2013 Cost of Service Orientation Session The Application Process - The Hearing Process and What Happens at an Oral Hearing? July 9, 2012 Jennifer Lea Counsel,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Unit 4 Area of Study 1 Booklet 1.2 Answers. What is the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal.
Advertisements

What Small and Emerging Contractors Need to Know Understanding Dispute Resolution Options in the Construction Industry © Copyright 2014 NASBP.
Ensuring that building products meet code requirements ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. The ICC-ES Evaluation Committee conducts open public hearings on proposed.
Regional Center Fair Hearing Process
1 FIFTH ANNUAL COAT CONFERENCE NSW CHAPTER DEALING WITH DIFFICULTIES IN THE ABSENCE OF LEGAL REPRESENTATION The Hearing Process In the Absence of Legal.
Your Community Association Partner Community Association Meetings: Owner Meetings & Board Meetings Trish Harris April 5, 2014.
Robert’s Rules of Order
Last Topic - Administrative Tribunals
The Adjudication Process Virginia Department of Health Professions New Board Member Training October 2008.
EVALUATION OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHODS. Strengths of Mediation  Strengths 1) Mediation is often less expensive. Mediation avoids the costs of a trial,
“Student Due Process” School Administrators of South Dakota April 7, 2015.
PERMANENCY PLANNING. Permanency Planning  How is it defined?  What does it mean for parents? For children?
Section 10.2.
2013 Cost of Service Orientation Session Filing Your Application – How to File Electronically and Technology in the Hearing Room July 9, 2012 John Pickernell.
SA Judicial Council 2008/2009 Explanation of Duties, Powers, and Processes.
School Deans appoint a pool of evaluators who are trained by the Centre for University Teaching The staff member whose teaching is being evaluated is informed.
Intervenor Review of Electricity Distributor Rate Applications July 9, 2012 Jay Shepherd for School Energy Coalition.
Pre-Trial Management of Criminal Cases
DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHODS
CAMPUT 2015 Energy Regulation Course Donald Gordon Conference Centre Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario Role of Tribunal Staff, Interveners and Independent.
Council Process and Resolution Review Hints and Helpers Garnet Patterson February 15, 2012.
Chapter 3: Board Hearings Jeffery D. Evans, Pharm.D. Associate Professor of Pharmacy Practice ULM COP.
Taking privacy cases through the Human Rights Review Tribunal Some observations on process and the roles of the Privacy Commissioner and the Director of.
LAW for Business and Personal Use © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
Third Party Alternative Dispute Resolution. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)?  It involves the application of theories, procedures, and skills designed.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The FERC Regulatory Process Dennis H. Melvin, Esq. Director – Legal Division (OAL) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
Office of the Chief Tax Counsel Jean Cordue Acting Director Adjudication.
Planning appeals Peter Ford Head of Development Management Planning Committee Training – 30 th July 2015.
Procedural Safeguards. Purpose Guarantee parents both an opportunity for meaningful input into all decisions affecting their child’s education and the.
Doc.: IEEE /1129r1 Submission July 2006 Harry Worstell, AT&TSlide 1 Appeal Tutorial Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
New rights for people complaining about adult social care providers – an introduction.
Supreme Court civil pre-trial procedures: an overview
The Planning Act 2008 Presentation to local authorities affected by the proposed Navitus Bay Wind Park 22 January 2014 Kay Sully, Senior Case Manager Richard.
School Deans appoint a pool of evaluators who are trained by the Centre for University Teaching The staff member whose teaching is being evaluated is informed.
Participation and Intervention before the FERC October 2007.
1 Public Involvement, Access, and Petitions DJ Law EPA Region 8.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
Administrative Law The Enactment of Rules and Regulations.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
Mediation with the Information Commissioner’s Office Cory Martinson Appeals and Policy Analyst 25 November 2009.
Oppositions, Appeals and Oral Proceedings at the EPO Michael Williams.
1 Eleventh National HIPAA Summit The New HIPAA Enforcement Rule Gerald “Jud” E. DeLoss, Esq. General Counsel Fairmont Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, P.A.
By Paramita Khisa.  VCAT and court use a range of methods to resolve criminal and civil disputes.  Criminal cases are solved by the judge in courts.
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
Welcome Managing concerns and complaints How should schools handle complaints? This session links to guidance from the DfE and local authorities, and looks.
Alternative Dispute Resolution Mediation. What is Dispute Resolution? Methods to resolve a conflict Methods to resolve a conflict May be referred to as:
1 1 CEQA Scoping Naomi Feger Planning TMDL Section Leader Region 2.
UNIT 4: SECTION 1 JUDICIAL BRANCH: ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES, AND POWERS Essential Questions: How are Supreme Court justices appointed and confirmed by the.
COUNTY COUNSEL Brown Act Public Records Act Presenter: Janice D. Killion Public Records Act – Ethics – Conflicts of Interest.
Open Meetings, Public Records, Conflicts of Interest, EMC Bylaws, and Penalty Remissions* Jennie Wilhelm Hauser Special Deputy Attorney General Presentation.
How to Conduct Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised 11 th Edition.
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULATORY UTILITY COMMISSIONERS REGULATORY PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM Partnership between: PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO (PUCO)
Administrative Agencies
SDAB HEARINGS ROLE OF THE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
The Federal Court System
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
NRC’s Decision Process: Judging The Safety Of A Proposed Repository
DRAFT FOUO PRE-DECISIONAL
Assigning evaluators Deans (Education) appoint a pool of evaluators who are trained by the Centre for Innovation in Learning and Teaching Dean (Education)
CAMPUT Regulatory Key Topics Meeting Montreal, January 28-30, 2018
Alternative Dispute Resolution
WHAT TO EXPECT: A CROWN CORPORATION’S GUIDE TO A SPECIAL EXAMINATION
Resolving Issues ADR, Due Process and CDE Complaints
NPA 403/587/780/825 (Area Code) Relief in Alberta
Key Knowledge The purposes and appropriateness of consumer affairs Victoria in resolving civil disputes Key Skills Discuss and justify the appropriateness.
Appeal Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
LECTURE No 6 - THE EUROPEAN UNION’s JUDICIAL SYSTEM I (courts)
How to Have a Good Meeting
Presentation transcript:

2013 Cost of Service Orientation Session The Application Process - The Hearing Process and What Happens at an Oral Hearing? July 9, 2012 Jennifer Lea Counsel, Special Projects Applications and Regulatory Audit Ontario Energy Board

2 Application Process Application Notice Interventions Interrogatories Technical Conference Settlement Conference Evidence Hearing Argument/ Submissions Decision Rate Order Motions/ Appeals Written Hearing – Streamlined 185 days Written Hearing – Standard 230 days Oral Hearing 280 days

3 Parties to a Regulatory Proceeding Applicant Board Panel or Delegated Authority –Decision Makers Board staff –Manage case process for decision maker –Public interest role to ensure accurate and complete record for decision makers Intervenors Ratepayers –Individual interventions –Letters of comment

4 Application filed File with Board Secretary Follow filing requirements at a minimum Notice Issues IRs Intv Evid IRs ADR Hearing Filing Tech Conf

5 Letter acknowledging application After application received, the Board, will send you a letter saying we received your application If application meets filing requirements application will proceed If application doesn’t meet filing requirements application cannot be processed without further evidence – we will specify

6 Must have a hearing Required by legislation – s.19(2) and 21(2) Ontario Energy Board Act,1998 Exception? –No-one responds to notice –No-one will be adversely affected in a material way by the outcome

7 Steps in a hearing Every hearing includes: Giving notice of the application Creating a record –Filing and testing evidence –argument (submissions) Making a decision Notice Issues IRs Intv Evid IRs ADR Hearing Filing Tech Conf

8 Notice: customers Notice must be given to anyone who is affected by the application Notice by way of publication in local newspaper(s) of highest circulation Service on particular groups, etc Notice Issues IRs Intv Evid IRs ADR Hearing Filing Tech Conf

9 Notice: intervenors The notice of application invites individuals or groups to intervene, observe or send comments Right to intervene: –Directly affected (e.g. ratepayer) –Represent a group of customers (e.g. low-income customers, industrial customers) Applicant can object to an intervention; notice describes how Notice Issues IRs Intv Evid IRs ADR Hearing Filing Tech Conf

10 Notice: proof The Board cannot proceed until it is satisfied notice has been given as directed The Board needs evidence of the date that notice was published File an affidavit proving date of notice, service and publication Notice Issues IRs Intv Evid IRs ADR Hearing Filing Tech Conf

11 Creating a record Board must decide case on basis of record Record includes: –Application –Evidence –Interrogatories (written Q&A) –Oral Q&A –Submissions Notice Issues IRs Intv Evid IRs ADR Hearing Filing Tech Conf

12 Creating a record: File everything through Board Secretary’s office The Board Secretary is the keeper of the record If it isn’t filed with the Board Secretary, it’s not on the record!

