Section 3 Introduction-1

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 14, Section 3 THE RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED
Advertisements

CH. 14: CITIZENSHIP & EQUAL JUSTICE United States Government Unit 5: The Judicial Branch.
AP Government Chapter 4 Review PowerPoint. Key points of Engel v. Vitale;
The American Legal System
Civil Liberties and Public Policy Chapter 4. The Bill of Rights– Then and Now Civil Liberties – Definition: The legal constitutional protections against.
Rights of the Accused th – Amendment Presumption of innocence Presumption of innocence Manzanar –one of our big failings Reasonable doubt Reasonable.
POP QUIZ How did the Courts increase the political power of people in urban areas and those accused of a crime? GIVE AN EXAMPLE.
Civil Liberties: Due Process Rights of Accused Persons.
GOVERNMENT CHAPTER 20 Read the chapter and these notes, then answer each part of the 6 questions.
Cases and Terms – Chapter 8 – Rights of the Accused Module 8 Amendments 4 -7.
The Bill of Rights First 10 Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
The Criminal Amendments: Rights of the Accused Trends Over Time
The Bill of Rights.
What rights are protected under the Bill of Rights?
15.3 The American Legal System
CIVIL LIBERTIES. THE POLITICS OF CIVIL LIBERTIES Civil liberties: protections the Constitution provides individuals against the abuse of government power.
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 3
Objective 29L Analyze he rights of the accused as set forth in the 4 th,5 th,6 th,8 th, and 14 th Amendments, including but no limited to such cases as.
Winning, until proven guilty …. Searches and Seizures The Fourth Amendment protects from unreasonable searches and seizures Searches must be conducted.
SUMMARY RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED. Why would anyone be accused of or charged with a crime if they are not guilty? Discuss with talk partner? QUESTION.
The Bill Of Rights The First Ten Amendments to the Constitution
The Bill of Rights.
U.S. Constitutional Amendments 1-10
Rights of the Accused Chapter 5, Theme D. Incorporation  Until the Warren Court of the 1960s, most rights of accused found in BOR only applied to the.
Civil Liberties and Public Policy
AP GOVERNMENT. CIVIL LIBERTIES  Civil Liberties are individual’s legal and constitutional protections against the government.  Although our civil liberties.
{ Criminal Trial Procedure What happens when the police arrest a criminal suspect?
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman. Civil Liberties and Public Policy Chapter 4  4 th -8 th Amendments Edwards, Wattenberg,
Rights of the Accused Amendments 4, 5, 6, 8.
Unit The Bill of Rights n First ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution. n Purpose is to prevent government from usurping the personal freedom of.
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 2
III. Rights of the Accused. A. Exclusionary Rule Exclusionary Rule – Supreme Court ruled any evidence collected illegally cannot be used in federal court.
Bill of Rights. What are your First Amendment Rights? Freedom of Right to Peacefully ________ Right to _____________the Government.
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 3.
Rights of Criminal Defendants Are the due process rights and the procedural guarantees provided by the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments.
The U.S. Constitution & the Bill of Rights
Homework: Read/OL 14.3 for Monday FrontPage: Have 3 worksheets on your desk.
How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.
Rights of Criminal Defendants
Due Process of the Law Requires the state and the federal government in matters of life, liberty, or property of individuals to be reasonable, fair, and.
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 3.
Essential Questions: What rights are guaranteed to all Americans who are accused of crimes?
AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS – Civil Liberties Civil Liberties part 3.
Essential Question How does the Constitution protect the rights of the accused?
BELLWORK What are the three types of crime? (Page 430)
Aim: How are defendants’ rights part of Civil Liberties? Chap 4, Day 4 Do Now: PAIR/SHARE 1.Put the following actions in chronological order. trial, prosecution,
Other Guarantees in the Bill of Rights The Constitution describes the powers of the national government.
How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.
“Ryan Rose, you are under arrest!” What rights do you have? Look it up.
Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Chapter 20.
DUE PROCESS. Procedural Due Process v. Substantive Due Process Procedural follows a set procedure, the same for all the accused Such as counsel, unreasonable.
Chapter 6 Due Process and Other Protected Rights Section 1 The Rights of Criminal Defendants.
Unit 4 Seminar. Tell me what the Miranda warning is and what it means to you.
LECTURE 4: THE CONSTITUTION AND DUE PROCESS. The Constitution and Due Process The US Constitution set out how US laws are passed and enforced. – The legislative.
The American Legal System
Warm-up List 5 types of laws and give an example of each.
The Rights of the Accused
Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual rights
Rights of Criminal Suspects
Criminal Justice U.S. Constitution Unit Hermitage Tech Center
DUE PROCESS.
15.3 The American Legal System
2.2 Civil Liberties 4th 5th, 6th, and 8th Amendments.
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 3
Civics & Economics – Goals 5 & 6 The us legal system
AMENDMENTS U.S. Bill Of Rights.
Defendants’ Rights Edgenuity Lessons 3.4 and 3.5.
AMENDMENTS U.S. Bill Of Rights.
DUE PROCESS.
Presentation transcript:

Section 3 Introduction-1 The Rights of the Accused Key Terms exclusionary rule, counsel, self-incrimination, double jeopardy Find Out • What constitutes unreasonable searches and seizures by the police? • In the 1960s, how did the Supreme Court rule on the right to counsel and self-incrimination cases? Section 3 Introduction-1

