PUFI BOF (Procedures Update for IETF) Chair: Pete Resnick Franklin 1/2 Audio channel 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IETF Calsify.
Advertisements

Whos who in the IETF Zoo? Geoff Huston Executive Director, Internet Architecture Board.
HIP WG Stockholm, Sweden THURSDAY, July 30, 2009, Congresshall C.
MPTCP – MULTIPATH TCP WG meeting #5 Nov 8 th & 10 th 2010 Beijing, ietf-79 Yoshifumi Nishida Philip Eardley.
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies Marc Linsner Roger Marshall IETF 89 London March 5, 2014.
Russ Housley IETF Chair 23 July 2012 Introduction to the IETF Standards Process.
Deterministic Networking (DetNet) BoF IETF 91 Monday Afternoon Session II, Coral 1.
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies (ECRIT) Marc Linsner Roger Marshall IETF 92 - Dallas March 24, 2015.
L2VPN WG “NVO3” Meeting IETF 82 Taipei, Taiwan. Agenda Administrivia Framing Today’s Discussions (5 minutes) Cloud Networking: Framework and VPN Applicability.
Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made.
PPSP Working Group IETF-89 London, UK 16:10-18:40, Tuesday, Webex: participation.html.
Draft-loughney-what-standards-01.txt IETF 59 NEWTRK WG Presented by Spencer Dawkins.
IETF 90: NetExt WG Meeting. Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet- Draft.
A tech spec requirements draft IETF 64 TECHSPEC BOF.
1 IETF Status at IETF 76 Russ Housley, IETF Chair.
Submission February 2014 Slide 1 IEEE 802 Response to FDIS comments on IEEE 802.1AR 20 March 2014 Authors: NameCompanyPhone .
Submission February 2014 Slide 1 IEEE 802 Response to FDIS comments on IEEE 802.1AR 19 February 2014 Authors: NameCompanyPhone .
RUCUS BOF IETF-71 IETF Exploratory Groups Bernard Aboba Microsoft Corporation Laksminath Dondeti Qualcomm, Inc. March 10, 2008 Philadelphia, PA.
MPTCP – MULTIPATH TCP Interim meeting #3 20 th October 2011 audio Yoshifumi Nishida Philip Eardley.
1 Yet Another Mail Working Group IETF 81 July 26, 2011.
July 27, 2009IETF NEA Meeting1 NEA Working Group IETF 75 Co-chairs: Steve Hanna
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies Marc Linsner Roger Marshall IETF 87 Berlin July 29, 2013.
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies Marc Linsner Roger Marshall IETF 84 Vancouver July 31, 2012.
IETF #82 DRINKS WG Meeting Taipei, Taiwan Fri, Nov 18 th
NomCom WG IETF58 Minneapolis. Agenda Agenda Review Review of changes made in draft-ietf-nomcom-2727bis-08.txt Review of proposals for closing open issues.
IETF and ISOC Internet Standardization Ole Jacobsen, Editor and Publisher The Internet Protocol Journal
TSVWG IETF-76 (Hiroshima) James Polk Gorry Fairhurst With an assist for this meeting from **Magnus Westerlund**
4395bis irireg Tony Hansen, Larry Masinter, Ted Hardie IETF 82, Nov 16, 2011.
Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services (PALS) WG Status IETF-91 Honolulu Co-Chairs: Stewart Bryant and Andy Malis
PAWS Protocol to Access White Space DB IETF 81 Gabor Bajko, Brian Rosen.
NEWTRK WG Paris, August 5, Agenda 0 – agenda bashing – 10m 1 - introduction & status - chair- 10m discussion on the issues with ISD proposal.
IAB Chair Report IETF 89 London, UK 3 March 2014.
Note Well This summary is only meant to point you in the right direction, and doesn't have all the nuances. The IETF's IPR Policy is set forth in BCP 79;
ECRIT Virtual Interim Meeting 3rd June 2009, 1PM EDT (New York) Marc Linsner Hannes Tschofenig.
Authority To Citizen Alerts IETF 81 Quebec. Note: Note Well the Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all.
IETF 86 PIM wg meeting. Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC.
Changes from -07 to -08 ISSUE 11 (and 23): Should clarifying text indicate that the Confirmed candidates, chosen by the standard process, as opposed to.
Slide 1 IEEE 802 Response to FDIS comments on IEEE 802.1AS 18 March 2014 Authors: NameCompanyPhone .
3777 drp 1 Arbiter Report: RFC 3777 Dispute Resolution Jan Scott Bradner 12 March 2008.
1 Yet Another Mail Working Group IETF 78 July 29, 2010.
DetNet WG 1 ST Meeting Chairs: Lou Berger Pat Thaler Secretary: Jouni Korhonen.
Who’s watching your network The IETF standards process and OpenPGP Jon Callas 8 October 1998.
PAWS Protocol to Access White Space DB IETF 83, Paris Gabor Bajko, Brian Rosen.
File: /ram/wgchairs.sxi Date: 7 January, 2016 Slide 1 Process and Tools (PROTO) Team General Area Meeting IETF59, Seoul, Korea -- March 2004
Transport Service (TAPS) Aaron Falk
Proposals for a New IETF Standards Track draft-ietf-newtrk-proposals-00.txt David Black Brian Carpenter IETF 60.
IETF #84 - NETCONF WG session 1 NETCONF WG IETF 84, Vancouver, Canada MONDAY, July 30, Bert Wijnen Mehmet Ersue.
Agenda Marc Blanchet and Chris Weber July 2011 IRI WG IETF 81 1.
MPTCP – MULTIPATH TCP WG meeting #1 Nov 9 th, 2009 Hiroshima, ietf-76.
MPTCP – MULTIPATH TCP WG meeting #5 Nov 8 th & 10 th 2010 Beijing, ietf-79 Yoshifumi Nishida Philip Eardley.
DMM WG IETF 84 DMM WG Agenda & Status Tuesday, July 31 st, 2012 Jouni Korhonen, Julien Laganier.
1 An RFC Stream for the IRTF Wednesday, 12 March 2008 Scalable Adaptive Multicast RG.
Slide 1 IEEE 802 Response to FDIS comments on IEEE 802.1AB 20 March 2014 Authors: NameCompanyPhone .
Interface to the Routing System (IRS) BOF IETF 85, Atlanta November 2012.
MPTCP – MULTIPATH TCP WG meeting Tuesday 23 rd & Friday 26 th March 2010 Anaheim, ietf-77.
HIP WG Gonzalo Camarillo David Ward IETF 80, Prague, Czech Republic THURSDAY, March 31, 2011, Barcelona/Berlin.
MODERN BoF Managing, Ordering, Distributing, Exposing, and Registering telephone Numbers IETF 92.
Routing Area WG (rtgwg) IETF 82 – Taipei Chairs: Alia Atlas Alvaro Retana
IETF #85 - NETCONF WG session 1 NETCONF WG IETF 85, Atlanta, USA WEDNESDAY, November 7, Bert Wijnen Mehmet Ersue.
Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made.
Source Packet Routing in Networking WG (spring) IETF 89 – London Chairs: John Scudder Alvaro Retana
1 IETF Status at IETF 73 Russ Housley, IETF Chair.
Mon 23 Mar 2015SIDR IETF 92 Dallas, TX, US1 SIDR Working Group IETF 92 Dallas, TX, US Monday, 23 Mar 2015.
GGF-Process WG Administrative Information Process Working Group:ggf-proc-wg Chairs:"Tony Genovese" "Cees de Laat" Secretary/Webmaster:"Stacey Bruno"
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies (ECRIT) Chairs: Marc Linsner & Roger Marshall Standing In for the Chairs: Brian Rosen IETF 94.
LMAP WG IETF 97 – Seoul, SK November 17, 2016 Dan Romascanu Jason Weil
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies Marc Linsner Roger Marshall IETF 86 Orlando March 13, 2013.
MODERN Working Group IETF 97 November 14, 2016.
16th November 2016 Gorry Fairhurst (via webrtc) David Black WG chairs
IETF 87 DHC WG Berlin, Germany Thursday, 1 August, 2013
Presentation transcript:

PUFI BOF (Procedures Update for IETF) Chair: Pete Resnick Franklin 1/2 Audio channel 1

Agenda Documents –draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes –draft-ietf-newtrk-docid –draft-klensin-stds-review-panel –draft-otis-newtrk-rfc-set –draft-bradner-ietf-stds-trk –draft-bradner-ietf-proc-ideas –draft-alvestrand-icar-xarea –draft-dawkins-newtrk-wgs –draft-klensin-nomcom-term –draft-ietf-newtrk-promotion –draft-iesg-alvestrand-twolevel –draft-dawkins-pstmt-twostage –draft-klensin-recall-rev –draft-ietf-newtrk-repurposing-isd –draft-klensin-overload –draft-huston-ietf-pact

Agenda Document handling changes Other changes IESG/WG procedural changes Nomcom/recall changes Ordered by simplicity of change as determined by Pete Brian’s doc appears first because some of the changes are simple

Ground rules Try to gauge consensus on two metrics –“Pain” incurred by making the change –“Motivation” to change the current state These are independent variables IESG/IAB are equal participants in this discussion. However… –Russ may call consensus. However… –If there is consensus that Russ/IESG doesn’t get to call consensus…

Document Handling (1) Abolish "STD 1" RFCs [draft-carpenter- rfc2026-changes]. Remove reference to RFC 1 [draft-carpenter- rfc2026-changes] Call out normative dependency rules. [draft- carpenter-rfc2026-changes] Specify seperating normative and informative references, and pointing out down-reference procedures [draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes]

