Welcome and Introductions District Departments ONLY Outcomes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
Teacher Evaluation Model
CONSOLIDATED PROGRAM REVIEW COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR TITLE I, PART C, MIGRANT EDUCATION PROGRAM MEP STATE CONFERENCE AUGUST 2013.
0 Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits This sample lesson and accompanying documentation are.
The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
LCSD APPR Introduction: NYS Teaching Standards and the Framework for Teaching Rubric Welcome! Please be seated in the color-coded area (marked off by colored.
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Portfolios. ULTIMATE GOAL: A portfolio should be something a student can take to job or college interviews. It serves as documentation of achievements.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
Theories of Action: What are they, why are they important, and how are they created? January 2015 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell,
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Clinical Teaching/Student Teaching
IES e-PATT Grant e-PATT: Parents and Teachers Together.
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Agenda 9/17/14 Intro to AcademiesTraci Intro to Academies SLOs: Learning GoalCIA Work/BreakYou SLOs: Assessment PlanCIA 1.
This product was developed by Florida’s Positive Behavior Support Project through University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Work Sample Seminar1 Work Sample Seminar Screening Assessments, File Review, & Context Part 1 Portland State University.
Connecting the Dots BISD’S LEARNING PLATFORM AND ESTABLISHING EXPECTATIONS FOR LEARNING RUBRIC.
Performance and Development Culture Preparing for P&D Culture accreditation April 2008.
Implementation (PD) Map
Principal Professional Development September 26, SUSD Common Core PD 2013.
Intervention and Referral Services (I&RS)
Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting, LLC Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits Simulation.
MAPS DATA SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT
Curriculum and Instruction Council June, Welcome and Introductions.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 5 Pre-Evaluation Conference Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Getting Engaged in Evaluation: How to Develop an Evidence-based Offense for Your Evaluation Presented by Ellen Holmes, NBCT
TWS Aids for Student Teachers & Interns Overview of TWS.
PD Online Network March 6, 2012 With Diane Wyatt & Sherry Gibson.
PBIS Meeting for BCPS Team Leaders and Coaches March 14, 2008 Oregon Ridge.
Field Test of Counselor System July 2000 Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program.
CENTRAL DAUPHIN SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADUATION PROJECT GUIDE STUDENTS.
Professional Development Forum (FY13). Professional Development Forum (FY13) Welcome & Introductions District Departments ONLY.
November 26, :00am – 11:00am Monitoring Quality of Tutor Instruction
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
TEM 4.0 For School Librarians Laurie Butler, Library Services Advisor 2014.
Welcome ! Collab Meeting May 6, Things to remember  Aug 12 – First day for teachers  Aug – FAI In-service  Aug 25 – First day for students.
Professional Learning Resources Download presentations and resources from today’s sessions!  Go to BISD homepage  Departments  Professional Learning.
Online Network MARZANO TEACHER EVALUATION Download the pre-filled Sign-In Sheet at ocuments/SignInSheet.pdf.
Documenting Completion of your PDP
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
Welcome to PD Forum FY 11. Professional Development Support Structure SchoolsDistrict Support Department PD Team (Administrator, PD Contact, & PD Team.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Welcome! March 2013 ELA Network
WELCOME!  The Physical Education Teacher Hire/ Professional Development Grant Application Webinar will begin in a few minutes!
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
The New Face of Assessment in the Common Core Wake County Public Schools Common Core Summer Institute August 6, 2013.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
PDA IN APPLICATIONS OF ICT IN LIBRARIES Levels 7 & 8.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.
Quarterly Meeting Focus
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Transforming Grading Robert Marzano
Honors Level Course Implementation Guide Q & A Session Social Studies
Core Competencies: Summative Self-Assessment
Strategic Prevention Framework – Planning
MD Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity #7
KDE School Assurances Due October 24, 2018
Texas Title 1 Priority Schools Grant
Presentation transcript:

Welcome and Introductions District Departments ONLY Outcomes

7 Core Policies Seven Core Policies 1. A Focus on College and Career Ready Students 2. The Priority Shifts in Professional Development 3. The Purposes of the Professional Development System 4. The Capacities Employed in the Professional Development System 5. The Deliverables of the Professional Development System 6. The Evaluation Practices of the Professional Development System 7. The Role of the Master Inservice Plan (MIP) Here is the description of the graph. This chart is compatible with PowerPoint 2007 or later.. Here is some more text. You may delete the graphical elements.

