Dianne Chadwick Iowa NAEP Coordinator Iowa Department of Education November 8, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stuart Kerachsky Acting Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics October 14, 2009 EMBARGOED until October 14, :00 a.m. E.D.T.
Advertisements

Dennis J. Kennedy NAEP State Coordinator West Virginia Department of Education.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 10, 2012.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 27, 2013 #NAEP.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Leonie Haimson & Elli Marcus Class Size Matters January.
Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics March 24, 2010.
Highlights from PIRLS and TIMSS 2011 Jack Buckley National Center for Education Statistics Washington, DC December 11, 2012.
Inside America’s Math Courses The Release of the Algebra I and Geometry Curricula: Results from the 2005 High School Transcript Mathematics Curriculum.
1 NAEP th Grade Economics Assessment. 2 ► First NAEP assessment of economics ► Content areas: market economy, national economy, and international.
NAEP 2008 Trends in Academic Progress in Reading and Mathematics.
Reliability and Linking of Assessments. Figure 1 Differences Between Percentages Proficient or Above on State Assessments and on NAEP: Grade 8 Mathematics,
The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics National Assessment of Educational Progress 1.
Office of Assessment October 22, PSAT/SAT/NAEP  PSAT – Pre-Scholastic Aptitude Test  SAT – Scholastic Aptitude Test  NAEP – National Assessment.
1 The New York State Education Department New York State’s Student Reporting and Accountability System.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
NAEP in Delaware  NAEP Inclusion Policy NAEP 2013 reporting of inclusion goals  NAEP 2015 Delaware state context Delaware inclusion guidelines  Students.
Montana’s statewide longitudinal data system Project Montana’s Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS)
1 Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 2011.
The Nation’s Report Card 2009 Reading and Mathematics – Grade 12 National and State Results.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 7, 2011.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Class Size Matters August
NAEP 101 Mathematics October NAEP  What’s NAEP?  No Child Left Behind  Organization of NAEP  NAGB  NAEP Statute  NAEP Components  Why.
Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) and the Connecticut Academic Achievement Test (CAPT) Spring 2011 Presented to the Guilford Board of Education September.
NAEP and International Assessments August 28, 2013 DAC Annual Meeting.
CINNAMINSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 TEST SCORE PRESENTATION.
International Assessments September 5, 2012 DAC Annual Meeting
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics January 25, 2011.
1 The Nation’s Report Card: 2007 Writing. 2 Overview of the 2007 Writing Assessment Given January – March 2007 – 139,900 eighth-graders – 27,900 twelfth-graders.
Spring 2012 Testing Results. GRANT API HISTORY
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Results of the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress.
0 Michele Sonnenfeld NAEP State Coordinator Florida Department of Education October 2006 Florida Association of Science Supervisors.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results Challis Breithaupt November 1, 2011.
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results NAEP State Coordinator Mark DeCandia.
Fall 2007 MEAP Reporting 2007 OEAA Conference Jim Griffiths – Manager, Assessment Administration & Reporting Sue Peterman - Department Analyst, MEAP.
The Nation’s Report Card: U.S. History National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
The Nation’s Report Card Science National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
United to Make a Difference: Improving the Achievement of Young Men of Color Council of the Great City Schools Fall 2014.
THE 2005 NAEP HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY. THE 2005 HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY Today ’ s Presentations.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 21, 2013.
United to Make a Difference: Improving the Achievement of Young Men of Color Council of the Great City Schools Fall 2014.
1. 2 Overview of the 2006 NAEP Assessments Administered in January–March 2006 National results for grades 4, 8, and 12 Results by scale scores and achievement.
The Nation’s Report Card: Geography National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
Future Ready Schools National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in North Carolina Wednesday, February 13, 2008 Auditorium III 8:30 – 9:30 a.m.
The Nation’s Report Card 4th-Grade Reading SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),
1 New England Common Assessment Program Guide to Using the 2005 NECAP Reports: Companion PowerPoint Presentation March/April 2006.
N ATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS BPS 2015 NAEP RESULTS Office of Data and Accountability OCTOBER 26, 2015.
2015 State PARCC Results A webinar for school and district leaders Robert Lee MCAS Chief Analyst and Acting PARCC Coordinator Wally McKenzie Edwin Analytics.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 4, 2011.
N ATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS BPS 2015 NAEP RESULTS Nicole Wagner Lam, Office of Data and Accountability Presentation to Boston School Committee.
NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS NAEP in South Dakota.
Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 20, 2010.
RESULTS Spring 2015 End-Of-Course tests Student Score Interpretation Guide.
Understanding AzMERIT Results and Score Reporting An Overview.
The Nation’s Report Card: Trial Urban District Assessment: Science 2005.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
The Nation’s Report Card: 2005 Reading and Mathematics Trial Urban District Assessments.
2015 State PARCC Results Presented to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Robert Lee MCAS Chief Analyst and Acting PARCC Coordinator October.
Novice Reduction & Non-Duplicated Gap Group
NAEP 2005 Reading and Mathematics Results. Overview of the 2005 Reading and Mathematics Assessment 1.
Peggy G. Carr Associate Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 2010 Peggy G. Carr Associate Commissioner National Center for Education.
Copyright © 2014 American Institutes for Research and Cleveland Metropolitan School District. All rights reserved. March 2014 Interpreting Vendor Assessment.
NAEP What is it? What can I do with it? Kate Beattie MN NAEP State Coordinator MN Dept of Education This session will describe what the National Assessment.
1. 2 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Survey of academic achievement for the nation and the states Assesses various subjects at grades.
Department of Research and Evaluation
NAEP 2017 Campus Testing Coordinator (CTC) Training October 2016
2017 TUDA NAEP Results for Miami-Dade
NAEP and International Assessments
Information for Parents
Welcome Reporting: Individual Student Report (ISR), Student Roster Report, and District Summary of Schools Report Welcome to the Reporting: Individual.
Presentation transcript:

Dianne Chadwick Iowa NAEP Coordinator Iowa Department of Education November 8, 2011

What is NAEP? The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) is the largest continuing and nationally representative assessment of what our nation’s students know and can do in core subjects. A survey designed to produce national, state, and select urban district level results. – NAEP results are for populations of students, not for individual students nor schools. – Measures student performance nationally and reports changes over time. – Allows comparisons between states and the nation.

NAEP Administration NAEP is administered over a six-week period. – For 2011: January 24 th – March 4 th About 3,000 students in approximately 100 schools are selected in Iowa and other states for each grade and subject. – Each student is only assessed in one subject area. – Accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and English language learners.

NAEP Results The results of NAEP are released as The Nation’s Report Card. – The report card provides national, state, and district-level results, results for different demographic groups, inclusion information, and sample questions. NAEP Results are reported in two formats – Average Scale Scores Numeric scale 0 − 500 on mathematics and reading assessments Scores cannot be compared across content areas – Achievement Levels Categorical scale Below Basic, Basic, Proficient, Advanced

Iowa’s Rank in the States and Jurisdictions Tested NOTES: White students comprise over 80 percent of those tested in Iowa. Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. *Accommodations were not permitted prior to 1998.

6

Grade 4 Mathematics Results Average Scale Scores Over Time

Mathematic Grade 4 Score Gap Comparison: NSLP Not Eligible and Eligible NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant.

Compared to Other States:

Geometry Question 49% of fourth-graders were able to identify a property common to two geometric shapes

Grade 8 Mathematics Results Average Scale Scores Over Time

Mathematic Grade 8 Score Gap Comparison: NSLP Not Eligible and Eligible NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant.

Compared to Other States:

31% of eighth-graders were able to identify the equation given a point and the slope Algebra Question Percentage of eighth-grade students in each response category: 2011 JurisdictionChoice AChoice BChoice CChoice DChoice E*Omitted Iowa Nation # Rounds to zero Note: Details may not sum to totals because or rounding

Grade 4 Reading Results Average Scale Scores Over Time

Reading Grade 4 Score Gap Comparison: NSLP Not Eligible and Eligible NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant.

Compared to Other States:

21

Integrate and Interpret Question 64% of fourth-graders were able to interpret a part of a literary text to explain character traits Percentage of fourth-grade students in each response category: 2011 JurisdictionAcceptableUnacceptableOmitted Iowa63361 Nation63351 # Rounds to zero Note: Details may not sum to totals because or rounding

Grade 8 Reading Results Average Scale Scores Over Time

Reading Grade 8 Score Gap Comparison: NSLP Not Eligible and Eligible NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant.

Compared to Other States:

26

59% of eighth-graders were able to locate specific information from the passage Locate and Recall Question Percentage of eighth-grade students in each response category: 2011 JurisdictionChoice AChoice B*Choice CChoice DOmitted Iowa Nation759259# # Rounds to zero Note: Details may not sum to totals because or rounding

28 For more information Dianne Chadwick, Ed.D. Grimes State Office Building Des Moines, IA Phone: (515) FAX: (515)