Section 3 Introduction-2 The Rights of the Accused Understanding Concepts Civil Rights How have Supreme Court rulings both expanded and refined the rights of the accused as described in the Constitution? Section Objective Summarize the rights of Americans accused of crimes. Section 3 Introduction-2

Prior to the Court ruling on Mapp v Prior to the Court ruling on Mapp v. Ohio, which banned the use of illegally obtained evidence at criminal trials in state courts, the exclusionary rule had applied only to federal courts. Section 3-1

I. Searches and Seizures (pages 398–401) A. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights protect the rights of accused persons. B. The Fourth Amendment offers protection from unreasonable searches and seizures, but the courts have dealt with this issue on a case-by-case basis. C. Today most police searches are conducted with a court warrant. Section 3-2

I. Searches and Seizures (pages 398–401) D. The 1914 exclusionary rule restricts the use of illegally obtained evidence. E. Supreme Court rulings in 1985 and 1987 limited the warrant requirement for legally stopped cars and for students and their property in school. F. In 1967 the Supreme Court reversed an earlier ruling permitting wiretapping. In 1968 Congress passed a statute requiring a court order before using wiretapping to obtain evidence. Section 3-3

I. Searches and Seizures (pages 398–401) Critics of the exclusionary rule argue that it weakens the power of courts to protect citizens from violent criminals. Do you agree? Explain. Answers will vary. See discussion of exclusionary rule on text pages 399–400. Section 3-4

II. Guarantee of Counsel (pages 401–402) A. The Sixth Amendment guarantees a defendant the right to an attorney. B. In federal cases, courts generally provide an attorney for defendants who cannot afford one. C. State courts must also provide attorneys for defendants. Section 3-5

II. Guarantee of Counsel (pages 401–402) Why is it significant that the Court ruled that criminal defendants have a right to a lawyer? Many prisoners who had been convicted without counsel were set free. Section 3-6

III. Self-Incrimination (pages 402–404) A. The Fifth Amendment protects witnesses before grand juries and congressional investigating committees. B. The Fifth Amendment also protects defendants against forced confessions. C. The Escobedo (1964) and Miranda (1966) decisions expanded the protections of persons arrested as suspects in a criminal case. Section 3-7

III. Self-Incrimination (pages 402–404) Why should persons accused of crimes be informed of their rights when they are arrested? To protect the accused from self-incrimination. Section 3-8

IV. Double Jeopardy (pages 404–405) A. The Fifth Amendment protects accused persons from double jeopardy, or being tried twice for the same crime; a person may be tried more than once for the same act, however, when a crime violates both a federal and a state law. B. It is not double jeopardy if a single act involves more than one crime; a defendant may be tried for each offense. In case of a hung jury, a second trial is not double jeopardy. Section 3-9

IV. Double Jeopardy (pages 404–405) How does the Fifth Amendment protect persons accused of crimes from double jeopardy? It prohibits retrying accused persons. Section 3-10

V. Cruel and Unusual Punishment (page 405) A. The Eighth Amendment forbids cruel and unusual punishment. B. Use of the death penalty is an ongoing controversy under this amendment. Section 3-11

V. Cruel and Unusual Punishment (page 405) Section 3-12

V. Cruel and Unusual Punishment (page 405) Do courts consider the death penalty cruel and unusual punishment? Not in most cases. Section 3-13

Checking for Understanding 1. Main Idea Use a graphic organizer like the one below to analyze the significance of the Gideon, Escobedo, and Miranda cases. Gideon: guaranteed the right to counsel; Escobedo: limited self-incrimination; Miranda: expanded protection of the accused Section 3 Assessment-1

Checking for Understanding Match the term with the correct definition. ___ exclusionary rule ___ counsel ___ self-incrimination ___ double jeopardy D A B C A. an attorney B. testifying against oneself C. retrial of a person who was acquitted of the same crime in a previous trial D. a law stating that any illegally obtained evidence cannot be used in a federal court Section 3 Assessment-2

Checking for Understanding 3. Identify Fourth Amendment, Sixth Amendment, Fifth Amendment, Eighth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment guarantees “the right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.” The Sixth Amendment guarantees a defendant the right “to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.” The Fifth Amendment says that no one “shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” The Eighth Amendment forbids “cruel and unusual punishments” and is the only constitutional provision specifically limiting penalties in criminal cases. Section 3 Assessment-3

Checking for Understanding 4. What procedure must police follow in making a lawful search? Police must state under oath that they have probable cause to search, and then they must obtain a warrant. Special warrantless situations also exist. Section 3 Assessment-4

Critical Thinking 5. Identifying Alternatives What decisions does the accused person have to make at the time he or she hears the Miranda rules? An accused person has to decide whether to say anything or remain silent. If the accused decides to talk, he or she must decide whether or not to ask for an attorney to be present. Section 3 Assessment-5

Section 3 Concepts in Action Civil Rights Would you be willing to undergo routine random drug testing or locker searches in your school? Note that the Fourth Amendment right to privacy is at issue here. Create a slogan explaining your position and use it to create a one-page advertisement promoting your position. Section 3 Concepts in Action