Use of Education Simulations and Serious Games in Language Instruction The Interagency Language Roundtable George P. Schultz national Foreign Affairs Training.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Depths of Knowledge and Reading
Advertisements

Modelling with expert systems. Expert systems Modelling with expert systems Coaching modelling with expert systems Advantages and limitations of modelling.
C Domain Teaching for Student Learning. The focus in the C Domain is on the act of teaching and its overall goal of helping students connect with the.
Writing Student Learning Outcomes
What is Differentiation?
CA 2012 ELD Standards Appendix B
Course Design: The Basics Monica A. Devanas, Ph.D. Director, Faculty Development and Assessment Programs Center for Teaching Advancement and Assessment.
Second language learning
Designing Instruction Objectives, Indirect Instruction, and Differentiation Adapted from required text: Effective Teaching Methods: Research-Based Practice.
Why this Research? 1.High School graduates are facing increased need for high degree of literacy, including the capacity to comprehend texts, but comprehension.
Objective Develop an understanding of Appendix B: CA ELD Standards Part II: Learning About How English Works.
Mapping our language programmes Vicky Wright Centre for Language Study
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
How to Integrate Students with Diverse Learning Needs in a General Education Classroom By: Tammie McElaney.
"Targets for Instruction" Learning Objectives. Are statements of expected learning outcomes Communicate those expected learning outcomes to students Assist.
Seminar /workshop on cognitive attainment ppt Dr Charles C. Chan 28 Sept 2001 Dr Charles C. Chan 28 Sept 2001 Assessing APSS Students Learning.
Writing Objectives General Education’s Great Expectations (GE)2 Tamara Rosier, Assistant Director of Assessment Julie Guevara, Assessment and Accreditation.
Principles of High Quality Assessment
Strategies to Promote Motivation in the Mathematics Classroom
Defining a Model of CALL Chapter 7, Ken Beatty (2003)
Planning, Instruction, and Technology
How we use effective strategies for teaching ESL learners (Whole School) January 27, 2014.
UNIT 9. CLIL THINKING SKILLS
Literacy in the Mathematics Classroom District Learning Day August 5, 2015.
Goals and Objectives.
CRITICAL REFLECTION FOR CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: using the SOAP strategy to analyze pedagogical experience Padmini Boruah Department of English.
General Considerations for Implementation
Taxonomies of Learning Foundational Knowledge: Understanding and remembering information and ideas. Application: Skills Critical, creative, and practical.
ACADEMIC DIRECTION / TESTING OFFICE. Language proficiency scale 0 No practical proficiency 1 Elementary 2 Fair Limited working 3 Good Minimum professional.
Lesson Planning. Teachers Need Lesson Plans So that they know that they are teaching the curriculum standards required by the county and state So that.
 Learning Domains ◦ Cognitive objectives  Describe the knowledge that learners are to acquire ◦ Affective objectives  Describe the attitudes, feelings,
Cognitive Strategy Instruction EEX 3257 Core Teaching Strategies University of FL.
COMPUTER ASSISTED / AIDED LANGUAGE LEARNING (CALL) By: Sugeili Liliana Chan Santos.
Interagency Language Roundtable Ray T. Clifford 23 May 2003.
1 Chapter 7 Models for Teaching: Direct Melinda Bauer and Shannyn Bourdon.
T 7.0 Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Central concepts:  Questioning stimulates and guides inquiry  Teachers use.
Day 3. Standards Reading: 1.0 Word Analysis, Fluency, and Systematic Vocabulary Development- Students apply their knowledge of word origins to determine.
Chapter 4: Planning Educational Outcomes Presented by: April Gannon & Lizzy Allen.
 Cognitive objectives ◦ Describe the knowledge that learners are to acquire  Affective objectives ◦ Describe the attitudes, feelings, and dispositions.
Chapter 3 The ASSURE Model “To insure effective instruction of media and technology”
LEARNING DOMAINS & OBJECTIVES Southern Illinois University Carbondale Instructor Workshop.
Scaling the Pyramid: The pursuit of higher order thinking skills Presented by Nathan Groff.
DLIFLC 7-9 FEB 01 Diagnostic Assessment Thomas S. Parry Directorate of Continuing Education Defense Language Institute BILC Professional Seminar 2005 Sofia,
Unit 5 Seminar D ESCRIBING Y OUR L EARNING. Agenda Unit Objectives Bloom’s Taxonomy Learning Statements Questions.
INSTRUCTIONAL OBJECTIVES
Benjamin Rifkin The College of New Jersey.  Background  Development  ACTFL and ILR  Modalities  Levels and sublevels.
Introduction to Content Standards Jacqueline E. Korengel, Ed.D.
Moodle Wiki Trial Design for Online Learning SEM
What are competencies?  Emphasize life skills and evaluate mastery of those skills according to actual leaner performance.  Competencies consist of.
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
COURSE AND SYLLABUS DESIGN
Aligning Program Goals, Instructional Practices, and Outcomes Assessment Dr. Ray T. Clifford BILC Conference, Budapest 29 May 2006.
Academic Language: The Gateway to Student Achievement Fall Susan GordonShort Version! Gaithersburg High School.
INTRODUCTION TO THE WIDA FRAMEWORK Presenter Affiliation Date.
1 Instructing the English Language Learner (ELL) in the Regular Classroom.
©2007 RUSH University Medical Center Writing Effective Learning Objectives Chris Zakrzewski, MS Ningchun Han, EdD.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Writing Learning Outcomes Best Practices. Do Now What is your process for writing learning objectives? How do you come up with the information?
SIUC Instructor Workshop Learning Domains and Objectives.
BILC Conference Athens, Greece 22 – 26 June 2008 Ray T. Clifford
Assessment and Reporting Without Levels February 2016
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
Innovative measures in teaching
Professional Learning Team Workshop #4
IN THE NAME OF “ALLAH” THE MOST BENIFICENT AND THE MOST MERCIFUL
Bloom's Taxonomy Prepared by: Maridalys López Melissa Torres
COMPETENCIES & STANDARDS
Writing Learning Outcomes
Teaching, Learning, and Testing: Finding Congruence
Writing Learning Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

