1 Game Theory. By the end of this section, you should be able to…. ► In a simultaneous game played only once, find and define:  the Nash equilibrium.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Concepts of Game Theory I
Advertisements

Math Intro: Matrix Form Games and Nash Equilibrium.
M9302 Mathematical Models in Economics Instructor: Georgi Burlakov 3.1.Dynamic Games of Complete but Imperfect Information Lecture
Basics on Game Theory Class 2 Microeconomics. Introduction Why, What, What for Why Any human activity has some competition Human activities involve actors,
Game Theory Assignment For all of these games, P1 chooses between the columns, and P2 chooses between the rows.
ECON 100 Tutorial: Week 9 office: LUMS C85.
© 2009 Institute of Information Management National Chiao Tung University Game theory The study of multiperson decisions Four types of games Static games.
David Bryce © Adapted from Baye © 2002 Game Theory: The Competitive Dynamics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics.
Non-Cooperative Game Theory To define a game, you need to know three things: –The set of players –The strategy sets of the players (i.e., the actions they.
6-1 LECTURE 6: MULTIAGENT INTERACTIONS An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems
Chapter 14 Infinite Horizon 1.Markov Games 2.Markov Solutions 3.Infinite Horizon Repeated Games 4.Trigger Strategy Solutions 5.Investing in Strategic Capital.
Chapter 10 Game Theory and Strategic Behavior
1 Chapter 14 – Game Theory 14.1 Nash Equilibrium 14.2 Repeated Prisoners’ Dilemma 14.3 Sequential-Move Games and Strategic Moves.
MIT and James Orlin © Game Theory 2-person 0-sum (or constant sum) game theory 2-person game theory (e.g., prisoner’s dilemma)
AP Economics Mr. Bernstein Module 65: Game Theory December 10, 2014.
Game Theory. “If you don’t think the math matters, then you don’t know the right math.” Chris Ferguson 2002 World Series of Poker Champion.
Game Theory: Inside Oligopoly
Game Theory. Games Oligopolist Play ▫Each oligopolist realizes both that its profit depends on what its competitor does and that its competitor’s profit.
EKONOMSKA ANALIZA PRAVA. Game Theory Outline of the lecture: I. What is game theory? II. Elements of a game III. Normal (matrix) and Extensive (tree)
17. (A very brief) Introduction to game theory Varian, Chapters 28, 29.
M9302 Mathematical Models in Economics Instructor: Georgi Burlakov 3.1.Dynamic Games of Complete but Imperfect Information Lecture
ECO290E: Game Theory Lecture 4 Applications in Industrial Organization.
Game Theory.
Game Theory And Competition Strategies
An Introduction to Game Theory Part I: Strategic Games
GAME THEORY.
2008/02/06Lecture 21 ECO290E: Game Theory Lecture 2 Static Games and Nash Equilibrium.
Eponine Lupo.  Game Theory is a mathematical theory that deals with models of conflict and cooperation.  It is a precise and logical description of.
A camper awakens to the growl of a hungry bear and sees his friend putting on a pair of running shoes, “You can’t outrun a bear,” scoffs the camper. His.
Chapter 12 Choices Involving Strategy McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Algoritmi per Sistemi Distribuiti Strategici
Bertrand Model Game Theory Prisoner’s Dilemma Dominant Strategies Repeated Games Oligopoly and Game Theory.
Basics on Game Theory For Industrial Economics (According to Shy’s Plan)
1 Game Theory Here we study a method for thinking about oligopoly situations. As we consider some terminology, we will see the simultaneous move, one shot.
