Substantive Change: Understanding Middle States Policy and Process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Federal Compliance Expectations for the Periodic Review Report Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Debra G. Klinman – Vice President Middle.
Advertisements

Evaluator 101: An Introduction to Serving as a MSCHE Evaluator Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
Substantive Change Requesting Commission Approval of Substantive Changes at Institutions MSCHE Annual Meeting December 2009.
1 Higher Education Opportunity Act: Implications for the PRR Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Barbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President MSCHE PRR Workshop.
Standard 13 Related Educational Activities. What does it cover? The institutions programs or activities that are characterized by particular content,
Understanding MSCHE Expectations for Governance Ellie A. Fogarty, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 2010 Annual Conference Philadelphia,
Overview of Institutional Accreditation AASCU Conference, Beijing, China 20 October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission on Higher.
The Commissions Expectations on Reporting Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
1 Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the Higher Education Opportunity Act 2008 – Part I Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Barbara Samuel Loftus.
Accreditation Liaison Officers (ALOs) MSCHE annual conference 2010 Mary Ellen Petrisko, Vice President.
Follow-up Reporting Expectations Part II MSCHE 2009 Annual Conference Mary Ellen Petrisko.
Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2009 Mary Ellen Petrisko.
Substantive Change Process
Substantive Change Policy – Response to the HEOA of 2008 Accreditation Provisions Barbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher.
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 1 Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the HEOA Barbara Samuel Loftus Vice President, MSCHE.
Understanding Expectations for the Self Study from the HEOA 2008 Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Barbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President Debra G. Klinman.
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 1 Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the HEOA Mary Beth Kait – Senior Director for Policy & Planning,
Tips and Strategies for Chairing a Successful Team Visit
THE PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT: RE-ACCREDITATION AT THE MID-POINT MSCHE Annual Conference – 2010 Debra G. Klinman Vice President, MSCHE.
Accreditation Liaison Officers (ALOs)
Standard 13 Related Educational Activities Robert K. Clark Cumberland County College Vineland, NJ.
How to Interpret and Apply the Characteristics of Excellence: A Framework for Determining Compliance Karen Stout, President Montgomery County Community.
Substantive Change, SACS and Electronically-delivered Programs FDLC Panel Presentation May 15, 2009.
Understanding Federal Compliance Expectations for the Self-Study Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Debra G. Klinman – Vice President Middle States Commission.
DEBRA G. KLINMAN, PH.D. ELLIE A. FOGARTY, ED.D. VICE PRESIDENTS, MSCHE Tips, Strategies, and Best Practices for Team Chairs.
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Spring 2015.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
2008 HIGHER EDUCATION OPPORTUNITY ACT: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SELF- STUDY & EVALUATION TEAM RESPONSIBILITIES Ellie A. Fogarty, Ed.D. Vice President, MSCHE.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Fifth Year Interim Reports Texas Association for Institutional Research Ralph Russell Director of Institutional Support Commission on Colleges.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
SACS Reaffirmation Robert B. Bradley October 2013 THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY 1.
Preparing for THE Visit: the PA Role in the Institutional Accreditation Report and Visit Ellie A. Fogarty, Ed.D., Vice President Middle States Commission.
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Fall 2014.
Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities Accreditation Liaison Workshop March 13, 2013.
CEPA Programs – Accrediting Concerns Presenters: Dr. Deborah Loper, Assistant Vice President of Institutional Effectiveness at Colorado Mountain College.
NEASC FIVE YEAR REPORT FITCHBURG STATE COLLEGE JANUARY 2007.
Fifth Year Report and Substantive Change Processes Presented by Dr. Belle S. Wheelan, President SACS Commission on Colleges April 29, 2009.
Plenary III - Institutional Changes Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities Accreditation Liaison Workshop March 13, 2013.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
Student Learning Assessment and the Open Pathway Accreditation Process Presentation to IIT Faculty Spring 2013.
CCLC Conference March 18, 2005 Pam Deegan, CIO President, Miramar Randy Lawson, CIO President Elect, Santa Monica.
SUBSTANTIVE CHANGE COMPLIANCE WORKSHOP Presented by Jodi Pettazzoni, Ph.D. Director of Assessment and Accreditation and SACSCOC Liaison October.
Recognize the practices that have GA and SACSCOC implications Recognize the Substantive Change compliance processes, actions, and timeframes Identify.
Expectations and Accountability in Regional Accreditation Ellie A. Fogarty, EdD – Vice President Debra G. Klinman, PhD – Vice President Middle States Commission.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
SELF STUDY: COUNTDOWN TO THE TEAM VISIT MSCHE ANNUAL CONFERENCE – 2009 Debra Klinman.
Addressing Past Recommendations; Substantive Change Reports; & Eligibility Requirements Carlotta Campbell, College of Alameda Maggie Taylor, Fresno City.
The Substantive Change Process: What is it and why should you care? ASCCC Accreditation Institute February 11, 2012.
SACRAO FEBRUARY 8, 2016 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK STEVEN M. SHEELEY VICE PRESIDENT Accreditation Update.
October 14, 2014 Reaffirmation of UofL.
Accreditation 101 STEVEN SHEELEY, PHD VICE PRESIDENT – SACSCOC GACRAO NOVEMBER 2, 2015.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Smooth Transitions to Making Program Modifications or Expansions
Academic Affairs Update
Curriculum Development Updates
Curriculum and Accreditation
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Accreditation 101 Tim Brown, ACCJC Commissioner
Welcome June 8, 2018.
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Accreditation and curriculum
Smooth Transitions to Making Program Modifications or Expansions
The Value of the Substantive Change Process
Fort Valley State University
Agency on the Move ACCJC Update
CURRICULUM AND ACCREDITATION
Presentation transcript:

Substantive Change: Understanding Middle States Policy and Process Understanding Expectations for the Self-Study from the HEOA 11/11/2010 Substantive Change: Understanding Middle States Policy and Process Debra G. Klinman – Vice President Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President MSCHE Annual Conference December 2011

Overview Federal Requirement Twelve Types of Substantive Change Review Process What Peer Reviewers Look For New Developments

Substantive Change is a Federal Requirement Accreditation decisions apply only to existing institutional conditions USDE requires that MSCHE determine the impact of any Substantive Change on the quality and effectiveness of the total institution Changes undertaken without appropriate review threaten the accreditation status of the entire institution

Substantive Change is a Federal Requirement Institutions must inform the Commission in advance and follow procedural guidelines. Prior approval is required. MSCHE can approve, reject, decline to act, or rescind approval of any Substantive Change. Policy Statement: www.msche.org/documents/updated-Substantive-Change-policy-11-18-10.pdf Procedural Guidelines: www.msche.org/documents/Substantive-Change-Processes-New-Version-January-2011.pdf

Types of Substantive Change Any change in the established mission or objectives of the institution Any change in the legal status, form of control, or ownership of the institution Initiation of a contractual arrangement wherein 25% of one or more educational programs is provided by unaccredited entity

Types of Substantive Change Addition of courses or programs representing a significant departure from existing offerings of educational programs, or method of delivery Addition of programs at a new degree or credential level Institutional closure or institutional status requiring a teach-out plan for approval

Types of Substantive Change Change from clock hours to credit hours in one or more programs Substantial increase or decrease in number of clock/credit hours for program completion Initiation/expansion of distance or correspondence education where 50% or more of courses/credits in an academic program are provided through alternative delivery

Types of Substantive Change Establishment of a branch campus, including a branch campus acquired from another institution Establishment of domestic and international additional locations Planned closure or relocation of additional location/branch campus (teach-out plan for approval)

Substantive Change Review Process Substantive Change Committee Submission deadlines are the first day of January, March, May, July, September, November every year Peer reviewers; chaired by Commissioner Conference call format Substantive Change Committee makes recommendations to Executive Committee of Commission for approval Institution receives formal notification of decision from the Commission

What Peer Reviewers Look For Type of change (be specific) Relationship to institutional mission and goals Readiness for review; are all supporting documents included? Evidence of sufficient resources, assessment of student learning outcomes, appropriate oversight, appropriate planning, and realistic projections, budget, other information as appropriate Analysis of impact on institution and assurance of continuing compliance with Standards

New Developments Templates for Substantive Change proposals Additional Locations (Domestic) http://www.msche.org/publications/Substantive-Change-Application-Form-Jan-2012.dot Other templates to follow Electronic submission of materials – evaluationservices@msche.org Peer reviewers visit additional locations Contact Jeff Ewing, Director for Volunteer and Accreditation Services (jfewing@msche.org)

Middle States Commission on Higher Education Questions? Middle States Commission on Higher Education