Use of Education Simulations and Serious Games in Language Instruction The Interagency Language Roundtable George P. Schultz national Foreign Affairs Training Center Ray T. Clifford 9 May 2008

Overview Where do educational simulations (ES) and serious games (SG) fit within any comprehensive educational system? –Independent and comprehensive, but parallel? –Dependent augmentation? Where do ES & SG fit within a comprehensive program of language instruction? –They fall within the controversial field of CALL. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Some arguments against the use of CALL. Only African languages use clicks. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Some arguments against the use of CALL. Only African languages use clicks. Computer delivered instruction will lead to over monitoring. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Some arguments against the use of CALL. Only African languages use clicks. Computer delivered instruction will lead to over monitoring. Extended CALL instruction could produce terminal learners. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Some arguments against the use of CALL. Only African languages use clicks. Computer delivered instruction will lead to over monitoring. Extended CALL instruction could produce terminal learners. Students have a right to a teacher who understands the language better than they do. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Some arguments for CALL You don’t have to pay computers salaries or retirement benefits. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Some arguments for CALL You don’t have to pay computers salaries or retirement benefits. Computers will consistently deliver the same program of instruction every day. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Some arguments for CALL You don’t have to pay computers salaries or retirement benefits. Computers will consistently deliver the same program of instruction every day. Computers will provide just-in-time information access and eliminate the need for schools. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Some arguments for CALL You don’t have to pay computers salaries or retirement benefits. Computers will consistently deliver the same program of instruction every day. Computers will provide just-in-time information access and eliminate the need for schools. Within 10 years, computers will “translate languages so quickly and so flawlessly” that no one will study foreign languages anymore. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Some arguments for CALL You don’t have to pay computers salaries or retirement benefits. Computers will consistently deliver the same program of instruction every day. Computers will provide just-in-time information access and eliminate the need for schools. Within 10 years, computers will “translate languages so quickly and so flawlessly” that no one will study foreign languages anymore. Wall Street Journal, 1998 (and reviewed January 28, Page R3) Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

