GTSTRUDL User’s Group Dynamic Analysis of Service Water Pump for Seismic Restraint June 24, 2011 Parimal Gandhi, PE Sr. Engineer 1 Annual Meeting - 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seismic Design of Buried Structures
Advertisements

GTSTRUDL Users Group Annual Meeting STANDBY LIQUID CONTROL TEST TANK June 14, 2012 Parimal Gandhi, PE Sr. Engineer 1.
FEA Reference Guide See additional material herehere.
Robustness assessment for multiple column loss scenarios
ASSIGNMENT 4 Problem 1 Find displacement and stresses in the crankshaft when engine runs at the first natural frequency of the crankshaft.
GTStrudl Damping Models for Dynamic Analysis
DISPLACEMENT TRANSMISSIBILITY IN BASE EXCITATION
Modeling of Composite Steel Floors Using GT STRUDL
Lecture 9 - Flexure June 20, 2003 CVEN 444.
1 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Structural Analysis of a Nuclear Fuel Handling Machine.
Response Spectrum Analysis Enhancements
Beams and Frames.
Response Spectrum Analysis as per Indian IS: 1893 (Part 1)-2002
Seismic design for the wind turbine tower (WP1.5 background document presentation) Institute of Steel Structures Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki.
SOFTWARE USED CAESER II ISOMETRIC DRAWING PREFACE Piping Stress analysis is a term applied to calculations, which address the static and dynamic loading.
GTSTRUDL User’s Group Annual Meeting
Keck Telescope Seismic Upgrade Design Support - Progress Report Frank Kan Andrew Sarawit 4 May 2011 (Revised 5 May 2011)
SEISMIC ANALYSIS Stability of a slope can be affected by seismicity in two ways: earthquake and blasting. These seismic motions are capable of inducing.
Mechanical Vibrations
#1 212 Ketter Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY Fax: Tel: x 2400 Control of Structural Vibrations Lecture.
NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 NEUTRAL BEAM ARMOR PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS.
Dynamics Free vibration: Eigen frequencies
U U 1 Excitation of Structural Resonance Due to a Bearing Failure Robert A. Leishear David B. Stefanko Jerald D. Newton IMECE 2007 ASME, International.
1 RF-Structures Mock-Up FEA Assembly Tooling V. Soldatov, F. Rossi, R. Raatikainen
RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD
December 3-4, 2007Earthquake Readiness Workshop Seismic Design Considerations Mike Sheehan.
Streamlined Process for Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of Nuclear Facilities Utilizing GTSTRUDL and MTR/SASSI Wei Li, Michael Perez, Mansour Tabatabaie,
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Lecture 5 January 31,  Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 5/ Slide 2 In this Lecture Impulsive.
CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE SEISMIC ANALYSIS USING ARTIFICIAL ACCELEROGRAMS
Multiple Coil Lift Calculation. Purposes of the Study  To investigate the stress distribution in the MCWF and the lifting device.  To make sure mounting.
Static Pushover Analysis
85M102006D. Seismic Analysis for a Turbine Building with Spring Supported Turbine / Generator Deck Feifei Lu, PE Shaw Power Group, Charlotte, NC June.
Bentley RM Bridge Seismic Design and Analysis
Using GSA & Compos for dynamic and footfall analysis 1 Footfall induced vibration analysis using Compos Thomas Li (Software Technology Group)
University of Palestine
MODULE 09 Inman chapter 5.
Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus October Aluminum Block Analyses.
Building Fun You will have 30 minutes to build the strongest structures you can with only the materials you are provided with. Explain to the class the.
Along-wind dynamic response
A NON-TRADITIONAL HIGH PERFORMANCE BROAD-BAND SEISMOMETER PMD/eentec, USA
ATLAS thermosiphon project Piping design and seismic analysis framework Délio Ramos EN/MME,
Presented by: Sasithorn THAMMARAK (st109957)
IMPACT OF FOUNDATION MODELING ON THE ACCURACY OF RESPONSE HISTORY ANALYSIS OF A TALL BUILDING Part II - Implementation F. Naeim, S. Tileylioglu, A. Alimoradi.
Fundamentals of Structural Engineering End Reactions.
6/25/20081 Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of a Composite Structure on a Backfill Hilltop WSRC-STI Rev 0 Lisa Anderson, Bechtel National,
Response of MDOF structures to ground motion 1. If damping is well-behaving, or can be approximated using equivalent viscous damping, we can decouple.
MODULE 08 MULTIDEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEMS. 2 Structure vibrating in a given mode can be considered as the Single Degree of Freedom (SDOF) system. Structure.
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 13, 2007 T. Brown.
GTSTRUDL User’s Group BASE PLATE ANALYSIS June 23, 2011 Parimal Gandhi, PE Sr. Engineer 1 Annual Meeting
February 12, John Anderson GE/CEE 479/679 Earthquake Engineering GE / CE - 479/679 Topic 7. Response and Fourier Spectra John G. Anderson Professor.
BoltJoin ppt P. Rogoff 3/24/2011. NSTX Supported by P. R. 3/9/2011 Update Ring Bolted Joint Design and Recommend the Joint Geometry using bolts.
BASICS OF DYNAMICS AND ASEISMIC DESIGN
FEM Analysis of the Stage3 Support Frame H.M. Fan March 14, 2007.
[14] SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NATIONAL COMPACT STELLERATOR EXPERIMENT (NCSX) PSFC/JA Peter H. Titus May Mode 7 Run #4 Mode 8 Run #4 Run #7.
General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD
CTA, MST – seismic calculation Roland Platzer, ZM1 DESY Hamburg Munich, January 28 th, 2013.
Results Verification Has the model been correctly implemented?
Basics Of Seismic Vibration Control
Seismic analysis of Bridges Part II
Mechanical Vibrations
Dead zone analysis of ECAL barrel modules under static and dynamic loads Marc Anduze, Thomas Pierre Emile – LLR CALICE Collaboration Meeting.
Mechanical Design and Analysis of LCLS II 2 K Cold Box
2K CB Internal Piping Flexibility Analysis
GTSTRUDL User’s Group Annual Meeting
Structural aspects related to the vacuum vessel of the SHIP Project
Dead zone analysis of ECAL barrel modules under static and dynamic loads for ILD Thomas PIERRE-EMILE, Marc ANDUZE– LLR.
Seismic Moment Dr. Syed Mohamed Ibrahim M.Tech., Ph.D.,
Earthquake resistant buildings
CALTRANS SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA Version 1.7 November 2012
Presentation transcript:

