Clearwater River Habitat/Bioassessment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lawyer Creek Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project presented by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
Advertisements

Information Needs for the Integrated F&W Program (ESA and Power Act) Jim Geiselman - BPA.
Riparian Thinning: Logic Paths for Silvicultural Prescriptions
Yakama Nation Pacific Lamprey Recovery Project Core Data And Monitoring Framework.
Watershed Watch Protocols Level I. Goals for this module Understand how biomonitoring is used to evaluate the health of a stream Understand how biomonitoring.
Riparian Zone Habitat Assessment Vegetation and More.
Monty Porter - Streams/Rivers Monitoring Coordinator Jason Childress – Biological Team Leader Oklahoma Water Resources Board (OWRB) Water Quality Programs.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Macroinvertebrates and Bioassessment: Using Biological Indicators to Measure Stream Health Caitlin Chaffee URI Cooperative Extension.
Watershed System Physical Properties Stream flow (cfs) Stream Channel Pattern Substrate Chemical Properties pH Dissolved Oxygen Temperature Nutrients Turbidity.
Habitat Assessment Developed by Ken Cooke Kentucky Division of Water Watershed Watch Program Coordinator Modified by Mike Kemp Professor of Environmental.
Final stuff: n Lab practical –Coleoptera, Hemiptera n Final exam: Fri May 2:15 –Assessment with Invertebrates n Lecture material (IDEM protocol) n.
MCDEP’s Database Conversion Overview Benthic MonitoringFish Monitoring Rapid Habitat Geomorphology Physchem Herpetofauna Spring MonitoringSummer Monitoring.
Lewis Creek Reach M19 Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3.
Common Monitoring Parameters. Step 1 Consider purpose/objectives of monitoring Assess use attainment Characterize watershed Identify pollutants and sources.
A landscape perspective of stream food webs: Exploring cumulative effects and defining biotic thresholds.
Bioassessment 1.0. Stream Visual Assessment Protocol 1. Turbidity 2. Plant growth 3. Channel Condition 4. Channel Flow Alteration 5. Percent Embeddedness.
Watershed Assessment (ENSC 202)
Rapid Bioassessment Protocol (RBP). Background to RBP changes in community/assemblage composition used to evaluate existence and degree of impact.
Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research Program Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research.
“Habitat Assessment Using the QHEI “ Edward T. Rankin June 6 City of Columbus, Level 3 Training Course Columbus, Ohio Senior ResearchScientist
River Ecosystem Assessment Group 2 Josh Parenti Josh Parenti Tristan Bond Tristan Bond Brady Russell Brady Russell Laura Kingsbury Laura Kingsbury Robert.
Ecology and environment, inc. International Specialists in the Environment The McKinstry Creek & Riparian Area NYSDOT Rt. 219 Mitigation Project Analysis.
Hydrosapiens GIV eSAT of Vermont: Water Group 2013 Ben DeJong, Nina Brundage, Caitlin Beaudet, Julie Rickner, Mariah Ollive, Hannah VanGuilder, Heather.
Presented by Insert your name, title, and district Lower Hudson Coalition of Conservation Districts Volunteer Streamwalk Program Developed by the Westchester.
To what extent is there excess sediment in the Middle Truckee River that impairs aquatic life use? Application of benthic macroinvertebrate bioassessment.
Nevada Bioassessment Program Statewide & on the Truckee River Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Quality Planning Karen Vargas.
Habitat Presentation 1 Phil Kaufmann --- USEPA, Corvallis, OR
STREAM ECOSYSTEMS.
Materials Transport & NSCD Material Classes Velocity to Transport Relationships York NSCD Restoration PSY CCREP.
Channel Modification Washington Dept. Forestry, 2004, Channel Modification Techniques Katie Halvorson.
CALIFORNIA’S BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PROGRAM April 5, 2005 Jim Harrington WPCL Bioassessment Laboratory.
Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment.
Final stuff: n Lab practical: Apr 29 n Final exam: due Fri May 2:15.
Development of a Southeastern Reference Stream Monitoring Network Debbie Arnwine Water Resources, TDEC
Kentucky’s comprehensive Water Monitoring and Assessment Program addresses water quality management objectives outlined in the Clean Water Act, as well.
The Importance of Professionally Trained Citizen Monitors For California Bioassessment Jim Harrington WPCL Bioassessment Laboratory.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
 Sustainability Master Plan  Effect of Runoff on Stream  Negative Effect on Lake Carnegie  Final Pre-Restoration Assessment  Why this first order.
Fish Assemblages of the Wabash River Mark Pyron. Wabash River Fishes 1.Large river 2.High diversity 3.History of human impact 4.Fish assemblages respond.
Stream macroinvertebrate responses to landscape variables; an evaluation of rapid bioassessment techniques using a statistical modeling approach. Declan.
Biological Assessment Developed by Ken Cooke Kentucky Division of Water Watershed Watch Program Coordinator Modified by Mike Kemp Professor of Environmental.
Stream Ecosystem Assessment Group 1 Camp Caesar August 2003.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Identifying Changes to Stream Condition caused by Urbanization How understanding the responses can improve ecological risk characterization
Comparison of Benthic Invertebrate Communities Upstream and Downstream of Proposed Culvert Installations in Alabama Amy C. Gill USGS, Alabama Water Science.
National Monitoring Conference May 7-11, 2006
Habitat Mapping of High Level Indicators at Multiple Scales for Fish and Wildlife.
Water Assessment Data Lab Assignment # 5 Land Use The first thing you notice when field sampling is the area around your site. What type of land use.
PCWA Study Plan Physical Habitat Characterization Study Plan –Geomorphology Study Plan –Riparian Habitat Mapping Study Plan –Aquatic Habitat Characterization.
Detecting Ecological Effects of Development in the Wappingers and Fishkill Watersheds Karin Limburg, Karen Stainbrook, Bongghi Hong SUNY College of Environmental.
Case Study Development of an Index of Biotic Integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highland Region McCormick et al
New Mexico Watershed Watch Your school name and river name This project funded by the NM Dept. Of Game & Fish and the Sports Fish Restoration Program.
Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index Bradley Hansen John Nieber Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering For BBE 4535/5535 Fall 2011.
Middle Fork Project AQ 3 – Macroinvertebrate and Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report Overview May 5, 2008.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
Dr. Thomas Hardy Chief Science Officer River Systems Institute Texas State University.
Effects of Stream Restoration: A Comparative Study of Pine Run in Felton, Pennsylvania Luke Mummert, Department of Biological Sciences, York College of.
EVALUATING STREAM COMPENSATION PERFORMANCE: Overcoming the Data Deficit Through Standardized Study Design Kenton L. Sena (EPA VSFS Intern), Joe Morgan,
Watershed Health Indicators
River Vocabulary Science 1.
KENTUCKY WATERSHED WATCH HIGH GRADIENT STREAM HABITAT ASSESSMENT
J. M. C. K Jayawardhana1, W. D. T. M Gunawardhana 1, E. P
Henrico County Stream Assessment / Watershed Management Program
Stream Geomorphic Assessment of Allen Brook
Water Testing Project for the North Fork River
Module 10/11 Stream Surveys
Streams Hydrodynamics
IBI’s: How It’s Done.
IBI’s: An Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Clearwater River Habitat/Bioassessment By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red Lake Watershed District

