An Experiential Team Challenge Nestle Team Build 22 nd March 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Instant Team How to Collaborate with Anyone, Anywhere, Anytime LawNet 2003 Andrea J. Daeubler.
Advertisements

Time Management By Zahira Gonzalez.
SMART Sessions Understanding the Client (0) building effective client relationships Understanding the Client.
OUR STRATEGIC PLANNING JOURNEY. The Department of Medicine Strategic Plan  Our roadmap for the future  It will shape and guide what the Department of.
The institute for employment studies What actions can line managers and organisations take?
Improving Executive Engagement Project Leaders Group Adrian Boyd, 7 th June 2011.
Growth Generation Leaders
1 From the Silent Generation to the New Millennials Generational Differences in the Workplace January 10, 2014.
CONSULTATIVE SALES FOR NON SALES STAFF This was produced as part of the Apprenticeship Staff Support Programme, which was commissioned and funded by The.
ELISE SERNIK MELISSA MACPHERSON Unleashing the power of purpose.
Code/Date © 2005 by Smiths Group: Proprietary Data Smiths Competency Model Strategic Decision Making Leading People Driving Results Commercial Orientation.
Line managers and their demons: taking the fear out of communication Kate Jones, Engagement & Channels Manager E.ON UK 12 May 2011.
I’ve Upped MY Service Excellence UP YOURS! With Andy Edwards.
Managing the Marathon. Note to attendees 1.Thanks for your interest in Managing the Marathon! 2.An accompanying job aid will be handed out in the session.
The Executive’s Guide to Strategic C H A N G E Leadership.
NETWORKS: SOME CORE PRINCIPLES Richard Bennett. NETWORKS Why? When? What? but mainly… How?
Influencing Others: If I Only Had the Power… Session 4106 Presented by Doug D. Whittle, Partner The Diagonal Group, LLC.
Federal Aviation Administration Discovery Learning Guide Getting Started - Introduction Overview of Insights Concepts © Andrew Lothian, Insights.
Introduction to Organizations
Teamwork 101.
WORKING WITH DIFFERENT SOCIAL STYLES Donald Heer 10/14/09 Adapted from Terri Fiez, Director, School of EECS 1.
Customer Focus Module Preview
GUTS Youth Leadership Corps Leadership Know Yourself.
Virtual teams These are teams that work together and solve problems through computer-based interactions. What are some benefits? Drawbacks? They save time,
Helena Sharpstone ANNUAL WORLDWIDE MEETING Dublin, Ireland October 18-22, 2013 Knowing Me Knowing You – A Guide to Effective Business Relationships.
Employee Engagement: Challenges and Opportunities MMUBS 11 th December 2014 Peter Cheese CEO CIPD Manchester Industrial Relations Society.
Lead With Your Strengths Developed from 15 years of NCLS research among 10,000 church leaders over 22 denominations in 4 countries.
Leadership - Strategic Leadership 1 LEADERSHIP STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP.
A Brief Overview for Austin Consultants Alliance
© 2015 Center for Creative Leadership. All rights reserved. Culture Eats Strategy for Breakfast 1 Impact of Culture on Leadership: Managing Across Cultures.
Better Networking Dani Koleva and George Bogdanov Inspired by Richard Bennett in March April 2014, Sofia, Bulgaria 1.
Malcolm Rae, Clinical Lead Martin Lawlor, Consultant Distributive Leadership and Inter-disciplinary working CRSI & UCC JOINT CONFERENCE 10 th JUNE 2009,
The Denison Model.
Module 4 :Session 4 Working with others Developed by Dr J Moorman.
MANAGEMENT RICHARD L. DAFT.
Lecturer: Gareth Jones Class 18: Teams.  Teams ◦ What are teams? ◦ Types of teams ◦ Conflict resolution ◦ Team strategies 27/10/2015Business Communication.
Creating a Team Vision Training Outcomes: 1.Identified strengths and contributions of each team member 2.List of each team members’ vision for the CTT.
1 Chapter Introduction to Organizations ©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly.
Culture change through leadership Amanda Singleton Group Executive: Corporate Communication Telkom.
Chapter 3 Strategic Information Systems Planning.
Team Development Objectives To know the stages in the development of teams To understand team roles To understand about team decisions To learn how to.
THE COLORFUL WORLD OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH 2005 SAIR Conference Mary Harrington
Queen’s Management & Leadership Framework
Team Assessment In software development, teams are how we accomplish more and better than what can be accomplished by an individual.
Georgia 2010 Conference for College and University Auditors August 2 – 3, 2010 Georgia Capitol Hill Campus Atlanta, Georgia.
This is a presentation about being a better, more effective team. There are no hidden agendas.
FACILITATING LEARNING Engaging. Enlightening. INSPIRING.
Engaging Senior and Middle Management in Organisational Change Dave Gorman, Director of Social Responsibility and Sustainability.
DEVELOPING GLOBAL MANAGEMENT February, 2010 KM-RDJ Copyright © Prof. R. D. Joshi 2010 Prof. R. D. Joshi.
The Business Case for Executive Assessment : Why Assessment in Challenging Times Can Enhance Productivity and Be a Talent “Game Changer” Linda Sharkey,
Relaxed Promotional Busy Reserved Share Decisions Expressive Decision Maker Secretive Non competitive Socializing Competitive Isolated TolerantSeek Crowds.
11 Setting Direction Broad Scanning Intellectual Flexibility Seizing the Future Political Astuteness Drive for Results Self Belief Self Awareness Self.
Copyright © 70:20:10 Forum We encourage you to share our freely accessibly Content, however we do not allow extraction, unauthorised use and/or duplication.
Nick Fewings, Director ‘eNgaging Change’ Leading Change Effectively Ngagementworks believes that success is achieved through transformational leadership.
Creating Positive Culture through Leadership (Recovery Orientation) Jennifer Black.
The Denison Organizational Culture Model & Link to Performance
1 Chapter Organizations and Organization Theory Organization Theory and Design Twelfth Edition Richard L. Daft.
Peacock in the Land of Penguins. Objectives Upon completion of this exercise, you’ll be able to: Understand, respect, and appreciate individual differences.
Your Colour Energy Mix Competitive Demanding Determined Strong-willed
SELLING IN COLOUR Seán Weafer
Masks & sociodrama for learning about personality preferences
‘There is somebody wiser than any of us, and that is everybody.’
Who in the Zoo are you?.
Module 2 Achieving Excellence through others
Organizations and Organization Theory
Briefing Session.
Employer Branding A Mammoth Opportunity.
Senior leadership – issues and best practices
Four Basic Behavioral Styles
Organizations and Organization Theory
Presentation transcript:

An Experiential Team Challenge Nestle Team Build 22 nd March 2014

Insights - Four Colour Energies On a good day … Competitive Demanding Determined Strong-willed Purposeful Driver Sociable Dynamic Demonstrative Enthusiastic Persuasive Expressive Caring Encouraging Sharing Patient Relaxed Amiable Cautious Precise Deliberate Questioning Formal Analytical

Insights - Four Colour Energies On a bad day … Aggressive Controlling Driving Overbearing Intolerant Excitable Frantic Indiscreet Flamboyant Hasty Docile Bland Plodding Reliant Stubborn Stuffy Indecisive Suspicious Cold Reserved

SCLT Team Wheel TO’H AL SG MB BW LK GBr MJ AS MA GBo AD CB DT

Your personal energy mix.... Energies above the half way point are most evident Special focus on the most and least energies....

Your Preference Flow Look at your position on the Insights Wheel in your Discovery Profile

Your Preference Flow Graph I – the Conscious Persona that part of the personality where who we are interacts with who we are expected to be

Your Preference Flow Graph II – the Less Conscious Persona the more instinctive “you” the “you” when you are not controlling the way you present yourself to the world

Your Preference Flow (middle graph) the degree to which the public persona (who you see yourself to be) (Graph I) pulls you from your more instinctive “you” (Graph II) determines which preferences are currently having a major impact on your work style and which are having less

Strengths Good understanding of each other Very clear on objectives High energy Work hard, play hard ‘Social creativity’ Togetherness – very supportive Very open No ‘hidden agendas on big picture’ Huge experience and varied More NIM than anywhere else Hard working Deliver Think beyond SC Seen as best practice in the world Challenging Good succession planning Aspirational – people want to be on the SCLT! Huge degree of trust Welcoming to others Very open to change Take responsibility for problem-solving Pride Strong on process No blame culture (?) Youth and experience Gender balance Flexible, agile, adapt to change Good engagement

Blindspots Do not consistently use blend of preferences Need to generate a funnel of ideas and prioritise them Do not commit and then see through to the end Green leader – drive for harmony = procrastination (e.g. conference) Size of SCLT drives decisions out of the meeting Debate dominated by a number of individuals NIM vs NUK + CPUK Don’t communicate enough what we are doing Clicks within (pre-alignment) to decision (lobbying) FRG Transparency Insular – not too open to external SC input Lack of diversity of the team SCLT being demonised

Opportunities Define the purpose and role of the SCLT and focus (scope in NIM/ not in NIM) Define goal and then all align on one goal –Get subgroup to decide Good communication strategy  drive engagement –Immediate conference issue Align to engage the teams Agree how to manage FRG (linked to first action) –Paradigm shift needed (put people first and think diversity) External connectivity Diversity Long term visioning Share skillsets and learn from each other e.g. Ireland market Other No need to involve everyone in everything Get blend right for the right task Better understanding of each others’ perspective Call out behaviours/ challenge over indexing What is the right role/ size/ shape of the SCLT to best deliver – define this What are we about – what is our end game? E.g. in G.C. much more productive Use Insights diversity to deliver Engage the ‘outsider’