From Blueprint to Finished Product: Selecting the Right Tools and Employing the Right People Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR SOCIAL BEHAVIOR Cynthia M. Anderson, PhD & Nadia Katul Sampson, MA University of Oregon.
Using the PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) E-12
Building Trainer Competency for Secondary/Tertiary Systems Don Kincaid, University of South Florida Kimberli Breen, Illinois PBIS Network.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support Professional Development Blueprint Tim Lewis, Ph.D University of Missouri Susan Barrett Shepard-Pratt Health Systems.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBIS) – Implementers’ Blueprint Michael Mahoney, M.S., NCSP Safe & Healthy School Coordinator Oregon Department.
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
Coaching: Tier 2 and 3 Rainbow Crane Dr. Eleanore Castillo-Sumi.
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
Implementation Action Planning
Rob Horner and Steve Goodman. Goals Logic for investing in Trainer development For state leadership teams developing action plan For individuals identified.
BLUEPRINT FOR SCHOOL- WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Tim Lewis, Ph.D. Susan Barrett University of Missouri Sheppard Pratt OSEP.
Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
PBIS Applications NWPBIS Washington Conference November 5, 2012.
PBIS Coaches Training Day 3. Coaches Training Day 4 Follow-up from Coaches Training Day 3 The Why? Preparing your teams for Tier 1 implementation Coaching.
Coming June 30,  Purpose of PBIS Assessment  Implications of the move from PBIS Surveys  Overview of available Tools and Surveys  Criteria for.
Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013.
Washington PBIS Conference Northwest PBIS Network Spokane, WA November 2013 Nadia K. Sampson & Dr. Kelsey R. Morris University of Oregon.
Using Data to Problem Solve Susan Barrett
Professional Development and Technical Assistance: The National Blueprint for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral.
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
SW-PBS District Administration Team Orientation
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Using Data to Guide Decision Making at the Pre-school Level Tim Lewis, Ph.D. & Susan Brawley University of Missouri.
Supporting and Evaluating Broad Scale Implementation of Positive Behavior Support Teri Lewis-Palmer University of Oregon.
Intensive Positive Behavior Support -- Secondary and Tertiary Behavioral Interventions Bruce Stiller, Ph.D.; Celeste Rossetto Dickey, M.Ed.
PBIS Data Review: Presented by Susan Mack & Steven Vitto.
The Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
PBIS Tier 1 Coaches Training
New Coaches Training. Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Rainbow Crane Behavior RtI Coordinator
Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.
Targeted and Intensive Interventions: Assessing Process (Fidelity) Cynthia M. Anderson, PhD University of Oregon.
Developing a Comprehensive State-wide Evaluation for PBS Heather Peshak George, Ph.D. Donald K. Kincaid, Ed.D.
Monitoring Advanced Tiers Tool (MATT) University of Oregon October, 2012.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Data Systems Northwest AEA September 7, 2010.
Making Data-Based Decisions Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports pbis.org.
E VALUATION FOR S CHOOL - WIDE PBIS Bob Algozzine University of North Carolina: Charlotte Rob Horner University of Oregon December 9, 2011.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Tier 2/ Tier 3 Planning for Sustainability Rachel Saladis WI PBIS Network/Wi RtI Center Katrina Krych Sun Prairie Area School District.
School-Wide PBIS: Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 11, 2008.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR SWPBS Rob Horner and Bob Algozzine.
1 Module L R ole of Coaches Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Data-Based Decision Making: Using Data to Improve Implementation Fidelity & Outcomes.
Evaluation Planning & Reporting for School Climate Transformation Grant (SCTG) Sites Bob Algozzine University of North Carolina at Charlotte Steve GoodmanMichigan's.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Coaches Corner: Kathryn Schallmo MiBLSi Director.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 1/31/20161 If you modify this powerpoint, update the version information below. This.
VTPBiS Coordinators as Coaches Learning and Networking Workshop Presented by VTPBiS State Team.
Module 2 : Using Data to Problem-Solve Implementation Issues Session 3 Phase I Team Training Presented by the MBI Consultants.
V 2.1 Version 2.1 School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory.
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Benchmarks of Quality KENTUCKY CENTER FOR INSTRUCTIONAL.
PBIS DATA. Critical Features of PBIS SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Culturally Knowledgeable Staff Behavior Supporting Culturally Relevant Evidence-based.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
Coaching PLC April 5, 2011 Pat Mueller
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports District-wide Implementation: Ensuring Success Kentucky Center for Instructional Discipline.
Coaching for Impact Susan Barrett
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS)
Presentation transcript:

From Blueprint to Finished Product: Selecting the Right Tools and Employing the Right People Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention & Supports

"All organizations [and systems] are designed, intentionally or unwittingly, to achieve precisely the results they get." R. Spencer Darling Business Expert

Key Across Blueprints Think about “function” of team members and support personnel vs. traditional roles – What expertise do we currently have? – What additional skill sets do we need? Focus on “key features” of process vs. examples – Steps to get to outcomes – How to embed in existing resources – “Repurpose” resources when necessary

Key Across Blueprints Target data/data collection strategies that will serve several functions – Student What supports do students need? Are behaviors improving? – Staff What supports do staff need? – System Are there break-downs (fidelity) in implementation? Guide resource allocation - District/ School Visibility / Political support