Clearwater River Habitat/Bioassessment The Clearwater Nonpoint Study identified a need for a detailed habitat/bioassessment on the Clearwater River Sampling completed in August 2003 Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) Scores a 100 meter reach of a river based upon a set of standardized metrics Different Types of IBIs Fish Macroinvertebrate Habitat

Methods Used EPA Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish Barbour, M.T., J.Gerritsen, B.D. Snyder, and J.B. Stribling. 1999

Site Selection More targeted than probabilistic. Sites were associated with water quality monitoring stations and access points along the river. Sites needed to be wadeable Reaches were located upstream of bridges in order to minimize (although arguably not eliminate) the influence of the bridge. 100 ft between starting point of reach and the bridge.

Site Selection For this study, tried to pick some sites that were minimally impacted, such as sites 3 and 4 in the NLF ecoregion, 6 in the NCHF ecoregion, as well as 14 and 15 in the RRV ecoregion Some sites on channelized sections of the river were picked to show the effect of channelization on habitat and aquatic life

Fish Sampling Backpack electrofishers Fish identified, weighed, and counted in the field

Fish Sampling Scores based upon Number of natives Number of native darters Number of native sunfish Number of native suckers Number of intolerants Percentage of tolerants Percentage of omnivores Percentage of insectivores Percentage of piscivores Percentage of hybrids Percentage of abnormalities catch rate

Fish Results

Clearwater River Habitat/Bioassessment Macroinvertebrates D-Frame Nets Same area sampled at each site (# of jabs) Habitat types sampled proportionally Riffles Woody Debris Vegetation Samples preserved in 99% Isopropyl Alcohol Sorted, Counted, Identified

Clearwater River Habitat/Bioassessment Habitat Assessment Scores based on 10 metrics Epifaunal substrate Embeddedness Velocity/depth regime sediment depostion channel flow status channel alteration frequency of riffles or bends bank stability vegetative protection riparian vegetative zone width

Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet

Habitat Assessment Results

Physical Characterization Watershed Features Predominant land use, NPS pollution, local erosion Riparian Vegetation In-stream Features Reach length, width, area, depth, velocity, canopy Large Woody Debris (cubic meters) Aquatic Vegetation Water Quality Temp, Cond, Do, pH, Turbidity, odors, oils Sediment/Substrate Odors, deposits, oils, inorganic and organic components

Clearwater River Habitat/Bioassessment – Zooplankton Sampling Plankton Net Preserved with 99% Isopropyl Alcohol Analyzed by MNDNR Aquatic Invertebrate Biology Lab

Clearwater River Habitat/Bioassessment – Vegetation Mapping

Positive and Negative aspects of Methods Used Positives Standard Available, easy to understand Results comparable if same methods are used Repeatable – sites are easy to locate Negatives Habitat assessment open to subjectivity, personal judgements on %’s Subsampling of macroinvertebrates can exclude species that don’t occur in abundance such as Nepidae and Belostomatidae Metrics used may differ among IBI studies Differing techniques of samplers could effect results

Reference Condition Discussion The presence of a bridge may technically rule out the use of any of our sites as reference sites, but the data can be used to find areas in which reference sites may be found (upstream of reaches that scored well in this study) There were some reaches where the bridge downstream of the reach was the only anthropogenic factor “impacting” the stream Is there an acceptable buffer between a monitored reach and impoundments, bridge areas, and large tributary confluences? Do bridges affect some IBI types more than others (fish more than macroinvertebrates and habitat)?

The End Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red Lake Watershed District 218-681-5800 coreyh@wiktel.com