Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program Impact and Radiation Effects Resulting from the Nuclear Events in Japan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiological Assessment March 29, AMS Summary Ops Summary – Aerial Measuring Systems totaled more than 130 hours of flying – Flight operations were.
Advertisements

Nuclear Accident in Japan: A Summary
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
Assessing the Challenges Resulting from the Events at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station A Preliminary Discussion March 25, 2011 Walter L. Kirchner.
Vermont Yankee Presentation to VSNAP 7/17/13 VY/Entergy Fukushima Response Update Bernard Buteau.
FUKUSHIMA, DESCRIPTION OF THE ACCIDENT AND CONSEQUENCES TO THE ENVIRONMENT Dragoslav Nikezic Faculty of Science, University of Kragujevac, Serbia
Safety Implications of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Sheldon L. Trubatch, Ph.D., J.D. Vice-Chairman Arizona Section American Nuclear Society.
WNFC San Francisco April, 2014 Learning the right lessons from Fukushima - A new paradigm for a brighter future.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant May 13, 2011.
Overview of Incident at Fukushima Daiich Nuclear Power Station (1F) (Informal personal observations) April 2011.
The Harnessed Atom Lesson Eight Concerns. What concerns do people have about nuclear power plants: Safety at nuclear power plants – Design features –
Nuclear Power.
Jed Harrison Office of Radiation & Indoor Air.  Review the Incident – What Happened  Describe the EPA Response  Review EPA’s RadNet Monitoring System.
EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency Mike Boyd, Senior Health Physicist EPA/Office of Radiation & Indoor Air Presented at 2011 OAS Annual.
Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program Radiation: Sources, Effects and Uses The Foundation for Nuclear Studies.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES REPORT Environmental health And Nuclear issues Ana Ormaechea Santi Mateos Silvia Saura.
Tsunami in Tohoku, Japan JEREMIAH, ARSEN, JORDAN, NICK W.
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response May 17, 2011.
Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant
Population Considerations for the Nuclear Field Danny Smith, PhD, PE COPAFS Quarterly Meeting June 3, 2011.
Ivan Li and Kyle Krogman.  Nuclear reactor meltdown on March 11 th 2011 near Fukushima, Japan  An earthquake and the following tsunami knocked out electrical.
What about Japan?. Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 5 Unit 6.
Nuclear Accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP June 2, 2011 Embassy of Japan in Bulgaria.
Fukushima Dai-ichi - LinkLink. Boiling Water Reactor – Video LinkVideo Link.
Worldwide Commercial Energy Production. Nuclear Power Countries.
Nuclear Power Plant Accidents Reporters: Uyangurin, Mareinne L. Suico, Monica Sharlyn L. Waresa, Daryl Mae B.
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
Chernobyl disaster The worst manmade disaster in human history.
Re-suspension of the radioactive fallout after the Fukushima accident: Risk of internal dose during the first week and the first two months M. Yamauchi,
February 2012 better environment with nuclear energy Nuclear Power: Facts and Fiction Better Environment with Nuclear Energy.
Nuclear Power Plant Meltdown Zach, Luke, and Nick.
FUKISHIMA Nuclear Reactors Radiological Assessment Air Measurement Surveillance AMS March 22,
Radiological Assessment March 22, AMS Summary 2 Ops Summary – Aerial Measurement Systems totaled more than 40 hours of flying Plot interpretation.
Fukushima Power Plant – Japan Post March 11, 2011
Agenda Background Update on Fukushima Daini Update on Fukushima Dai-ichi – Summary of Events at Fukushima Dai-ichi Summary of Radiation and Reports.
The Curious Absence of New Nuclear Michael Hoeger Presented 02/06/2012.
Radiological Assessment April 4, AMS Summary Ops Summary – Aerial Measuring Systems have totaled more than 221 flight hours in support of aerial.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 7, 2011.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 18, 2011.
Nuclear Power Plant How A Nuclear Reactor Works.
Grab binders & handouts, begin the Do Now
Nuclear Power. Generators Generators produce electricity by spinning a coil of wire (solenoid) in front of permanent magnets. The part of a generator.
A BRIGHT SPOT AFTER A YEAR OF BAD NEWS FOLLOWING JAPAN’S MARCH 11, 2011 CATASTROPHE February 2, 2012 Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction,
A LTERNATIVE ENERGY : NUCLEAR Group 4 Bar Shida Keane.
Short how nuclear plant works how nuclear power works.
MEHB 513 Introduction on nuclear technology assignment GROUP MEMBERS:ID: SEEH CHONG CHIN ME YEE QIAN WAHME TING DING PINGME LIM JIA YINGME
Wed/Thurs Dec 3-4 Objective: Calculate the radiation exposure of different people. Checkpoint: How much radiation (in mSv) is a cancer risk? How much radiation.
The Price and Promise of Nuclear Science Nuclear radiation has it’s good points and it’s bad points.
Enhancing Safety at America’s Nuclear Energy Facilities U.S. Industry’s Fukushima Response Joseph Pollock, Nuclear Energy Institute Christopher H. Mudrick,
FROM CHERNOBYL TO FUKUSIMA. Lesson Objectives  foster lexical and grammar skills;  develop comparison-contrast strategies;  activate scanning and monologue.
The March 2011 Earthquake and Tsunami in Japan: A Nuclear Perspective Mary Lou Dunzik-Gougar, PhD Associate Chair of Nuclear Engineering and Health Physics.
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response April 20, 2011.
Nuclear Power.
Fukushima Daiichi Jourdan Robbins 12/6/ /16/16.
Current Events -- week of March
FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NUCLEAR DISASTER Organizational accident analysis
9.5 Nuclear Power Although nuclear power does not come from a fossil fuel, it is fueled by uranium, which is obtained from mining and is non-renewable.
Triple Disaster! Japan 2011.
Nuclear power stations
Background Radiation.
Chernobyl disaster The worst manmade disaster in human history
Nuclear Power.
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions
Fukushima Lessons Learned
Nuclear Power.
Moving Forward From Fukushima Near-Term Task Force EP Recommendations
Nuclear Reactor Chernobyl Disaster.
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response
Fission and Fukushima part 1 Gordon J
Radiological Assessment March 22, 2011
Presentation transcript:

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program Impact and Radiation Effects Resulting from the Nuclear Events in Japan The Foundation for Nuclear Studies Rayburn 2325 April 1, :00 AM Mark Pierson Associate Professor 1

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program Fukushima Dai-ichi 2 Source: Nuclear Energy Institute

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program  Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plants were designed to withstand an 8.0 earthquake and 5.7 meter (18.7 feet) tsunami  Actual earthquake on March 11 was 9.0 and tsunami height estimated at 8 meters (26.2 feet) by NOAA and at 14 meters ( 46 feet) by TEPCO  Backup power sources were located 10 to 13 meters above sea level  Plant withstood the earthquake, but the tsunami caused the extended loss of site power Earthquake and Tsunami 3

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program Japanese Nuclear Event Was Caused by Nature Not Man 4

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program  Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plants were designed to withstand a ground acceleration of about 0.46g  Maximum ground acceleration at the site from the Tohoku earthquake was estimated at 0.52g by TEPCO  U.S. Geologic Survey provisional estimate of ground acceleration was 0.25g  Diablo Canyon is designed for 0.75g peak ground acceleration and San Onofre for 0.67g Ground Acceleration 5

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program  To prevent escape of radioactivity, multiple barriers are used to block passage to the surrounding population: Principle of Multiple Barriers 6 Fuel Cladding Reactor Vessel/Closed coolant system Containment building Site location Evacuation

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program On-Site Barriers 7

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program Mark 1 BWR Containment 8 Source: NEI Mark 1 Containment Report

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program  Japanese settled on a 20 km (12.5 mi) evacuation zone and for those within 30 km (19 mi) to stay indoors  U.S. has a 10 mi Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) around its nuclear power plants that would be evacuated with a 50 mi monitoring zone around the plant  Japanese have since recommended those within 30 km to leave as it was hard to get needed services to them Evacuation Zones 9

