Providence School Board September 10, 2012 Introductory Briefing Providence Public School District Comprehensive Information Technology Blueprint Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WEST HEMPSTEAD UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT Three Year Strategic Plan
Advertisements

Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Response to Recommendations by the National Association of Child Care Resource & Referral Agencies (NACCRRA) The Massachusetts Child Care Resource & Referral.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Building a Strategic Management System Office for Student Affairs, Twin Cities Campus Ground Level Work Metrics Initiatives Managing Change Change Management.
Global Congress Global Leadership Vision for Project Management.
Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Page 1 Service Organization Overview October, 2006 Oakland Unified School District Redesign Oakland Unified School District.
NJDOE TALENT DIVISION OVERVIEW prepared for: NJPSA ANNUAL LEGISLATIVE CONFRENCE AND MEMBERSHIP MEETING March 30,
Project Team MSBA – local school board members MASA – local school superintendents and other stakeholders MSBA/MASA.
According to the Texas Long-Range Technology Plan, every school should comply with the NCLF act, and integrate technology infrastructure such as audio,
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
OHIO OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. Even the agents are suffering…
VCOE Curriculum Council NGSS Update December 4 th, 2014.
Center for Health Care Quality Licensing & Certification Program Evaluation 1 August 2014 rev.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
NAUGATUCK HIGH SCHOOL STRATEGIC PLAN Presentation to Board of Education November 13, 2014 A collaborative effort between teachers, students, and administrators.
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
Strategic Objectives 2011 January 14, Growth of Aligned Programs ObjectiveAccountabilityProcessOutput/ Outcome Status Report Enhance and expand.
The District Technology Plan The District Technology Plan Melanie & David Dillard Melanie & David Dillard
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
©2007 Dr. Karl Squier1 Toolkit 1 –Step 1b Understanding a Complete Planning Cycle.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ William E. Harner, Acting Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Principal Effectiveness: Domains Domain 1: Strategic/Cultural.
SCC Faculty Vision and Core Values Statements 2011.
Improve Achievement for EACH PreK-12 Student Areas of Focus Preview GREENWICH PUBLIC SCHOOLS October 11, 2007.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
1 Status Report: Task Force on FAMU Finance and Operational Control Issues Derry Harper, Inspector General & Director of Compliance December 6, 2007.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
By Nanette Chapa.  To realize the benefits of technology, schools must develop a plan for integrating technology into the curriculum. An effective technology.
© Dr. John T. Whiting All Rights Reserved Slide 1 Information Technology – The Key to Public Education Reform Based.
Family Service System Reform Grant Application Training Video FY Donna Bostick-Knox, Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, Office of Children.
District Improvement Plan August 10, 2015.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
Full-Service Community Schools TASK FORCE Staff Lead: Jane Nicholson.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Strategic Leadership Share vision of changing world in 21 st century Create processes to ensure school’s identity Create processes to distribute leadership.
NELA Professional Growth Plan: Growth Analysis C. Miller-Walker Cohort 3.
District Improvement Plan September 21, 2015.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
HANDOUT 3 Middle School Reform. 2 What does it take to prepare our middle school students for the 21 st Century? They must be able to … Work in teams.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Rapides Parish School District February 2, 2011.
Developing & Sustaining Community Schools to Build a Systemic Initiative April 8, 2010 Janice Chu-Zhu, Sr. Dir. Natl. Capacity Building Coalition Forum.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Transforming the Learning, Teaching, and Leadership Environment Summer Institutes 2001 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction/Association of Washington.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
NEASC SITE VISIT SEPTEMBER 30-OCTOBER 3, Standards of Accreditation 4 standards of Teaching and Learning 1- Mission and Expectations for Student.
21 st Century Skills for Education Leaders: How do we prepare our students for the new global economy? Partnership for 21 st Century Skills Teaching &
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Overview and Update.  LBUSD is currently facing a unique set of challenges and opportunities. It is imperative that we look intensely and thoroughly.
1 School Board and Superintendent Continuous Improvement and Evaluation Quality New Mexico June 9, 2011.
OVERVIEW of the ISTE NETS for Administrators Presented by Kevin Brady and Alison Fricke.
Working With Parents as Partners To Improve Student Achievement Taylor County Schools August 2013.
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Instructional Technology Plan Overview
What Does a 21st Century School Administrator Look Like?
Presentation transcript:

Providence School Board September 10, 2012 Introductory Briefing Providence Public School District Comprehensive Information Technology Blueprint Center for Educational Leadership and Technology Leadership, Learning, and Technology for the 21 st Century

© 2012 Center for Educational Leadership and Technology Slide 1 Welcome and Introductions Center for Educational Leadership and Technology (CELT) Dr. John Phillipo, Chief Executive Officer Ms. Patti Sullivan-Hall, Technology Planning and Staff Development Coordinator

© 2012 Center for Educational Leadership and Technology Slide 2 CELT’s Mission To help learning organizations attain their vision, mission, and goals by integrating high-quality, mission-critical programs, services, and technology with the organization's people and processes in a timely, efficient, and cost-effective way.