Key Across Blueprint Follow basic logic, but use resources and tools to accomplish what you would like to achieve Continue to self-evaluate Continue to “check in” with key stake holders – Parents – School Board – Staff

School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Implementers’ Blueprint and Self-Assessment

Key Features Teams – District = Funding / Support to Schools – School = Address student challenges / Support staff Problem Solving Strategy – Data-Practice-System

SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Staff Behavior Supporting Decision Making Supporting Student Behavior SW-Positive Behavior Support OUTCOMES Social Competence & Academic Achievement

SW-PBS Problem Solving Logic 1.Establish Ground Rules 2.Start with Data 3.Match Practices to Data 4.Align Resources to Implement Practices (systems, systems, systems)

SW-PBS Problem Solving Logic 1. Establish Ground Rules – Nothing sacred / Everything is important – Not about “philosophy” or “theory" – Keep focus on outcomes – Remember, if what we are doing now was meeting the needs of all students we wouldn’t be having the conversation – Allow for a transition period (Phase of Implementation) 2-3 years

SW-PBS Problem Solving Logic 2. Start with Data – Be prepared for the “examination & explanation” – Understand that data are simply a “sample” of what is going on – Data must be contextualized – Don’t drown in the data – Assess the integrity of the data (plan to correct) – Keep the conversation focused on data that are “in your control” – Be prepared with a draft action plan

SW-PBS Problem Solving Logic 3. Match Practices to Data – Strategies, curricula, and resources independent of what is currently in place – Don’t limit to what you currently know – outside resources – Build your daily schedule around priorities

SW-PBS Problem Solving Logic 4. Align Resources to Implement Practices – New roles to reach outcomes will require training and on-going technical assistance (systems)

Blueprint for School-wide Positive Behavior Support Training and Professional Development

Professional Development Blueprint Purpose: (a)Identify core components to allow development of local training adaptations, (b)Provide tools and measures to verify and evaluate content validity of training, (c)Provide tools and measures to guide assessment of implementation integrity, (d) Judge the preparedness of professional development providers, and (e)Guide development of comprehensive professional development plans at the district, region, and state level.

At the school level Start any PD with a measurable outcome in mind Simplest delivery method to share content Check for change

Trainers Levels of skill development Organized around Phases of Implementation – Team Member – Team Leader – Coach – Trainer – Coach Coordinator – Regional/State Coordinator

Building Training Capacity Kincaid- Florida SkillScore ObtainedScore PossiblePercent Obtained I.Training Skills80 I.Content Area Skills: Knowledge 60 I.Content Area Skills: Ability to Train 60 Total Skill Score200 Directions:Rating 1= not at all confident 2= somewhat confident 3= neutral 4= confident 5= very confident Training Skills When conducting past trainings I feel confident that I:  Started the training with an appropriate introduction, agenda, and overview  Set up the room to be conducive to the type of training being conducted (i.e., teams, classroom style, individual)  Adjusted my training specifically for adult learning styles (i.e., …)  Used eye contact and appropriate body language

Coaching within SWPBS Implementation Defining the Role Internal vs External Selecting Coaches Training and support for coaches Assessing Impact

Outcomes of Coaching Fluency with trained skills Adaptation of trained concepts/skills to local contexts and challenges And new challenges that arise Rapid redirection from miss-applications Increased fidelity of overall implementation Improved sustainability Most often due to ability to increase coaching intensity at critical points in time.

Coach Competencies

Evaluation Blueprint for School- wide Positive Behavior Support

The Logic Model for Evaluation

1. Determine what questions you want to answer Examples Can we predict problems/success? – When/where/who? Possible “function” of problem behavior? Who needs targeted or intensive academic supports? What environmental changes/supports are needed?

2. Determine what data will help to answer questions Existing data set(s) Current data collection Additional / new data Confidence in accuracy? Complete picture?

3. Determine the simplest way to get data Agreement on definitions Standard forms / process Frequency of collection Target “Multi-purpose” data/use Train ALL staff on use & provide on- going TA

4. Put system in place to collect data Build on existing systems Add components over time Central entry point – Electronic

5. Analyze data to answer questions Trends Instruction & supports in place/not in-place Pre/post “big outcomes” Comparisons (norm / local) – Relative growth – Absolute growth

Tools To Assist Identify Progress Monitoring Tool – Tier I Team Implementation Checklist Benchmarks of Quality School-wide Evaluation Tool School Assessment Survey SWIS – Tier II/III CICO Progress Monitoring Tool Benchmark for Advance Tiers (BAT)

Year 1Year 2Year 3 PreSumFallWinSprSumFallWinSprSumFallWinSpr Universal SWPBS Progress Monitoring: TIC XXXXXX Annual Self- Assessment: BoQ, XXX Research Measure: SET XXX Self-Assessment Survey: SAS XXXX Secondary/ Tertiary Progress Monitoring: TBA XXXXXX Annual Self- Assessment: BAT XX Research Measure: I-SSET XX The Fidelity Tools: A Schedule

Conclusion District Leadership Team / Building Team / Classroom Level Team / Individual Staff: – DATA – PRACTICES – SYSTEM Parallel process that: – Supports above process – Supports educators at all levels