Flight Management Computer The ‘To’ Waypoint Miles to go

You are inbound to EDI RWY 24, expecting no delay and have just taken up a radar heading from TARTN. ATC have given you no indication of expected track miles to run. The CI24 point is at 10nm on the ILS for 24. Speed = 250kts Altitude = 9000ft Miles to go = 30nm

Are we? HIGH ON PROFILE LOW PLAY YOUR CARDS RIGHTPLAY YOUR CARDS RIGHT

PLAY YOUR CARDS RIGHTPLAY YOUR CARDS RIGHT

This also agrees with the ‘raw data’ calculation of track miles required. Height AAL9000’ x 3 = 27 Decel to 220kts (1nm/10kts) 3 x 1 = 3 30 nm

This is actually one of the ‘gates’ we aim for. Speed = 250kts Altitude = 9000ft Miles to go = 30nm

How are we doing now? Looks similar to our first example, doesn’t it?

Are we? HIGH ON PROFILE LOW PLAY YOUR CARDS RIGHTPLAY YOUR CARDS RIGHT

PLAY YOUR CARDS RIGHTPLAY YOUR CARDS RIGHT

Spot the tail-wind! Any head/tail-wind must be accounted for in our calculations: Height AAL9000’ x 3 = 27 Decel to 220kts 3 x 1 = 3 Head/Tail wind (1nm/10kts) 3 x 1 = 3 33nm now required

Conclusion CDO approaches are beneficial in terms of noise and efficiency CDOs require thought – advise crews they are required!

Conclusion

CDO approaches are beneficial in terms of noise and efficiency CDOs require thought – Advise crews they are required Essential components to fly a CDO 1. Accurate track miles from ATC 2. Speed reduction to be considered 3. Correct rate of descent used 4. Wind conditions to be considered

Beyond the Flight Deck