DRIVING BREAKTHROUGH PERFORMANCE IN THE NEW WORK ENVIRONMENT Gail Thakarar June 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Presentation to the Cabinet A Presentation to Stakeholders
Advertisements

PINNACLE CONSULTING & COACHING / TABLE GROUP CONSULTING PARTNERS
Coaching Why do Manager and Executives Fail? Four out of ten new executives fail within 18 months. The single biggest reason (according to a survey of.
Twelve Cs for Team Building
Working for Warwickshire – Competency Framework
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
How to Enhance Personal Productivity By Janet Hadley
2013 CollaboRATE Survey Results
The Power of Employee Engagement
Fit to Learn Using the Employability Skills Framework to improve your performance at College The Employability Skills Framework has been developed by business.
Chapter 8: Foundations of Group Behavior
Interpersonal skills & Communication Edina Nagy Lajos Kiss Szabolcs Hornyák.
Leadership Development Nova Scotia Public Service
1 Attracting and Retaining Human Capital David Lofquist, HR Director for Russia, ExxonMobil.
Chapter 13 Teams and Teamwork
Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter Strategic Training.
Leadership and Strategic Planning
Employee Motivation, Involvement, and Recognition.
Coaching Workshop A good coach will make the players see what they can be rather than what they are. –Ara Parseghian ®
Leader’s Role in Engagement Presented by Nancy Carlson Learning & Development Leader.
Fundamentals of Organization Structure
13th June '121Getrude Childrens' Hospital. Getting started 2 2 Organising the workplace involving employees, employee training and committees 3 3 Gathering.
Tools and Software  Globalization, competition and technological trends, and changes in the workforce make finding and retaining talented employees.
Charting a course PROCESS.
Competency Models Impact on Talent Management
Chapter 7 and 8 Organizational Structure and Managing Change.
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
Motivating and Connecting Experienced Older Leaners 1 Intel Corporation – Global – 107,600 employees Fabrication facilities (Fabs) – Global – 19 facilities.
with Terry Doerscher Doerscher Consulting LLC
Understand What Drives Employee Engagement
Measuring Leadership (Aitken)1 Unit 5: Enabling Others to Act.
CLAIMING THE FUTURE THE ASSOCIATION OF THE FUTURE.
THE FIJI EXPERIENCE.  US Online Company  Offers new employees a sum of money to leave after one week  Testing their Commitment to the company  Would.
2008 Indiana State Personnel Department Conference Presented by Krista F. Skidmore, Esq., SPHR, President Strategic Doing—A Model to Align and Execute.
Use a plan review Keep Score Provide incentives for positive behavior Manage knowledge retention & transfer Follow up for Sustainable Results Cox Ch 7.
© 2007 Towers Perrin Does being a Top Employer make a difference in employee engagement? How - And Why - Top Employers Are Building An Oasis for Talent.
TEST With Johan Beeckmans
Management Theory: Chapter 10
Managing and Developing Talent ‘Every small thing we do habitually is an expression of who we are’
State of California Executive Leadership Competency Model January 12, 2011 Presentation for the California Citizens Redistricting Commission.
Employee engagement Guide Global Human Resources June 2014.
Management Development
Employee Guide: Becoming an Enterprise Contributor
High Performance Work Systems (HPWS). HR Alignment Planning and Job Design Recruiting and Selection Training and Development Performance Management Compensation.
Understanding Groups & Teams Ch 15. Understanding Groups Group Two or more interacting and interdependent individuals who come together to achieve particular.
+ Chapter 9: Management of Business Intelligence © Sabherwal & Becerra-Fernandez.
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook The University of West Alabama 16 © 2010 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning All rights reserved.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Mgt 4310 Teamwork. Teams? What if we: Select Train Compensate Promote Fire All at the team level?
Employee Engagement. What is Employee Engagement  An engaged employee is one who is fully involved in, and enthusiastic about his/her work.  Desire.
Organizations and Management
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Developed by Cool Pictures & MultiMedia PresentationsCopyright © 2004 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved. Fundamentals.
Chapter 1 The Knowledge Context
1. Development Planning and Administration MPA – 403 Lecture 15 FACILITATOR Prof. Dr. Mohammad Majid Mahmood Bagram.
Fundamentals of Organization Structure
PERFROMANCE MANAGAMENT SEMINAR ON MANAGING TEAM PERFORMANCE by RAJ KUMAR BAGHEL(10EC64R21) DIPIN KUMAR (10EC64R09) PRASUN PANDE(10EC64R19)
Identify, Develop and Retain High Performers
Personal Leadership Serving Customers Managing Resources Leadership Serving Customers Serving Customers Managing Resources Managing Resources Working for.
Management, Supervision, and Decision Making Chapter 2.
0 Response to Request For Information Bergen Brunswig Corporation W W W. W A T S O N W Y A T T. C O M Financial Executives International Linking HR Practices.
©SHRM SHRM Speaker Title Bhavna Dave, PHR Director of Talent SHRM member since 2005 Session 2: Relationship Management Competencies for Early-Career.
The Denison Organizational Culture Model & Link to Performance
HCE MID-YEAR CONFERENCE - Multi-Generational Leadership Panel - June 22, 2016 (9:00 am to 10:30 am)
1 Chapter 9 Implementing Six Sigma. Top 8 Reasons for Six Sigma Project Failure 8. The training was not practical. 7. The project was too small for DMAIC.
HR Business Partner Individual Development Plans
Human Resources Competency Framework
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY RESULTS
High Performance Work Systems (HPWS)
Chapter 11 Managing Team Performance
Presentation transcript:

DRIVING BREAKTHROUGH PERFORMANCE IN THE NEW WORK ENVIRONMENT Gail Thakarar June 2014

AGENDA Changes in the Labor Market Driving Performance & Retention Through Employee Engagement Driving Performance in the New Work environment

CHANGES IN THE LABOR MARKET

Geographically Dispersed Workforces Higher Volume of Information More Matrixed Organization Structures Generational

CHANGES IN THE LABOR MARKET WORKPLACE CHARACTERISTIC VETERANS BABY BOOMERS GENERATION X GENERATION Y Work EthicRespect Authority, Hard work, Company first, Seniority Workaholics, Desire quality, Question authority Eliminate the task, Self reliant Want structure & direction, Skeptical What’s next, Multitasking, Tenacity, Entrepreneurial Work Is:An obligationAn exciting adventure A difficult challenge, A contract A means to an end Leadership StyleDirective, Command & control QualityEveryone is the same, Challenge others, Ask why Remains to be seen CommunicationFormal memoIn personDirect, Immediate , Voic

CHANGES IN THE LABOR MARKET WORKPLACE CHARACTERISTIC VETERANS BABY BOOMERS GENERATION X GENERATION Y Rewards & Feedback No news is good news. Satisfaction in a job well done Money. Title. Recognition. Give me something to put on the wall Sorry to interrupt but how am I doing? Freedom best reward Whenever I want it. Meaningful work Motivated ByBeing respectedBeing valued and needed Freedom and removal of rules Working with other bright people Work/Life BalanceKeep them separate No balance ‘Live to work’ Balance ‘Work to Live’ Balance – It’s 5pm - I’ve got another gig Technology is:Hoover DamThe microwaveWhat you can hold in your hand, PDA, cell Ethereal – intangible

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT

WHAT IS EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT? “The extent to which employees commit to something or someone in their organization, how hard they work, and how long they stay as a result of that commitment.”* CLC research demonstrates that increased discretionary effort is a direct prediction of improved performance CLC survey of 50,000 employees found: Engaged employees perform 20% better 87% less likely to leave the organization 1 in 10 employees are fully disengaged No high-engagement or low-engagement groups Engagement levels determined by company strategies and policies Emotional engagement is 4 times more valuable than rational engagement *Defined by Corporate Leadership Council

20 MOST EFFECTIVE LEVERS OF EFFORTMANAGER IMPACT 1.Connection Between Work & Organization Strategy 2.Importance of Job to organization Success 3.Understanding of How to Complete Work Projects 4.Internal Communication 5.Demonstrates Strong Commitment to DiversityYes 6.Demonstrates Honesty & IntegrityYes 7.Reputation of Integrity 8.Adapts to Changing EnvironmentsYes 9.Clearly Articulates Organizational GoalsYes 10Possesses Job SkillsYes MOST EFFECTIVE LEVERS OF DISCRETIONARY EFFORT

20 MOST EFFECTIVE LEVERS OF EFFORTMANAGER IMPACT 11.Sets Realistic Performance ExpectationsYes 12.Puts the Right People in the Right Roles at the Right TimeYes 13.Helps Find Solutions to ProblemsYes 14.Breaks Down Projects into Manageable ComponentsYes 15.Accepts responsibility for successes & failuresYes 16.Encourages & Manages InnovationYes 17.Accurately Evaluates Employee PotentialYes 18.Respects Employees as IndividualsYes 19.Demonstrates Passion to SucceedYes 20.Cares About EmployeesYes

MAXIMUM IMPACT ON DISCRETIONARY EFFORT Change in Discretionary Effort EMOTIONAL RATIONAL Source: CLC Employee Survey The impact of rational commitment is much smaller

