3. Geocentre and scale Comparison of weekly and daily IGS reference frames: the first year Peter J Clarke, School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2006 AGU Fall Meeting. 14 Dec. 2006, San Francisco – Poster #G43A-0985 Jim Ray (NOAA/NGS), Tonie van Dam (U. Luxembourg), Zuheir Altamimi (IGN), Xavier.
Advertisements

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | A | Cambridge MA V F.
ASL QC Procedures Status and plans. GSN ANSS Traditional Waveform Review  The “morning run” Daily summarizes problems with availability, timing,
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna Vie_LSM Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm.
The General Linear Model Or, What the Hell’s Going on During Estimation?
Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
Jake Griffiths & Jim Ray NOAA/National Geodetic Survey Acknowledgement: Kevin Choi SUBDAILY ALIAS AND DRACONITIC ERRORS IN THE IGS ORBITS Harmonics of.
Effects of azimuthal multipath heterogeneity and hardware changes on GPS coordinate time series Sibylle Goebell, Matt King
OLG LAC Reprocessing EPN 2006 G. Stangl 1, C. Aichhorn 2, S. Krauss 2 (1) Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (BEV)‏ (2) Space Research Institute,
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
International Terrestrial Reference Frame - Latest Developments Horst Müller 16th International Workshop on Laser Ranging, Poznan, Poland, October
“Real-time” Transient Detection Algorithms Dr. Kang Hyeun Ji, Thomas Herring MIT.
Excess phase computation S. Casotto, A. Nardo, P. Zoccarato, M. Bardella CISAS, University of Padova.
Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.
The IGS contribution to ITRF2014 Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, Zuheir Altamimi, Xavier Collilieux 26th IUGG General Assembly, Prague, 28 June.
Real-Time Orbit And Clock Estimation Using PANDA Software Shi C, Lou YD, Zhao QL, Liu JN GNSS Research Center, Wuhan University, China IGS Analysis Center.
Workshop, Miami, June 2008 ITRF2005 residuals and co-location tie issues Zuheir Altamimi IGN, France Some features of ITRF2005 residuals ITRF2005 vs IGS05.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, 2-6 June 2008 M. Fritsche, R. Dietrich, A. Rülke Institut für Planetare Geodäsie (IPG), Technische Universität.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, June 2008 Comparison of GMF/GPT with VMF1/ECMWF and Implications for Atmospheric Loading Peter Steigenberger.
1 North American Reference Frame (NAREF) Working Group Mike Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada 2nd SNARF Workshop Montreal, May.
Future IGS & inter-technique SINEX combinations: Issues and challenges D. Lavallée (aka Peter Clarke), R. Ferland, D. Thaller, T. Herring, R. Biancale.
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
October 8, session 2REFAG2010 Paris1 Distributed processing systems for large geodetic solutions IAG WG “Comparison and combination of precise.
1/17 REFAG Symposium 6 October 2010 – Marne-la-Vallée, France Recent Results from the IGS Terrestrial Frame Combinations __________________________________________________________________________________________________.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 June 2008, Florida, USA GPS in the ITRF Combination D. Angermann, H. Drewes, M. Krügel, B. Meisel Deutsches Geodätisches.
The IGS contribution to ITRF2013 – Preliminary results from the IGS repro2 SINEX combinations Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, Xavier Collilieux, Zuheir.
Determination of seasonal geocenter variations from DORIS, GPS and SLR data.
IGS Workshop, June 02, Validation of GNSS Satellite Orbits C. Flohrer, G. Beutler, R. Dach, W. Gurtner, U. Hugentobler 1, S. Schaer, T. Springer.
Matt A. King 1, Christopher S. Watson 2 1 School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, UK 2 School of Geography.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
AGU Fall meeting Quality assessment of GPS reprocessed Terrestrial Reference Frame 1 IGN/LAREG and GRGS 2 University of Luxembourg X Collilieux.
Testing intraplate deformation in the North American plate interior E. Calais (Purdue Univ.), C. DeMets (U. Wisc.), J.M. Nocquet (Oxford and IGN) ● Is.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 1 NAREF & CBN Velocity Solutions for a New Version of SNARF Mike Craymer Joe Henton Mike Piraszewski 8th SNARF Workshop AGU.
