Mock Trial: The Basics Prof. Robert T. Sherwin February 4, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In-House Mock Trial Seminar
Advertisements

Trial Work: The Most Fun You Will Ever Have in a Courtroom! BLST, DECEMBER 2013 MARIE C. BECHTEL, ESQ., LEGAL AID OF WEST VIRGINIA.
Rules of Evidence and Objections
WINNING YOUR UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE HEARING Presented By D DeGROOT M MANAGEMENT S SERVICES, INC
2:05 sec Today you will be learning about how to conduct and participate in a mock trial. You will become familiar with some basic courtroom procedures.
2:05 sec Today you will be learning about how to conduct and participate in a mock trial. You will become familiar with some basic courtroom procedures.
R OLES & R ESPONSIBILITIES From Speaking With A Purpose: Jo Thornton & Jessica Pegis.
Preparing for Court Scott Pelking, LPC-S. I am not an attorney, and the information conveyed in this presentation should not be construed to be legal.
Purpose of Testimony Inform the fact finder of your version of a story. Provide facts essential for a case/hearing.
Mock Trial Procedures You and the Law. There are 2 sides: Prosecution Prosecution Responsible for proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed.
Common Trial Procedures United States. Opening Statements.
LAW for Business and Personal Use © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible.
Minnesota State Bar Association High School Mock Trial Program State of Rigor v. Jess Dubois and Pat Dowling.
Courtroom Testimony Presented by Anna Roberts Smith.
Mock Trial Modified by Dennis Gerl from Evidence PPT by John Ed-Bishop
Eric J. Bengtson, Esq. Civil defense attorney (No criminal stuff!) Davis & Young, APLC.
TRIAL INFORMATION Steps, vocabulary.
Parts with Explanations
The Case Police vs. Jack Jones
Mr. Valanzano Business Law. Dispute Resolution Litigate – ________________________________________________ In some cases, people decided too quickly to.
EVIDENCE Some Basics Spring Overview The cases you read involve facts and law Most often appellate courts decide legal issues based on the facts.
Trial advocacy workshop
OBJECTIONS IN COURT. WHAT ARE THEY? An attorney can object any time she or he thinks the opposing attorney is violating the rules of evidence. The attorney.
MBA Mock Trial Program. What is a Mock Trial?  Trial before a real judge (or lawyer)  Held in real courtroom (State Court)  Examination of witnesses.
Tips on Making a Successful Mock Trial. Semifinalists 2008.
Simplified Rules of Evidence How to Behave in the Courtroom.
Section B, Part V: Examination of Witnesses. Credibility –Most of the information upon which the jurors/judge will decide your case will come from examination.
MBA Mock Trial Program Mock Trial Basics Presentation by Jim and Josh McGuire Permission granted for any education use in connection with MBA Mock Trial.
CROSS EXAMINATION YOU tell the story. YOU are the star.
Direct Examination Caroline Goldner Cinquanto Adjunct Professor
YOUR GUIDE TO THE MOCK TRIAL. MOCK TRIAL ORDER OF OPERATIONS- THE CROWN Crown (prosecution) opening statement- 5 minutes Crown's first witness direct.
Closing Arguments Saving the Best for Last. Purpose of Closing Arguments This is your one chance to be an advocate. This is your one chance to be an advocate.
STEPS IN A CRIMINAL TRIAL. 1. OPENING STATEMENTS PROSECUTION ALWAYS GOES FIRST DEFENSE CAN DELAY UNTIL THEY BEGIN THEIR CASE. WHY? INTRODUCTION THIS IS.
Basic Evidence and Trial Procedure. Opening Statement  Preview the evidence “The evidence will show”  Introduce theme  Briefly describe the issues,
The American Mock Trial Association Welcomes You AMTA Evaluator Orientation.
Questioning Witnesses Miss Getsch Crime and Justice.
Direct Examinations DO NOW: VOCABULARY ON LINE ON MY WEBSITE.
English 9H Ms. Bugasch November 4, 2013 “D” Day Goals 1. Evidence Submittal and Approval 2. Students will be able to: -Understand the purpose of cross-examination.
 WATCH THE VIDEO CLIP, THEN GO TO THE WEB SITE WRITE DOWN WHAT’s THE MOST IMPORTANCE PART OF THE TRIAL AND TELL WHY. 
Presentation by Jim and Josh McGuire Permission granted for any education use in connection with MBA Mock Trial Program November 18, 2002 Pirated and modified.
How To Prepare A Team For Mock Trial Presenters: Jean Wentz and Lourdes Morales.
The Criminal Trial Process Section 11 (d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that each person charged with an offence is to be ‘presumed innocent.
People in a Courtroom. People in a courtroom Criminal Court Judge Jury Defendant Prosecutor Bailiff Defense Attorney Witness Civil Court Judge Defendant.
Brown: Legal Terminology, 5 th ed. © 2008 Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved. Legal Terminology Fifth Edition by Gordon.
Trial Procedure. Theory of a case  Attorneys must present a logical argument demonstrating what really happened to the jury  This is prepared prior.
CHAPTER 7: Emond Montgomery Publications 1 Direct Examination of Witnesses.
The Trial Civ Lit I: Unit 9. 2 Preparing for Trial.
Examining the Witnesses. Witness Examinations in Trials This is how you present evidence to the jury. DIRECT EXAMINATION  You tell your side of the story.
Mock Trial Team Strategies and Formalities. Opening Statements 3 minutes Objective – Acquaint court with the case and outline what you are going to prove.
+ Trial Basics Information you need for the trial!
CJ227: Criminal Procedure Unit 6 Seminar Mary K Cronin.
Attorney/Judge. The purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. The opening statements.
Today’s Goal : Learn Mock Trial Procedures in preparation for our Mock Trial.
2:05 sec Today you will be learning about how to conduct and participate in a mock trial. You will become familiar with some basic courtroom procedures.
Closing Arguments Organizing and delivering effective closing arguments.
Direct Examination Direct is when you tell your side of the story
“A-B-C’s” of what you need to know for your mock trials!
PREPARATION AND PRESENTATION OF A MOCK TRIAL
Pretrial Conference After discovery, a pretrial hearing is held to clarify the issues, consider a settlement, and set rules for trial Once the trial court.
MBA Mock Trial Program Mock Trial Basics
MBA Mock Trial Program Mock Trial Basics
Opening Statements & Closing Arguments
How Witnesses are Examined
Belleville High School Law Related Education Program
What is Mock Trial? Steps in what we do…...
Rules of Evidence and Objections
Mock Trial: The Basics.
MBA Mock Trial Program Mock Trial Basics
Mock Trial Objections Part II.
Business Law Final Exam
Presentation transcript:

Mock Trial: The Basics Prof. Robert T. Sherwin February 4, 2011

Mock Trial: Defined Mock: Feigned; not real; sham. Trial: The examination before a judicial tribunal of the facts put in issue in a cause, often including issues of law as well as those of fact. In short: A simulated trial! It is NOT a simulated oral argument (that’s moot court). 2

How we prove and determine facts In the American justice system, juries (or judges) are asked to determine facts based upon evidence. Evidence generally comes in two forms: –Witness testimony –Physical evidence (documents, videos, objects) 3

Witness testimony Witnesses are “called to the stand” to give testimony under oath. Their testimony comes in the form of answers to questions (an “examination”) by the attorneys. The party who calls the witness to testify conducts the “direct examination” of the witness. The side against whom the witness testifies conducts the “cross examination.” 4

Physical evidence Witnesses may be asked to testify about documents, videos, or other physical objects. These pieces of physical evidence can be “admitted into evidence” as “exhibits” and be considered by the jury to the same extent it considers witness testimony. 5

Trial – in sum The purpose of the trial is to allow each side to introduce evidence that the fact finder can use to answer questions of fact. 6

How does a mock trial go? Housekeeping/motions in limine Opening statements Plaintiff/Prosecution puts on evidence (two witnesses) Defendant moves for directed verdict/acquittal Defendant puts on evidence (two witnesses) Closing arguments 7