Game Theory Here we study a method for thinking about oligopoly situations. As we consider some terminology, we will see the simultaneous move, one shot.
1 Section 2d Game theory Game theory is a way of thinking about situations where there is interaction between individuals or institutions. The parties.
TOPIC 6 REPEATED GAMES The same players play the same game G period after period. Before playing in one period they perfectly observe the actions chosen.
QR 38, 2/22/07 Strategic form: dominant strategies I.Strategic form II.Finding Nash equilibria III.Strategic form games in IR.
UNIT II: The Basic Theory Zero-sum Games Nonzero-sum Games Nash Equilibrium: Properties and Problems Bargaining Games Bargaining and Negotiation Review.
1 Oligopoly. 2 By the end of this Section, you should be able to: Describe the characteristics of an oligopoly Describe the characteristics of an oligopoly.
Social Choice Session 7 Carmen Pasca and John Hey.
Chapter 12 Choices Involving Strategy Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
Monetary Economics Game and Monetary Policymaking.
Dynamic Games of complete information: Backward Induction and Subgame perfection - Repeated Games -
Standard and Extended Form Games A Lesson in Multiagent System Based on Jose Vidal’s book Fundamentals of Multiagent Systems Henry Hexmoor, SIUC.
Chapters 29, 30 Game Theory A good time to talk about game theory since we have actually seen some types of equilibria last time. Game theory is concerned.
Public Policy Analysis MPA 404 Lecture 24. Previous Lecture Graphical Analysis of Tariff and Quota Game Theory; The prisoner's Dilemma.
KRUGMAN'S MICROECONOMICS for AP* Game Theory Margaret Ray and David Anderson Micro: Econ: Module.
Lecture 5 Introduction to Game theory. What is game theory? Game theory studies situations where players have strategic interactions; the payoff that.
Mixed Strategies and Repeated Games
Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Static Games of complete information: Dominant Strategies and Nash Equilibrium in pure and mixed strategies.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 8: Games and Strategic Behavior 1.Describe the basic.
Intermediate Microeconomics Game Theory. So far we have only studied situations that were not “strategic”. The optimal behavior of any given individual.
Chapter 16 Oligopoly and Game Theory. “Game theory is the study of how people behave in strategic situations. By ‘strategic’ we mean a situation in which.
ECO290E: Game Theory Lecture 3 Why and How is Nash Equilibrium Reached?
Oligopoly CHAPTER 13B. Oligopoly IRL In some markets there are only two firms. Computer chips are an example. The chips that drive most PCs are made by.
Advanced Subjects in GT Outline of the tutorials Static Games of Complete Information Introduction to games Normal-form (strategic-form) representation.
Chapter 12 Game Theory Presented by Nahakpam PhD Student 1Game Theory.
Game theory basics A Game describes situations of strategic interaction, where the payoff for one agent depends on its own actions as well as on the actions.
Chapter 28 Game Theory.
Microeconomics Course E
Intermediate Microeconomics
©2011 John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, all rights reserved.
Oligopoly & Game Theory Lecture 27
Learning 6.2 Game Theory.
Managerial Economics Kyle Anderson
Chapter 29 Game Theory Key Concept: Nash equilibrium and Subgame Perfect Nash equilibrium (SPNE)
Game Theory Day 3.
Molly W. Dahl Georgetown University Econ 101 – Spring 2009
Presentation transcript:

