Blueprint for ELL Success Office of Bilingual Education and Foreign Language Studies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
PORTFOLIO.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Parent Advisory Council Seven Hills Classical Academy May 10, 2012.
Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
Scaffolds for English Language Learners in the NYS ELA and Mathematics Curriculum Modules February 4th, 2014 EngageNY.org.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Ensuring Equal Educational Opportunities for English Language Learners
Comprehensive Literacy Program Louisiana Department of Education
NYSESLAT 2015: New York State ELL Demographics
The New York State Assessment System and LEP/ELLs: An Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, and Reporting OBE-FLS 2007.
TeacherSchoolStudent Percentile Average 50 The Effects of Teachers and Schools on Student Achievement Over 2 consecutive years Marzano, R. J. (2003).
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Language Allocation Policy (LAP)
English Language Learners Scaffolds and Supports
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
High Schools Literacy: English Language Learners June 2008 Maria Santos Office of English Language Learners.
English Language Learners and Standards-based Education in Massachusetts.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
 Inclusion and the Common Core State Standards  Inclusion and State Assessment  Inclusion and Teacher Evaluation  Results Driven Accountability 
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Language Proficiency Assessment Commitee (LPAC)
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.
General Considerations for Implementation
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
The Common Core State Standards and the English Language Learners Wen Ma, Ph.D. Le Moyne College.
Provided by Education Service Center Region XI 1 Title I, Part A Overview Provided by Education Service Center Region XI
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
Re-envisioning English Language Development and Native Language Literacy Office of ENL, World Languages and Bilingual Education
Presentation II A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement, and Policy Decisions.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. April 4, 2006.
The College Board Standards for College Success CCSSO – SEC State Collaborative Alignment Study CCSSO-SEC Meeting and Content Analysis Workshop San Diego,
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 Keys to Successful 21 st Century Educational Leadership Jazzar and Algozzine Chapter 8 Curriculum Considerations & Implementations.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
New Jersey Assessment Of Skills and Knowledge Science 2015 Carmela Triglia.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Multi-year Academic Acceleration Plan (MAAP) and Community Plan for Accountability in Schools (ComPAS) Oakland Unified School District January 31, 2007.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
December 14, 2015 Facilitator: Tanya Rosado-Barringer, Mid-State RBERN Coordinator ELL Considerations for Evaluators.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
A Resource Guide for Parents. play&list=UUF0pa3nE3aZAfBMT8pqM5PA&playnext=1
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Baltimore County Public Schools’ Office of Equity and Assurance in collaboration with: Department of Professional Development World Languages Special Education.
Common Core Standards Overview. The Common Core Standards (CCS) were developed by the Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Governor’s.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Meeting the LEAPS Act May 5, PEI: Building Rigorous and Robust PreK-3 Family Engagement 1.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Radford City Schools School Board Presentation
New Jersey Assessment Of Skills and Knowledge
Blueprint for ELLs’ Success
When you are ready to start – just “click” to the next slide!
Common Core Update May 15, 2013.
Radford City Schools School Board Presentation
English Learner Parent Academy
Presentation transcript:

Blueprint for ELL Success Office of Bilingual Education and Foreign Language Studies

Buffalo (4103) Rochester (3478) Syracuse (2809) Brentwood (5139) Hempstead (1853) Yonkers (3085) New York City (151,558) Utica (1543) Central Islip (1790) Newburgh (1555) Spring Valley (East Ramapo) (2125) New York State Demographics 2 Large geographic distribution, with ELLs concentrated in a handful of large urban districts (NYC, Brentwood, Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, Yonkers), but many small rural and suburban districts that also have ELLs and have many LOTE programs. Top ELL Districts # of ELLs New York City151,558 Brentwood5,139 Buffalo4,103 Rochester3,478 Yonkers3,085 Syracuse2,809 Spring Valley2,125 Hempstead1,853 Newburgh1,555 Central Islip1,790 Utica1,543 Source: Public School LEP Counts as of May 31, 2013

New York State Demographics 3 Linguistically diverse state with over 140 languages spoken by our students Top 10 ELL Home Languages

Percentage of ELLs in New York State 2007 to 2013 School Year# of Students% of ELLs , % , % , % , % , % , % , % Source: SIRS

14% 19%

ELLs vs. Non ELLs by Disability Classification Source: SIRS 2013.