What We Know About CALL There are more opinions than there are facts. There are more experts than expertise. It is time for a principled analysis of needs and capabilities. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Lets Begin with Some Definitions of Basic Terms Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Computer: A person who computes. A device that computes; especially, an electronic machine that performs mathematical or logical calculations or… processes… information… in accordance with a predetermined program. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Computer: A person who computes. A device that computes; especially, an electronic machine that performs mathematical or logical calculations or… processes… information… in accordance with a predetermined program. Note: Because of programming challenges we have successfully automated only the worst of our teaching practices. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Assisted: Aided. Helped. Supported. From Latin “assistere” to stand beside. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Assisted: Aided. Helped. Supported. From Latin “assistere” to stand beside. Note: It is not clear whether the meaning here implies standing beside the teacher, the student, or both. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Language: The most complex of human behaviors. A uniquely human communication skill that is: –Imperfectly understood. –Still being studied and analyzed. –Inadequate for communication unless the participants have a shared context for that communication. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Language: The most complex of human behaviors. A uniquely human communication skill that is: –Imperfectly understood. –Still being studied and analyzed. –Inadequate for communication unless the participants have a shared context for that communication. Note: Language is so complex that even language professionals make mistakes. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Language is Complex Even Without a Translation A Headline in the Chronicle of Higher Education (online blog, 13 Nov 2007): Berkeley Tree-Sitter Falls, Breaks 2 Limbs Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Learning: To gain knowledge, comprehension, or mastery of something. Scientists are still refining their constructs and definitions of what it means to know or comprehend. The process is not directly observable and only the outcomes can be measured. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Learning: To gain knowledge, comprehension, or mastery of something. Scientists are still refining their constructs and definitions of what it means to know or comprehend. The process is not directly observable and only the outcomes can be measured. Note: Learning is perhaps the least understood of human endeavors. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Bloom’s Taxonomy Evaluation and persuasion through refined use of professional, literary, and rhetorical skills. Synthesis of concepts to produce and comprehend abstract ideas and hypothetical situations. Analysis and definition of factual relationships in paragraph length communications. Application of skills to create and understand new communications. Comprehension and use of words and phrases. Memorization of facts. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Language and Cognition Levels 4 & 5, evaluation and persuasion through refined use of professional rhetorical skills. Level 3, synthesis of ideas to produce and comprehend abstract comments and hypothetical situations expressed in essays, chapters, etc. Level 2, analysis and definition of relationships expressed in multiple interrelated paragraphs. Level 1, application of skills to create and understand sentence length communications. Level 0+, comprehension and use of words and phrases. Level 0, memorization of facts. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Language and Perceived Intelligence It is good [for people] to become acquainted with languages, for they may have to go abroad, and should be able to talk to people, and not look like fools. I care not how much intelligence you have, if you cannot exhibit it, you look like an ignoramus. John Taylor, 1852 Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Another Perspective Bloom describes observable outcomes of learning. There is also a commonly used hierarchy that describes three types of learning: –Learning for limited transfer. –Learning for near transfer. –Learning for far transfer. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

3 Major Types of Learning Memorized ability for limited transfer. Rehearsed ability for near transfer. Extemporaneous ability for far transfer. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

The Challenge of CALL We want to program electronic devices… to help learners… through processes that are imperfectly understood… develop skills in the most complex of human behaviors. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Is the challenge too great? Should we give up? No, IFF instructional goals are well defined, then CALL programs can be useful. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

The Framework for Discussions of CALL effectiveness A general model of the language learning process. Seven instructional elements that must be defined before the effectiveness of programs can be evaluated. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

A Model of the Language Acquisition Process Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

7 Elements That Define Goals and Capabilities 1.The learners’ entering ability level(s). 2.The language skill modalities, tasks, topical domains and text types to be taught. 3.The extent of the instruction defined in terms of both lessons and “learning hours”. 4.The type of learning expected. 5.The judging capabilities of the program. 6.The feedback capabilities of the program. 7.The learners’ expected exit ability level(s). Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

The ILR Proficiency Levels [With language “text type” highlighted in red] 5 LEVELFUNCTION/TASKSCONTEXT/TOPICSACCURACY All expected of an educated NS [Books] All subjects Accepted as an educated NS Tailor language, counsel, motivate, persuade, negotiate [Chapters] Wide range of professional needs Extensive, precise, and appropriate Support opinions, hypothesize, explain, deal with unfamiliar topics [Multiple pages] Practical, abstract, special interests Narrate, describe, give directions [Multiple paragraphs] Concrete, real- world, factual Intelligible even if not used to dealing with non-NS Errors never interfere with communication & rarely disturb Q & A, create with the language [Multiple sentences] Everyday survival Intelligible with effort or practice Memorized [Words and Phrases]Random Unintelligible Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Conclusions CALL capabilities and limitations would be better understood if every program came with clear “truth in advertising” statements that describe the 7 essential elements that define its goals and capabilities. Producing these statements will require the collaboration of linguists, teachers, and programmers. Collaboration should also result in a better definition of needs and better programs. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Some Final Observations If a teacher’s skills are so limited that s/he could be replaced by a computer – s/he ought to be replaced. Good teachers can’t be replaced by computers – but good teachers who use computers will replace teachers who don’t. Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008

Thank You Are there any questions? Ray T. Clifford, 9 May 2008