Arguments for Nativism Various other facts about child language add support to the Nativist argument: Accuracy (few ‘errors’) Efficiency (quick, easy)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Making sense of comprehension Nick Dawson Pearson Education.
Advertisements

Correction, feedback and assessment: Their role in learning
Intro to NLP - J. Eisner1 Learning in the Limit Golds Theorem.
2: FIRST LANGUAGE ACQUSITION The process of how children learn their native language (L1), e.g. The stages: bubbling  words (one word/two words)  complex.
Psych 156A/ Ling 150: Acquisition of Language II Lecture 12 Poverty of the Stimulus I.
EDUC 200 Final Power Point Presentation Scott Reding Spring 2005.
Ling 240: Language and Mind Structure Dependence in Grammar Formation.
Designing Scoring Rubrics. What is a Rubric? Guidelines by which a product is judged Guidelines by which a product is judged Explain the standards for.
Passive comprehension by Slovak typically and atypically developing children Master thesis in psychology, Author: Radka Antalíková, Supervisor: Kristine.
Language Learning in Early Childhood Explaining first language acquisition.
Nativism: Noam Chomsky. John Locke ( ): “ Essay Concerning Human Understanding ” “ Since it is the understanding that sets man above the rest.
Introduction: The Chomskian Perspective on Language Study.
Nativism: Noam Chomsky
Week 3a. UG and L2A: Background, principles, parameters CAS LX 400 Second Language Acquisition.
Dr. Bibhuti Mahapatra, KReSIT, IIT BombayIntroduction to Linguistics1 Principle of structure dependency Bibhuti Bhusan Mahapatra.
The theoretical significance of UG in second language acquisition Present by Esther, Karen, Mei.
Psych 156A/ Ling 150: Acquisition of Language II Lecture 14 Poverty of the Stimulus III.
Language Special form of communication in which we learn complex rules to manipulate symbols that can be used to generate an endless number of meaningful.
LEARNING FROM OBSERVATIONS Yılmaz KILIÇASLAN. Definition Learning takes place as the agent observes its interactions with the world and its own decision-making.
Language, Mind, and Brain by Ewa Dabrowska Chapter 9: Syntactic constructions, pt. 2.
Psych 156A/ Ling 150: Psychology of Language Learning Lecture 11 Poverty of the Stimulus II.
© 2004 Programmed Instruction ­Students work through this Unit of Learning at their own pace and are tested at each step with a multiple choice question.
1 Human simulations of vocabulary learning Présentation Interface Syntaxe-Psycholinguistique Y-Lan BOUREAU Gillette, Gleitman, Gleitman, Lederer.
Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA). Introduction to LSA Learning Model Uses Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to simulate human learning of word and passage.
8-2 Basics of Hypothesis Testing
 A New School System A Guide for Parents and Carers.
FIRST LANGUAGE ACQUISTION Applied Linguistics University of Huelva.
TRANSFORMATIONAL GRAMMAR An introduction. LINGUISTICS Linguistics Traditional Before 1930 Structural 40s -50s Transformational ((Chomsky 1957.
Chapter 17 Chomsky & After
Adobe Forms THE FORM ELEMENT PANEL. Creating a form using the Adobe FormsCentral is a quick and easy way to distribute a variety of forms including surveys.
Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition
At Any Age. Research is a multi-dynamic way children begin to think critically It is a series of sequential skills linked with thought processes Essential.
AP English Language & Composition Exam Review
Psych 156A/ Ling 150: Acquisition of Language II Lecture 16 Language Structure II.
Elementary School Observation by Victoria DeRoy.
Critical Thinking Looking at the Reasons. Let’s review last week’s questions. What is the main _____? What is the main issue?
Test Your Knowledge. x + 3 =6 a.5 b.4 c.3 d.2 y - 11= 78 a. 69 b. 89 c. 87 d. 68.
Learning from observations
$1,000,000 $500,000 $100,000 $50,000 $10,000 $5000 $1000 $500 $200 $100 Is this your Final Answer? YesNo Question 2? Correct Answer Wrong Answer.
Universal Grammar Noam Chomsky.
Theories of first language acquisition.  We are not born speaking!  Language must be acquired. ◦ Learning vs. acquisition  If we think of all that.
GROUP 5 ANNIS LUTHFIANA AULYA PURNAWIDHA D FITA ARIYANA
A means of communication.
Language Acquisition A brief introduction to a selection of theories behind language acquisition.
Language Acquisition Computational Intelligence 4/7/05 LouAnn Gerken.
Introduction Chapter 1 Foundations of statistical natural language processing.
Learning a foreign language: Twice As Hard?. Scanning Scan the text and tell the following statements “true” or “false”.
Conclusion The conclusion wraps up your experiment. It includes the answer to your question but also provides you with a chance to share how the experiment.
Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 2 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 3.
Approaches to (Second) Language Acquisition. Behaviorism (Theory) tabula rasa (to be filled with language material) children learn language by imitation;
Spellings Why the need to change? Sending home a list of spellings to learn by rote has been widely found to have virtually no impact on children’s ability.
Three perspectives of language development Behaviorist Nativist Interactionist.
Universal Grammar Chomsky and his followers no longer use the term LAD, but refer to the child’s innate endowment as Universal Grammar (UG). UG is a theory.
Chapter 3 Language Acquisition: A Linguistic Treatment Jang, HaYoung Biointelligence Laborotary Seoul National University.
The Teachability Hypothesis. Stages of acquisition of morpho-syntactic structures follow a set developmental order. Stages cannot be skipped as a result.
Theories of language acquisition
Chapter 10 Language acquisition Language acquisition----refers to the child’s acquisition of his mother tongue, i.e. how the child comes to understand.
3 Test-taking Strategies Do you know how to test efficiently and effectively?
Poverty of Stimulus Poverty of Stimulus Reading Group.
Multiplication Timed Tests.
Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition
The nativist theory Noam Chomsky (1928—).
Psych156A/Ling150: Psychology of Language Learning
Theories of Language Development
Using the Scientific Method
Over the past fifty years, three main theoretical positions have been advanced to explain language development from infancy through the early school years:
L.O.1 To be able to derive quickly division facts corresponding to tables up to 10x10.
Over the past fifty years, three main theoretical positions have been advanced to explain language development from infancy through the early school years:
First Language Acquisition
What do you know when you know a language?
Presentation transcript:

Arguments for Nativism Various other facts about child language add support to the Nativist argument: Accuracy (few ‘errors’) Efficiency (quick, easy) Uniformity (within and across languages) Constrained (POS)

Poverty of the Stimulus If (i) children know X, and (ii) evidence for X is not sufficiently present in the input to children, then X must be innate.  Children come to know things that they should not know, given what they hear.

Example of the POS: auxiliary inversion (Chomsky, 1971) (1)thegirlistheinmarket

Example of the POS: auxiliary inversion (Chomsky, 1971) (1)thegirlistheinmarket

Example of the POS: auxiliary inversion (Chomsky, 1971) (1)thegirl[t]theinmarketIs?

Principle of Y/N Question Formation:  Move the auxiliary to the front of the sentence. This works for 99% of the sentences in English. But not all…

Sentences with Multiple Auxiliaries John is in the house now that it is raining.

Sentences with Multiple Auxiliaries John is in the house now that it is raining. Is John [t] in the house now that it is raining?

Sentences with Multiple Auxiliaries John is in the house now that it is raining. Is John [t] in the house now that it is raining? *Is John is in the house now that it [t] raining?

Revised Principle of Y/N Question Formation:  Move the first auxiliary to the front of the sentence. The girls is in the market John is in the house now that it is raining.

But… a.The child that is sitting on the floor is hungry. b.*Is the child that [t] sitting on the floor is hungry? c.Is the child that is sitting on the floor [t] hungry?

So what’s the principle? [The child that is sitting on the floor] is hungry. [The child that is sitting on the floor]

So what’s the principle? Is [the child that is sitting on the floor] [t] hungry?

Linear Order Hypothesis (Incorrect) : To make a yes-no question, front the first auxiliary. So what’s the principle? Structural Dependency Hypothesis (Correct) : In order to make a yes-no question, front the main auxiliary.

How does a child learn this? The child must hear sentences of the following kind: Is the child that is sitting on the floor hungry? Nativists argue such evidence is stunningly rare in CDS. Crain & Nakayama (1987) show children aged 3;2 have knowledge of this principle.

Poverty of the Stimulus At its heart, the POS argument is a problem of INDUCTION. Induction: how do you go from individual examples to a generalized rule?

Induction A simple example: 1 2 … What’s the next number in this progression? 3? 4? 7?

The Induction Problem You’re about to see 5 slides of 3 colored bars in frames. The first 4 slides exhibit a property that you need to learn. Decide whether or not the 5th slide exhibits the property in question.

1

2

3

4

?

Answer  NO  The property in question in whether the area covered by the bars is greater than 50% of the area of the rectangle. This generalization is more natural for pigeons to learn than for humans.

Try it again

1

2

3

4

?

Answer YES Property in question in whether the 3 bars are unequal in height. This generalization is more natural for humans than for pigeons.

Try it again

1

2

3

4

?

Answer  YES  You only saw examples decreasing in height from left to right. But the generalization was still that the bars only had to be different heights.

Try it again

1

2

3

4

?

Answer YES Property in question is whether the 3 bars are unequal in height. But what about the 4th example? Oh, that? It was a mistake.

The Induction Problem You have to be able to discern the relevant dimension(s) Any set of input data potentially allows an infinite number of generalizations. How does an unbiased learner select the one correct hypothesis from amongst these infinite hypotheses?

Linear Order Hypothesis (Incorrect): To make a yes-no question, front the first auxiliary. Returning to Yes-No Question Formation Structural Dependency Hypothesis (Correct) : In order to make a yes-no question, front the main auxiliary.

So how do kids learn the correct principle?

Children are born with the knowledge that language is dependent on structure, not linear order.

Lawn Bowling

This is the current state of the field

A ball is about to be bowled

This is the final state of the field

How did you get from the initial state to the final state?

Lots of possibilities

Which is the correct way to get from initial state to final state?

So how do kids learn the correct principle?

Children are born with the knowledge that language is dependent on structure, not linear order.

The End