April 9, 2013.  Our school district has received some questions regarding the State required student assessments  Parents are asking our thoughts on.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Update on Novi’s Journey Presentation for MAASE April 13, 2011.
Advertisements

Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
Targeted Efforts to Improve Learning for ALL Students.
The New York State Assessment System and LEP/ELLs: An Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, and Reporting OBE-FLS 2007.
Arizona College and Career Readiness Extraordinary Learning for All Strategic Plan Goal 1: Ensure each Madison student achieves annual academic growth.
PUSD Compensation Committee Process Overview Governing Board Study Session January 7, 2013.
 Gisela Feild Administrative Director Assessment, Research and Data Analysis July 2014.
DRIVING INSTRUCTION THROUGH DATA WITHOUT DATA IT IS JUST AN OPINION.
Espanola Public School Back to School Administrative Meeting July 28, 2015, 8:00-5:00 PM Presented by: Myra L. Martinez Associate Superintendent The mission.
Title 1 at J. Evans Middle School. Title 1 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 was created to ensure that all children have a fair,
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
1 Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Standards (OCIS) Update Holiday Inn Albany, New York October 15, 2010.
ICSD District RtI Committee Agenda 3/13/12 3:45- Review of Our Norms and today’s agenda 4:00- Defining RtI and screening tool criteria 4:30- Begin review.
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Annual Report and Public Hearing Grapevine-Colleyville ISD
Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Standards (OCIS) The Albany Marriott Albany, New York September 15, 2010.
NYS Middle Level Liaisons Network As representatives of statewide middle level education, our purpose is to advocate for middle level needs, inform SED.
Maximizing Reading Gains to Meet AYP Targets: Decision Support Analytics for School Board Providence School District, RI April 2014.
November 7,  Provisos are in annual Appropriations Bills  Proviso 1A.60 included in bill  Very prescriptive.
Compliance Considerations Keeping Up in an Age of Accountability Presented by Jean E. Taraskiewicz.
UNDERSTANDING LEXILES Lancaster School District Department of Curriculum, Instruction & Assessment.
Alpine School District and Utah Core Standards Information for Parents and Employees Updated: July 23, 2014.
Charles A. Lindbergh Elementary School Kenmore-Town of Tonawanda UFSD A Business First Math Award Winning School 2010 Top 10% in all of WNY.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
BOCES Advisory Council for Curriculum & Instruction NYS Board of Regents Adjustment Options to Common Core Implementation Teresa Prendergast, Ed.D. Garden.
Accessing and Reporting State Student Achievement Data for GPRA Purposes Amy A. Germuth, Ph.D. Compass Consulting Group, LLC.
1 Community Accountability Summit April History of Accountability Changes.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2013 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting State.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
What is a Title I? Title I is Part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of This program provides financial assistance to states.
NYS Middle Level Liaisons Network As representatives of statewide middle level education, our purpose is to advocate for middle level needs, inform SED.
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
MEAP / MME New Cut Scores Gill Elementary February 2012.
PARCC AND MCAS FAQ FOR ADMINISTRATORS AND EDUCATORS Will Massachusetts use PARCC or MCAS in spring 2016? To evaluate PARCC’s quality, rigor,
Drewry Mason Elementary Annual Title I Meeting 12:00-1:00, 3:00-4:00, 6:00-7:00 August 8, 2013.
1 Performance Trend Data ELA and MATH Grades 3-8 Aggregate Results August 2012.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction January 2015 Jenny Singh, Administrator Academic Accountability.
Drewry Mason Elementary Annual Title I Meeting 12:00-1:00, 3:00-4:00, 6:00-7:00 August 9, 2012.
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
Federal Accountability Accountability Policy Advisory Committee (APAC) and Accountability Technical Advisory Committee (ATAC) Meeting | March 5, 2012 Texas.
ISAT AND MAP ASSESSMENTS THORP SCHOLASTIC ACADEMY SESSION 2: 2/27/2013.
CCSSO Task Force Recommendations on Educator Preparation Idaho State Department of Education December 14, 2013 Webinar.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
Raising the Bar for Oregon. Why Now?  New Mathematics Content Standards were adopted for grades K-8 in 2007 and high school in Oregon Statewide.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
Anderson School Accreditation We commit to continuous growth and improvement by  Creating a culture for learning by working together  Providing.
What just happened and what’s next? Presenters: Steve Dibb, MDE Debra Landvik, MDE AYP 2011.
Diane Mugford – Federal Accountability, ADAM Russ Keglovits – Measurement and Accountability, ADAM Renewing Nevada’s ESEA Waiver Flexibility Request.
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
1. Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA December
Highland Creek Elementary School Read to Achieve February 6, 2014.
Research and Evaluation
Annual Title I Parent Meeting
Freehold Borough Public Schools ESEA/Title I Presentation
January 2015 Jenny Singh, Administrator Academic Accountability Unit
Budget Overview Review of Last Years Budget
Sonoraville Elementary School
Identifying Multiple Measures and Defining Significance
Wallkill Central School District OPEN HOUSE
Wallkill Central School District OPEN HOUSE
NSTA Summer Congress July, 2002
Rockville Centre Schools
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
Whose Job Is It? Part Two At the Board Table Discussion Tool
Presentation transcript:

