8. Failure Rate Prediction Reliable System Design 2011 by: Amir M. Rahmani.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REL103; Slide 1 Reliability Predictions n The objective of a reliability prediction is to determine if the equipment design will have the ability.
Advertisements

IEC – IEC Presentation G.M. International s.r.l
Chapter 12 Prototyping and Testing Design of Biomedical Devices and Systems By Paul H. King Richard C. Fries.
Bridging Theory in Practice Transferring Technical Knowledge to Practical Applications.
Reliability Engineering (Rekayasa Keandalan)
Reliability. Introduction Introduction to Reliability Historical Perspective Current Devices Trends.
Relex Reliability Software “the intuitive solution
RELIABILITY Dr. Ron Lembke SCM 352. Reliability Ability to perform its intended function under a prescribed set of conditions Probability product will.
5th Conference on Intelligent Systems
6. Reliability Modeling Reliable System Design 2010 by: Amir M. Rahmani.
SMJ 4812 Project Mgmt and Maintenance Eng.
Robust Low Power VLSI ECE 7502 S2015 Burn-in/Stress Test for Reliability: Reducing burn-in time through high-voltage stress test and Weibull statistical.
Time-Dependent Failure Models
BURN-IN, RELIABILITY TESTING, AND MANUFACTURING OF SEMICONDUCTORS
1 Lecture 2: System Metrics and Pipelining Today’s topics: (Sections 1.6, 1.7, 1.9, A.1)  Quantitative principles of computer design  Measuring cost.
Failure Rate Estimation M.Lampton UCB SSL An upper limit on failure rate, or a lower limit on MTTF, is required to establish system reliability The limit.
From Compaq, ASP- DAC00. Power Consumption Power consumption is on the rise due to: - Higher integration levels (more devices & wires) - Rising clock.
Reliability A. A. Elimam. Reliability: Definition The ability of a product to perform its intended function over a period of time and under prescribed.
Copyright 2007 Koren & Krishna, Morgan-Kaufman Part.2.1 FAULT TOLERANT SYSTEMS Part 2 – Canonical.
1 Review Definition: Reliability is the probability that a component or system will perform a required function for a given period of time when used under.
Introduction Before… Next…
Copyright © 2014 reliability solutions all rights reserved Reliability Solutions Seminar Managing and Improving Reliability 2014 Agenda Martin Shaw – Reliability.
Reliability Chapter 4S.
Automobile Warranty Data Analysis by Anita Rebarchak DSES-6070 HV5 Statistical Methods for Reliability Engineering Professor Ernesto Gutierrez-Miravete.
PowerPoint presentation to accompany
RELIABILITY & SAFETY ANALYSIS PRESENTED BY: ANDREW BATEK Team # 15: Acoustic Storm Interweaving the impressive visual power of electricity and the visceral.
BPT2423 – STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL.  Fundamental Aspects  Product Life Cycle Curve  Measures of Reliability  Failure Rate, Mean Life and Availability.
1 Product Reliability Chris Nabavi BSc SMIEEE © 2006 PCE Systems Ltd.
Project & Quality Management Quality Management Reliability.
1 Reliability Application Dr. Jerrell T. Stracener, SAE Fellow Leadership in Engineering EMIS 7370/5370 STAT 5340 : PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS FOR SCIENTISTS.
MS SANNA BT TAKING / July 12, 2006 EMT 361/3: RELIABILITY & FAILURE ANALYSIS.
Transition of Component States N F Component fails Component is repaired Failed state continues Normal state continues.
Software Reliability SEG3202 N. El Kadri.
Vegard Joa Moseng – Student meeting. A LITTLE BIT ABOUT SYSTEM RELIABILITY:  Reliability: The ability of an item to perform a required function, under.
Lean Six Sigma: Process Improvement Tools and Techniques Donna C. Summers © 2011 Pearson Higher Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved.
Parameter NameParameter Symbol ValueDescription Base Failure Rate λ b Voltage Regulator value Temperature FactorπTπT ° C Max Junction.
Copyright © 2014 reliability solutions all rights reserved Reliability Solutions Seminar Managing and Improving Reliability 2015 Agenda Martin Shaw – Reliability.
The Influence of the Selected Factors on Transient Thermal Impedance of Semiconductor Devices Krzysztof Górecki, Janusz Zarębski Gdynia Maritime University.
Kian Hui Wong Chia Siong Goh Wan Qi Choo Jun Jun Peh Presenter: Kian Hui Wong.
Reliability & Maintainability Engineering An Introduction Robert Brown Electrical & Computer Engineering Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
CoolRunner XPLA3 CPLD Overview - August 2000 File Number Here ®
Reliability McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Solar Telematics System
Isograph Reliability Software Overview of Prediction Methods.
1 Design for Reliability
Practice Problems Actex Sections 6, 7. Section 6 -- #3 A company prices its hurricane insurance using the following assumptions: – In any calendar year,
Part.2.1 In The Name of GOD FAULT TOLERANT SYSTEMS Part 2 – Canonical Structures Chapter 2 – Hardware Fault Tolerance.
Reliability Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill.
Taniya Siddiqua, Paul Lee University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
CS203 – Advanced Computer Architecture Dependability & Reliability.
Module 13 Reliability 1. Key Dimensions of Quality Performance – primary operating characteristics Features – “bells and whistles” Reliability – probability.
Fault Trees.
Quantitative evaluation of Dependability
Integrated Circuits.
Microcontroller Enhancement Design Project
Martin Shaw – Reliability Solutions
3 PHASE SEQUENCE CHECKER BY LED INDICATION
Reliability and Safety Analysis
Martin Shaw – Reliability Solutions
RAM XI Training Summit October 2018
Reliability.
Quantitative evaluation of Dependability
Martin Shaw – Reliability Solutions
YuankaiGao,XiaogangLi
Reliability Calculations
Computer Evolution and Performance
Production and Operations Management
RELIABILITY Reliability is -
Reliability Calculations
سیستم های تحمل پذیر خرابی
Presentation transcript:

8. Failure Rate Prediction Reliable System Design 2011 by: Amir M. Rahmani

matlab1.ir Bathtub Curve Three phases of system lifetime – Infant mortality – Normal lifetime – Wear-out period Every product has a failure rate, λ which is the number of units failing per unit time.

Bathtub Curve (2) It is the manufacturer’s aim to ensure that product in the Infant mortality period does not get to the customer. This leaves a product with a Normal lifetime period during which failures occur randomly i.e. λ is constant, and finally a Wear-out period, usually beyond the products Normal lifetime, where λ is increasing. matlab1.ir

Usefulness of failure rate prediction - to assess whether reliability goals can be reached, - to identify potential design weaknesses, - to compare alternative designs, - to evaluate designs and to analyze life-cycle costs, - to provide data for system reliability and availability analysis, - to plan logistic support strategies, - to establish objectives for reliability tests. matlab1.ir

The failure rate prediction process - define the equipment to be analyzed - understand system by analyzing equipment structure - determine operational conditions: operating temperature, rated stress; - determine the actual electrical stresses for each component; - extract the reference failure rate for each component from the database; - sum up the component failure rates; - document the results and the assumptions. matlab1.ir

Failure Rate Calculation How do we can calculate failure rate? - Experimental system observation Needs to very long time Technology wear-out High cost - Failure prediction with standards Telcordia SR332/ Bellcore TR332 British Telecom HRD4 and HRD5 Siemens SN29500 (based on IEC 61709

COMPARISON OF FEATURES OF RELIABILITY PREDICTION METHODS matlab1.ir

Failure Rate Prediction Mil-Hdbk-217F, 217F_1, 217F_2 Microprocessor, PAL, PLA, MOS device λ p = Π L Π Q (C 1 Π T + C 2 Π E ) failures/10 6 hours λ p is the part failure rate Π L represents the learning factor and is determined by the experience of the manufacturer Π Q is determined by the part quality C 1 is related to die complexity Π T is related to ambient temperature C 2 is related to the package type Π E is determined by the operating environment

matlab1.ir Failure Rate Prediction Π L : learning factor (section 5.10) Π L =2, for a new chip Π L =1 for product of a chip with high experience Π L = 0.01exp( *year) Π Q : quality factor, chips testing before selling (section 5.10) 1- A: Π Q =1, high quality military application (all chips will be tested) 2- B: Π Q =2, military application 3- C: Π Q =16, high quality commercial application (e.g. one of 1000 chips will be tested) 4- D: Π Q =150, standard components

matlab1.ir Failure Rate Prediction Π T : temperature factor (section 5.8) depends on: Device technology Packaging type Case temperature Power dissipation Π T = 0.1e -A(1/(Tj+273) – 1/298) A depends on: –Device technology –Packaging type T j = T c + θ jc * P –T c is case temperature –θ jc is temperature resistance between case and junctions –P is Max. of power dissipation

matlab1.ir Failure Rate Prediction C 1 : Die complexity (section 5.1) Microprocessor C 2 : Package type (section 5.9) for hermetic DIP C 2 = 2.8 * (N p ) 1.08 N p = Number of functional pin Π E : environment factor, (section 5.10), Table 3-2 Number of bitsBipolarCMOS Up to Up to Up to

matlab1.ir Failure Rate Prediction: Example What is the failure rate of MC6800 microprocessor? What is the failure rate for each gate? What is the MTTF? Function: 8-bit processor No. of gate:12667 Number of pins64 Technology:NCMOS Packaging:64 pin ceramic DIP hermetically Power dissipation:1.5 W Environment:room Case temperature:35 oc Power supply:+5 v Quality:commercial

matlab1.ir Failure Rate Prediction: Example Π L = 1, Π Q = 150 Π T = 0.1*e -5794(1/(35+15* )-1/298) = 0.68 C 1 = 0.06 C 2 = 2.8* (10 -4 )*(64) 1.08 = Π E = 0.38 λ CPU =Π L Π Q (C 1 Π T +C 2 Π E )= 0.75*10 -6 failures/hour λ gate = λ CPU /12667 = 0.395* failures/hour MTTF = 1/λ = 1/0.5*10 -6 = 2*10 6 ≈ 228 years

matlab1.ir Failure Rate Prediction Mil-Hdbk-217F Memories, SRAM, DRAM, xROM λ p = Π L Π Q (C 1 Π T + C 2 Π E +λ cyc ) failures/10 6 hours λ p is the part failure rate Π L represents the learning factor and is determined by the experience of the manufacturer Π Q is determined by the part quality C 1 is related to die complexity Π T is related to ambient temperature C 2 is related to the package type Π E is determined by the operating environment

matlab1.ir Hardware failure rates Ways of improving reliability of hardware – Decrease temperature – Decrease electrical stress – Reduce number of components or increase integration – Increase quality of components – Improve physical environment