© 2012 Center for Educational Leadership and Technology Slide 3  Uniquely integrates leadership, learning, and technology with contemporary educational reforms, and research/best practices  Creates partnerships among state education agencies, school districts, community, business, and industry  Provides nationally recognized staff with diverse educational and technical expertise  Serves as an independent and unbiased thought leader, trusted advisor, and project manager  Delivers creative problem solving regarding funding, organizational development, and change management  Makes improved student achievement the driving force behind all leadership, learning, and technology decisions CELT’s Approach

© 2012 Center for Educational Leadership and Technology Slide 4 IT Blueprint Study Objectives The objectives of this study are effective integration and use of technology resources throughout the school district to:  improve student achievement,  develop students’ competencies,  maximize operational effectiveness and efficiency,  enhance staff productivity, and  increase parent involvement.

© 2012 Center for Educational Leadership and Technology Slide 5 Project Milestones MilestoneDate Project Kick-off and Vision Setting September 2012 Comprehensive Needs Assessment September 2012 Key Findings and Recommendations October - November 2012 Information Technology Blueprint December January 2013 RIDE SubmissionJanuary 2013 Public Presentation of Information Technology Blueprint January 2013

© 2012 Center for Educational Leadership and Technology Slide 6 Project Participants The following constituents will be invited to participate:  Students and Parents  Teachers and Support Staff  School and District Administrators  School and District Technology Staff  School Board Members  Community, Business, Municipal Government, and Higher Education Partners via interviews, focus groups, and school site visits.

© 2012 Center for Educational Leadership and Technology Slide 7 Continuous Improvement Model Design Specifications and Procurement Implementation, Training, and Support Needs Analysis Curriculum and Business Audit IT Program Recommendations Organizational Structure Revisions and Modifications Assess Impact on Learning for Students, Staff, and Community Monitoring and Evaluation Information Technology Blueprint District Vision and Strategic Plan Phase 1: Needs Analysis Phase 2: Recommendations Phase 3: Implementation Phase 4: Evaluation Needs Recommendations Implementation Legend: Strategic Technology Design Decisions and Framework Detailed Implementation Plans, Budget, and Funding Strategy

© 2012 Center for Educational Leadership and Technology Slide 8 Key Components of a Comprehensive Information Technology Blueprint 1.Introduction and Study Design 2.Curriculum and Assessment 3.Teaching and Learning Technologies 4.Learning Environments and School Facilities 5.IT Organizational Development and Staffing 6.Staff Development and Human Resource Management 7.Standards, Procurement, Maintenance, and Asset Management 8.Policies, Procedures, Security, and Safety 9.District-, School-, and Program-Level Planning 10.Administrative and Productivity Systems 11.Decision Support and Accountability Systems 12.Communications and Network Infrastructure 13.Community/Home Access and Participation 14.IT Monitoring, Evaluation Programs, and Implementation Management 15.Budget, Funding Sources, and Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)

© 2012 Center for Educational Leadership and Technology Slide 9 Contact Information Center for Educational Leadership and Technology 65 Boston Post Road West Marlborough, Massachusetts Phone:(508) Fax:(508) Web: Center for Educational Leadership and Technology 65 Boston Post Road West Marlborough, Massachusetts Phone:(508) Fax:(508) Web: Ms. Patti Sullivan-Hall Office: (508) x1231 Dr. John Phillipo Office: (508) x1208

© 2012 Center for Educational Leadership and Technology Slide 10 About CELT For nearly two decades, CELT has helped education leaders align their use of information technology with improved student learning. CELT works collaboratively with educational organizations to support and transform 21st century teaching, learning, and administrative processes. In order to ensure widespread and productive use of technology, our strategies include staffing plans and professional development programs, as well as maintenance and support activities. CELT is one of the largest and most comprehensive providers of research and planning services for schools, education service agencies, and departments of education. CELT's mission is to help learning organizations attain their vision, mission, and goals by integrating high-quality, mission-critical technology programs, services, and technology with the organization's people and processes in the most timely, efficient, and cost-effective way possible.