Bargaining in Markets with One-Sided Competition: Model and Analysis Nicola Gatti DEI, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
N. Basilico, N. Gatti, F. Amigoni DEI, Politecnico di Milano Leader-Follower Strategies for Robotic Patrolling in Environments with Arbitrary Topology.
Advertisements

S. Ceppi, N. Gatti, and N. Basilico DEI, Politecnico di Milano Computing Bayes-Nash Equilibria through Support Enumeration Methods in Bayesian Two-Player.
F. Amigoni, N. Basilico, N. Gatti DEI, Politecnico di Milano Finding the Optimal Strategies in Robotic Patrolling with Adversaries in Topologically-Represented.
Multiagent Technology Solutions for Planning in Ambient Intelligence Nicola Gatti, Francesco Amigoni, Marco Rolando {ngatti,
Reaching Agreements II. 2 What utility does a deal give an agent? Given encounter  T 1,T 2  in task domain  T,{1,2},c  We define the utility of a.
TFG - MARA, Budapest, September Modeling Complex Multi-Issue Negotiations Using Utility Graphs Valentin Robu, Koye Somefun, Han La Poutré CWI, Center.
Arbitration. Introduction In this section we will consider the impact of outside arbitration on coordination games Specifically, we will consider two.
Mechanism Design without Money Lecture 1 Avinatan Hassidim.
Game Theory in Wireless and Communication Networks: Theory, Models, and Applications Lecture 6 Auction Theory Zhu Han, Dusit Niyato, Walid Saad, Tamer.
Game Theoretical Insights in Strategic Patrolling: Model and Analysis Nicola Gatti – DEI, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo.
Chapter 6 Game Theory © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Nash equilibria in Electricity Markets: A comparison of different approaches Seminar in Electric Power Networks, 12/5/12 Magdalena Klemun Master Student,
Negotiation A Lesson in Multiagent System Based on Jose Vidal’s book Fundamentals of Multiagent Systems Henry Hexmoor SIUC.
1 Regret-based Incremental Partial Revelation Mechanism Design Nathanaël Hyafil, Craig Boutilier AAAI 2006 Department of Computer Science University of.
Preference Elicitation Partial-revelation VCG mechanism for Combinatorial Auctions and Eliciting Non-price Preferences in Combinatorial Auctions.
Game Theory The study of rational behavior among interdependent agents Agents have a common interest to make the pie as large as possible, but Agents have.
SARANI SAHABHATTACHARYA, HSS ARNAB BHATTACHARYA, CSE 07 JAN, 2009 Game Theory and its Applications.
Chapter 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Game Theory.
EC941 - Game Theory Prof. Francesco Squintani Lecture 8 1.
Game-Theoretic Approaches to Multi-Agent Systems Bernhard Nebel.
Approximate and online multi-issue negotiation S.S. Fatima Loughborough University, UK M. Wooldridge N.R. Jennings University of.
Distributed Multiagent Resource Allocation In Diminishing Marginal Return Domains Yoram Bachrach(Hebew University) Jeffrey S. Rosenschein (Hebrew University)
Algorithmic Game Theory Nicola Gatti and Marcello Restelli {ngatti, DEI, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, Milano,
Step 1 Select good to buy Step 2 Select quantity to buy Step 3 Click “Buy” to purchase the item selected Remember, prices will change over time Step 4.
Bargaining in-Bundle over Multiple Issues in Finite- Horizon Alternating-Offers Protocol Francesco Di Giunta and Nicola Gatti Politecnico di Milano Milan,
Developing Principles in Bargaining. Motivation Consider a purely distributive bargaining situation where impasse is costly to both sides How should we.
Negotiation: Markets, Rationality, and Games. Intro Once agents have discovered each other and agreed that they are interested in buying/selling, they.
On Spectrum Selection Games in Cognitive Radio Networks
Distributed Rational Decision Making Sections By Tibor Moldovan.
Towards Automated Bargaining in Electronic Markets: a Partially Two-Sided Competition Model N. Gatti, A. Lazaric, M. Restelli {ngatti, lazaric,
1 Lecture 2: Negotiating Strategy Professor Keith Chen.
UNIT II: The Basic Theory Zero-sum Games Nonzero-sum Games Nash Equilibrium: Properties and Problems Bargaining Games Bargaining and Negotiation Review.
Alternating-Offers Bargaining under One-Sided Uncertainty on Deadlines Francesco Di Giunta and Nicola Gatti Dipartimento di Elettronica e Informazione.
A Study of Computational and Human Strategies in Revelation Games 1 Noam Peled, 2 Kobi Gal, 1 Sarit Kraus 1 Bar-Ilan university, Israel. 2 Ben-Gurion university,
Strategic Game Theory for Managers. Explain What is the Game Theory Explain the Basic Elements of a Game Explain the Importance of Game Theory Explain.
1 Bargaining & Markets u As before: Buyers and Sellers, δtp,δtp, δ t (1-p). u Matching: Seller meets a buyer with probability α. A buyer meets a seller.
Efficiency Loss in a Network Resource Allocation Game Paper by: Ramesh Johari, John N. Tsitsiklis [ Informs] Presented by: Gayatree Ganu.
Bargaining Towards Maximized Resource Utilization in Video Streaming Datacenters Yuan Feng 1, Baochun Li 1, and Bo Li 2 1 Department of Electrical and.
1 Quality, Upgrades and (the Loss of ) Market Power in a Dynamic Monopoly Market James J. Anton Gary Biglaiser Duke University University of North Carolina.
Microeconomics Lecture 2 Gains from exchange. Attention! I am giving each of you a piece of paper. On it is written information useful to you and private.
Game Theory is Evolving MIT , Fall Our Topics in the Course  Classical Topics Choice under uncertainty Cooperative games  Values  2-player.
Unions and Collective Bargaining Topic 4 Part I. Topic Outline Bargaining Models under Complete Information Applied to Collective Bargaining Nash’s Cooperative.
Standard and Extended Form Games A Lesson in Multiagent System Based on Jose Vidal’s book Fundamentals of Multiagent Systems Henry Hexmoor, SIUC.
Linking multi-agent simulation to experiments in economy Re-implementing John Duffy’s model of speculative learning agents.
Introduction to Matching Theory E. Maskin Jerusalem Summer School in Economic Theory June 2014.
A Study of Central Auction Based Wholesale Electricity Markets S. Ceppi and N. Gatti.
An Extended Alternating-Offers Bargaining Protocol for Automated Negotiation in Multi-agent Systems P. Winoto, G. McCalla & J. Vassileva Department of.
1 What is Game Theory About? r Analysis of situations where conflict of interests is present r Goal is to prescribe how conflicts can be resolved 2 2 r.
5.1.Static Games of Incomplete Information
1 Bargaining & Markets u Two populations: Buyers and Sellers u A sellers has 1 indivisible unit to sell u A Buyer has 1 unit of divisible money u If they.
Market Design and Analysis Lecture 2 Lecturer: Ning Chen ( 陈宁 )
Ch. 16 Oligopoly. Oligopoly Only a few sellers offer similar or identical products Actions of any seller can have large impact on profits of other sellers.
Bargaining games Econ 414. General bargaining games A common application of repeated games is to examine situations of two or more parties bargaining.
Second lecture: The theory of monopoly, monopsony and bilateral monopoly: the standard microeconomic theory and its limits. Third lecture: The theory of.
Lecture V: Bargaining Recommended Reading: Dixit & Skeath, Chapter 17 Osborne, Chapter 6.1, 16 Powell, In the Shadow of Power, Ch. 3.
RUPAYAN GUPTA ROGER WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY November 8, 2012 Designing Institutions for Global Security.
Oligopoly Overheads. Market Structure Market structure refers to all characteristics of a market that influence the behavior of buyers and sellers, when.
Game Theory By Ben Cutting & Rohit Venkat.
Management support systems II
Multi-Item Auctions.
Ch. 16 Oligopoly.
Game Theory: The Competitive Dynamics of Strategy
Algorithmic Game Theory and Internet Computing
Lecture 8 Asymmetric Information: Adverse Selection
Games Of Strategy Chapter 4 Dixit, Skeath, and Reiley
Exploring Auction mechanisms for local-nodal-markets
Games & Politics Evgeniya Lukinova.
Putting it all together
Game Theory in Wireless and Communication Networks: Theory, Models, and Applications Lecture 2 Bayesian Games Zhu Han, Dusit Niyato, Walid Saad, Tamer.
What do we agree on when we disagree
Presentation transcript:

Bargaining in Markets with One-Sided Competition: Model and Analysis Nicola Gatti DEI, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, Milano, 20133, Italy

Nicola Gatti Results Overview The paper aims at studying models for bilateral negotiations with rational agents when they are in competition Modeling result: extension of the alternating-offers protocol to the situation wherein: There are more buyers and one seller, and The seller can exploit the outside-option Algorithmic result: development of an efficient solving algorithm for computing agents’ equilibrium strategies (this result is not discussed in the presentation) 2

Nicola Gatti 3 Bilateral Negotiation (Bargaining) BuyerSeller 10$ 12$ 11$...

Nicola Gatti 4 Alternating-Offers Protocol Game theoretical mechanism for bilateral negotiation [Rubinstein, Econometrica, 1982] A buyer and a seller wants to negotiate in an alternate-fashion with discrete time Someone decides the agent that starts to make offers Time discounts agents’ utilities (so agents prefer to reach agreement as soon as possible) Agents are supposed to be rational, i.e., they act aiming at maximizing their expected utility The solution is a pair of strategies, a buyer’s one and a seller’s one, that are in equilibrium (typically, refinement of Nash)

Nicola Gatti 5 The Formal Model [Di Giunta and Gatti, 2006] Players Player function Actions Preferences

Nicola Gatti Bargaining in Markets More buyers and more sellers are present in a market More buyers are in competition over the purchase of an item from the same seller More sellers are in competition over the sale of an item to the same buyer The alternating-offers protocol does not capture this competition We extend the alternating-offers protocol to capture: The matching between a buyer and a seller The possibility of leaving a negotiation to start a new one with a different commercial partner We consider a situation with a seller and more buyers 6

Nicola Gatti Bilateral Negotiation with Outside-Option 7 Buyer 3 Seller 11$ Buyer 1 Buyer 4 Buyer 2 14$ 15$ accept

Nicola Gatti 8 The Formal Model situationstageagentstime pointsavailable actions agent i is not negotiating 1buyeranymatchable, nonmatchable 2selleranymatch(b j ) if b j has made matchable agent i is negotiating 2buyeralternatelyoffer(x), accept, exit 2selleralternatelyoffer(x), accept, exit, match(b j ) is b j has made matchable Devoted to matching Devoted to negotiation

Nicola Gatti Closing Remarks The proposed model allows one to effectively capture competition among agents: With one seller and more buyers, the seller gains drastically more than against the weakest buyer The computation of agents’ equilibrium strategies is easy (linear in the size of the problem) In future, we will investigate: The comparison between the agents’ expected utilities in our protocol with respect to the ones in multilateral negotiations The analysis of negotiations with uncertainty 9

Nicola Gatti Questions to: 10