Who’s Minding the Store ? The Adventures of Subrecipient Monitoring.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
1 Safety Policy April Safety Policy National Level Regulator Service Provider Service Provider.
Arizona Department of Homeland Security SAA Site Monitoring 6 th Annual Homeland Security UASI Conference May 2012 May 2012 Governor Janice K. BrewerDirector.
MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
Contract Staff Training Contract Management 2007.
Subchapter M-Indian Self- Determination and Education Assistance Act Program Part 273-Education Contracts under Johnson-OMalley Act.
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
WIA Section 188 Disability Checklist Training Element 9 Corrective Actions and Sanctions.
Methods of Administration MOA Element 9 Corrective Actions and Sanctions.
Methods of Administration MOA Element 7 Monitoring and Compliance.
A Tale of Terror and Suspense by Dave Leighow. Well, not really. BUT, it could have been! Consider this dialogue: “Are the feds watching you?” “I don’t.
“The mission of the Sub-recipient Monitoring Section is to monitor, assess, and assist Sub-recipients to successfully implement and complete Grant Program.
Risk Analysis So how do we choose who gets monitored?  HQ gives each Field Office a monitoring goal they must meet.  Each year HUD reviews all of its.
MODULE 8 MONITORING INDIANA HPRP Training 1. Role of Independent Financial Monitors 2 IHCDA is retaining an independent accounting firm to monitor its.
Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Program Federal Monitoring Update James Gray Program Specialist.
IS Audit Function Knowledge
How to Draft New & Update Old Policies and Procedures Brette Kaplan WurzburgJennifer Segal Brustein & Manasevit,
Emerging Latino Communities Initiative Webinar Series 2011 June 22, 2011 Presenter: Janet Hernandez, Capacity-Building Coordinator.
1 | Weatherization Assistance Programeere.energy.gov Eric Bell 1 Federal/State Monitoring 2010 Orientation for State WAP Directors and Staff.
1 1 Roles and Responsibilities in the CDBG Program For Grant Administrators.
Control environment and control activities. Day II Session III and IV.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
The mission of the Office of Migrant Education is to provide excellent leadership, technical assistance, and financial support to improve the educational.
Financial Monitoring of Subgrantees You need to know... The information in this session is based on CNCS and Federal laws, rules, and regulations; CNCS.
Programmatic and Fiscal Compliance as a Team Effort 2014 Project Director Training & Annual Meeting1.
Audit and Fiscal Oversight Responsibilities VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO., LLP December 15,2010.
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
Erica Cummings Grant Coordinator 1.  The New Mexico Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) is responsible for:  Monitoring.
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
HARRIS COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Office of Financial Services Grant Accounting Section Craig B. Atkins – Director/CFO Charlie Walker – Assistant.
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
BTOP OVERSIGHT WASHINGTON D.C. MAY 2012 U.S. DOC Inspector General Recovery Act Oversight Task Force 1.
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA Grant Management and Monitoring – Discretionary Grantees Pacific Northwest Workforce Development.
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA Grant Management and Monitoring – Discretionary Grantees Southern California Training and.
Public Transit Division 2012 Federal Transit Administration State Management Review.
1 CDBG Roles and Responsibilities For Local Officials.
Award Monitoring Update National Science Foundation Advisory Committee for Business and Operations October 22, 2003 Mary Santonastasso, Director, Division.
JANAURY 22-24, 2014 JANAURY 22-24, Why monitor Sub-Recipients? 2 1.The organization continues to be eligible for funding 2.All sub-recipient agreements.
Monitoring & Evaluation. Objective Learn the why, what and how-to approach to monitoring Review monitoring techniques and define the roles monitoring.
Practice Management Quality Control
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
Webinar for FY 2011 i3 Grantees February 9, 2012 Fiscal Oversight of i3 Grants Erin McHughJames Evans, CPA, CGFM, CGMA Office of Innovation and Improvement.
Harris County Community Services Department Office of Financial Services Grant Accounting Section Craig B. Atkins – Director/CFO Charlie Walker – Assistant.
Audit and Audit Resolution Presented by Wendy Spivey ADECA Audit Manager.
Brown Buckley Tucker CSBG Head Start LIHEAP WA P WIA.
Preston Alderman MSDE, Director of Audit.  As recipients of federal and state funds we are charged with ensuring that the funds are adequately accounted.
Learning Objectives Conducting an On-Site Monitoring Review FPO calls the Grantee: “As you know, we’re a little more than nine months into your 24 month.
The Clock is Ticking: Timeliness Insights for Your Community Development Program Shirletta Best - CDBG Administrator - City of McKinney, Texas.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
Methods of Administration MOA Element 3 Assurances.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
1 PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE OF MINERAL RESOURCES. STATEGIC PLAN 2014/19 DATE: 8 JULY 2014 Programme Financial Administration.
Jaimie Lewis Omnitrans San Bernardino, California SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING.
HARRIS COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Office of Financial Services Grant Accounting Section Craig B. Atkins – Director/CFO Charlie Walker – Assistant.
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 6 CH 5 ISO MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY Philippe Bauwin Medical.
Effective Practices for a Successful Standards Review.
Recordkeeping Requirements
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Subrecipient Monitoring
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
Working with your AoA Project Officer
Implementing 2 CFR 200 Carrie Kronberg Housing Programs Manager
CoC Subrecipient Management
Managing Federal grants
Monitoring & Managing Your WIF Grant
Uniform Guidance and Internal Controls
CDBG Public Service Agency Funding Process
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Presentation transcript:

Who’s Minding the Store ? The Adventures of Subrecipient Monitoring

Powering Up… 24 CFR (b) and Subpart J 24 CFR Part 85 states that: “the grantee is responsible for ensuring that CDBG funds are used in accordance with all program requirements. The use of subrecipients does not relieve you the recipient of this responsibility. The recipient is responsible for determining the adequacy of performance under subrecipient agreements… and for taking appropriate action when performance problems arise. Supart J 24 CFR Part 85 further details: “Grantees must monitor…subgrant supported activities to assure compliance with applicable Federal requirements and that performance goals are being achieved.”

Using GPS... IMPORTANT: Keep track of your subrecipients’ activities and help them avoid problems and improve performance.  3 Focus Areas: Program performance Financial performance Regulatory performance

Mission Possible… ENSURE THAT SUBRECIPIENTS: Comply with all regulations governing administrative, financial, and programmatic operations; and Achieve performance objectives on schedule and within budget.

“ We look forward to monitoring visits because we know they’re not out to get us, and we usually wind up solving a problem.” Relationship Climate…

Common Misconceptions…  Catch you making a mistake on purpose!  AHAAA Gotcha!  Nail you with blame!  To take your money back!

Usual Suspects… 3 EFFECTIVE STRATEGIES: On-site field visits; Open communication; Assisting subrecipients in creating good record-keeping systems.

Monitoring Objectives… DETERMINE IF THE SUBRECIPIENT: Is in compliance with federal requirements 24 CFR (b); Is carrying out activities according to their agreement; Is expending funds in a timely manner; Is ensuring the costs are eligible expenses; Has adequate control over program and financial performance; and Has capacity to carry out project.

Objectives…continued HOW CAN WE: Identify any potential problem areas; Assist with applicable laws; Help to resolve compliance issues; Provide adequate follow-up measures; and Ensure required records are maintained.

Helpful tips… THE DO’S & DONT’S OF MONITORING: DO…develop an on-going monitoring process of planning, implementation, communication, and follow-up. XDON’T… have a “one-time event” policy. DO…create a method to decide which subreicipients are the highest risk for serious problems. XDON’T… ignore subrecipients you think won’t have serious problems. Problems are found even with the most experienced subrecipients. DO… create a monitoring checklist to promote thoroughness and consistency. XDON’T… use the same checklist for all activity areas. DO… research, print, and study the monitoring exhibits provided by HUD or your Grantee. XDON’T… digress from the tools that have been provided by HUD or your Grantee.

Tips…continued DO…set up standing meetings with staff. XDON’T…try to be a “superhero” and brave this alone. DO…research historical data and pull old program files. ХDON’T…be too proud to ask for guidance from peers or even a predecessor. DO… start your day with a great breakfast and cup of coffee. XDON’T… consume an adult beverage to loosen your nerves (even if it is 5 o’clock somewhere)!

Information System…  Commitment drives the system…assures that everyone using it follows the established procedures.

Systems…continued  Purpose – help subrecipients attain program goals and observe program rules.  People – systems are only as good as the training and motivation of those who use them.  Process – knowing what, when, how, and who will measure the information; What is the purpose and the end user of the information.

Most Importantly… Monitoring is a healthy tool and not a means of intimidating Subrecipients! Win-Win Scenario Reference from today’s presentation: Managing CDBG A Guidebook for Grantees on Subrecipient Oversight