Assessment of Reference Frame Stability trough offset detection in GPS coordinate time series Dragan Blagojević 1), Goran Todorović 2), Violeta Vasilić.
Geocenter motion estimates from the IGS Analysis Center solutions P. Rebischung, X. Collilieux, Z. Altamimi IGN/LAREG & GRGS 1 EGU General Assembly, Vienna,
Introduction Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke, Nigel Penna, David Lavallée Global GPS Processing strategy Conclusions and Future Work The preliminary.
CEGRN 2015 Campaign A. Caporali (1), J. Zurutuza (1), O. Khoda (2), G. Stangl (3), M. Becker (4), M. Bertocco (1), L. Gerhatova (5), M. Mojzes (5), M.
1/16 ITRF2008-P: Some evaluation elements and impact on IGS RF products Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, 16 April 2010 ITRF2008-P: SOME EVALUATION ELEMENTS.
Jeff J. Orchard, M. Stella Atkins School of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University Freire et al. (1) pointed out that least squares based registration.
Reference Frame Theory & Practice: Implications for SNARF SNARF Workshop 1/27/04 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.
International Workshop on Laser Ranging, October 2008, Poznań (Poland) Quality assessment of the ILRS EOP „Daily” Product G. Bianco Agenzia Spaziale.
Combination of long time series of tropospheric parameters observed by VLBI R. Heinkelmann, J. Boehm, H. Schuh Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, TU.
Do Annual Geopotential Variations Affect IGS Products ? J. Ray NOAA/NGS with major help from S. Bettadpur, J. Ries U. Texas/CSR T.-S. Bae Sejong U. X.
Ian Thomas, Nigel Penna, Matt King, Peter Clarke Introduction GPS measurements of Zenith Tropospheric Delay (ZTD) and Precipitable Water (PW) vapor are.
5/18/2994G21D-04 Spring AGU Realization of a Stable North America Reference Frame Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary, Sciences,
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 09 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Water vapour estimates over Antarctica from 12 years of globally reprocessed GPS solutions Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke Newcastle University, UK.
Towards a standard model for present-day signals due to postglacial rebound H.-P. Plag, C. Kreemer Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological.
Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften (ÖAW) / Institut für Weltraumforschung (IWF), 8042 Graz, Austria, Contact:
Inherent Length Scales and Apparent Frequencies of Periodic Solar Wind Number Density Structures Nicholeen Viall 1, Larry Kepko 2 and Harlan Spence 1 1.
Vertical velocities at tide gauges from a completely reprocessed global GPS network of stations: How well do they work? G. Wöppelmann 1, M-N. Bouin 2,
12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences
Aug 6, 2002APSG Irkutsk Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan Thomas Herring, Bradford H. Hager, Brendan Meade, Massachusetts.
Armasuisse Swiss Federal Office of Topography swisstopo Determination of Tectonic Movements in the Swiss Alps using GNSS and Levelling E. Brockmann, D.
1/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco TRANSITION OF THE IGS REFERENCE FRAME COORDINATION FROM NRCAN TO IGN - STATUS AND.
Importance of SLR in the Determination of the ITRF Zuheir Altamimi IGN, France Geoscience Australia, Canberra, August 29, 2005 SLR Strength: its contribution.
Insensitivity of GNSS to geocenter motion through the network shift approach Paul Rebischung, Zuheir Altamimi, Tim Springer AGU Fall Meeting 2013, San.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
Errors in Positioning Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Status and Future of the IERS Combination Efforts Markus Rothacher GeoForschungsZentrum.
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Strategies for Weekly Routine Generation of Combined IERS Products Markus Rothacher.
Reference Frame Representations: The ITRF from the user perspective
How to constrain the origin, orientation and scale
Reference Frame Working Group
ESOC IGS Reprocessing T. Springer, F. Dilssner, E. Schoenemann,
Proposal for long station names in SINEX format Paul Rebischung Unified Analysis Workshop, Paris, July 2017 Good morning. So I’m going to.