Division of duties You compete as a team of two. One teammate delivers the opening statement; the other delivers the closing argument. Each teammate conducts a direct examination of one of your witnesses and a cross examination of one of the other team’s witnesses. 8

Division of duties (cont.) Other matters (housekeeping, dispositive motions) may be divided as you see fit, but try to equal each teammate’s “face time” as much as possible. You must prepare both sides (Plaintiff AND Defendant) of the case; you will switch throughout the competition. 9

Formalities Plaintiff/Prosecution sits at table closest to jury box (or left if no jury box). Stand up when the judge enters or calls the court to order (and any time you speak). Judge will ask attorneys to make their announcements (Plaintiff/Prosecution goes first). 10

Housekeeping Opportunity to address preferences of the judge in how trial will proceed. –Permission to roam about courtroom during opening/closing? –Arm’s length from podium during witness questioning? –Constructive approach/witness swearing? –Reading of jury instructions? –Addressing judge as both judge and jury? Plaintiff should present motions first. 11

Opening statement Your opportunity to introduce yourself and present your theory of the case. Tell the jury what you expect the evidence will show. This is an opening “statement,” not an opening “argument” – you are not supposed to be argumentative or combative. Opening statements are NOT evidence! 12

Opening statement (cont.) Should last no more than five minutes “May it please the Court? Counsel [acknowledge opposing counsel]. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury [turn to the jury].” Introduce yourself, your co-counsel, and the party you represent. Begin telling your client’s story as framed by your “theme.” 13

Theme You should always have a theme to describe your case – a “hook” the jury can latch on to and conceptualize the evidence through. Examples: –“If the glove don’t fit…” –CSI –Desperate Executives 14

Opening statement (cont.) Explain the dilemma in the case – what the plaintiff is claiming or why the plaintiff is wrong. Explain the burden of proof and the elements of the claim (particularly if you’re the plaintiff). Introduce your witnesses and explain how you expect them to testify. Explain how you expect the other side’s witnesses to testify. 15

Opening statement tips (cont.) Couch everything in terms of “we expect the evidence will show” or “the evidence will likely show” or “you’ll learn that…” –Remember – you haven’t held the trial yet, so you can’t say things as a matter of fact that are in dispute! Objections? Ending: Ask the jury to carefully weigh the evidence and find for your client. 16

Direct examination After each side has opened, the parties put on their “case in chief.” You do this through calling witnesses. Decide which of your two witnesses you want to call first. When the judge asks you to call your first (or next) witness, stand and say “Your Honor, the Plaintiff calls Witness McWitnessy to the stand.” 17

Direct examination (cont.) Make sure witnesses have carefully read their deposition/statements. Give them a list of the questions you’re going to ask and the answers you’d like them to give (even though they can’t take that to the stand with them). Plan out your questions according to subject areas. Within each subject area, move chronologically so your questions make sense. 18

Direct examination (cont.) What do you need from the witness? Be sure to ask whatever questions necessary to get the witness to testify about the essential elements of your claim. If the witness doesn’t say it, it’s not in evidence and you haven’t proven your case! Ask open-ended questions. Any question that suggests its answer is leading, and therefore objectionable. 19

Direct examination (cont.) Use the witness to explain physical evidence. To give the witness an exhibit, first ask the judge, “Your Honor, may I approach the witness?” Before you approach the witness, give a copy of the exhibit to opposing counsel, and ask the judge if he/she would like a copy as well. 20

Direct examination (cont.) Once you finish your direct examination, look to the judge and say “Your honor, I pass the witness.” Don’t say “I have no further questions,” which may lead a mean judge to say that you’ve waived your right to do a re-direct examination after cross. 21

Cross examination Your opportunity to “question” the other side’s witnesses Goals: –Tell “the rest of the story” –“Impeach” a witness/make him look bad –Collect ammo for closing argument –Make yourself look good Hardest part about trial work (and mock trial). Also most fun. 22

Why so hard? 23 Three reasons: –Witness is adverse –What we think we know about cross is wrong –Can’t rehearse it Control over the witness is vital. Without it, the examination goes badly. With control, you look good, and when the witness tries to deny you of it, he looks bad.