GTSTRUDL User’s Group Dynamic Analysis of Service Water Pump for Seismic Restraint June 24, 2011 Parimal Gandhi, PE Sr. Engineer 1 Annual Meeting

PURPOSE 2 Dynamic Analysis of Service Water Pump to Evaluate Seismic Loads on the Restraint. AND NRC Reg. Guide 1.92 & NRC Gupta Method for Missing Mass Impact on Seismic Loads.

AGENDA 3  Background of Plant Service Water System, Pump, and Seismic Restraint.  Failure of Seismic Restraint.  Dynamic Analysis of SW Pump With and Without Seismic Restraint.  Impact of NRC Reg.Guide 1.92, Rev. 2 on SW Pump Dynamic Analysis.  Conclusion.

BACKGROUND PLANT SERVICE WATER SYSTEM 4 The Service Water Pond covers approximately 94 surface acres, and is required to provide adequate cooling for 30 days following an accident.

BACKGROUND PLANT SERVICE WATER SYSYEM 5 The Plant Service Water System is designed to:  Withstand the design basis earthquake (DBE) without impairing its function.  Have sufficient capacity and redundancy to provide reliable cooling.  Be operable during loss-of-offsite power

BACKGROUND SW PUMP 6 The SW pumps' capable to withstand a design basis earthquake (DBE) without a loss of function. If the seismic restraints are degraded to the point that their design function can-not be met, then the associated SW pumps may not be able to withstand a DBE.

7 BACKGROUND SW PUMP PUMP MOTOR COLUMN ASSEMBLY BOWL ASSEMBLY DISCHARGE HEAD ASSEMBLY PUMP BASE PLATE SEISMIC RESTRAINT

BACKGROUND SEISMIC RESTRAINT 8

FAILURE SEISMIC RESTRAINT 9

10  CORROSION  MAINTANCE LOAD (VERTICAL)  ZERO GAP FOR LATERAL RESTRAINT FAILURE SEISMIC RESTRAINT

EXAMPLE: STRUDL Math Model For Pump With Seismic Restraint FLOOR PUMP BASEPLATE 17- UPPER SEISMIC RESTRAINT 12 - LOWER SEISMIC RESTRAINT

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS 12

13 DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

14 EIGENPROBLEM SOLUTION

15 DYNAMIC MASS PARTICIPATION FACTORS

16 RESPONSE SPECTRA CURVE EAST-WEST RESPONSE SPECTRA CURVE EAST-WEST

17 STORING RESPONSE SPECTRA EAST-WEST STORING RESPONSE SPECTRA EAST-WEST

18 RESPONSE SPECTRA CURVE VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA CURVE VERTICAL

19 STORING RESPONSE SPECTRA VERTICAL STORING RESPONSE SPECTRA VERTICAL

20 RESPONSE SPECTRA CURVE NORTH-SOUTH RESPONSE SPECTRA CURVE NORTH-SOUTH

21 STORING RESPONSE SPECTRA NORTH-SOUTH STORING RESPONSE SPECTRA NORTH-SOUTH

22 RESPOSNSE SPECTRUM LOADING

23 NRC REG. GUIDE 1.92 Rev.1 LOADING Reg.Guide Rev.1: TOTAL = [(LOAD1-Z) 2 + (LOAD2-X) 2 +(LOAD3-Y) 2 ] 1/2

24 SUPPORT REACTIONS & DISPLACEMENT WITH SEISMIC RESTRAINT SUPPORT REACTIONS & DISPLACEMENT WITH SEISMIC RESTRAINT Reg.Guide Rev.1: TOTAL = [(LOAD1-Z) 2 + (LOAD2-X) 2 +(LOAD3-Y) 2 ] 1/2 UNITS: FORCE  LBS, MOMENT  IN-LBS UNITS: DISPACEMENT  INCH, ROTATION  RAD

STRUDL MATH MODEL FOR PUMP WITHOUT SEISMIC RESTRAINT FLOOR PUMP BASEPLATE

26 SUPPORT REACTIONS & DISPLACEMENT WITHOUT SEISMIC RESTRAINT SUPPORT REACTIONS & DISPLACEMENT WITHOUT SEISMIC RESTRAINT Reg.Guide Rev.1: TOTAL = [(‘LOAD1-Z’) 2 + (‘LOAD2-X’) 2 +(‘LOAD3-Y’) 2 ] 1/2 UNITS: FORCE  LBS, MOMENT  IN-LBS UNITS: DISPACEMENT  INCH, ROTATION  RAD

27 PUMP STRESSES & DISPLACEMENT Check Pump Base Plate Stresses Forces At Pump Base Plate Due to Seismic Condition With Seismic Restraint Without Seismic Restraint Remarks Fx (kips) Fy (kips)2.05 Fz (kips) Mx (in-kips) My (in-kips)00 Mz (in-kips) Bolt Tensile Stress with Nozzle & Seismic Loads 10.0 ksi20.2 ksiAllowable 19.2 ksi for 1 ¼” Bolts A-307 Check Pump Displacement Displacement At Lower end of Pump Due to Seismic Condition With Seismic Restraint Without Seismic Restraint Remarks Δ x ( inch) Δ y ( inch)0.0 Δ z ( inch) `

28 NRC Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 1 Missing Mass Positions NRC Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 1 Missing Mass Positions All modes are assumed to be out-of-phase with the ground acceleration and out-of-phase with each other All modes having frequencies ≤ “significant” frequency If frequencies are not closely spaced: SRSS Mode Combination Method

29 Frequency Low Frequency Out-of-Phase Response Mid Frequency Transition from Out-of-Phase to In-Phase Response High Frequency In-Phase Rigid Static Response F 1 =frequency at which peak spectral acceleration is observed F 2 = frequency above which the SDOF (modal) oscillators are in-phase with the transient acceleration input used to generate the spectrum and in phase with each other F ZPA =frequency at which the spectral acceleration returns to the zero period acceleration; maximum base acceleration of transient acceleration input used to generate the spectrum NRC GUPTA METHOD Missing Mass Positions NRC Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 2 NRC GUPTA METHOD Missing Mass Positions NRC Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 2

30 ● For each mode i, in each ground motion direction k, the response is separated into a periodic part and a rigid part: ● The periodic modal response portions are combined using a double sum rule: NRC GUPTA METHOD Missing Mass Positions NRC Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 2 NRC GUPTA METHOD Missing Mass Positions NRC Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 2

31 ● The rigid modal responses are combined algebraically, including the residual rigid contribution from the missing mass: ● The total response in each ground motion direction is computed from the SRSS of the modal combinations of the periodic and rigid responses: NRC GUPTA METHOD Missing Mass Positions NRC Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 2 NRC GUPTA METHOD Missing Mass Positions NRC Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 2

32 NRC Reg.Guide Rev.2: TOTAL+MM = [(‘LOAD1-Z’+’Z-MAS’) 2 + (‘LOAD2-X’+’X-MAS’) 2 +(‘LOAD3-Y’+ ‘Y-MASS’) 2 ] 1/2 Missing Mass NRC Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 2 Missing Mass NRC Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 2

33 NRC Gupta Method Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 2 NRC Gupta Method Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 2

34 NRC Gupta Method Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 2 NRC Gupta Method Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 2

35 NRC Gupta Method Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 2 NRC Gupta Method Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 2

36 NRC Gupta Method Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 2 NRC Gupta Method Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 2 ‘GUP-ZT’= [(‘ZR’+’ZPMM’) 2 + (‘Z-PERDC’) 2 ] 1/2 ‘GUP-XT’= [(‘XR’+’XPMM’) 2 + (‘Z-PERDC’) 2 ] 1/2 ‘GUP-YT’= [(‘YR’+’YPMM’) 2 + (‘Z-PERDC’) 2 ] 1/2 ‘GUP-TOTL’= [(‘GUP-ZT’) 2 + [(‘GUP-XT’) 2 + (‘GUP-YT’) 2 ] 1/2

37 Reg.Guide Rev.1: TOTAL = [(‘LOAD1-Z’) 2 + (‘LOAD2-X’) 2 +(‘LOAD3-Y’) 2 ] 1/2 NRC Reg.Guide Rev.2: TOTAL+MM = [(‘LOAD1-Z’+ ‘Z-MAS’) 2 + (‘LOAD2-X’+ ‘X-MAS’) 2 +(‘LOAD3-Y’+’Y-MASS’) 2 ] 1/2 ‘GUP-TOTL’= [(‘GUP-ZT’) 2 + [(‘GUP-XT’) 2 + (‘GUP-YT’) 2 ] 1/2 Missing Mass Positions NRC Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 1 & 2 NRC Gupta Method Missing Mass Positions NRC Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 1 & 2 NRC Gupta Method

38 FREQUENCY SPECIFICATONS O TO 900 NUMBER OF MODES 50 NRC Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 1, 2 & Gupta Method Missing Mass Positions NRC Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 1, 2 & Gupta Method Missing Mass Positions Frequency Acceleration

39 NRC Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 1 & 2 Missing Mass Positions NRC Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 1 & 2 Missing Mass Positions

40 DYNAMIC MASS PARTICIPATION FACTORS

41 Reg.Guide Rev.1: TOTAL = [(‘LOAD1-Z’) 2 + (‘LOAD2-X’) 2 +(‘LOAD3-Y’) 2 ] 1/2 NRC Reg.Guide Rev.2: TOTAL+MM = [‘(LOAD1-Z’+ ‘Z-MAS’) 2 + (‘LOAD2-X’+ ‘X-MAS’) 2 +(‘LOAD3-Y’+ ‘Y-MASS’) 2 ] 1/2 ‘GUP-TOTL’= [(‘GUP-ZT’) 2 + [(‘GUP-XT’) 2 + (‘GUP-YT’) 2 ] 1/2 Missing Mass Positions NRC Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 1 & 2 NRC Gupta Method Missing Mass Positions NRC Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 1 & 2 NRC Gupta Method

42 Reg.Guide Rev.2: TOTAL-X = [(X LOAD2) 2 + (MM LOAD2) 2 ] 1/2 NRC Gupta Method: GUP XT = [(X RIGID+MM-XPERD) 2 + ( X PERDC) 2 ] 1/2 Reg. Guide 1.92, Rev. 1: X LOAD 2 Missing Mass Positions NRC Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 1, 2 & NRC GUPTA Method Missing Mass Positions NRC Reg Guide 1.92, Rev 1, 2 & NRC GUPTA Method

CONCLUSION 43  Seismic Restraint : To Reduce Pump Deflection and Stresses  No Impact of NRC Reg.Guide 1.92, Rev. 2 on Pump Dynamic Analysis

Questions? Thank you. 44