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program  NRC is being prudent to have all U.S. citizens evacuate a 50 mi zone around Fukushima as they do not need to be there  This was not a recommendation that the Japanese should evacuate all of their population within 50 mi  Japan is already overburdened with refugees  Similarly, U.S. Navy has evacuated all dependents and unnecessary people from its Tokyo base and sent its ships to sea Evacuation Zones 10

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program  Most of the fission products released are particulates  Hence, most will “fallout” to the ground within a 30 mile radius  Need a large explosion and fire to carry particles high into the atmosphere to be carried around the globe (a.k.a. Chernobyl)  Concentration of the particles is significantly diluted by the time they would reach the U.S. Evacuation Zones 11

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program  Need redundant and reliable power sources to handle a prolonged station blackout  Backup generators (many U.S. plants have these)  Underground off-site power cables  Sustainable fuel sources for diesel generators  Need redundant sources of backup water cooling for the reactor  Japanese resorted to sea water; this should be a last resort, but better than nothing if that is all that is left  More steam-driven and diesel-driven pumps Lessons Learned 12

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program  Need redundant sources of water for spent fuel pool  After 9/11, U.S. took a hard look at large site disasters  Significant upgrading of firefighting capability including for spent fuel pool  Example: North Anna Power Station has a diesel-driven fire pump with a fire main that can discharge directly into the spent fuel pool Lessons Learned 13

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program  Need hardened hydrogen vents  After Three Mile Island, U.S. incorporated hardened vents into plants  Consider other methods of burning/removing hydrogen  Note that a hydrogen explosion did occur inside the Three Mile Island Unit 2 containment building, but caused no damage Lessons Learned 14

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program  Need better communications with the public  U.S. learned that lesson from Three Mile Island accident  Public lost confidence in the nuclear utilities as a result  We now see the same effect in Japan Lessons Learned 15

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program  About 180 improvements were implemented in U.S. after Three Mile Island Accident  A significant review of all nuclear plants was conducted following 9/11 for security aspects and large site-wide disasters  Expect only a handful of changes as a result of the Japanese nuclear accident U.S. Nuclear Plants Remain Very Safe 16

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program  Short-term effort at 30, 60, and 90 days  Longer-term review to start within 90 days and to report out within 6 months of starting  Absolutely no reason to place a moratorium on new construction plants  Newer plants are already safer and better designed  NRC will still have time to look at incorporating any lessons learned into these plants Two-Pronged Review by U.S. NRC 17

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program  Units of effective radiation dose  U.S. unit is the rem or millirem (1 mrem = rem)  International unit is the Sievert, milliSievert, or microSievert  1 mSv = Sv  1 μSv = mSv = Sv  Multiply Sieverts by 100 to obtain rem  Divide mSv by 10 to obtain rem Let’s Talk About Radiation 18

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program Annual Radiation Limits 19 U.S. UnitsInternational Units Member of Population 100 mrem1 mSv Occupational Worker 5 rem50 mSv In Emergency Only25 rem250 mSv

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program Linear No Threshold Model 20

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program Average Dose in U.S. is 620 mREM/year 21

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program  200 mrem/yr from Radon in your home  4 mrem from round trip airline flight from NYC to LA  200 to 400 mrem/yr for flight crews  10 mrem typical chest x-ray  1000 mrem = 1 rem from torso CT scan  30 mrem from food and water consumed throughout the year  100 mrem from a mammogram Radiation Perspective 22 We are showered in radiation daily

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program  Radioactivity limit for I-131 is 1 pCi/ml in water  A typical banana has 540 pCi, eating one-a-day could yield about 3 mrem/yr  Traces of I-131 detected in rain water and milk in U.S. have been well below limits  Impact to the U.S. population from the radioactivity released in Japan is essentially nonexistent  No known effects from radioactivity released during Three Mile Island accident to those within 50 mi Radioactivity 23

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program  Do not buy potassium iodide pills  Do NOT take potassium iodide in the U.S. due to radioactivity released by the Japanese nuclear plants  KI is a drug and may have side effects  There is no benefit Potassium Iodide (KI) 24

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program Questions ? 25