Timescales of Inference in Visual Adaptation
Motivation Time Series Analysis Spectra and Results Conclusions
Presentation transcript:

3. Geocentre and scale Comparison of weekly and daily IGS reference frames: the first year Peter J Clarke, School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, UK 1. Introduction From GPS week 1702 (19 Aug 2012), the International GNSS Service adopted daily analyses of the terrestrial reference frame (TRF). Analysis Centers (ACs) should now provide independent 24-hour batch solutions for each day’s data, with the mildest possible constraints from one day to the next. Amongst other benefits, in due course this will allow more detailed analysis of sub-seasonal errors in GNSS (e.g. Ray et al., in press). Previously, ACs provided weekly TRFs based on data arcs with different lengths and constraints. In the official (IGN) and associate (MIT-GNAAC and NCL-GNAAC) IGS combinations, TRFs including Earth Rotation Parameters (ERPs) produced by each AC are combined and quality-checked to yield separate daily and weekly products. Here, I report on recent changes in the NCL-GNAAC ‘Tanya’ software, and offer a preliminary comparison of data quality before and after week Conclusions Reference Ray, J., J. Griffiths, X. Collilieux & P. Rebischung (in press). Subseasonal GNSS positioning errors. Geophys. Res. Lett., published online 26 Nov 2013 (doi: /2013GL058160). Acknowledgements This work was funded in the UK by NERC grant NE/E017495/1. The contributions of all analysis and data centres of the IGS are gratefully acknowledged. Previous developers of the Tanya software at Newcastle University and the University of Nevada, Reno include Geoff Blewitt, Phil Davies, David Lavallée, Konstantin Nututdinov and Dave Booker. I also thank Nigel Penna for his Lomb-Scargle periodogram software. Plots have been generated using the Generic Mapping Tools. 2. Changes in combination procedure 4. Spectra of coordinate residuals The approximately eightfold increase in computation required by the adoption of daily solutions has led to the replacement of the old processing strategy (left) with one based on distributed processing (right). Automatic outlier detection has also been improved: individual station coordinate-triplet outliers are now removed iteratively using Baarda’s w-statistic, and ERP outliers using a threshold for the weighted residual that decreases at each iteration. Collate input weekly AC SINEX (solution+VCM) files Helmert parameters estimated between the loose GNAAC epoch solution and the propagated IGS08_1632 reference solution are shown above. Results are compared for the 70 weekly solutions from the adoption of the IGS08_1632 TRF (thin blue lines) to week 1701, and the 66 weeks of daily solutions since week 1702 (thick red lines). The increase in number of input solutions, and enhancements in outlier detection and AC solution quality, result in clear improvements in the time series. However, first indications are that the spectral content of each time series (slope of periodogram) is largely unchanged, and is similar at the shorter periods now observable. Similar to panel 3, but showing median values of stacked periodograms based on detrended coordinate time series. Solid and dashed vertical lines indicate odd harmonics 1-11 of the solar (365 d) and GPS-draconitic (351.4 d) years respectively. In the daily analysis, the peaks aligned with the 3 rd and 7 th harmonics in the North residuals seem to have disappeared. Some reddening of the spectra is apparent at shorter periods, and whitening at longer ones. The switch to daily IGS analysis, and associated improvements in Tanya, have led to an improvement in TRF quality. Further improvements may become evident as the time series extends onwards, and backwards via the second IGS reprocessing campaign. Initial results, based on a similar time span before and after the switch, suggest that TRF alignment is now less noisy. Site coordinate noise does not whiten at short periods. GPS draconitic errors seem to be mitigated slightly: given that there has been no change in satellite force models, this may mean that these errors are being absorbed into other estimated parameters. Output weekly GNAAC SINEX and block scale factor data Convert to tanya format and deconstrain / loosen datum Form, stack and solve weekly normal equations Manual outlier removal Collate input daily AC SINEX (solution+VCM or NEQ) files Output daily GNAAC SINEX Convert to tanya format and deconstrain / loosen datum Form, stack and solve daily normal equations Automated outlier detection Old:New: 7× parallel daily solutions Form, stack and solve weekly normal equations Automated outlier detection Output weekly GNAAC SINEX and block scale factor data Align to IGS08 via 6-parameter transformation, compute stats