Document Handling (2) Update the reference to the RFC formatting rules [draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes] Add reference to RFC Editor errata [draft- carpenter-rfc2026-changes] Document the I-D archive. [draft-carpenter- rfc2026-changes] Don't expire drafts under any kind of IESG consideration. [draft-carpenter-rfc2026- changes]

Document Handling (3) Call out that a Technical Specification might be an API, a data format, or a registry. [draft- carpenter-rfc2026-changes] Remove explicit separation of Techical Specification and Applicability Statement [draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes] Apply "requirements levels" to all specs and BCPs [draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes] Allow a document to contain it's own process variance statement [draft-carpenter-rfc2026- changes]

Document Handling (4) Point out that Informational and Experimental RFCs are sometimes protocols and often get reviewed by the IESG [draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes] Document separation between individual submissions and RFC Editor independent submissions, IAB, and IRTF documents. [draft- carpenter-rfc2026-changes] Remove idea of a requirements document as conformance specification. [draft-carpenter-rfc2026- changes] Clarify that more recent standards obsolete older ones regardless of their respective stages on the standards track [draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes]

Document Handling (5) Remove implementation warnings about PS documents [draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes] IESG assigns Historic status [draft-carpenter-rfc2026- changes] Remove IESG "stuck at level" document review requirement and make it the community's responsibility to request such review [draft-carpenter- rfc2026-changes] Require AD sponsorship of non-WG Informational or Experimental except for RFC Editor submissions [draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes]

Document Handling (6) Loosen the DS advancement rules to give discretion to IESG [draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes] Fast-track some old but widely deployed documents to full standard [draft-ietf-newtrk-promotion] Say that BCPs must be IETF reviewed and IESG approved [draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes] Say that advancing through the standards track requires either a WG or an AD sponsorship [draft- carpenter-rfc2026-changes]

Document Handling (7) Rename Proposed Standard as "Preliminary Standard" [draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes] Rename Draft Standard as "Deployable Standard" [draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes] Standards-track identifiers (instead of only for full standard) [draft-ietf-newtrk-docid, draft- carpenter-rfc2026-changes] Drop Draft Standard level [draft-dawkins- pstmt-twostage]

Document Handling (8) RFC Sets, i.e., updateable documents that point to a set of RFCs. [draft-otis-newtrk-rfc- set] Add a "Working Group Snapshot" label to drafts to identify WG milestones [draft- dawkins-newtrk-wgs] Create an Internet Standards Documentation series [draft-ietf-newtrk-repurposing-isd] Switch standards track to "Stable Snapshot", "Proposed Standard", "Internet Standard" [draft-bradner-ietf-stds-trk]

Other changes Remove things now in by RFC 4844 and 4846 [draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes] Remove the reference to the ISOC newsletter [draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes] Strike discussion of what the Internet is in 2026 [draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes] Clarify interaction between IETF and other SDOs [draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes]

IESG/WG Procedural Changes (1) Allow spam to be deleted from WG archives [draft- carpenter-rfc2026-changes] Allow WGs to have the secretariat keep the archive [draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes] Allow any decsion by IESG, chairs, or other appointed roles, to be appealable [draft-carpenter- rfc2026-changes] Mandatory independent technical review before IESG review [draft-bradner-ietf-proc-ideas] WG chairs and document editors participate in IESG deliberation [draft-bradner-ietf-proc-ideas] AD designated reviewer which can substitute for AD review [draft-bradner-ietf-proc-ideas]

IESG/WG Procedural Changes (2) Cross area review teams review documents before IESG (and have force of IESG decisions) [draft-alvestrand-icar- xarea] Require 3 ADs to agree to return a document to WG [draft-bradner-ietf-proc-ideas] Require 2/3 of ADs to re-return a document after WG review [draft-bradner-ietf-proc-ideas] Assign IAB task of technical review of documents (instead of IESG) [draft-bradner-ietf-proc-ideas] Separate Internet Standards Review Panel (ISRP) from the IESG [draft-klensin-stds-review-panel] Increase the size of the IESG and divide/disperse tasks of document review and WG management [draft-iesg- alvestrand-twolevel]

IESG/WG Procedural Changes (3) Restructure IETF into Ops, Sec, and Gen, with IAB review [draft-bradner-ietf-proc-ideas] Limit number of WGs per area [draft-klensin- overload] More explict analysis required of WG charters [draft- huston-ietf-pact] Short timeouts are put in place for IESG document discussions [draft-huston-ietf-pact] The IESG would do (modified) proportional voting on all documents [draft-huston-ietf-pact] WG drafts have time limits for publication [draft- huston-ietf-pact]

Nomcom/Recall Changes Two-phase nomcom; first decide on which incumbents return, then choose from new folks [draft-klensin-nomcom- term] Allow IAB and IESG members to be recall petitioners [draft-klensin-recall- rev]