13 Option: Issues Day If: Complicated application Large distributor Many intervenors Have an issues day Issues conference – parties meet Issues day – Board hears and decides Notice Issues IRs Intv Evid IRs ADR Hearing Filing Tech Conf

14 Option: Interrogatories Board staff and intervenors will need to ask questions about the application In writing: interrogatories Advantage: time to answer, completeness To minimize questions: –Complete and clear application –Give reasons for the numbers provided –Ask: what does the Board need explained to fully understand the application? Notice Issues IRs Intv Evid IRs ADR Hearing Filing Tech Conf

15 Option: Technical Conference Oral questions instead of or as well as written interrogatories – technical conference –transcribed and part of the record Advantage: quicker than the interrogatory process –But usually need additional IRs or undertakings May not be suitable for large or complex applications Notice Issues IRs Intv Evid IRs ADR Hearing Filing Tech Conf

16 Option: ADR Can often settle some or all of the issues to avoid a hearing Applicant, intervenors and staff meet, sometimes with a facilitator, to try to create a settlement proposal Board considers proposal – if accepted, no need to hear the settled issues Proposal becomes part of the record Settlement Conference Guidelines Notice Issues IRs Intv Evid IRs ADR Hearing Filing Tech Conf

17 Example: Written hearing Use IRs to build a good record –Can have supplemental IRs if necessary Then proceed to submissions from parties (staff, intervenors, applicant) Advantage: Better record, but no need for oral hearing Won’t work if need to debate issues or meet to clarify evidence Notice Issues IRs Intv Evid IRs ADR Hearing Filing Tech Conf

18 Example: Written hearing with technical conference Add technical conference to clarify application and IR responses –Conference part of record Then written submissions Advantages: –opportunity to discuss evidence and clarify through verbal exchange –less formal than oral hearing Notice Issues IRs Intv Evid IRs ADR Hearing Filing Tech Conf

19 Example: Written hearing with technical conference & ADR Add ADR to try to settle issues Advantages: –May be able to avoid hearing altogether –More predictable result –Even if no full settlement, better understanding of what’s at issue BUT: have to be willing to negotiate Notice Issues IRs Intv Evid IRs ADR Hearing Filing Tech Conf

20 Example: Full oral hearing Large and complicated applications may need full oral hearing Include all steps, including evidence from intervenors and Board staff and interrogatories on that evidence ADR optional Advantage: comprehensive review Notice Issues IRs Intv Evid IRs ADR Hearing Filing Tech Conf

21 What Happens at an Oral Hearing? Hearings are public unless ordered to be “in camera”. A sense of formality confers respect on the process and the powers of the Board, as represented by the Panel. When the Panel enters, Board counsel or the case manager will call the Hearing Room to Order and all must stand. The Panel will sit at the dais with the Chair (presiding member) of the Panel in the centre. The Panel will introduce themselves and ask other parties to do the same. The Panel will establish the process for the hearing. The hearing is transcribed by a court reporter in attendance during the hearing.

22 What Happens at an Oral Hearing? General Rules of Conduct All cell phones must be turned to mute or vibrate and not be used during a hearing. –Blackberries and similar devices should be turned to mute or vibrate and be used judiciously and unobtrusively. Participants should wear appropriate business attire rather than “business casual”. No food should be brought into, or consumed, in the hearing room. –Beverages such as water, coffee and juices may be consumed. Participants need not bow when entering or leaving the hearing room while the Panel is sitting. The courtesy of bowing is between counsel and the tribunal/panel members. Role of Board Staff Case managers generally number exhibits and undertakings throughout the course of the hearing and provide them to the Panel on the dais. The system for numbering is: –Exhibits:J 1.1 (1st exhibit of day 1), J 2.1 (1st exhibit of day 2) –Undertakings:K 1.1, K 2.1 In addition to the above, the case manager on the staff team should be alert to “housekeeping” matters such as difficulties with the microphones.

23