1 Game Theory

By the end of this section, you should be able to…. ► In a simultaneous game played only once, find and define:  the Nash equilibrium  dominant and dominated strategies  the Pareto Optimum ► Discuss strategies in infinitely repeated games. 2

3 What is Game Theory? ► DFN: A way of describing various possible outcomes in any situation involving two or more interacting individuals. ► A game is described by:  1. Players  2. Strategies of those players  3. Payoffs: the utility/profit for each of the strategy combinations.

4 Assumptions in Game Theory ► 1. Perfect Information – Players observe all of their rivals’ previous moves. ► 2. Common Knowledge – All players know the structure of the game, know that their rivals know it and their rivals know that they know it.

5 Prisoner’s Dilemma Game ► There at 2 players: Player 1, and Player 2. ► Each has 2 possible strategies: Confess (C) or Do Not Confess (DNC). ► Players only play the games once. ► Payoffs are years in jail, so they are expressed as negative numbers. Both players want the least amount of years in jail they can have. Player 2 Player 2 Player 1 CDNC C -6, -6 0, -9 DNC -9, 0 -1, -1 C C DNC

6 Prisoner’s Dilemma Game ► How do we “solve” this game (predict which set of strategies will be played)? ► 1. Look for Strictly Dominant Strategies and Strictly Dominated Strategies  Strictly Dominant Strategies - the best strategy regardless of what other players do.  Strictly Dominated Strategies – a strategy in which another strategy yields the player a higher payoff regardless of what other players do.

7 Prisoner’s Dilemma Game ► 2. Eliminate Strictly Dominated Strategies (Player 1’s Strategy if Player 2 Confesses)  If Player 2 C and Player 1 C, Player 1 gets 6 years.  If Player 2 C and Player 1 DNC, Player 1 gets 9 years in jail.  If Player 2 is going to Confess, # of years in jail if Player 1 C < # of years in jail if Player 1 DNC  Thus if Player 1 thinks Player 2 is going to confess, Player 1 is better off confessing too. Player 2 Player 2 Player 1 CDNC C -6, -6 0, -9 DNC -9, 0 -1, -1

8 Prisoner’s Dilemma Game ► 2. Eliminate Strictly Dominated Strategies (Player 1’s Strategy if Player 2 Does Not Confess)  If Player 2 DNC and Player 1 C, Player 1 gets 0 years.  If Player 2 DNC and Player 1 DNC, Player 1 gets 1 year in jail.  If Player 2 is going to Not Confess, # of years in jail if Player 1 C < # of years in jail if Player 1 DNC  Thus if Player 1 thinks Player 2 does not confess, Player 1 is better off confessing. Player 2 Player 2 Player 1 CDNC C -6, -6 0, -9 DNC -9, 0 -1, -1

9 Prisoner’s Dilemma Game ► 2. Eliminate Strictly Dominated Strategies (Player 1’s Dominant Strategy)  If Player 2 C, Player 1 is better off confessing.  If Player 2 DNC, Player 1 is better off confessing.  Regardless of what Strategy Player 2 uses, Player 1 is better off confessing.  Thus, Confessing is a dominant strategy for Player 1 and Do Not Confess is a dominated strategy. Player 2 Player 2 Player 1 CDNC C -6, -6 0, -9 DNC -9, 0 -1, -1

10 Prisoner’s Dilemma Game ► 2. Eliminate Strictly Dominated Strategies (Player 2’s Dominant Strategy)  Since we know it is strategic for Player 1 to play Confess, to determine Player 2’s dominant strategy we compare Player 2’s years in jail.  Since Player 1 C, Player 2 is better off confessing.  Thus, Confessing is a dominant strategy for Player 2 and Do Not Confess is a dominated strategy. Player 2 Player 2 Player 1 CDNC C -6, -6 0, -9 DNC -9, 0 -1, -1

11 Prisoner’s Dilemma Game ► 3. Solution to the Game  Both Players playing the strategy which is best for them given what the other person does yields a solution at Confess, Confess.  After all dominated strategies are eliminated, what’s left is a Nash Equilibrium.  You can eliminate Strictly Dominated Strategies in any order and will get the same result. Player 2 Player 2 Player 1 CDNC C -6, -6 0, -9 DNC -9, 0 -1, -1

12 Nash Equilibrium ► DFN: The result of all players playing their best strategy given what their competitors are doing.  Player 1 knew it is a strictly dominant strategy for Player 2 to Confess. Thus Player 1 will confess because they do best under that strategy knowing what Player 2 will do and vice versa.

