EPA Air Toxics Programs Ruben R. Casso Toxics Coordinator EPA Region 6 Phone 214-665-6763.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 13, 2011 Final Rules to Reduce Air Toxics from Boilers.
Advertisements

MSW LANDFILL MACT STANDARD DEVELOPMENT SWANA’s 22nd Annual Landfill Gas Symposium March 22-25, 1999 Michele Laur Emission Standards Division US Environmental.
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE Closing the Diesel Divide Protecting Public Health and the Environment from Diesel Air Pollution.
The Trona Cloud Featuring OCI, FMC, General Chemical, and Solvay Minerals “Left Click” to Next Slide.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
New Federal Regulations for Internal Combustion Engines Doug Parce.
Overview of the Clean Air Act and the Proposed Petroleum Refinery Sector Risk and Technology Review and New Source Performance Standards Public Outreach.
April 15, 2015 Betty Gatano, P.E. Permitting Section North Carolina Division of Air Quality, Raleigh, NC (919)
Materials Lifecycle Solutions MACT DEVELOPMENT DEFINITIONS HAP - HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS: FEDERAL LIST OF 188 COMPOUNDS AND COMPOUND CATAGORIES. COMMON.
A History and Status of CEMS Applications in USEPA Regulations Dale Evarts US EPA December 16, 2002 Better Air Quality in Asian Cities 2002
Solutions: Preventing and Reducing Air Pollution
Classification of Air Pollutants
Tier 3 Vehicle and Fuel Standards: Final Rule National Tribal Forum on Air Quality May 21,
Air Quality 101: Clean Air Act Overview/ Update. 2 Origins of the Clean Air Act Historic air pollution Donora, Pennsylvania, – PSD, tribes.
1 Control Techniques Guidelines Joel Leon September 16, 2011.
Home sweet home... Or is it???? Breathing! Some basics.
Recent Developments in Air Quality Modeling Techniques for studying Air Toxics in the Houston-Galveston Area Prof. Daewon W. Byun Dr. Soontae Kim, Ms.
Update on EPA Oil and Gas Activities Greg Green, Outreach and Information Division, OAQPS.
Actions to Reduce Mercury Air Emissions and Related Exposure Risks in the United States Ben Gibson Office of Air Quality and Planning and Standards U.S.
Presentation Overview Alaska air pollution Pollutants Sources What is an emissions inventory?
1 Overview of Emissions Inventories Melinda Ronca-Battista, ITEP/TAMS Center.
0 Office of Transportation and Air Quality Update for Air Directors: Transportation and Air Quality Christopher Grundler Deputy Director NACAA Spring Meeting.
Community Air Risk Evaluation (CARE) Program Philip Martien, Ph.D. Senior Advanced Projects Advisor Bay Area Air Quality Management District CAPCOA Conference.
1 EPA’s Proposal for Nonroad Diesel Engines & Fuel May 2003 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Transportation and Air Quality Informal document.
Clean Air California’s Success -- and Future Challenges.
Overview of the Air Toxics Program Jeff Whitlow U.S. EPA May 15-18, 2007.
Air Toxics Study Prepared in collaboration with the University of Louisville, School of Public Health Depts. Epidemiology and Clinical Investigation Sciences.
TITLE III UPDATE Joel Leon Air Quality Evaluation Section Bureau of Technical Services 1.
Health Impacts of Air Pollution on Communities Source Category Regulations Dan Donohoue Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
Oil & Gas NSPS/NESHAPS Bob Lebens WESTAR Bob Lebens WESTAR.
CONCEPTUAL MODELING PROTOCOL FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT PROGRAM.
UTILITY MACT WORKING GROUP STATE AND LOCAL STAKEHOLDER RECOMMENDATIONS.
Blue Skies Delaware; Clean Air for Life NESHAPs Jim Snead October 8, 2008.
MACT Residual Risk Experience Presented to: Air &Waste Management Association, Southern Section 2007 Annual Meeting & Technical Conference August 8,2006.
Industrial Sources of Mercury in the Atmosphere Jim Orgeron Staff Environmental Scientist, Environmental Planning Division.
Diesel Risk Reduction Plan California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
Environmental Technology Council EPA /State / DOD Region IV Environmental Conference June 2005 Joydeb “Joy” Majumder, EPA Region 4.
Grace Hill Clean Air Partnership - Overview Doug Eller, Grace Hill Settlement House Gwen Yoshimura, Region VII EPA For Air Quality Advisory Committee July.
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
Presumptive MACT For Municipal Solid Waste Landfills July 1999 Emission Standards Division US Environmental Protection Agency.
National Clean Diesel Campaign Upcoming Funding Opportunities Rosalva Tapia June 3, 2009 National Tribal Forum on Air Quality Management Conference 2009.
Air Toxics. 2 What are Air Toxics? Toxic chemicals Cause serious health effects such as cancer.
FIRE STRATEGY Fire Policy Update. Background Agricultural land is defined as forestland, rangeland, cropland and pastureland. Types of fires – Prescribed,
Air Toxics Monitoring in the Houston- Galveston Area David Brymer, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Hydraulic Fracturing in Central North Carolina Potential Impacts on Triangle Air Quality Therese Vick March 2012 Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League.
Talking About Air Toxics John D. Wilson Galveston-Houston Association for Smog Prevention
Air Toxics Update Melanie Loyzim February 25, 2010.
HRM Houston Regional Monitoring 1 Hazardous Air Pollutants Ambient Air Monitoring Data Review Air Toxics: What We Know, What We Don’t Know, and What We.
David J. Shaw Director, NYSDEC Division of Air Resources Presented To: NACAA Spring Meeting Sacramento, CA May 17 – 19, 2010 Air Quality Management Plan.
Essential Standards Used in California for the Measurement of Toxics in Ambient Air, Ozone Precursors from Automotive Emissions, and Cleaner Burning Gasoline.
Current Status, New Directions
Class Project Report, May 2005 ME/ChE 449 Sustainable Air Quality Highway Transportation: Trends from 1970 to 2002 and Beyond By Scott Kaminski Instructor.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency March 2, 2011 John Seltz.
JATAP Joint Air Toxics Assessment Project 2011 National Tribal Forum for Air Quality Spokane, WA June 14-16, 2011 A Successful Multi-Jurisdictional Research.
Welcome! Please read the board carefully and get out paper for notes. Please read the board carefully and get out paper for notes.
1 ITSA Meeting April 2, 2004 San Diego Thermal Spraying in California.
PARTICULATE MATTER: REGULATORY RESPONSE Presented by: Karl Loos.
Final Omitted Rulemakings Repeals: Employer Trip Reduction; Portable Fuel Container Requirements; and St. Joe Resources Company Emission Limits Environmental.
EPA’s SPECIATE 4.4 Database: Development and Uses Office of Research and Development National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Air Pollution Prevention.
Office of Research and Development National Risk Management Research Laboratory Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can be masked by a collage.
Proposed Research Plan Fiscal Year Today’s Proposed Action Approve Fiscal Year Research Plan Allocate $6 million in four research.
PROPOSED FINE PARTICULATE ATTAINMENT/ NONATTAINMENT DESIGNATION RECOMMENDATIONS This proposal is available on the DEP Website at
1 Emissions Inventory Overview–Part 1 Melinda Ronca-Battista, ITEP.
Reducing Air Pollution
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Clean Air Act (CAA) Purpose
The Clean Air Act By Jessi Walker Per 2.
Travis Felthaus APES -4 Bodas
Air Toxics Program Laura McKelvey.
Presentation transcript:

EPA Air Toxics Programs Ruben R. Casso Toxics Coordinator EPA Region 6 Phone

The Federal Government/EPA’s Role: The focus with regard to air toxics is for EPA to issue nationwide rules to control air toxics emissions at the source. EPA does not have ambient air quality standards for air toxics Regulatory efforts Stationary sources: major (large) & area (smaller) Mobile source air toxics Voluntary efforts Support for State/Local community air toxics efforts

EPA’s Relationship with the State Congress intended for state agencies to be the primary implementers of Air Quality Programs EPA approves/delegates the implementation of Federal Air Quality Programs to the States States may decide to conduct their air quality programs/activities at levels which go beyond the minimum requirements set forth by EPA

EPA Stationary Source Air Toxics Rulemaking The CAA identified 188 hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) and 174 specific categories to be regulated under maximum achievable control technology (MACT) rules technology- based rules for facilities Two phase program for large industrial sources (e.g., chemical manufacturers) Technology-based standards major sources Risk-based review of technology standards Technology-based standards for smaller sources (or “area” sources, e.g., dry cleaners)

EPA MACT Rulemaking EPA promulgated about 100 major source MACT rules for specific facility categories EPA has begun the process of evaluating residual risk on major source MACT rules EPA is developing MACT rules for 70 area (minor) source categories

Mobile Source Air Toxics Regulatory Air Toxics Effort Mobile source air toxics (MSAT) Rule Additional Efforts – Diesel Emission Reduction School Buses Other efforts on vehicles/infrastructure Diesel-powered equipment at: Ports Airports Rail

Mobile Source Air Toxics (MSATs) Diesel Emissions (Diesel Particulate Matter +Diesel Exhaust Organic Gases) Acetaldehyde, Acrolein, Benzene, 1,3-Butadiene, Ethylbenzene Formaldehyde, MTBE, Naphthalene, n–Hexane, Styrene, Toluene, Xylene Arsenic Compounds, Chromium Compounds, Lead Compounds Manganese Compounds, Mercury Compounds, Nickel Compounds Polycyclic organic matter (POM), Dioxin/Furans

Mobile Source Air Toxics (MSAT) Rule Proposed Rule expected February 2006 Final Rule expected February 2007 EPA expects the new MSAT rule to have 3 parts: 1) Fuel controls ( i.e. benzene content in gasoline) 2) Light-Duty vehicles (Evaporation provisions similar to CA requirements and cold temperature VOC reduction provisions) 3) Gas can requirements

Impact of the EPA Air Quality Standards for Ozone include requirements to reduce VOC ozone precursor emissions under the SIP, some of which are air toxics. Houston SIP controls in the time frame should result in emission reductions/improvements for air toxics Highly reactive volatile organic compounds (HRVOC) rules will lower 1,3-butadiene emissions in the area. Benzene emissions will also be reduced through SIP efforts. Additional Ozone SIP State/Local Air Toxics Emissions Reductions

EPA Support for State/Local Community Air Toxics Efforts States may decide to conduct their air quality programs/activities at levels which go beyond the minimum requirements set forth by EPA EPA supports State/local agency efforts to address community air toxics EPA support flexibility for State/Local agencies to address community air toxics in a manner they deem appropriate for specific state/local circumstances