How to get control? 24 Leading questions? No! SHORT, SIMPLE, STATEMENTS

Problems with questions Jury wants to hear the witness’s answers. You lose the ability to tell a story. 25

The benefit of short statements The length of the statement dictates the length of the response. Focusing on short statements prevents asking compound questions that allow the witness to say “No” when at least part of the answer begs a “Yes.” Allows you to communicate with the jury, not the witness. 26

So how do I do it? Decide the points you need to make through the examination. Only ask questions to transition from point to point. –Mr. Smith, I’d like to ask you some questions about _____. Is that OK? Eliminate prefixes. Eliminate suffixes. Design short statements to move in a logical progression toward each point you need to make. 27

What if it doesn’t work? If witness stares at you, say, “Correct” or “Isn’t that right?” while nodding. On the next statement, nod. If witness argues with you or says something other than “Yes,” listen to his answer. And then… 28

What NOT to do The “Deal” Cut off witness and thank him/her for answer “Just answer yes or no” Ask the court for help (except as a last resort) 29

What TO do Ask, repeat, repeat. –Or ask, repeat, reverse. Full, formal name. Shorten the question. “I’m sorry, you must have misunderstood my question. I wasn’t asking about…” “That didn’t answer my question, did it?” “Then your answer is yes?” 30

Cross examination tips There’s no need to be mean to the witness Avoid the “one question too many” – it might be OK to save the conclusion for jury argument. Try to end with a powerful point. “Pass the witness” when you’re done. 31

Re-direct examination The person who calls the witness always has “the last word.” So, after cross, you can ask additional direct examination questions of your witness. Fix any damaging testimony that came out on cross by letting the witness explain. Limited to scope of direct/cross. 32

Re-direct examination When you’re done, say “Your Honor, I have no further questions. May this witness be excused?” No re-cross examination allowed in our mock trial competitions. 33

Closing the “case in chief” After the Plaintiff has called its two witnesses, rise and tell the judge “Your Honor, at this time the Plaintiff rests its case in chief.” Defendant should do the same after it calls its two witnesses in its case in chief. 34

Motion for Directed Verdict (Halftime!) After the Plaintiff rests its case in chief, the Defendant should ask the judge to excuse the jury. Defendant then moves for a Directed Verdict, arguing that the Plaintiff did not put on sufficient evidence to prove a prima facie case. Argue the elements of the cause(s) of action and why they weren’t met. It will be denied. That’s OK! 35

Closing argument Opportunity to be theatrical (and argumentative!). Use the same theme that your partner introduced in opening. Talk about what the witnesses said. If a witness didn’t say it or it didn’t appear in an admitted exhibit, you can’t talk about it! Point out inconsistencies in opposing witness’s statements. 36

Closing argument (cont.) Explain the elements of the claim and how the evidence did/did not establish those elements. If there are jury instructions, explain them and how the jury should answer. Explain the burden of proof and make it work for you. Ask the jury to hold for your client. Plaintiff can reserve time for rebuttal. 37

Objections For 1L mock trial, we’ve eliminated nearly all evidentiary objections. The objections you may make: –Ambiguous –Argumentative –Asked and answered –Assumes facts not in evidence –Compound –Leading –Narrative 38

Objections (cont.) The objections you may make (cont.): –Non-responsive (as to witness testimony) –Relevance You may not object to any evidentiary issues other than relevance. In particular, no hearsay objections! Only the attorney handling that witness may object. Keep a list of available objections at counsel table. 39

Objections (cont.) When the other side asks a question that is objectionable, rise and say “Objection, Your Honor,” and then state the grounds of your objection. The counsel objected to should then say, “May I respond your Honor?” (unless you know you’re wrong, in which case just say, “I’d be happy to rephrase, your Honor.”) 40

Closing thoughts Keep counsel table neat and clean. Consider putting everything in a binder with tabs. Other than announcements and objections, speak from podium (unless permission to roam in opening/closing). Stand up straight – look like a lawyer! Don’t talk or overly whisper to co- counsel. 41

Mock Trial: The Basics Prof. Robert T. Sherwin February 4, 2011