Who are our ELLs Subgroups? SUBGROUPS DEFINITION CHARACTERISTICS Newcomers Developing ELLs Long-term ELLs Special Education ELLs Students with Interrupted Formal Education (SIFE) Former ELLs

Who are our ELLs Subgroups? SUBGROUPS DEFINITION CHARACTERISTICS Newcomers Students who have been in our schools for three years or less and are English Language Learners. ELLs in our schools one year or less are exempt from the ELA. ELLs who have been in school for 3 years or less. Developing ELLs Students who have received ELL services for 4 to 6 years. ELLs who are in their 4 to 6 year of service and have the potential to become LTE’s. Long-term ELLs Students who have completed at least six years of ELL services in New York State schools and continue to require them. Based on the NYSESLAT data LTE’s typically performing at Advanced level. Also a majority of LTE’s have an IEP. Special Education ELLs ELLs served by an Individualized Education Plan (IEP). An IEP/CSE team determines a student’s eligibility for special education services and the language in which special education services are delivered. Based on data a significant percentage of Special Education ELLs have a learning disability classification and Language Disorder Students with Interrupted Formal Education (SIFE) ELLs who have entered a US school after second grade; have had at least two years less schooling than their peers; function at least two years below expected grade level in reading and mathematics; and may be pre-literate in their first language. More than half of new SIFE speak Spanish at home, and with more than half of those from the Dominican Republic. Former ELLs Students that have reached proficiency on a test of English language skills and no longer require ELL services. Schools are permitted to provide LEP/ELL testing accommodations on NYS assessments to former LEP/ELLs for up to two years after achieving proficiency.

Language Programs Program TypeGOALSTUDENTS TRANSITIONAL BILINGUAL Providing grade-level academic work in the student’s native language so that the student maintains academic progress while developing English proficiency. Providing instruction in two languages: the language spoken at home and English. ELLs of a shared home language MAINTENANCE BILINGUAL (Two-Way Bilingual/Dual Language; One-Way Bilingual/Developmental) Students in both language groups are expected to comprehend, speak, read and write in English and the other language. The students are expected to: Meet or exceed New York State Common Core Standards; Develop proficiency in their second language; Attain a higher level of self-esteem; and Develop an appreciation for cultural diversity. ELLs and English proficient students FOREIGN LANGUAGEStudents are expected to comprehend, speak, read and write in a Language Other Than English. All students ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE Students are expected to comprehend, speak, read and write in English with home language support. ELLs 9

Blueprint for ELL Success The Blueprint aims to:  Clarify expectations for administrators, policy makers, and practitioners;  Provide a framework to prepare ELLs for success—beginning in Prekindergarten to lay the foundation for college and career readiness;  Provide guidance, resources, and supports to districts, schools, and teachers; and  Promote a better understanding and appreciation of Bilingual Education, English as a Second Language, and World Languages/Foreign Language Studies. 10Office of Bilingual Education and Foreign Language Studies

EngageNY.org11 Blueprint for ELL Success The Blueprint is composed of the following 8 principles: 1. All teachers are teachers of English Language Learners (ELLs) and need to plan accordingly. 2. All schools boards and districts/school leaders are responsible for ensuring that the academic, linguistic, social, and emotional needs of ELLs are addressed. 3. Districts and schools engage all English Language Learners in instruction that is grade-appropriate, academically rigorous, and aligned with the New York State Prekindergarten Foundation for the Common Core and P- 12 Common Core Learning Standards. 4. Districts and schools recognize that bilingualism and biliteracy are assets and provide opportunities for all students to earn a Seal of Biliteracy upon obtaining a high school diploma. Office of Bilingual Education and Foreign Language Studies

Blueprint for ELL Success 8 Principles continued: 5. Districts and schools value all parents and families of ELLs as partners in education and effectively involve them in the education of their children. 6. District and school communities leverage the expertise of bilingual, ESL, and Language Other Than English (LOTE) teachers and support personnel while increasing their professional capacities. 7. Districts and school communities leverage ELLs’ home languages, cultural assets, and prior knowledge. 8. Districts and school use diagnostic tools and formative assessment practices in order to monitor ELLs’ content knowledge as well as new and home language development to inform instruction. 12Office of Bilingual Education and Foreign Language Studies

Principle 1: All teachers are teachers of English Language Learners and need to plan accordingly: Designing and delivering instruction that is culturally and linguistically appropriate for all diverse learners, including those with Individualized Educational Programs (IEP). Providing integrated language and content instruction to support language development through language-focused scaffolds. Bilingual, ESL, and other content-area teachers must collaborate purposefully and consistently to promote academic achievement in all content areas. Utilizing materials and instructional resources that are linguistically, age/grade appropriate, and aligned to the Common Core Learning Standards (CCLS). Collaborating with school support personnel and community-based human resources in order to address the multiple needs of ELLs. EngageNY.org13

Principle 2: All schools boards and districts/school leaders are responsible for ensuring that the academic, linguistic, social, and emotional needs of ELLs are addressed: Providing a clear vision for student success that includes high expectations for ELL student achievement and socio-emotional development, supported by a purposeful plan of action that provides multiple pathways to college and career readiness through high-quality programs that meet the needs of ELLs. Providing high-quality instruction for ELLs. Aligning and coordinating fiscal and human resources to ensure that the instructional plan is being effectively implemented. Providing high-quality supports, feedback and direction to educators to improve their instructional practice. Providing a safe and inclusive learning environment that recognizes and respects the languages and cultures of all students. Ensuring districts and school leaders are trained in meeting the needs of ELLs in order to cultivate a school culture of high expectations. Providing high-quality instructional and support services to ELLs with disabilities in alignment with their IEPs and current policies. EngageNY.org14

