1 Flight Ops dept Capt Cor Blokzijl, DFO Mandala Airlines WATS, Orlando, 27 April 2010 The Impact of automation on Pilot Training.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Division Of Early Warning And Assessment MODULE 11: ASSESSING THE FUTURE.
Advertisements

Fire safety training is important, not only because it is mandated by governments for schools and offices, but also because the training will.
Tania G. Longoria EDTC We live in a technology area in which our children are surrounded by it. We have to become technology oriented because.
TRAINING & SAFETY IS IT TIME TO QUESTION OUR BELIEFS? TRAINING & SAFETY IS IT TIME TO QUESTION OUR BELIEFS? Capt. Jean-Michel Bigarré Vice President ATR.
Management Of Human Factors Risk Conference - RAeS 11 th May 2006 Managing Human Factors Risk Captain Steve Sheterline General Manager Training British.
The FITS SBT Methodology by Mike Franz FAASTeam Representative 1.
The Importance of Synergy Between Flight Deck and Cabin Crews
Digital Training to Analog Flying: Is There a Problem? Western Michigan University, College of Aviation Geoff Whitehurst, Tom Grossman, William Rantz Great.
Ken KUSUKAMI Director Safety Research Laboratory Research and Development Center of JR East Group East Japan Railway Company Development of human factors.
Cabin Crew CRM Forum Captain Robert Calvert Head of Training Standards
Modeling Human Reasoning About Meta-Information Presented By: Scott Langevin Jingsong Wang.
 promotion of an open and fair culture  mistakes treated in a non judgmental manner manner  it is about education not castigation - Vision -
1 Enhancing Flight Crew Management of Unexpected Events This presentation is intended to enhance the reader's understanding, but it shall not supersede.
WORSER BAY SCHOOL: CHILDREN AS WRITERS: A PRESENTATION FOR PARENTS MURRAY GADD: 2015.
Federal Aviation Administration FAA Inspectors and FAAST Managers Training MODULE 1 Introduction 03/10/09Rev. 1.0SL-1-FIFMT-1.
Providing Tutoring Service through Accumulating Interaction Data Chi-Jen LIN Fo Guang University, Taiwan.
Observing Learning Helen Bacon and Jan Ridgway Inclusion Support Services.
September 2002-MoroccoARAB INSTRUMENT PROCEDURE DESIGN SEMINAR Instrument Procedure Designer Training and continuous training How to get, improve.
Federal Aviation Administration General Aviation’s Technology Transition Presented to: SETP Flight Test Workshop By: FAA Small Airplane Directorate Lowell.
Flight Department 1 A Research and a Result Barcelona October 2003 Capt. Cor Blokzijl, Aero Lloyd 10 th Airbus Flight Safety Conference.
Aviation Safety International
AnalyseDesignDevelopImplementEvaluate ADDIE - Model.
Aviation English Skills On-line Crew Room A Brand-new Style of Learning Online! Crew Room Professional Development of English Language Skills for ICAO.
Nationally Recognized Seven Areas of Concern for Migrant Students
Incident Review Meeting Example  The next slides are an example of how to complete the template and identify latent conditions, threats, errors, UAS and.
Nicosia, May 15th, th International Conference Challenges facing aviation safety - An airlines’ perspective.
Understanding Effective Leadership Development John West-Burnham.
Automation, Expert Behaviour & Motivation Capt Craig Mitchell Training Manager – Airbus, Emirates Airline ©2015 Emirates. All Rights Reserved.
Threat and Error Management in Aviation
What Our Students Need Most The 7 Fundamental Conditions of Learning.
TDAW103A Practical Training Balance Mark Christie workplace project Cluster workplace project Use training packages.
Intro to Threat & Error Management
Excellence in crew security training Scott Graham MEC Security Chairperson Air Line Pilots Association Vicki Jurgens MEC Safety, Health & Security Chairperson.
Downloaded from Lecture 8: Crew Personality & Attitude.
Cirrus Design and FITS. Train Pilots to fly within Their Capabilities.
Griffith Aerospace Safety Centre Training Interventions for Managing Startle During Unexpected Critical Events Wayne Martin Griffith University Aerospace.
1 © by Lufthansa Flight Training Ab Initio Pilot Training today – Capt Matthias Kippenberg, Airline Training Center Arizona,Inc. WATS, 27 April 2010, Orlando.
Development of Indicators for Integrated System Validation Leena Norros & Maaria Nuutinen & Paula Savioja VTT Industrial Systems: Work, Organisation and.
Strand III Formative Assessment. Goals of Strand III Formative Assessment Training To explore teachers’ perceptions of assessments and how these perceptions.
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF UKRAINE NATIONAL AVIATION UNIVERSITY Air Navigation System Department.
Quimba Software June 2008 Improvisation as a Training Framework for Emergency Managers Nina Zumel, PhD. Quimba Software Zeno Franco Larry Beutler, PhD.
1 IE 590D Applied Ergonomics Lecture 26 – Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Automation Vincent G. Duffy Associate Prof. School of IE and ABE Thursday April.
Presented to: CFI Workshops By: FAASTeam Date: April 1, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration CFI Workshop 7 Core Topic 14 Flight Review.
SMS for a Modern Flight Training Organization
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Lessons Learned From Aviation Accidents World Aviation Training Conference Daniel I. Cheney, Manager,
Managing Rotorcraft Safety During Frequently Performed Unique Missions September 28, 2005 AHS International Helicopter Safety Symposium 2005 Philip G.
THOMAS COOK CRM STANDARDS ASSESSMENT Captain Karen Varney CRM Manager Thomas Cook Airlines UK.
Is an SMS enough to make our organisations safer? By Jan Peeters RIO DE JANEIRO – 20/10/2015 SRMCOACH.EU 1.
Safety Regulation Group Slide 1 CABIN CREW CRM TRAINING BEST PRACTICE Aviation House 29 January 2009.
Troubleshooting: Enhancing Technical Training WATS 2009.
Airbus Flight Seminar – Kuala-Lumpur March 2007 Human Factors Model.
WATS 2010 Orlando Flight Standards and Training April 27-29, 2010.
Federal Aviation Administration Downloaded from FAA Inspectors and FAAST Managers Training MODULE 1 Introduction 03/10/09Rev. 1.0SL-1-FIFMT-1.
THINGS YOUR INSTRUCTOR MIGHT NOT HAVE TOLD YOU !.
Human Factors. Six key areas proposed Fatigue, Automation Insertion of new technologies, Physical environment, Pilot decision making, Procedural non-compliance,
Flight Operations Research Centre of Excellence Dr. Hazel Courteney Head of Research & Strategic Analysis.
From Open Textbook to Adaptive Learning The Possibilities of Doing More with Open February 2016.
Glass cockpit safety initial transition training recurrent training ongoing proficiency program.
The main goals of the new design was to reduce operating costs by:  Optimizing the climbing altitude  The route of the flight  Decent to the runway.
Reflective Learning An Overview.
Supporting participation and reification in Communities of Practice
Risk Tolerance Factor # 10 Role Models Accepting Risk
STUDY UNIT 9 Training and development of employees and career management at organisational level SU 9 TRAIN AND DEVELOP 1.
C-2 Departs Runway CRM CASE STUDY.
Mental Engineering– A Significant Contribution to Resilience Engineering in Aviation Dr. Reiner Kemmler/Capt. Max Scheck Dezember Thomas Rueder.
Dealing with Unreliable Speed at Recurrent Training
Leadership for Safety Through the Case Method
System analysis and design
Federal Aviation Administration General Aviation’s Technology Transition Presented to: SETP Flight Test Workshop By: FAA Small Airplane Directorate Lowell.
THOMAS COOK CRM STANDARDS ASSESSMENT
Presentation transcript:

1 Flight Ops dept Capt Cor Blokzijl, DFO Mandala Airlines WATS, Orlando, 27 April 2010 The Impact of automation on Pilot Training

2 Flight Ops dept Statement : Aircraft do seldom fall out of the sky due to a system or engine failure. Accidents involve a long chain of events before matters really go dramatically wrong. It is much more the complex systems and the man-machine interface (and dialogue), which are the starting point of matters going wrong, mainly because pilots are faced with situations which are difficult to comprehend or to understand.

3 Flight Ops dept Question : ”Should our pilot training, especially our recurrent training, be focussed on this comprehending and understanding?”

4 Flight Ops dept Background : Flight training = teaching psychomotoric skills (RAF AP-129) Increased technology = added technical knowledge Highly Automated Cockpit is more cognitive challenge HAC needs man-machine-interface + man-machine-dialogue Cognitive adjustment is needed Focus on comprehend and understand M-M-I & M-M-D

5 Flight Ops dept Tools for training : Training tools: Documentation hard/soft Classroom training/interactive, on line modules Films, ppt’s, VACBI, etc. System trainers FFS

6 Flight Ops dept Effects of training tools : Time wise limited Has to be rehearsed regular Recurrent training = repeating items from original training

7 Flight Ops dept Exposure training : E xposed to a scenario = experienced the scenario B urned your fingers once = always remembered C hances to find useful information when needed is higher being exposed than learning in class, VACBI or sim exercise C reate events which happened world wide (SR111, AF 447)

8 Flight Ops dept Exposure training: Training tools not necessarily related to daily flying (ESSAI) Do not require knowledge but understanding By scenario teach system failures and the influence on the system interface What does the pilot expect to see, what if this is not the case?

9 Flight Ops dept What do we train: Initial training: Systems & system knowledge Operating these systems in normal, ab-normal & emergency conditions System interface Line-training

10 Flight Ops dept What do we train: Recurrent training: Repetition of exercises Required performance by regulating authorities Minimum 5 “ab-normals “ or failures Minimum 3 emergencies Typical one day LOFT and one day skill test

11 Flight Ops dept Conventional training: Risk of conventional training in HAC: Training skills related to single event Training skills in isolated manner Training skills for a combination of other skills which: - very unlikely combination - not become relevant at same moment

12 Flight Ops dept Exposure training: Which events, incidents or accidents happened in last year? Examples: Hudson river Sao Paulo Jamaica Toronto AF 447

13 Flight Ops dept Exposure training: Exposure training is also Mind-map training Mind-map is the behavioural strategy for DM, TM and SA Mind-map training: Experience (exposure) Training cognitive skills in operational situations Training to understanding i.s.o knowledge per se System understanding major factor in TM and SA

14 Flight Ops dept Conclusion: Exposure training enhances : Situation Awareness Understanding System Interface Understanding of dynamic of system failures Understanding of fleet accidents & incidents world wide Problem/situation recognition

15 Flight Ops dept Any Questions?

16 Flight Ops dept Feedback: Any feedback to: