220-3956 Voter Attitudes Toward Energy Issues in Ohio Key Findings from a Statewide Voter Survey August 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Survey Conducted: January 26-29, 2012 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DRUG POLICY REFORM BALLOT MEASURE ISSUES SURVEY.
Advertisements

Energy Efficiency & Canadians National Opinion Research for CEEA April 12, 2013.
SOUTH CAROLINA South Carolina Voters Tell Congress: NO to New Internet Sales Tax Laws! South Carolina Statewide Survey: June 1-2, 2014 N= 400 Likely South.
MISSOURI Missouri Voters Tell Congress: NO to New Internet Sales Tax Laws! Missouri Statewide Survey: June 2-3, 2014 N= 400 Likely Missouri Voters 70%
Key Findings from a Countywide Voter Survey Conducted November 21-25, 2013.
2008 Latino Voter Survey in Key Battleground States Produced by The NALEO Educational Fund and Latino Decisions, Sponsored by AARP October 23, 2008.
U.S. Public Opinion September 2013 Ann Bisconti, PhD President, Bisconti Research, Inc. BRi.
& Conducted June 6 - 8, 1999 N=1,002 Registered “Likely” Voters Nationwide, With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
March, 2010 Public Support for Energy Reform in Colorado Survey Results.
Voters with Disabilities and the 2014 Elections November 10, 2014.
National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems: National Research Findings from a Survey of 500 Small Business Owners Nationwide.
MIRRAM GROUP, LLC 895 Broadway, 5 th Floor New York, NY Voice: Fax: Presentation of Survey Findings November 2006 William.
#13362 Data from a statewide survey of 500 registered voters in Arizona, conducted October 3, 6-7, A survey commissioned by the Conducted by:
PENNSYLVANIA Pennsylvania Voters Tell Congress: NO to New Internet Sales Tax Laws! Pennsylvania Statewide Survey: June 4-5, 2014 N= 400 Likely Pennsylvania.
NORTH CAROLINA North Carolina Voters Tell Congress: NO to New Internet Sales Tax Laws! North Carolina Statewide Survey: June 1-2, 2014 N= 400 Likely North.
September 27, 2013 What Polling Tells Us About Investing in Children, Youth and Families.
Key Findings from Mail Survey Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison,
HART RESEARCH ASSOTESCIA Key findings from a telephone survey among 1,009 voters nationwide (including 201 cell-phone only voters), conducted Nov. 7 –
Key findings from a survey of 400 registered Washington voters conducted Sept , 2014.
Contra Costa County Survey of Likely November 2014 Voters Presentation to Board of Supervisors June 24, 2014.
st Street, NW, Suite 401  Washington, DC   The Graduate School of Political Management POLITICS FROM A NEW.
NATIONAL POLL March 28-30, 2014 N=1,997 Likely Voters #
Center for American Progress Common Core Survey of Parents Prepared by Purple Strategies September 2014.
Summary of Survey Results Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison,
Minnesota Environmental Partnership Minnesota Environmental Priorities Survey Key Findings from Interviews Conducted January 6-8, 2013.
Immigration Reform: National and Swing District Polling Presented by Pete Brodnitz June 3, 2009.
1 Colorado Transportation Issues July 10, These unique polling results are based on 1,001 live telephone surveys among likely 2014 voters statewide.
New Hanover County Capitol Communications Restricted 1 Survey of New Hanover County Voters February 2, 2010.
Lake Research Partners * Voter/Consumer Research 1 Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease A presentation on findings from a nationwide survey of 1,500 likely.
Chapter 7 Public Opinion. What is Public Opinion?  How people think or feel about particular things. students in 1940 found that, while a small group.
Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison, WI - Mexico City June.
Arkansas Voters Age 50+ and the 2014 Election Key Findings from a Survey among Likely Voters Age 50/over Conducted June 2014 for.
Future Of Transportation National Survey #
CA Latino Voter Poll: Early Learning is a Winning Issue HART RESEARCH ASSOTESCIA THETARRANCEGROUP Key findings from statewide survey Conducted for.
Survey of 49 Swing Congressional Districts Regarding Environmental Issues August 26 - September 2, 2007 Ayres, McHenry & Associates, Inc. 112 North Alfred.
America’s Voice: Immigration 2008 Presented by Benenson Strategy Group and Lake Research Partners November 13, 2008.
C.9 Political Parties. Third Parties These parties are referred to as third parties because throughout history they have challenged the two major parties.
Orange County Voter Perceptions: Water and Desalination Survey Analysis October 14, 2008.
Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison, WI - Mexico City City of Palo.
PUBLIC OPINION STRATEGIES Senior Project Director PID# Sarah Simmons On Behalf of.
Michael McKenna MWR Strategies April 2008
120 Exchange Street Portland Maine 1 October 2010 Maine Voter Preference Study – Wave III Prepared for: Maine Today Media October.
Communicating about Active Transportation Developing your story & communications strategy Lessons learned from polling & focus groups Effective messages.
Civics Review. The Supreme Court decision referred to by the phrase “one person, one vote” made our state governments fairer by…
120 Exchange Street Portland Maine 1 October 2010 Maine Voter Preference Study – Wave III Prepared for: Maine Today Media October.
Survey conducted: May 14-19, Key Findings Two-thirds of respondents perceive that the City is headed in the right direction. Six out.
Public Opinion and Political Action Chapter 6. Introduction Public Opinion – The distribution of the population’s beliefs about politics and policy issues.
Prepared by: Lake Research Partners 1000 BROADWAY SUITE 294 OAKLAND, CA PHONE: FAX: M St., NW.
Protestant Pastors Approval of the President and Views on Endorsements Survey of 1,000 Protestant Pastors.
Celinda Lake, David Mermin, and Jeff Klinger Washington, DC | Berkeley, CA | New York, NY LakeResearch.com Center for Responsible Lending.
Political Parties & Elections. Political Parties Political Parties are organizations of people who want to influence government by getting people elected.
Climate Change: Public Attitudes and Messaging Recommendations Anna Fahey Communications Strategist Sightline Institute.
& Conducted June 6 - 8, 1999 N=1,002 Registered “Likely” Voters Nationwide, With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
Survey Conducted: May 6-14, 2009 Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland,
Support for Budget, Tax and Social Welfare Programs The Political Environment.
Survey Basics This survey involved 300 completed telephone interviews with registered voters in the Prescott School District. All interviews were completed.
Celinda Lake April 21 st, 2016 Washington, DC | Berkeley, CA | New York, NY LakeResearch.com Energy, Environment, and the Electorate.
Voter Attitudes Toward Energy Issues in Iowa Key Findings from a Statewide Voter Survey August 2014.
#16273 University of Montana Crown of the Continent and Greater Yellowstone Initiative Key Findings from a Montana Statewide Survey May 2016 Key Findings.
TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Statewide Transportation Survey Arizona Transportation Summit May 29, 2008.
Medicare, Social Security, and the 2016 Election
Swing State Clean Energy Survey
Future Of Transportation National Survey
Key findings from a statewide survey of 600 registered voters in Ohio conducted July 28th - August 1st, LORI WEIGEL JAY CAMPBELL
Public Views on Climate, Energy and Environment Issues
A DIVIDED ELECTORATE IS UNITED ON EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION
HART RESEARCH ASSOCIATES AFL-CIO 2014 Election Night Survey.
Waters of the United States
Presidential Elections Electoral College Political Platforms
Puerto Rican Diaspora Findings and Recommendations from two statewide surveys in Florida and New York May 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Voter Attitudes Toward Energy Issues in Ohio Key Findings from a Statewide Voter Survey August 2014

1 Bipartisan Research Team Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin, Metz & Associates (FM3) – a national Democratic opinion research firm with offices in Oakland, Los Angeles and Madison, Wisconsin – has specialized in public policy oriented opinion research since The firm has assisted hundreds of political campaigns at every level of the ballot – from President to City Council – with opinion research and strategic guidance. FM3 also provides research and strategic consulting to public agencies, businesses and public interest organizations nationwide. Public Opinion Strategies is the largest Republican polling firm in the country. Since the firm’s founding in 1991, they have completed more than 10,000 research projects, interviewing more than five million Americans across the United States. Media outlets such as The Wall Street Journal, NBC News, CNBC, and National Public Radio rely on Public Opinion Strategies to conduct their polling. The firm conducts polling on behalf of hundreds of political campaigns, as well as trade associations, not-for-profit organizations, government entities and industry coalitions throughout the nation. As a bipartisan team, FM3 and Public Opinion Strategies have researched a wide range of issues for nearly a decade, in particular on conservation-related initiatives and policies. Together, the two firms have jointly conducted research on behalf of political campaigns, businesses, not-for-profit organizations and public agencies in 42 states and nationally. Dave Metz – FM3 Lori Weigel – POS

2 Methodology Survey conducted July 26 – August 3, 2014 Interviews on landline and wireless phones with 405 randomly-selected Ohio registered voters Margin of sampling error of +/-4.9%

3

4 Voters strongly support increased use of energy efficiency, solar and wind power. Q6f/h/l. ^Not Part of Split Sample Here is a list of specific sources of energy. Please tell me whether you would support or oppose increasing use of that source of energy to meet your state’s future needs. Total Supp. Total Opp. 94%4% 90%8% 85%14%

5 Voters support increasing the use of many sources of energy, with varying intensity. Q6a/b/d/e/i. ^Not Part of Split Sample Here is a list of specific sources of energy. Please tell me whether you would support or oppose increasing use of that source of energy to meet your state’s future needs. Total Supp. Total Opp. 88%10% 82%7% 65%32% 53%43% 46%13%

6 Support for Increased Energy Efficiency, by Party 6h. Here is a list of specific sources of energy. Please tell me whether you would support or oppose increasing use of that source of energy to meet your state’s future needs. Split Sample Energy Efficiency by Party 92% 93% 96%

7 Support for Increased Energy Efficiency, by Gender 6h. Here is a list of specific sources of energy. Please tell me whether you would support or oppose increasing use of that source of energy to meet your state’s future needs. Split Sample Energy Efficiency by Gender 92% 95%

8 Support for Increased Energy Efficiency, by Age 6h. Here is a list of specific sources of energy. Please tell me whether you would support or oppose increasing use of that source of energy to meet your state’s future needs. Split Sample Energy Efficiency by Age 95% 89%

9 Support for Increased Energy Efficiency, by Household Income 6h. Here is a list of specific sources of energy. Please tell me whether you would support or oppose increasing use of that source of energy to meet your state’s future needs. Split Sample Energy Efficiency by Income 96% 93% 96% 98% 88%

10 Support for Increased Use of Wind Energy, by Party 6f. Here is a list of specific sources of energy. Please tell me whether you would support or oppose increasing use of that source of energy to meet your state’s future needs. Split Sample Wind by Party 91% 83% 81%

11 Support for Increased Wind Energy, by Household Income 6f. Here is a list of specific sources of energy. Please tell me whether you would support or oppose increasing use of that source of energy to meet your state’s future needs. Split Sample Wind by Income 86% 83% 81% 82% 93%

12 Voters see many benefits to renewables. Thinking about renewable energy like wind and solar power, please tell me if you think each of the following phrases describe renewable energy – very well, somewhat well, not very well, or not at all well. Q14. Split Sample Total Well Total Not Well 86%12% 79%19% 76%20% 73%22% 70%25% 67%27% 58%37%

13 Voters want to diversify energy sources and transition away from coal. 91% 75% 7a & c. Now I'm going to read you a series of statements about energy. Please tell whether you generally agree or disagree. Split Sample 8% 23%

14 Which of the following do you think should be the highest priority for meeting America’s energy needs? Voters would rather reduce the need for fossil fuels by expanding the use of energy efficiency and renewables. Q9. OR

15

16 One of Most/Very Impt. 84% 80% 78% 77% 55% 46% 35% 44% 29% 30% Voters see renewables as a bigger contributor to their economy than coal or natural gas. 4. Thinking about the economy in your state, how important is each of the following industries to the economy in your state: one of the most important, very important, somewhat important, or not too important? Split Sample Thinking about the economy in your state, how important is each of the following industries to the economy in your state: one of the most important, very important, somewhat important, or not too important?