13 Another Way to Solve a Game ► Star the highest payoff for one of the Players given the other Player is locked into each strategy and vice versa. ► Suppose Player 1 is locked into Confessing, Player 2 is better off Confessing. ► So we put a star above Player 2’s Payoff. Player 2 Player 2 Player 1 CDNC C -6, -6 0, -9 DNC -9, 0 -1, -1

14 Another Way to Solve a Game ► Suppose Player 1 is locked into Not Confessing, Player 2 is better off Confessing. ► So we put a star above Player 2’s Payoff. Player 2 Player 2 Player 1 CDNC C -6, -6 0, -9 DNC -9, 0 -1, -1

15 Another Way to Solve a Game ► Suppose Player 2 is locked into Confessing, Player 1 is better off Confessing. ► So we put a star above Player 1’s Payoff. Player 2 Player 2 Player 1 CDNC C -6, -6 0, -9 DNC -9, 0 -1, -1

16 Another Way to Solve a Game ► Suppose Player 2 is locked into Not Confessing, Player 1 is better off Confessing. ► So we put a star above Player 1’s Payoff. ► (Confess, Confess) is a Nash Equilibrium because it has two stars Player 2 Player 2 Player 1 CDNC C -6, -6 0, -9 DNC -9, 0 -1, -1

17 Nash Equilibrium vs. Pareto Outcome ► Nash Equilibrium is the result when both players act strategically given what the other is going to do (Confess, Confess). ► Pareto Optimum is the result that benefits both players the most (DNC, DNC). Player 2 Player 2 Player 1 CDNC C -6, -6 0, -9 DNC -9, 0 -1, -1

18 Another Game ► Suppose now there are two Players, Row and Column, with two Strategies each.  Row can go Up or Down  Column can go Left or Right Column Player Column Player Row Player LeftRight Up 5, 11 1, 10 Down 10, 7 2, 2

19 Another Game – Eliminating Strictly Dominated Strategies ► Down is a Dominant Strategy and Up is a Dominated Strategy. (10>5 and 2>1) ► Left is a Dominant Strategy and Right is a Dominated Strategy. (7>2) ► Thus, (Down, Left) is a Nash Equilibrium. Column Player Column Player Row Player LeftRight Up 5, 11 1, 10 Down 10, 7 2, 2

20 Another Game – Stars ► If Column chooses Left, Row is better choosing Down (10>5)  Star Row’s payoff for (Down, Left) ► If Column chooses Right, Row is better choosing Down (2>1)  Star Row’s payoff for (Down, Right) ► If Row chooses Up, Column is better choosing Left (11>10)  Star Column’s payoff for (Up, Left) ► If Row chooses Down, Column is better choosing Left (7>2)  Star Row’s payoff for (Down, Left) ► Thus (Down, Left) is the Nash Equilibrium (2 stars) Column Player Column Player Row Player LeftRight Up 5, 11 1, 10 Down 10, 7 2, 2

21 Another Game – Nash vs. Pareto ► Notice the Nash Equilibrium has the highest total society payoff (Pareto Outcome). Column Player Column Player Row Player LeftRight Up 5, 11 1, 10 Down 10, 7 2, 2

22 Another Type of Game ► Coordination ► There are 2 Nash Equilibriums Friend 2 Friend 2 Statue of Liberty Empire State Bldg Friend 1 Statue of Liberty 8, 8 0, 0 Empire State Bldg 0, 0 3, 3

23 Another Type of Game II ► Battle of the Sexes ► There are 2 Nash Equilibriums. Male Male BalletGame FemaleBallet 8, 3 0, 0 Game 3, 8

24 Infinitely Repeated Games ► Strategies Players can play:  1. Always play Pareto (Co-operate)  2. Always play Nash (Strategic)  3. Grimm Strategy (Punish) – play Pareto until the other player diverges from Pareto, then play Nash.  4. Tit-for-Tat (Reciprocate) – play what the other player played last round. ► One of two things will happen:  1. Players Converge on Nash Equilibrium by strategically playing Dominant Strategies.  2. Players could end up “co-operating” for the greater good of all play Pareto.

25 A Final Note on Nash Equilibrium ► Nash Equilibrium predictions are only accurate if each player correctly predicts what the other player is going to do. ► For a player to accurately predict what the other player is going to do and act on it, both players must act strategically and NOT select Strictly Dominated Strategies. ► But, with some other knowledge about the other player (relationship, partner before, etc.), it could be strategic to play other strategies.