Access to Public Information in Georgia Presentation of research project results Tbilisi, 22 June 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
______________________
Advertisements

Ministry of Interior of Montenegro,,The Fight against corruption and organized crime in Montenegro Ministry of Interior of Montenegro,,The Fight against.
Fighting corruption in the Italian Public Sector Law November Prof. Fabio Cintioli Scuola Nazionale di Amministrazione.
Parliamentary System and Structure of Government Separation of Power -three main bodies -do not overlap and no interference Executive legislative judiciary.
Module 7.1 State Reporting to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
Strategic Approach of Bosnia and Herzegovina to Prevent Corruption IMPLEMENTING A COMPREHENSIVE AND INTEGRATED APPROACH IN PREVENTION AND FIGHT AGAINST.
Government of the Republic of Serbia Presentation of the Work Programme for the year 2008 Dušan Petrović, Minister of Justice Ministry of Justice December.
Examples of Best Practices: Anti- corruption Strategy of the TCA Musa KAYRAK Senior Auditor, CISA.
The Treaties, Institutions and Policies of the EU
WORKSHOP ON THE HANDBOOK ON “PARLIAMENTARY OVERSIGHT OF THE SECURITY SECTOR” Podgorica, Montenegro 26 – 27 May, 2005 Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control.
Jasminka Dzumhur, Ombudsperson of BiH “Role of national human rights institutions” Ljubljana, 1. December 2014.
Legal Aspects of the Right to Information. What is Information Information means facts, documents.
ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training
Specifics in the prevention of corruption and ascertainment of conflict of interest through a single body. The experience of Latvia. Jaroslavs Streļčenoks.
LOCAL GOVERNANCE IN THE 21 ST CENTURY: FRAUD, CORRUPTION AND ETHICS (THE UGANDA EXPERIENCE) PAPER PRESENTED AT TRAINING WORKSHOP HELD AT DOCKLANDS HOTEL.
Using the UN Convention against Corruption as a Basis for Good Governance.
European Ombudsman Access to environmental information Task Force on Access to Information Geneva, 4 December 2014.
Legal System in Thailand
CURRENT NATIONAL SYSTEM LEGAL AID TO THE INDIGENT.
Indicators for Criminal Cases Management in Bulgaria Public Hearing: Improving Criminal Justice Systems in Europe: The Role of E-Tools and Performance.
1 Protection of the rights of consumers in Energy sector Malkhaz Dzidzikashvili 27 June - 3 July, 2008 Georgian National Energy and Water Supply Regulatory.
1 GOVERNANCE in COMMUNITY ORGANISATIONS Community Solutions- NESB Community Safety Development and Coordination Project Auspiced by Illawarra Forum Inc.
Access to Public Information in Slovenia Nataša Pirc Musar, LL.B. Commissioner for Access to Public Information The Hague – 24 th -25 th November, 2004.
1 Chinese Court System Liling Yue China University of Political Science and Law
Division for Treaty Affairs Aims and Structure of Convention Preventive Measures International Cooperation Asset Recovery Technical Assistance Information.
Regulatory Impact Analysis – Lebanon Working Group IV: Focus Group on Public Service Delivery, Public-Private Partnership and Regulatory Reform Amman,
Energy Regulatory Partnership Program of National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners of the USA and National Commission for Energy State Regulation.
How SAIs influence Good Governance in the Public Administration: an experience of the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation The Accounts Chamber of.
Transparency International Secretariat National Integrity System Assessment Tool.
Privacy and the Civil Commitment Process Allyson K. Tysinger Assistant Attorney General June 4-5, 2008.
1 Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation. The Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation 2 PreventiveRepressive.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