17 Voters believe increasing the use of renewable energy and energy efficiency projects will create new jobs…. Q10 & Q12. Split Sample Increasing the use of clean, renewable energy sources like wind and solar power…. Energy efficiency projects like weatherizing and insulating buildings, and upgrading appliances and technology in homes and businesses …. Will create new jobs in Ohio Will not affect jobs in Ohio Will cost jobs in Ohio All/None/DK 76% Believe It Either Does Not Affect/ Creates Jobs 80% Believe It Either Does Not Affect/ Creates Jobs

18 …and reduce energy costs. Q11 & Q13. Split Sample Increasing the use of clean, renewable energy sources like wind and solar power…. Energy efficiency projects like weatherizing and insulating buildings, and upgrading appliances and technology in homes and businesses …. Will reduce energy costs in Ohio Will not affect energy costs in Ohio Will increase energy costs in Ohio All/None/DK 72% Believe It Either Does Not Affect/ Reduces Costs 80% Believe It Either Does Not Affect/ Reduces Costs

19

20 16a. I would like to read you some ideas related to energy that might be proposed by people in Ohio. Please tell me whether it sounds like something you would support or oppose. Not Part of Split Sample Total Support 72% Total Oppose 24% Voters like the idea of an expanded RES. Requiring that Ohio get 25% of its electricity from renewable sources

21 Idea of Expanding RES by Party Majorities of voters across party lines back the idea of an expanded RES. 16a. I would like to read you some ideas related to energy that might be proposed by people in Ohio. Please tell me whether it sounds like something you would support or oppose. Not Part of Split Sample

22 Total Supp. Total Opp. 85%14% 85%13% 83%17% 76%22% 63%33% 61%34% They also support a wide range of other policy proposals to increase clean energy use. 16c/d/e/h/i/j. I would like to read you some ideas related to energy that might be proposed by people in Ohio. Please tell me whether it sounds like something you would support or oppose. Split Sample

23

24 In thinking about the election for state office in your area later this year, I am going to read you a series of pairs of descriptions of different candidates. Please tell me which candidate in each pair you think you would be most likely to vote for: OR Q21c. Voters reject candidates who frame energy efficiency requirements as a “hidden tax.”

25 In thinking about the election for state office in your area later this year, I am going to read you a series of pairs of descriptions of different candidates. Please tell me which candidate in each pair you think you would be most likely to vote for: OR Voters also favor a candidate who wants a transition to renewables. Q21b.

26 Preferred Candidate Energy Position by Party Democrats and independents favor a candidate who will switch to clean energy, and GOP voters are split. 21b. In thinking about the election for state office in your area later this year, I am going to read you a series of pairs of descriptions of different candidates. Please tell me which candidate in each pair you think you would be most likely to vote for:

27 Difference +74% +71% +65% +64% +56% The strongest positioning for a candidate focuses on middle-income job creation. Q20. Split Sample In thinking about the elections for state office this November, please tell me how a candidate taking each of the following positions would impact your vote – would it make you more likely or less likely to vote for that candidate, or would it not make much difference in your vote decision? A candidate who wants to improve the economy by creating more middle-income jobs in the clean energy and clean technology industries, and training Ohio workers to fill them A candidate who wants to reduce government red tape so consumers can choose rooftop solar and any form of financing it A candidate who wants to make Ohio a leader in developing innovative clean energy technologies A candidate who wants to improve the economy by creating more middle-income jobs in the clean energy and clean technology industries A candidate who wants to promote more use of renewable energy – like wind and solar power

28 The only negative profile focuses on a candidate who wants to cut support for clean energy. 20. In thinking about the elections for state office this November, please tell me how a candidate taking each of the following positions would impact your vote – would it make you more likely or less likely to vote for that candidate, or would it not make much difference in your vote decision? Split Sample Difference +53% +50% +44% +36% +28% -12% A candidate who will work to expand transportation options and provide more alternatives to driving, like light rail buses, and more opportunities to walk and bike A candidate who supports state laws requiring utilities to use more clean energy and increase their energy efficiency A candidate who wants to stop taxpayer support for oil and gas companies A candidate who wants to reduce government red tape so that there can be more oil and gas development in your state A candidate who wants to keep energy prices low, regardless of where the energy comes from A candidate who wants to stop taxpayer support for solar and wind energy companies

17145 West 62nd Circle Golden, CO Phone (303) Fax (303) Harrison St., Suite 1290 Oakland, CA Phone (510) Fax (510)