DRIVING BREAKTHROUGH PERFORMANCE IN THE NEW WORK ENVIRONMENT

EXECUTIVE EXPECTATIONS Percentage of Executives Source: Business Barometer Quarterly Report, CEB Finance Leadership Council, Q3 2012

PERCENTAGE OF EMPLOYEES EXPERIENCING AN INCREASE IN WORKLOAD IN THE PAST 3 YEARS Percentage of Employees Source: CEB, CLC, HR High Performance Survey, 2012

Understand the most important changes taking place in the new work environment and the implications for employee performance and productivity Identify the necessary new skills and competencies for employees to be productive and determine how best to quickly build them across the workforce, and Adjust management approaches and target technology investments to better enable high performance TO ACHIEVE PROFITABLE GROWTH

Frequent Organizational Change – more and frequent – greater financial uncertainty – organizational downsizing Interdependent Work – cross-function or departmental work groups – matrix reporting relationships – Geographically dispersed workforce – Team-based work Knowledge Work – New information technology – More non routine work – Greater information availability UNDERSTAND THE NEW WORK ENVIRONMENT

HIGH PERFORMER CHARACTERISTICSNEW COMPETENCIES – DRIVERS OF PERFORMANCE Adapt to ChangeOrganizational Awareness (3) Self-Awareness (5) Proactivity (6) Learning Agility (9) Work CollaborativelyTeamwork (2) Influence (7) Technical Expertise (10) Apply JudgmentPrioritization (1) Problem Solving (4) Decision Making (8) NEW COMPETENCIES: DRIVERS OF PERFORMANCE Source: CEB - High Performance Survey

Target Technology Investments to the Evolving Needs of Knowledge Workers & Collaborative teams Build back from employee needs, not just broad business needs Identify and use early adopters to redefine technology needs Fix data accessibility and usability Create collaboration platforms to make immediate, in- the-moment interactions easy Provide a wider array of analytic application TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE SCORES CANNOT PREDICT BUSINESS UNIT PERFORMANCE Source: CEB, CLC, HR High Performance Survey, 2012 Business Unit-Specific Average Employee Performance Score Business Unit Performance Against Profit Goals

MODEL OF HIGH PERFORMANCE Individual Task Performance An employee’s effectiveness at achieving his / her individual tasks and assignments + Network Performance An employee’s effectiveness at improving other’s performance and using other’s contributions to improve his or her own performance Enterprise Contribution An employee’s effectiveness at his / her individual tasks, contribution to others’ performance, and use of others’ contributions to improve his / her own performance Business Unit Outcomes Profit Revenue =

THE ENTIRE WORKFORCE MUST DISPLAY ENTERPRISE CONTRIBUTION Source: CEB, CLC, HR High Performance Survey, 2012 Percentage of Employees Percentile Change in Profit High Individual Task and Network Performance (High Enterprise Contribution) High Individual Task Performance Alone

FOUR IMPLICATIONS FOR COMPETENCY MODEL DESIGN Prioritizes Tasks: Prioritizes activities to fulfill job description and manager directs work Builds Connections: Increases the number of, and maintains strong, personal relationships Knows Formal Organization: Understands business basics and the formal structure and mechanics of the organization Receptive to Change: Displays openness and willingness to change behavior in response to new situations From:To: Prioritizes Contributions: Prioritizes activities based on organizational goals and self-directs work Understands Peers’ Motivations: Coordinates one’s work and performance with that of others to achieve mutual outcomes Understands Organizational Context: Understands the informal structures and decision-making processes of the organization Initiates Change: Identifies problems or opportunities for changes and implements solutions when appropriate Prioritization Teamwork Organizational Awareness Problem Solving

TO DRIVE BREAKTHROUGH PERFORMANCE IN THE NEW WORK ENVIRONMENT Design jobs and roles that provide: – Clear guidelines for network responsibilities, not just individual responsibilities – Boost manager effectiveness at facilitating and advising not filtering – Design roles to facilitate critical relationships, not tasks

Improve Critical Competencies: – Update competency models to reflect fundamental changes in how employees’ prioritize their contributions, work with others, understand the organization and initiate change – Tailor core competency models for critical employee segments – Incorporate customer input to improve the relevance and impact of competency models – Consider the needs of specific business lines and customize the relative importance of behaviors for each specific group TO DRIVE BREAKTHROUGH PERFORMANCE IN THE NEW WORK ENVIRONMENT

Performance Management Systems – Update current performance management approaches to better align with changes in the nature of work – Orient talent investments toward improving individual task and network performance – Focus on shifting all employees, not just a handful of ‘A-players’ to higher enterprise contribution to achieve breakthrough performance

QUESTIONS?