“Foreign Official” under the FCPA means “any officer or employee of a foreign government or any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof, or of.
INDEPENDENCE OF JUDICIARY Brusels 18th June 2013 Rosario Ruiz DEVCO B.1 – Governance, Democracy, Gender and Human Rights European Commission EuropeAid1.
SEYCHELLES EXPERIENCE Hon. Nichole Barbe, PAC Member, Seychelles.
Georgia The Second Wave of Democratic Reforms 2009.
Protocol on Water and Health: added value and challenges for public participation Tsvietkova Anna MAMA-86’s Water and Sanitation Program Workshop on Water.
Data Practices in Minnesota December Outline for this presentation Minnesota data practices laws Classification of government data Government entity.
11 /Module I.3/ Management of public procurement /Module I.3/ а. Procuring entity b. Evaluation committee & Rights and Duties c. Procurement Planning.
Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Tool MODULE 11 “POA 9: ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY”
Records and Accountability Presentation made by Sahr J. Kpundeh World Bank Institute.
Publicity and Transparency in Local Government – the Role of NAMRB Guinka Tchavdarova Executive Director of the National Association of Municipalities.
BNAO ROLE FOR EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC FINANCES Tzvetan Tzvetkov, CIA, CGAP, CRMA - President of the Bulgarian National Audit Office.
Dr Jarosław Sułkowski.  Constitution of the Republic of Poland  the Act of 15 July 1987 on the Commissioner for Human Rights LEGAL ACTS.
European Labour Law Institutions and their Competencies JUDr. Jana Komendová, Ph.D.
RTI RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT (RTI Act) Presented By – Pratik Maru Durlabh Giripunje.
Regional Conference Money in Politics LELA TALIURI Georgian Young Lawyers` Association FEBRUARY 19, 2016.
Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, associated professor.
Ion Gâlea.  Law no. 544/2001 on the free access to information of public interest;  Government Decision no. 123/2002 – Methodological Norms for implementation.
Organisational Profile.  CEDEM was founded in 1998 in Podgorica, Montenegro as a non-profit association of citizens.  CEDEM was the first organization.
1 Legal Frameworks for Public and Stakeholder Engagement by Carl Bruch Asia Regional Workshop on Stakeholder Engagement in International Waters Management.
Prosecution and investigative authorities in Romania Current status and future reforms Monica Otava Prosecutor Prosecutor’s Office Attached to the High.
Malaysian Administrative System and Structure Malaysia a parliamentary democracy, a country with a monarchy but ruled by people with a right to form a.
Freedom of information – raising public and institutional awareness TAIEX workshop, Skopje Kristina Kotnik Sumah Deputy of the Information Commissioner.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment Bilateral screening:
Barkhas Losolsuren 23 June  SA as defined by ANSA refers to ◦ “… actions initiated by citizen groups to hold public officials, politicians, and.
The activities of the state tax authorities
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Situation Analysis Access to Court Decisions in Georgia
THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR FOR PARLIAMENT RESEARCH SERVICE
New challenges for archives in Iceland
Parliamentary oversight in the Republic of Uzbekistan
Chapter 9: controlling mechanisms of governmental powers
State Reporting to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Module 7.1.
MEASURING PERFORMANCE OF SUPREME AUDIT INSTITUTION
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
Ministry of Social Security and Labour
Judicial System in India
UNCAC Chapter II Overview Prevention of Corruption under the United Nations Convention against Corruption 8-10 April 2019 Addis Ababa.
DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLES
Presentation transcript:

Access to Public Information in Georgia Presentation of research project results Tbilisi, 22 June 2010

National Integrity System Assessment National Integrity System: Set of institutions that, when functioning properly, safeguard against corruption and contribute to the larger struggle against the abuse of power, malfeasance, and misappropriation in all its forms. Pillars of NIS: – Executive, Judiciary and Legislative – Law-enforcement – Civil Society – Business – Media

NIS Assessment methodology Evaluation of the legal framework for the functioning of institutions (pillars) and their actual performance – Transparency – Corruption prevention – Accountability – Role Research methodology: – Desk research – Interviews with key stakeholders – Fieldtests NIS Advisory Group – open consultations

Fieldtests – Access to Information Testing of state institutions’ responsiveness to Freedom of Information requests Will citizens succeed in obtaining information to which they are legally entitled?

Fieldtests methodology Types of requestors: 2 journalists 2 representatives of NGOs 2 representatives of ethnic minorities 2 unaffiliated citizens Type of requests: Difficult requests Standard requests Total: 52 requests 6-7 requests submitted by each requestor

Legislative pillar (16) Legal Issues Committee Procedural Issues and Rules Committee Budget and Finance Committee Chief of Staff Executive Pillar (20) Ministry of Defense Ministry of JusticeMinistry of Finance Ministry of Internal Affairs Office of the Public Prosecutor Judiciary pillar (4) Supreme Court Office of the Public Defender (4) Chamber of Control (4) Institutions tested Central Election Commission (4)

Simple requests - Examples Ministry of Justice: – What are the salaries of the minister, the deputy minister, the head of department and the lead specialists? – What are the bonuses of the minister, the deputy minister, the head of department and the lead specialists? Legal Issues Committee: – What is the procedure for attending a Committee session? How can I find out when the next Committee session will be held and what issues will be discussed? How can I submit my comments to the Committee session? Central Election Commission: – Request annual (2008) political party finance reports

Difficult requests - Examples Ministry of Finance: – MoF procurements breakdown (2008) according to single-source and open tenders Ministry of Defense: – List of vehicles purchased in 2007 and 2008 by MoD and the amount of money spent on these vehicles Office of the Public Prosecutor: – Breakdown of plea bargains in 2009 according to the number of people, amount of money paid by each and crimes committed Office of the Public Defender: – Copies of recommendations that the Ombudsman's office has sent to government bodies in 2008 and 2009

Data Categorization Information Received Transferred or Referred Incomplete Answer Oral Refusal Written Refusal Mute Refusal Unable to Submit Refusal to Accept Request

Results Analysis Satisfactory outcome Information Received Correct transfer Cases where the public institution wrote the requestors that due to absence of a relevant database, the public agency would be unable to provide the full requested information Unable to submit (due to problems in the postal system) Unsatisfactory outcome Mute Refusal Incorrect transfer Incomplete information Oral or written refusal without providing an acceptable reason for refusal

Bonuses – public information? The information existing on official papers pertaining to individual’s health, his/her finances orother private matters, shall not be accessible to any one without the consent of the individual in question except in the cases determined by law, when it is necessary for ensuring the state security or public safety, for the protection of health, rights and freedoms of others. Constitution of Georgia, Art. 41 (2) –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Personal data, except for those of an official, may not be accessible for anyone without the consent of the person concerned or reasoned decision of a court, as provided in Article 28 of this Code General Administrative Code of Georgia, art. 44 (1)

Explaining motives and reasons? General Administrative Code of Georgia, Art. 37 (2) The requestor is not obliged to provide the motives and reasons for requesting public information.

Refusal to grant public information General Administrative Code of Georgia, Art. 41 The decision on refusal to grant public information must be communicated to the requestor immediately. In case of refusal to grant public information, the institution is obliged, after 3 days of rendering the decision, to notify the requestor in written on his/her rights and procedures for appeal and to inform him/her about the department [hierarchy], which took the decision not to release the public information requested.

Problems identified - summary High rate of unsatisfactory outcomes (21%) Low responsiveness of most Ministries and the Office of the Public Prosecutor Absence of databases (in some cases) Violations of timeframes within which the information should be provided In cases of refusal to grant the public information, not notifying the requestor about his/her rights and the procedures for appeal One case of asking the requestor about the motives and the aims for requesting the public information Refusal to grant information on the bonuses of public officials

Recommendations Elaborating better mechanisms of control of the persons responsible for providing public information Elaborating better databases Providing the reasons for refusal to grant the public information Defining the rights of the requestors and the procedures for appeal, in cases when information is refused If the full 10 working days’ period is needed to release the public information, the requestor should be notified about this immediately