April 9, 2013

 Our school district has received some questions regarding the State required student assessments  Parents are asking our thoughts on the topic and what the implications are if their children do not participate in the assessments  This presentation is created to provide accurate information regarding this topic

 Designated as a focus district in even though all of our schools were in “good standing”  Must develop complex building (2) and district improvement plans  Uses resources and time that are drawn away from more pressing educational needs  If student participation rate falls below 95%, we will remain on focus designation status with more buildings required to develop improvement plans

 State Education Department indicates “No new districts will be focus designated for two more years; however, there will be an increase in local assistance plan designations due to failure to make AYP because of participation rates.”  This may result in an increase of school improvement funds that must be set aside for required activities

 There is no “opt out” provision  Failure to comply will have a negative impact on accountability as all schools are required to have a 95% participation rate in State testing  Schools failing to make AYP cannot become a SED recognized Reward School or can lose its current Reward status  Note: Lindbergh Elementary is currently designated as a “Highest Performing Reward School”

 July 2010: SED adopted and shared the Common Core Learning Standards  December 2010: The Board of Regents announced that progress on these standards will be measured in grades 3-8 beginning in and in high school in June 2014  NYSUT says teacher evaluation agreement is ‘good for students and fair to teachers’ - NYSUT Media Relations - February 16, 2012  Recently NYSUT indicated that assessments are ahead of the curriculum

 Ken Slentz (SED): “The Common Core State Standards allows states to share a common definition at each grade level by working backward based on the demands of college and careers.”  State assessments are redesigned to measure what students know and can do relative to the grade level Common Core State Standards  Increases in rigor  Focus on text  Depth of math

 To provide NYS educators and parents with an accurate indicator of how our students are performing and their progress toward college and career readiness

9 ELAMATH Green bar shows first year performance with new cut score

 Sample assessment questions can be found at the following link:  common-core-sample-questions common-core-sample-questions

 Some parents have cited “congressional findings” at 20 USCS 3401as a right for opting their students out of assessments  Education is a local endeavor and primarily a state responsibility: “The legislature shall provide for the maintenance and support of a system of free common schools, wherein all the children of this state may be educated.” -New York State Constitution

 7210: Student Evaluation and Reports to Parents  7250: Student Privacy, Parental Access to Information, etc.  7260: Response to Intervention (RtI)  8110: Curriculum Development, Resources and Evaluation  8111: Quality Control in District Curriculum  8250: Evaluation of the Instructional Program

 The District has formed a committee to review the locally chosen and created assessments (not State-required assessments) to determine which, if any, of these assessments may be reduced or eliminated

 The number and type of student assessments for teacher evaluation were reviewed and approved by our teachers’ union, district administration, and Board of Education  This APPR agreement must be reviewed on an annual basis with consideration given to the total amount of student assessments being administered

 Consider the following hypothetical class:  6 students refuse to take State assessments  7 students refuse to take local District assessments  5 students refuse to take both State and local District assessments  8 students take all assessments

 What are the reactions of the students to each other?  What are the potential distractions during assessments?  What are the management challenges that teachers will face in such a scenario in addition to the increased expectations already in existence?

 It is in the best interest of the District and the students to participate in the State and local assessment systems  Assessment is a vital part of the total educational process  Concerned individuals should advocate to improve the State assessment system at the State and Federal levels  The District will work to improve our local assessment system

 Please see the District website for additional information on this topic under “Headlines and Press Releases”  District URL: