Meaningful Use 2013 Changes Overview JoAnne Hawkins Meaningful Use Sr

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meaningful Use and Health Information Exchange
Advertisements

Dedicated to Hope, Healing and Recovery 0 Dec 2009 Interim/Proposed Rules Meaningful Use, Quality Reporting & Interoperability Standards January 10, 2010.
ARRA Meaningful Use Update Mount Auburn Hospital Information Systems Update March 2011.
Meaningful Use and IHS. Setting The IHS National Immunization and Information Technology Programs work closely with IIS personnel, software programmers.
NYMedicaid HITECHEHR Incentive Program James J. Figge, M.D., M.B.A. Medical Director, Office of Health Insurance Programs September 2010.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Final Rule Implementing the American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009.
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
Meaningful Use Performance Measures Report Carmen Land Meaningful Use National Team Business Analyst Data Networks Corporation contractor for US Indian.
QIO Update On Federal Initiatives Right Care Initiative Rotating University of Best Practices San Diego, CA September 10, 2012 Mary Fermazin, M.D., MPA.
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
CMS EHR Incentive Registration and Attestation JoAnne Hawkins Meaningful Use Sr. Healthcare Policy Analyst DNC (Contractor) for U.S. Indian Health Service.
Practice Management System Electronic Medical Records Accelerate Your Practice Stage 2 Meaningful Use with MVE 2014 Practice Management.
Meaningful Use and the EHR Incentive Program Tribal Self-Governance Conference.
GOVERNMENT EHR FUNDING: MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 UPDATE October 25, 2012 Jonathan Krasner Healthcare IT Consultant BEI
Meaningful Use Jacqueline L. Candelaria ABQ Area Program Analyst April 25, 2012.
Clinical Lab Test Results Configuring RPMS-EHR for Meaningful Use Resource Patient Management System.
Behavioral Health providers are being challenged to adopt health information technology with very limited resources. There is a need to prepare for increased.
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
“Preserve and Improve the Health Status of all Californians” Medi-Cal Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program Medi-Cal Electronic Health Records.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
Moderator Kevin Larsen, MD Medical Director, Meaningful Use Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Washington, D.C. Using.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
MU - Selection & Configuration of Measures August 28, 2015 Presenter: Christy Erickson.
EHRS as a Tool to Improve BP Control 1.Brief history of OQIUN, CCI. Began 1999 using data cards. Started working with multiple practice sites using different.
Daniel T. Golder, DDS, MBA Chief Information Officer Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality This material is provided by the Oklahoma Foundation for Medical.
EHR for Meaningful Use Clinical Quality Measures Dr. Aneel Advani Associate Director for Informatics IHS Office of Information Technology Indian Health.
Practice Management System Electronic Medical Records Accelerate Your Practice Stage 1 Meaningful Use with MVE 2014 Practice Management.
Meaningful Use Stage 1 & 2 Helping Colorado Providers Achieve Meaningful Use Tracy Rue Senior Consultant, Colorado Regional Extension Center.
Christopher Geer, MBA Meaningful Use Project Manager Unity Health System
Prepared by: Health Technology Services Regional Extension Center A division of Mountain-Pacific Quality Health.
1 EHR Incentive Program Registration & Attestation Tips for the Eligible Professionals Marlene Hodges & Denise Warren June 8, 2011.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Achieving Meaningful Use Common standards. Common language. Common sense.™
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
Universal Adoption of the EHR What is Meaningful Use and why should it be important to me?
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
Implementation days 10 Days Onsite Training Additional Hardware Automated Workflow Paperless Environment MD with PC Tablet / iPad Workflow Analysis.
INTRODUCTION TO THE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD CHAPTER 1.
Patient Volume for Meaningful Use Richard Kashinski Meaningful Use National Business Analyst DNC (Contractor) for U.S. Indian Health Service OIT Last Updated:
ACMHA: The College for Behavioral Health Leadership June 8, 2011 Patricia MacTaggart HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE.
Discussion with BEACON Council ODJFS/OHP Medicaid Provider Incentive Program.
Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.
Missouri Hospital Association Meaningful Use Quality Measure Update.
Component 11: Configuring EHRs Unit 2: Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
Unit 1b: Health Care Quality and Meaningful Use Introduction to QI and HIT This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department.
Meaningful What? AAP Child Health Informatics Center Update on EHRs and related issues.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Jason McNamara Technical Director for Health IT.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Robert Anthony HIT Policy Committee March 7, 2012.
©2011 Falcon, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary. May not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of Falcon, LLC. Falcon EHR.
June 18, 2010 Marty Larson.  Health Information Exchange  Meaningful Use Objectives  Conclusion.
HITECH/MEANINGFUL USE Danielle Smith Trends and Issues in Healthcare December 2, 2014 Power Point Project.
Component 2: The Culture of Health Care Unit 7: Quality Measurement, Performance Improvement, and Incentive Payment Schemes Lecture 4 This material was.
Quality Measurement and Improvement Component 2 / Unit 7d.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Meaningful Use Made Easy Step by Step Approach to Stage 1 Compliance and 2013 Changes My Vision Express Practice Management and EMR Software Presented.
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview 1 Robert Anthony.
Configuring axiUm for Meaningful Use
By: Rebecca Cameron Amie Dennis Amy Everson Debborah Stokes.
Moving Toward HITECH Healthcare EHR Adoption at the Dawn of a New Era
Meaningful Use Update 2015: How Does It Impact Family Medicine? Ryan Mullins, MD, CPE, CPHQ, CPHIT.
Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 16, 2016 Today’s presenters: Brendan Gallagher Thomas.
Praxis EMR Training Seminar
2017 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 September 19,
How to receive your incentive dollars quickly
Presentation transcript:

Meaningful Use 2013 Changes Overview JoAnne Hawkins Meaningful Use Sr Meaningful Use 2013 Changes Overview JoAnne Hawkins Meaningful Use Sr. Healthcare Policy Analyst DNC (Contractor) for  U.S. Indian Health Service January 29, 2013

Today’s Objectives Review and understand CMS EHR Incentive Program Stage 1, 2013 changes Review Patient Volume Calculation changes Review Performance Measure changes 2

2013 Changes All changes made for 2013 are not retroactive to CY/FY 2011 or 2012

Meaningful Use

What is Meaningful Use? Meaningful Use is using certified EHR technology to: Improve quality, safety, efficiency, and reduce health disparities Engage patients and families in their health care Improve care coordination Improve population and public health All the while maintaining privacy and security The ultimate objective of Meaningful Use is to improve patient care. The CMS Final Rule released on July 28th identified five broad priorities – listed on this slide -- for making these improvements. Each priority concentrates on an aspect of patient care. Every aspect of Meaningful Use is focused on fulfilling 1 or more of these 5 priorities. 5

3 Stages of Meaningful Use This image shows a conceptual graphic of the advancements of meaningful use. After the rule making period which led to the Final Rule that is now published in the Federal Register, 3 stages of meaningful use were established. Stage 1 which takes place in 2011 through 2013 is aimed at data capture and sharing. Stage 2 which begins in 2014 is aimed at advanced clinical processes and Stage 3 which is slated for 2016 targets improved outcomes. 6

Timeline

Eligible Professionals: Incentive Program Timeline CY 2013 01/01/13 First day of calendar and EHR reporting year 10/03/13 Last day to begin 90-day reporting period for the Medicare Incentive Program 12/31/13 Last day of calendar and EHR reporting year 02/28/14 Last day to register and attest

Eligible Hospitals: Incentive Program Timeline FY 2013 10/03/12 First day of calendar and EHR reporting year 07/01/13 LAST day to begin 90-day reporting period for the Medicare Incentive Program 09/30/13 Last day of fiscal year and EHR reporting year 11/30/13 Last day to register and attest

Medicaid EP/EH MU Timeline 2011 2012 2013 2014* 2015 2016 2017 A/I/U Stage1 MU 90 Days Stage 1 MU 365 Days Stage 2 Stage 3 10

Medicare EP/EH MU Timeline 2011 2012 2013 2014* 2015 2016 Stage1 MU 90 Days Stage 1 MU 365 Days Stage 2 MU 90 Days Stage 3 11

Eligible Professionals: Medicare Incentive Payment Example Amount of Payment Each Year of Participation Calendar Year EP Receives a Payment CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013 CY2014 CY 2015 and later $18,000 $12,000 $8,000 $15,000 CY 2014 $4,000 CY 2015 $2,000 $0 CY 2016 TOTAL $44,000 $39,000 $24,000 Chart showing annual payments based on the first year an EP qualifies for an incentive payment. If the EP qualifies for their first incentive payment in either calendar year 2011 or calendar year 2012, their incentive payments would be: year 1: $18,000, year 2: $12,000, year 3: $8,000, year 4: $4,000, year 5: $2,000. This would total $44,000 over the course of 5 years participating in the program. If the EP qualifies for their first incentive payment in calendar year 2013, their incentive payments would be: year 1: $15,000, year 2: $12,000, year 3: $8,000, year 4: $4,000. This would total $39,000 over the course of 4 years participating in the program. If the EP qualifies for their first incentive payment in calendar year 2014, their incentive payments would be: year 1: $12,000, year 2: $8,000, year 3: $4,000. this would total $24,000 over the course of 3 years participating in the program. There are no incentive payments for an EP who begins demonstrating meaningful use starting in calendar year 2015 or later. The last payment year for the incentives is 2016. 12

Eligible Professionals: Medicaid Incentive Payment Example Amount of Payment Each Year if Continues Meeting Requirements 1st Calendar Year EP Receives a Payment CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013 CY 2014 CY 2015 CY 2016 $21,250 $8,500 CY 2017 CY 2018 CY 2019 CY 2020 CY 2021 TOTAL $63,750 Chart showing annual payments based on first year EP qualifies for an incentive payment in the Medicaid EHR incentive program. If you start participating anytime between 2011 and 2016, your first year payment would be $21,250. Subsequent payments for the remaining 5 years that an EP can participate would be $8,500 each year they qualify. At the end of the 6 years, if you continue to meet the program requirements to qualify for payment, your total incentive payments would be $63,750. The total for pediatricians who meet the 20 percent patient volume but fall short of the 30 percent patient volume is $14,167 in the first year and $5,667 in subsequent years. This adds up to a maximum Medicaid EHR incentive payment of $42,500 over a six-year period. NOTE: A provider will receive payment for A/I/U during their first participation year. However, their A/I/U participation year does not count towards the Meaningful Use participation years. Providers will start Stage 1 of their during their second payment year as outlined below: Payment year 1- A/I/U Payment year 2- MU Stage 1, year one (demonstrate MU for 90 days) Payment year 3- MU Stage 2, year two (demonstrate MU for 365 days) 13

EP Patient Volume and Medicaid Hospital Incentive calculation

Eligible Professionals and Medicaid: Patient Volume Threshold Eligible Professional (EP) If EP does not practice predominantly at FQHC/RHC: Minimum Medicaid patient volume thresholds If EP does practice predominantly at FQHC/RHC*: Minimum needy individual patient volume thresholds Physicians 30% - Pediatricians 20% Dentists Certified Nurse-Midwives NPs PAs practicing at an FQHC/RHC that is led by a PA N/A * All Tribal/Urban clinics are deemed FQHC/RHC for the CMS incentive program

EP Patient Volume Current Patient Volume Calculation is based on Medicaid Paid Claims Beginning in 2013, the patient volume calculation will include: Medicaid paid claims Zero paid claims Individuals enrolled in Medicaid at the time of service CHIP encounters for patients in Title 19 and Title 21 Medicaid expansion programs (still cannot include CHIP stand-alone Title XXI encounters) Release date for New Patient Volume Report will be April 30, 2013. Practicing Predominantly- States will have the flexibility to allow EPs to use a six-month period within the prior calendar year or preceding 12 month period from the date of attestation for the definition of practicing predominantly (more than 50% of the encounters). Option to determine volume based on a 90 day period in the previous calendar year OR a 90 day period in the previous 12 months preceding the date of attestation. Medicaid encounters defined where any services were rendered on any one day to an individual enrolled in an eligible Medicaid program. Encounters no longer have to be paid to be counted. Provider patient volume can include CHIP encounters in the numerator if part of Title XIX expansion of part of Title XXI expansion (still cannot include CHIP stand-alone Title XXI encounters). 16

EP Patient Volume Calculation EP Patient Volume Calculation 2013 (Non-Medicaid Expansion State) – Federal Sites Numerator = Medicaid Paid + Zero Paid Claims + Medicaid Enrolled Denominator = All encounters for that EP EP Patient Volume Calculation 2013 Medicaid Expansion State – Federal Sites Numerator = Medicaid Paid + Zero Paid Claims+ CHIP+ Medicaid Enrolled Denominator = All encounters for that EP

EP Needy Patient Volume EP Patient Volume Calculation – Needy Individual (Tribal and Urban sites) Numerator = Medicaid Paid + Zero Paid Claims + Medicaid Enrolled + CHIP (Title 19 & Title 21) + Uncompensated Care Denominator = All encounters for that EP

Patient Volume Look-Back Period Prior to 2013, patient volume was calculated on a 90-day period on the previous calendar year (qualification year) Beginning in 2013, states have the option to allow EPs to generate a patient volume report based on a different look-back period, either: across a 90-day period in the last 12 months preceding the provider’s attestation; or a 90-day period in the previous calendar year

Medicaid Hospital incentive calculation

Medicaid Incentive Hospital Calculation Change Prior to 2013, Medicaid Hospital Incentive Calculation was based on the most recent cost report data (previous year) Participation beginning in 2013 can utilize data from the most recent continuous 12-month period prior to attestation FEIR report will be updated to reflect the data elements needed for Medicaid Hospital Incentive Calculation

Stage 1 2013 Mu Performance AND Clinical quality Measures

2013 MU Requirements Stage 1: 2013 Objectives and Measures Eligible Professionals must complete: 13 core objectives 5 out of 10 objectives from menu set 6 total Clinical Quality Measures (3 core or alternate core, and 3 out of 38 from additional set) Eligible Hospitals must complete: 12 core objectives 15 Clinical Quality Measures Note: A new performance measure report will be released in March 2013

Stage 1: 2013 Performance Measures EH Target Core Measure X >30% CPOE for Medication Orders *Measure change* Yes/No Drug Interaction Checks >80% Maintain Problem List >40% E-Prescribing *New Exclusion added* Active Medication List Medication Allergy List >50%: Record Demographics >50% Record Vital Signs Record Smoking Status Clinical Quality Measures *Removed in 2013* Clinical Decision Support Rule Electronic Copy of Health Information   Clinical Summaries Electronic Copy of Discharge Instructions Electronic Exchange of Clinical Information *Removed in 2013* Protect Electronic Health Information

2013: Stage 1 Performance Measures EH Target Menu Set Measure X Yes/No Drug Formulary Checks   >50% Advance Directives >40% Clinical Lab Test Results Patient Lists >20% Patient Reminders 10% Patient Electronic Access >10% Patient Specific Education Resources Medication Reconciliation Transition of Care Summary *Immunization Registries Data Submission *Syndromic Surveillance Data Submission *Reportable Lab Results to Public Health Agencies

CPOE Objective: Use computerized provider order entry (CPOE) for medication orders directly entered by any licensed health care professional who can enter orders into the medical record per state, local, and professional guidelines. DENOMINATOR: Number of medication orders created by the EP during the EHR reporting period NUMERATOR: The number of medication orders in the denominator recorded using CPOE THRESHOLD: The resulting percentage must be more than 30 percent in order for an EP to meet this measure EXCLUSION: Any EP who writes fewer than 100 medication orders during the EHR reporting period

e-Prescribing Objective: Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically (eRx) . DENOMINATOR: Number of prescriptions written for drugs requiring a prescription in order to be dispensed other than controlled substances during the EHR reporting period; or Number of prescriptions written for drugs requiring a prescription in order to be dispensed during the EHR reporting period NUMERATOR: The number of prescriptions in the denominator generated, queried for a drug formulary and transmitted electronically using CEHRT THRESHOLD: The resulting percentage must be more than 50 percent in order for an EP to meet this measure EXCLUSIONS: Any EP who: (1) Writes fewer than 100 permissible prescriptions during the EHR reporting period; or (2) Does not have a pharmacy within their organization and there are no pharmacies that accept electronic prescriptions within 10 miles of the EP’s practice location at the start of his/her EHR reporting period.

Eligible Professionals: Clinical Quality Measures Core Set: If denominator = 0, must report on the Alternate Core measures NQF Measure Number and PQRI Implementation # Clinical Quality Measure Title NQF 0013 Hypertension: Blood Pressure Measurement NQF 0028 Preventive Care and Screening Measure Pair: a) Tobacco Use Assessment, b) Tobacco Cessation Intervention NQF 0421 PQRI 128 Adult Weight Screening and Follow-up

Eligible Professionals: Clinical Quality Measures Alternate Core Set NQF Measure Number and PQRI Implementation # Clinical Quality Measure Title NQF 0024 Weight Assessment and Counseling for Children and Adolescents NQF 0041 PQRI 110 Preventive Care and Screening: Influenza Immunization for Patients 50 Years Old or Older NQF 0038 Childhood Immunization Status

Eligible Professionals: 38 Additional Clinical Quality Measures (Choose 3) Diabetes: 9 Heart Failure (HF): 3 Coronary Artery Disease (CAD): 3 Pneumonia Vaccination Status for Older Adults Anti-depressant medication management: 2 Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG): Optic Nerve Evaluation Asthma: 3 Appropriate Testing for Children with Pharyngitis Cancer Prevention and/ or Oncology: 6 Smoking and Tobacco Use Cessation: 3 Ischemic Vascular Disease (IVD): 3 Initiation and Engagement of Alcohol and Other Drug Dependence Treatment: 2 Prenatal Care: 2 Controlling High Blood Pressure Chlamydia Screening for Women Low Back Pain: Use of Imaging Studies

Eligible Hospitals: 15 Clinical Quality Measures Emergency Department Throughput – admitted patients Median time from ED arrival to ED departure for admitted patients Admission decision time to ED departure time for admitted patients Ischemic stroke – Discharge on anti-thrombotics Ischemic stroke – Anticoagulation for A-fib/flutter Ischemic stroke – Thrombolytic therapy for patients arriving within 2 hours of symptom onset Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke – Antithrombotic therapy by day 2 Ischemic stroke – Discharge on statins Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke – Rehabilitation assessment VTE prophylaxis within 24 hours of arrival Anticoagulation overlap therapy Ischemic or Hemorrhagic stroke – Stroke Education Intensive Care Unit VTE prophylaxis Platelet monitoring on unfractionated heparin VTE discharge instructions Incidence of potentially preventable VTE 31

Resources

Resources Stage 1 Changes Tip Sheet : http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/Stage1ChangesTipsheet.pdf Stage 2 Final Rule: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-09-04/pdf/2012-21050.pdf

Area MU Contacts Area Area MU Contact Email Phone Number Aberdeen CAPT Scott Anderson Scott.Anderson@ihs.gov (605) 335-2504 Alaska Richard Hall Kimi Gosney Karen Sidell rhall@anthc.org kgosney@anthc.org ksidell@anthc.org (907) 729-2622 (907) 729-2642 (907) 729-2624 Albuquerque Jacque Candelaria Jacque.Candelaria@ihs.gov (505) 946-9311 Bemidji Jason Douglas Jason.Douglas@ihs.gov (218) 444-0550 Billings CAPT James Sabatinos James.Sabatinos@ihs.gov (406) 247-7125 California Marilyn Freeman Steve Viramontes Marilyn.Freeman@ihs.gov Steve.Viramontes@ihs.gov (916) 930-3981 x.362 (916) 930-3981 x.359 Nashville Robin Bartlett Robin.Bartlett@ihs.gov (615) 467-1577 Navajo CDR Michael Belgarde Donna Nicholls Michael.Belgarde@ihs.gov Donna.Nicholls@ihs.gov (928) 871-1416 (505) 205-9177 Oklahoma Amy Rubin Amy.Rubin@ihs.gov (405) 951-3732 Phoenix CAPT Lee Stern Keith Longie, CIO Lee.Stern@ihs.gov Keith.Longie@ihs.gov (602) 364-5287 (602) 364-5080 Portland Woody Crow Sherwood.Crow@ihs.gov (503) 414-5594 Tucson Scott Hamstra, MD Scott.Hamstra@ihs.gov (520) 295-2532

Regional Extension Center REC REC Contact Email Areas NIHB Tom Kauley Tkauley@nihb.org; (505) 977-6053 All ANTHC Richard Hall Kimi Gosney Karen Sidell RHall@anthc.org; (907) 729-2622 KGosney@anthc.org; (907) 729-2642 KSidell@anthc.org; (907) 729-2624 Alaska CRIHB Tim Campbell Rosario Arreola Pro Amerita Hamlet Tim.campbell@ihs.gov; (707)889-3009 Rosario.arreolapro@crihb.net; (916)929-9761 x.1300 Amerita.hamlet@crihb.net; (916)929-9761 x.1323 California NPAIHB Katie Johnson Kjohnson@npaihb.org; (503) 416-3272 Portland USET Vicki French Vicki.French@ihs.gov (615)-467-1578 Aberdeen Albuquerque Bemidji Billings Nashville Navajo Oklahoma Phoenix Tucson 35

IHS Meaningful Use: Contact Information Contact Title E-mail Phone Chris Lamer Meaningful Use Project Lead, IHS Chris.Lamer@ihs.gov (615) 669-2747 Luther Alexander MU Project Manager, DNC Luther.Alexander@ihs.gov (301) 443-8114 JoAnne Hawkins MU Healthcare Policy Analyst, DNC JoAnne.Hawkins@ihs.gov (505) 767-6600, x1525 Cecelia Rosales MU Requirements Manager, DNC Cecelia.Rosales@ihs.gov (505) 767-6600, x1230

Questions? Sign up for the MU Listserv! http://www.ihs.gov/listserver/index.cfm?module=signUpForm&list_id=168MeaningfulUseTeam@ihs.gov