Articulating specific content and language objectives. Integrating explicit and implicit research-based vocabulary instruction. Providing opportunities for students to discuss content and problem-solve with peers. Anchoring instruction by strategically using research-based practices (e.g., multimedia, visuals, graphic organizers, etc.). Providing special education supports, services, accommodations and specially- designed instruction to meet the specific instructional needs of ELLs with disabilities. Designing, selecting, and implementing a high-quality curriculum that meets the needs of Early Learning ELLs, and supports the New York State Prekindergarten Foundation for the Common Core. Using academic language and content-area supports to strategically move ELLs along the language development continuum utilizing New York State Bilingual Common Core Progressions. initiative initiative EngageNY.org15 Principle 3: Districts and schools engage all English Language Learners in instruction that is grade-appropriate, academically rigorous, and aligned with the New York State Prekindergarten Foundation for the Common Core and P- 12 Common Core Learning Standards:

Opportunities to participate in language learning or language support programs that lead to proficiency in English and other languages. Opportunities to use and develop academic language and content knowledge both in English and a language other than English, including the student’s home language. Rigorous Bilingual Education programs for ELLs aimed at maintaining and developing the home language and attaining English proficiency as well as biliteracy. Alternate pathways for those students whose home language is that which a Bilingual Education Program does not exist in a district due to the language’s low incidence. EngageNY.org16 Principle 4: Districts and schools recognize that bilingualism and biliteracy are assets and provide opportunities for all students to earn a Seal of Biliteracy upon obtaining a high school diploma:

Providing parents with resources that enable them to make informed decisions about their children’s education. Providing parents with all pertinent information about their rights and program choices in a language and format that parents can easily understand and access. Providing training to parents in English and in their home language on effective strategies to support their children’s learning in and out of school. Engaging parents as active participants, contributors and cultural liaisons to the school community. Sharing with parents and family members the high expectations that schools have established for the education of all ELLs and engaging them in the pursuit and achievement of those expectations. Collaborating with the school support personnel and immigrant community- based organizations in order to address the multiple needs of families of ELLs. EngageNY.org17 Principle 5: Districts and schools value all parents and families of ELLs as partners in education and effectively involve them in the education of their children:

Creating intentional learning opportunities for all teachers to collaborate and design instruction, analyze student work, and develop rigorous lessons. Providing substantial and sustained opportunities for all teachers to participate in meaningful professional development that addresses the needs of ELLs, including home and new language development. EngageNY.org18 Principle 6: District and school communities leverage the expertise of Bilingual, ESL, and Language Other Than English (LOTE) teachers and support personnel while increasing their professional capacities:

Regarding home languages as instructional assets, and using them in bridging prior knowledge to new knowledge while ensuring that content is meaningful and comprehensible. Using home languages and cultures of ELLs to promote diversity pursuant to the Dignity for All Students Act (NYS initiative, effective July 2013), EngageNY.org19 Principle 7: Districts and school communities leverage ELLs’ home languages, cultural assets, and prior knowledge:

Regarding home languages as instructional assets, and using them in bridging prior knowledge to new knowledge while ensuring that content is meaningful and comprehensible. Using home languages and cultures of ELLs to promote diversity pursuant to the Dignity for All Students Act (NYS initiative, effective July 2013), EngageNY.org20 Principle 7: Districts and school communities leverage ELLs’ home languages, cultural assets, and prior knowledge:

Using State assessments in conjunction with formative assessments. Using State language proficiency data (from the New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test [NYSESLAT] and the New York State Identification Test for English Language Learners [NYSITELL]) to understand where ELLs are along the continuum of language development, and how to provide appropriate scaffolds for them according to their proficiency level. Employing authentic assessments that require sophisticated uses of language embedded in authentic and rich content. Utilizing appropriate tools to assess the needs and progress of ELLs with disabilities. Utilizing analytical rubrics that provide feedback on content knowledge and language development. Using home language assessments to inform instruction and demonstrate growth in Bilingual Education programs in which the home language is being used. EngageNY.org21 Principle 8: Districts and school use diagnostic tools and formative assessment practices in order to monitor ELLs’ content knowledge as well as new and home language development to inform instruction:

Next Steps:  Blueprint will be released online in April 2014 and shared with districts, the ELL Leadership Committee, key ELL advocacy groups.  The Department, in collaboration with the field, will develop resources that are aligned to the Common Core that districts can use to implement the principles of the Blueprint. 22 Blueprint for ELL Success Office of Bilingual Education and Foreign Language Studies

Commissioner’s Regulation Part 154 Blueprint for ELL Success Seal of Biliteracy ELL Curriculum Students with Interrupted Formal Education Native Language Arts (NLA) ELL Scaffolds Math Translations (5 languages) ELL Leadership Council Students with Interrupted Formal Education Initiatives Bridges Identification material Resources Assessments NLA assessment NYSITELL NYSESLAT Videos 23 New York State Education Department Initiatives for English Language Learners Office of Bilingual Education and Foreign Language Studies