A Collaborative Effort with a Big Payoff : Southwest-Central Ontario Infant Feeding Survey.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Texas Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Turning Information Into Health.
Advertisements

WIC Program Overview Healthy Choices More Variety.
Program Planning: Community Nutrition Assessment
An Evaluation Model to promote linkages between community-based public health practice and academia.
VISION: All eligible facilities in Ontario receive the Baby-Friendly Initiative designation and other supporting facilities practice according to Baby-Friendly.
Purpose of Project  To assess the state of oral health within Douglas County  To develop a strategic plan, utilizing the data obtained from the assessment,
FLORIDA MATERNAL, INFANT & EARLY CHILDHOOD HOME VISITING INITIATIVE florida association of healthy start coalitions, inc.
DSB Ontario North East Mental Health Team and Pathways to Care
DECISION SUPPORT RESEARCH TEAM “Providing expertise to improve health & wellbeing of families” Retention in a Study of Prenatal Care: Implications of attrition.
Perinatal services in Medi-Cal Managed Care: strategies to better serve our members 11/5/14 Perinatal Services Coordinator Annual Meeting Maternal, Child.
Program Planning: Community Nutrition Assessment
Universal well-being assessment for families A path to more coordination and better health outcomes Helen Bellanca, MD, MPH Maternal Child Family Program.
National BFI Symposium April, 2015 Catherine Lowes & Evelyn te Nyenhuis Provincial Infant Feeding Surveillance Pilot Study.
1 The Evolution of Hospice Palliative Care Policy and Practice in Ontario, Canada.
Early Childhood Mental Health Consultants Early Childhood Consultation Partnership® Funded and Supported by Connecticut’s Department of Children and Families.
NCALHD Public Health Task Force NC State Health Director’s Conference January 2014 A Blueprint of the Future for Local Public Health Departments in North.
Introducing HealthStats Eleanor Howell, MS Manager, Data Dissemination Unit State Center for Health Statistics February 2, 2012.
DISENTANGLING MATERNAL DECISIONS CONCERNING BREASTFEEDING AND PAID EMPLOYMENT Bidisha Mandal, Washington State University Brian E. Roe, Ohio State University.
Building your Plan. Sneak Preview – Section 7  Learning objective: Develop a strategic plan for implementing “The Business Case for Breastfeeding” in.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
11 ECPD Regional Planning Project Webinar December 4, 2009.
Evaluation of the Implementation of the MCH KAS Service Activity Framework Year 2 (2011) Progress Report Claire Jennings Centre for Community Child Health.
Smoking and Pregnancy: Status Profile 2007 Annie Berthiaume Roberta Heale Irene Koren Rachelle Arbour-Gagnon Funded by the Louise Picard Research Grant.
RRFSS Evaluation: Issues and Strategies RRFSS Workshop, June 19th 2002 Catherine Bingle Sarah Feltis.
Breastfeeding Support for the Community
Slide 1 Long-Term Care (LTC) Collaborative PIP: Medication Review Tuesday, October 29, 2013 Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate Director, PIP.
Update on WIC Breastfeeding Education and Support Efforts Secretary's Advisory Committee on Infant Mortality November 30, 2006 Patricia N. Daniels, MS,
Ingham Healthy Families. History: Why Healthy Families America? Michigan Home Visiting Initiative Exploration & Planning Tool (Fall 2013)  Ingham County.
Dental Basic Screening Survey Project Summary Healthy Start Coalitions.
INDIANA MEDICAID PERINATAL UPDATES Presumptive Eligibility Notification of Pregnancy Prenatal Care Coordination July 7, 2010 Glenna Asmus Nall, Quality.
Incorporating BFI Messages Everyday Laura Matz, RN, BSN, MPH Public Health Nursing Consultant Ministry of Health April 2015.
Engaging Community Stakeholders in the Delivery of Injury Prevention Messages in Early Childhood Name of Presenter: Orgnization: Date:
UMConnect Meeting: March 11, 2009 Volunteer Leadership Systems Task Force
Georgetown University National Technical Assistance Center for Children’s Mental Health 1.
