Muons going through MICE should –Have ISIS proton timing structure –Generate TOF signals –Satisfy ISIS and TOF trigger requirements MICE tracker DAQ will.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HW 2 is out! Due 9/25!. CS 6290 Static Exploitation of ILP.
Advertisements

SciFi Tracker DAQ M. Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) MICE meeting at LBNL 10.Feb.2005 DAQ system for KEK test beam Hardware Software Processes Architecture SciFi.
Goal: Describe Pipelining
MICE TARGET OPERATION C. Booth, P. Hodgson, R. Nicholson, P. J. Smith, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy University of Sheffield, England.
January 11, Data Format for MICE Trackers Tracker Data Readout Basics Preliminary Tracker Data Format and Suitability for VME Data Transfers. Questions.
1 Lecture: Pipelining Extensions Topics: control hazards, multi-cycle instructions, pipelining equations.
9 March 2005Edda Gschwendtner1 DAQ Terminology ISIS Terminology MICE Terminology Parameter Definitions.
Daresbury Aug 2005Jean-Sébastien Graulich Detector DAQ Overview and Needs Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Univ. Genève o Introduction o Detector Systems Overview.
First Results from Tracker 1  Cryostat Commissioning  AFE/VLSB Firmware and Readout  Cosmic Ray Setup  Tracker Readout  Software  Trigger Timing.
Tracker DAQ Makoto Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) MICE Frascati 2005/6/27.
MICE Tracker Readout Overview channel AFE II-t boards - 8 Visible Light Photon Counter (VLPC) cassettes - 4 cryostats.
March 30, 2004 TJR1 MICE Upstream Particle Identification Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology March 30, 2004.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 MOM Update Linda R. Coney 21 September, 2009.
MICE Tracker Front End Progress Tracker Data Readout Basics Progress in Increasing Fraction of Muons Tracker Can Record Determination of Recordable Muons.
1 MICE Tracker Readout Update, Preparation for Cosmic Ray Tests Introduction/Overview AFE-IIt firmware development VLSB firmware development Hardware progress.
Y. Karadzhov MICE MICO First EMR Plots 1.EMR detector has been successfully incorporated in the MICE DAQ system. 2.First 3 days of data taking in MICE.
1 COMP541 Sequencing – III (Sequencing a Computer) Montek Singh April 9, 2007.
Luminosity Monitor Commissioning MICE Collaboration Meeting March 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Luminosity Monitors MICE Video Conference 7 May 2009 Paul Soler.
DAQ Considerations For Increased Rep. Rate J. Leaver 01/12/2009.
DAQ WS03 Sept 2006Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 DDAQ Trigger o Reminder: DAQ Trigger vs Particle Trigger o DAQ Trigger o Particle Trigger 1) Possible.
MICE Tracker Readout Increased Data Readout Rate VLSB Development 16 AFE II t boards 8 Visible Light Photon Counter (VLPC) cassettes 4 cryostats.
4.1 System of linear Equations Solving graphically Solving by substitution Solving by addition.
4.2 Adding and Subtracting Matrices 4.3 Matrix Multiplication
MICE Tracker Readout and Data Acquisition; Solenoid Magnetic Field Measurement Terry Hart for the MICE Collaboration, Illinois Institute of Technology,
Three variables Systems of Equations and Inequalities.
11/18/2003Haixin Huang1 RHIC Polarimeter Status All targets and Si detectors have been installed at the end of October. The targets survived the vacuum.
MICE CM18 June 07Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Status o Since CM17 o Detector DAQ software o Front End Electronics o Schedule Milestones.
Review Session #2. Outline Logarithms Solving Systems of Equations Factoring and Roots.
MR (7/7/05) T2K electronics Beam structure ~ 8 (9?) bunches / spill bunch width ~ 60 nsec bunch separation ~ 600 nsec spill duration ~ 5  sec Time between.
Types of IP Models All-integer linear programs Mixed integer linear programs (MILP) Binary integer linear programs, mixed or all integer: some or all of.
MICE CM25 Nov 2009Jean-Sebastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Issues o Achievements Since CM24 o Trigger o Event Building o Online Software o Front End.
Module 2 : Behavioral modeling TOPIC : Modeling a Digital pulse UNIT 1: Modeling and Simulation.
Introduction to State Machine
8/4~8/9 Work H.Y.Huang. 8/4 Improve VB program to resolve that the counter recording numbers turn to we want.
‘Dude where's my muon?’ Trigger Efficiency of the Single Station. Edward Overton 1.
Timing and synchronisation to ISIS RF Edward Overton 1.
Luminosity Monitor UKNF Meeting 7 June 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
Timing Model VHDL uses the following simulation cycle to model the stimulus and response nature of digital hardware Start Simulation Update Signals Execute.
Tracker Timing and ISIS RF Edward Overton 1. At CM32… 2 Had done some preliminary checks on the ISIS RF. Was beginning to think about how to handle the.
MICE TARGET OPERATION C. Booth, P. Hodgson, P. J. Smith, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy University of Sheffield, England. 1 – The MICE Experiment2 - The.
January 31, MICE DAQ MICE and ISIS Introduction MICE Detector Front End Electronics Software and MICE DAQ Architecture MICE Triggers Status and Schedule.
1 AFE IIt/VLSB Update Terry Hart, MICE Tracker Phone Conference September 5, 2007.
March 18, 2008 TJRMICE Beamline Status1 MICE Beamline Status (March 18, 2008) Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. Illinois Institute of Technology.
Linda R. Coney – 5 November 2009 Online Reconstruction Linda R. Coney 5 November 2009.
PID simulations Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting RAL.
1 MICE Tracker Readout Update AFE IIt firmware development VLSB firmware development Hardware progress Summary Terry Hart, MICE Tracker Meeting, August.
Review Continuous Random Variables Density Curves
MICE CMPB Alain Blondel 1 Highlights on MICE.
MICE CM28 Oct 2010Jean-Sebastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ o Achievements Since CM27 o DAQ Upgrade o CAM/DAQ integration o Online Software o Trigger.
1 MICE Tracker Readout Update Introduction/Overview TriP-t hardware tests AFE IIt firmware development VLSB firmware development Hardware progress Summary.
Tracker Cosmic Ray Test 2011 Linda R. Coney UC Riverside CM 29 - February 16, 2011.
Detector Summary Tracker. Well, as far as the tracker hardware is concerned, we are done. – Need to do the system test to make sure nothing has degraded.
January 17, MICE Tracker Firmware Dead Time and Muon Detection Studies for the MICE Tracker Tracker Data Readout Basics Progress in Increasing Fraction.
Software Overview 1M. Ellis - CM21 - 7th June 2008  Simulation Status  Reconstruction Status  Unpacking Library  Tracker Data Format  Real Data (DATE)
External Trigger System PAB To provide straight muon track efficient selection for TPC performance characterization Adjustable geometry for.
1 DATE-based DAQ Hideyuki Sakamoto CM22, RAL 19/10/08.
Aggregation To combine the creation of many similar products into one relevant measure of activity for the organization. Click here for Hint heuristic.
Differential Equations Solving First-Order Linear DEs Prepared by Vince Zaccone For Campus Learning Assistance Services at UCSB.
VC98 March 07Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 DDAQ Status o DAQ Software o Front-End and Trigger o What will happen soon o Schedule Milestones Jean-Sebastien.
MICE. Outline Experimental methods and goals Beam line Diagnostics – In HEP parlance – the detectors Magnet system 2MICE Optics Review January 14, 2016.
Doubling the Target Insertion Rate P J Smith for MICE VC 163.
ETD meeting Architecture and costing On behalf of PID group
Tracker TriP-t Test Stand
MICE Operations Scenario Run 1
Timing Model Start Simulation Delay Update Signals Execute Processes
Luminosity Monitor Status
Muon Recording Studies and Progress for the MICE Tracker
LNF PID session 1 December 1st 2009
Presentation transcript:

Muons going through MICE should –Have ISIS proton timing structure –Generate TOF signals –Satisfy ISIS and TOF trigger requirements MICE tracker DAQ will keep raw tracker data of appropriate ISIS bucket upon receipt of trigger (L1ACCEPT or Particle Trigger). Description of Trigger/Pipeline Issues

Trigger formation from ISIS and TOF signals takes ~ 1000 ns. When raw data arrive at AFE IIt boards, we don’t know immediately if this data corresponds to muon data. Solution: –Store data from each ISIS bucket in pipeline putting data into pipeline at bucket period. –When trigger is received, keep and process data from particular pipeline slot corresponding to trigger formation time. Note: slot number or pipeline depth ~ (trigger formation time)/(bucket period) Potential problems –Trigger formation time not multiple of proton bucket period –Proton bucket period varies from 345 ns to 324 ns over course of 1 ms wide spill

Start with ISIS bucket structure at end of spill with - bucket period = 324 ns - bucket width = 108 ns

A B Start with ISIS bucket structure with - bucket period = 324 ns - bucket width = 108 ns Suppose events A, B occur in bucket 1 at times t A = 50 ns, t B = 90 ns.

A B Trigger formation time = 1000 ns Start with ISIS bucket structure with - bucket period = 324 ns - bucket width = 108 ns Suppose events A, B occur in bucket 1 at times t A = 50 ns, t B = 90 ns. Assume it takes 1000 ns to form trigger.

Trigger formation time = 1000 ns Buckets are placed in pipeline: bucket 1 Bucket 1 added to pipeline. 1 A B

Trigger formation time = 1000 ns Buckets are placed in pipeline: bucket 2 Bucket 1 added to pipeline. Bucket 2 added to pipeline A B

Trigger formation time = 1000 ns Buckets are placed in pipeline: bucket 3 Bucket 1 added to pipeline. Bucket 2 added to pipeline. Bucket 3 added to pipeline A B

Trigger formation time = 1000 ns Buckets are placed in pipeline: bucket 4 Triggers for events A and B arrive before and after bucket 4 added to pipeline. This presents problem for setting pipeline depth for taking data out of pipeline. Bucket 1 added to pipeline. Bucket 2 added to pipeline. Bucket 3 added to pipeline. Bucket 4 added to pipeline A B

Before 4 th bucket added to pipeline, pipeline depth needs to be set to 3 for event A. Trigger formation time = 1000 ns Bucket 1 added to pipeline. Bucket 2 added to pipeline. Bucket 3 added to pipeline. Bucket 4 added to pipeline. A B Buckets are placed in pipeline: bucket 4 Triggers for events A and B arrive before and after bucket 4 added to pipeline. This presents problem for setting pipeline depth for taking data out of pipeline. After 4 th bucket added to pipeline, pipeline depth needs to be set to 4 for event B.

After 4 th bucket added to pipeline, pipeline depth needs to be set to 4 for events A and B. Trigger formation time = 1000 ns Bucket 1 added to pipeline. Bucket 2 added to pipeline. Bucket 3 added to pipeline. Bucket 4 added to pipeline. A B Solution: Add delay to trigger. In this case, a delay between 80 ns – 296 ns results in necessary pipeline depth of 4 for any event in bucket 1. Trigger formation delay = 80 ns

What About Variable ISIS Bucket Period? At beginning and end of spill, the trigger needs to be delayed so that the pipeline depth is 4 for any event occurring in bucket 1. Adding trigger delay of 80 ns – 296 ns works at end of spill –Bucket period = 324 ns –Bucket width = 108 ns Adding trigger delay of 150 ns – 380 ns works at start of spill –Bucket period = 345 ns –Bucket width = 115 ns Trigger formation time = 1000 ns

What About Variable ISIS Bucket Period? Adding trigger delay of 80 ns – 296 ns works at end of spill –Bucket period = 324 ns –Bucket width = 108 ns Adding trigger delay of 150 ns – 380 ns works at start of spill –Bucket period = 345 ns –Bucket width = 115 ns Satisfying both constraints done be setting trigger delay between 150 ns – 296 ns. Appropriate trigger delays can be determined for trigger formation times < ~3000 ns. Trigger formation time = 1000 ns