UPDATE = Component Proposal Form 1853  Additional training dates can be added to existing/approved components.  To add dates to an existing/approved component, a form has been created.  Access this form on the PD Forum site, the same place you find meeting documents.  Complete this form and send electronically to PD. If you are asked to conduct more trainings beyond the original proposal, after January 31, then...

UPDATE = Component Proposal Form 1853 No Marzano focus No implementation assignment is attached Implementation assignment does not match training content Proposal was not sent to Supervisor Mistakes for calculating inservice points Primary purpose code selected is incorrect Training dates, times, locations are incomplete or missing Component Proposal - Form Opens/Closes January 2, 2014 – January 31, 2014 Common mistakes when completing Component Proposal Form 1853

Choosing an Implementation: Making Appropriate Choices Some Possible Teacher Evidences Some Possible Student Evidences  Classroom Observations  Teacher Interviews  Focus Groups  Implementation Logs  Reflective Journals  Teacher Portfolios  Teacher Products/Artifacts  Observations of Student Behaviors  Student Interviews  Student Surveys  Results of Standardized, District-created, and/or Teacher-created Assessments  Results of Group Activities  Student Grades  School Records  Student Work Samples  Reflective Journals

Professional Development ‘Authentic Reason’ for Implementing Implementation is a ‘Natural Consequence’ SwPBS Teacher: Evidence of procedures and routines (Posters, teacher tallies, seating, rules) Students: Evidence of behavior changes (Logs, detentions, referrals, grades, observation) MS PowerPoint Teacher: Evidence of creation and use of PowerPoint in classroom (Product) Student: Evidence of student engagement (Observation) Cultural Sensitivity Teacher: Evidence that teacher has changed his/her beliefs, attitudes, aspirations (Reflection, journal entries) Student: Evidence that accommodations are being provided to targeted students (Accommodation lists, student surveys) Literacy Teacher: Evidence of use of literacy strategies during instruction (Posters, product, observation) Student: Evidence that literacy strategies used in reading and writing has resulted in improved performance (Student work samples, student writing journals, grades) Examples of the Best Ways to Show Authentic Implementation

7 Core Policies Exemplars for Implementation Activities Courtesy of Dave Ramos, Exceptional Student Education Participants are required to submit a copy of the cover sheet of one completed WPPSI-IV Record Form WPPSI-IV Training 3 training hours 1 implementation hour = 4 possible points Here is the description of the graph. This chart is compatible with PowerPoint 2007 or later.. Here is some more text. You may delete the graphical elements. Participants are required to submit a copy of a Conference Note or Conference Staffing Record indicating the implementation of an effective threat assessment or intervening on a crisis. Effective Threat Assessment/ Crisis Intervention 3 training hours 1 implementation hour = 4 possible points

7 Core Policies More Exemplars for Implementation Activities Courtesy of Dave Ramos, Exceptional Student Education Participants are to submit a copy of a psycho- educational report, wherein information from the DSM-V is tied into information for eligibility determination decisions. DSM-V Training 6 training Hours 2 implementation hours = 8 possible points Here is the description of the graph. This chart is compatible with PowerPoint 2007 or later.. Here is some more text. You may delete the graphical elements. Participants are to submit a copy of notes from an individual or group counseling session that specifically addresses social skills Social Skills Training for Students 6 training hours 2 implementation hours = 8 possible points

? Calculating Inservice Points Point Worthy = Content Training NOT POINT WORTHY Welcomes Breaks Updates Assigning homework Registration Caution!

UPDATE = Component Evaluation Form 0471 Component Evaluation - Form 0471 Opens/Closes December 16 – January 31 (EXTENDED) March 10 – 14

Common mistakes when completing Component Evaluation Form 0471  Completed participants number does not match Excel spreadsheet  Numbers are listed with “%” symbols or decimals (use whole numbers ONLY)  Sect. 4A= Impact Assessment (Participant Changes) numbers do not match participants that completed training  Sect. 4B= Impact Assessment (Student Changes) numbers do not match participants that completed training = % of participants failed to submit student artifacts  Excel spreadsheet incomplete or not attached  Evaluation was not sent to Supervisor  Text boxes left blank

EXCEL Spreadsheet – attach to Component Evaluation Name, School, Dept #, Job title, EMPLID, and points to be awarded must be included. ONLY include participants that have earned inservice points.

Diane Wyatt, Manager Professional Development PX Questions? More Information?