ANNUAL PLANNING REGION MEETING May 28, 2009, 11-1.
Generic protocol for national population-based impact evaluation of national programs for PMTCT at 6 weeks post-partum Thu-Ha Dinh, MD., MS., US CDC/GAP.
Kelli Ham, Consumer Health Coordinator National Network of Libraries of Medicine, Pacific Southwest Region.
The Business Case for Breastfeeding Section 6 Building Your Plan.
Learning from our Success: Building a Parent-Only RRFSS 3 rd Annual RRFSS Workshop, June 23, 2004 Ruth Sanderson Middlesex-London Health Unit
Addressing Maternal Depression Healthy Start Interconception Care Learning Collaborative Kimberly Deavers, MPH U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
Why Breastfeeding Policies?  International Campaigns –WHO campaign against the extravagant and untrue marketing of breast milk substitutes (WHO Code)
1-2 Training of Process Facilitators 3-1. Training of Process Facilitators 1- Provide an overview of the role and skills of a Communities That Care Process.
Evaluating Pay for Performance in Health Provincial Maternal -Child Health Investment Project in Argentina Sebastian Martinez HDNVP Presentation joint.
Kent County Home Visiting Hub Michigan Home Visiting Conference August 6, 2014.
Evaluation of the Rapid Risk Factor Surveillance System (RRFSS) RRFSS Annual Workshop 20 June 2006.
Welcome Home Baby Report to the First Steps Commission July 31, 2014.
PRENATAL Breastfeeding Information Sessions A collaborative approach to increasing breastfeeding duration Gillian Szollos, Carlington Community Health.
1 The RRFSS Evaluation Framework 2005 Background Information and Progress to Date Presenters  Amira Ali  Jane Hohenadel  Kate O’Connor  Deborah Radcliffe.
Towards a health and wellbeing service framework a discussion paper for consultation.
A Collaborative Approach to Workforce Development Kim Barro Hosted by the Pan Canadian Task Force on Public Health Nutrition Practice CPHA Conference June.
Introduction Breastfeeding promotion is currently a significant focus of national health policy. In January 2011, the U.S. Surgeon General’s Call to Action.
Breastfeeding rates and practices: Monitoring, evaluation and research gaps.
Maternal and Child Health and Oral Health Integration Jared I. Fine, D.D.S., M.P.H. Dental Health Administrator Alameda County Public Health Department.
Slide 1 Oregon Smoke Free Mothers and Babies Project Lesa Dixon-Gray, MSW, MPH Office of Family Health (503)
Prepared by: Forging a Comprehensive Initiative to Improve Birth Outcomes and Reduce Infant Mortality in [State] Adapted from AMCHP Birth Outcomes Compendium.
 The development of the perinatal assessment tool was a vital precursor leading to the addition of data collection of the perinatal population. Data collected.
Making BFHI a Standard of Care in Health Care will Improve Implementation of 10 Steps in Health Facilities: Tanzanian Hypothesis Presented at IA Conference,
Consortium for Educational Research and Evaluation– North Carolina Building LEA and Regional Professional Development Capacity First Annual Evaluation.
JULY 10, 2015 OC’s Partnership & Plan to Improve Health.
Saving and improving lives in the world’s toughest places. Determined Behavior Change A comparative study of the application of Barrier Analysis methodology.
How good is good enough? RRFSS Module Validation Stephanie Totten Epidemiologist Niagara Region Public Health Department June 20, 2007.
Pre-planning Planning to plan (and adapt) Implementation starts Here!
What is the Healthy Baby Program?
Health Statistics Division
Mono County Maternal Child & Adolescent Health Title V Needs Assessment Public Health Planning Team Meeting Presented by: Sandra Pearce, RN,
United Way Success By 6 Liberty City Outreach Initiative
WIC Dental Days A collaborative Early Childhood Caries prevention program Presented by Theresa Anselmo, Linda McClure, and Suzanne Russell San Luis Obispo.
A Path of Learning and Improvement
WisPQC Informational Webinar for NAS/NOWS Initiative
Stocktaking of Early Childhood Development (ECD)
Presentation transcript:

A Collaborative Effort with a Big Payoff : Southwest-Central Ontario Infant Feeding Survey

Authors Alanna Leffley, Grey Bruce Health Unit Catherine Bingle, Simcoe County District Health Unit Brenda Coleman, Elgin-St. Thomas Health Unit Iris Gutmanis, Southwest Region Health Intelligence Partnership (SRHIP) Lorna Larsen, Oxford County Health Unit Rolf Puchtinger, Huron County Health Unit April Rietdyk, Chatham-Kent Health Unit

Overview l Purpose and Background l Process Survey Content Methodological Issues l What Worked... l Lessons Learned

Purpose and Background

MHPSG - Child Health goal: To increase to 50% the percentage of infants breast-fed up to six months by the year 2010.

But where is the data? l Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) problems with questions problems with level of geography l Rapid Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (RRFSS) $$$ time to get sufficient data l Health Unit surveys & routine data collection validity problems

Early Childhood Development Funding l Announced to public health units by Ontario Ministry of Health & LTC mid- December, 2001 l Funding initiatives including the Perinatal and Child Health Survey Strategies Project Goal: to address info needs in support of Early Childhood Development related to maternal, pregnancy, infant and child health (0-6 years)

Perinatal and Child Health Survey Strategies Initiative l Late Dec/01, SRHIP hosted a teleconference for SWO health units to discuss ECD fund plans & explore opportunities for collaborative projects Several decided to join RRFSS Six rural hu’s expressed interest in developing a survey to look at breastfeeding initiation and duration

Process (or Under Construction)

Infant Feeding Survey Participants

Who was involved? Working Group l 4 epidemiologists l 2 program managers l 1 program evaluator l 1 public health nurse l SRHIP director Consultants l nutritionists & dietitians l lactation consultants l dental hygienists & dental educators l public health managers l public health nurses l survey company staff

How did we do it? l Met via teleconferences & all-day, face- to-face meetings, s (Dec/01 through Sept/02) l Survey companies - quotes from 3 places CATI systems in place deliver reports including basic analyses cost savings for the group l SRHIP’s role

General Structure l About 500 new mothers per health unit to be interviewed by telephone l Survey length about 12 minutes each time l Each participant contacted at 2-3 times: 6 week/3 months 2 hu’s also surveyed at 6 months 9 months postpartum

Survey Topics - 3 Months l Demographics Prenatal, perinatal, postpartum: l Exposure to & evaluation of information sources about infant feeding l Decision making, early experiences, supports and difficulties l Breastfeeding initiation rates

Survey Topics - 9 Months l Breastfeeding status, experiences, supports, satisfaction l Use of formula l Introduction to solid foods l Plans to go back to work/school l Postpartum depression l Infant oral care l Breastfeeding duration rates

Methodological Issues In Common l Survey company l Instructions to interviewers & referral resources l Core content l Analyses & report structure Individually l Contracts l Sample size & consent l Timing of surveys l Timelines l Optional & HU specific content

What Worked...

l Diverse group-varied experiences & expertise l Shared experiences, expertise, resources, workload produced a better product l Synergy (whole greater than the sum of its parts) l Learning & capacity building l Shared goals, objectives, consensus decision- making

What Worked... l Cost-savings l SRHIP coordination l Good communications l Comprehensive scope of project l Flexible content l Potential for future collaborations

Lessons Learned

l Designate a Project Leader l Create a schedule of critical dates, deadlines at the start l Identify report specifications early on l Have an Integration Process for new members

Lessons Learned l Beware of Workload Issues within project & externally l Remember to give yourselves enough Time to do the work, get consensus, get feedback l It’s very hard to Keep the Momentum Going over such a long time frame

Would We Do It Again? You Bet Ya!

Thank You!