Interaction between EIA and Articles 6.3 and 6.4 of Habitats Directive Yvonne Scannell Law School, Trinity College, Dublin Arthur Cox, Solicitors, Dublin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Legal issues on shale gas activities raised in petitions received by the European Parliament Committee on Petitions.
Advertisements

1 European Commission, DGENV.D. 3 Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive 2001/42/EC on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes.
Joint Aarhus Convention/Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety workshop on public awareness, access to information and public participation regarding living modified.
European Commission: Environment Directorate General Slide: 1 EC Environmental Liability Directive (ELD) Training course in European and International.
1 Strategic Environmental Assessment and SFs Operational Programmes: An assessment Jonathan Parker DG ENV ENVIRONMENT EUROPEAN COMMISSION Aarhus Workshop.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Scoping.
Sources of Law Dr Y Scannell. Different kinds of law International European Domestic or Irish law Common law – the law made by the courts throughout the.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SEA Jamie Byfield SEA Technical Officer HRA & EIA Cara Davidson Policy Manager.
1 CEER How to balance the public’s concerns and critical infrastructure construction Matti Vainio, Deputy HoU DG ENV – C.5, European Commission.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
Secretariat to the Espoo Convention and its Protocol on SEA
Jerzy Jendrośka The EIA Directive in the case law of CJEU INTERACTION BETWEEN THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND THE NATURE DIRECTIVES ACADEMY OF.
Natura 2000 Environmental assessment Anna Liro. Impact Assessment according to Art. 6 (3) Any plan or project not directly connected with or necessary.
The SEA Directive – Implications, Obligations, Strengths and Weaknesses Workshop SEA in Practice Malta, 11 November 2011 Louis Meuleman Unit Cohesion Policy.
Jerzy Jendrośka Introduction to the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Directives INTERACTION BETWEEN.
Implementing the Second Pillar of the Aarhus Convention: Problems Identified in the National Implementation Reports Magda Tóth Nagy, Senior Expert Geneva,
UNECE and OSCE joint event, Almaty, May 2012
The Aarhus & Espoo Conventions Making implementation work for stakeholders.
Legal instruments for site protection in the EU Boris Barov, BSPB/BirdLife Bulgaria.
Organ, body, authority Prof. Gyula Bándi. A reference to the competent organ or body, particularly to the competent authority, are part of legal regulation.
Article 9, paras.1 and 2 of the Aarhus Convention: overview “IMPLEMENTING THE AARHUS CONVENTION TODAY: PAVING THE WAY TO A BETTER ENVIRONMENT AND GOVERNANCE.
IRM Compliance Review VLORË THERMAL POWER GENERATION PROJECT April 2008.
European Commission Biodiversity and Nature Conservation in the EU today – Business & Biodiversity Alexandra Vakrou, EC, DG Environment IEF European Roundtable.
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
Compensation in Bulgarian Law Where are we ? KONSTANTIN ILCHEV.
Kavala Workshop 1-2 June 2006 Legal protection of Transitional Waters [in the Cadses area]: A comparative analysis Dr. Petros Patronos / Dr. Liliana Maslarova.
Jerzy Jendrośka Energy security and legal requirements for environmental protection, public involvement and transboundary co-operation Scientific support.
Presentation on the application of the restrictions on access to environmental information provided by article 4 (4) (d)-(f) of the Convention (agenda.
LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS IN NATURE CONSERVATION AND HABITATS LAW IN 2011 Margaret Austin 29 March 2012.
Prof. Dr. G. Van Hoorick Faculty of Law – Department of Administrative and Environmental Law pag. 1 COMPENSATORY MEASURES IN EUROPEAN NATURE CONSERVATION.
Environmental Impact Assessment of public and private projects EIA Directive 85/337/EEC as amended by 97/11/EC and 2003/35/EC Recent developments Laura.
Consultation seminar on the preparation of full Application Form for LSP 6 December 2011, Tartu Consultation seminar on the preparation of full Application.
The European SEA Directive Simon Marsden School of International Business, University of South Australia Module 1: Basics of SEA.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Recent developments on Access to Justice in environmental matters in Sweden – Joanna Cornelius.
Environmental Impact Assesment and Strategic Environmental Assesment – tools for biodiversity conservation Emilian Burdusel – Clubul ecologic UNESCO Pro.
The Habitats Directive in BANES A (brief) guide to the most commonly encountered legal issues.
Pilot Project on implementation of SEA for regional planning in Ukraine Prof. Dr. Michael Schmidt Dmitry Palekhov Brandenburg University of Technology.
IAIA Conference on international experience & perspectives in SEA, Prague, September 2005 IAIA Conference on international experience & perspectives.
Cases C-401 to 403/12 and C-404 to 405/12: No review of legality in light of the Aarhus Convention Dr. Mariolina Eliantonio, LL.M. Prof. Chris Backes Maastricht.
Jerzy Jendrośka Decisions on proposed activities not listed in annex 1 of the Convention (article 6 paragraph 1 (b) of the Convention) Task Force on Public.
INTERNATIONAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT LAW OCTOBER 29, 2012.
DG ENV Environmental assessment procedures for energy infrastructure projects of common interest (PCIs)
Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context (Espoo, 1991) Task Force on Public Participation in Decision-making Aarhus Convention,
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE The role of EIA and decision-making.
Peter Lukáč Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic Department of Environmental Assessment.
Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, Germany Environment Agency (UBA), Germany Federal Agency for Nature Conservation.
Climate change: Rethinking Restoration
13ZA - Fit for purpose?.
Public Participation in Biofuels Voluntary
EIA approval process, Management plan and Monitoring
Overview of public participation in strategic decision-making in the UNECE area David Aspinwall.
Environmental assessment system in Finland
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
Towards Modern Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in Uzbekistan
Jerzy Jendrośka Transboundary procedures
Nick Bonvoisin Secretary to the Convention on the
Scottish Natural Heritage
EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE
EC GUIDANCE ON IWT AND NATURA 2000 CHAPTER 3
Updating the Article 6 guide Outline of envisaged changes
When and how to best consider the provision of the Habitats directive
Updating of the Article 6 general guide
Overview of Article 6 procedures under the Habitats Directive
PROVISIONS UNDER THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE RELEVANT TO NEEI
Analysis of the notification of compensatory measures
Meeting of PAP/RAC Focal Points, Split, Croatia, 8-9 May 2019
Habitats Protection _Prof Yvonne Scannell 28/06/2019.
Environmental Impact Assessment of public and private projects
Presentation transcript:

Interaction between EIA and Articles 6.3 and 6.4 of Habitats Directive Yvonne Scannell Law School, Trinity College, Dublin Arthur Cox, Solicitors, Dublin

Cf EIA to AA Requires EIA for listed projects only. Can apply to any kind of plan or project big or small- including EIA projects Art.6.3.

Exemptions Exemptions for defence projects, projects adopted by legislation and in exceptional cases EIA Directive, Arts.1.3, 1.4, 2.4. Only exemption is if the plan or programme “is directly connected with or necessary to the management of the site”. Art 6.3

Publication requirements for screening Annex 11 screening decisions to be publicly available and ECJ says reasons must be given for them if requested. No explicit obligation to publish screening decisions but they must be available to requesting third parties. Methological Guidelines say reasoning and decision to be published

SCREENING & MITIGATION Mitigation measures may/must be considered when screening for EIA subject to satisfying certain criteria. Methological Guidelines say no but argued mitigation measures can be considered but criteria for mitigation measures arguably somewhat stricter when screening for AA

Screening tests Environmental features must be likely to be affected to justify requiring EIA Directive, Art.5.1.a If there is a mere probability that the plan or project will have effects, or if there is a risk or doubt re significant effects or it cannot be excluded that there will be significant effects, AA required. Waddenzee, para 45 Pfizer – proportionality principle applies to risk assessment

WHAT HAS TO BE STUDIED? Likely significant effects on the environment as defined in the EIA Directive. Significant effects to be assessed (on all the environment) theoretically very extensive Applies to plans and projects likely to have a significant effect on a site in view of the site’s conservation objectives

CUMULATIVE EFFECTS Applies to cumulative effects of various projects. Applies to cumulative effects of plans or projects either alone or in combination with other plans or projects

QUALITY OF INFORMATION REQUIRED Information required is having regard, inter alia, to “current knowledge and methods of assessment” in so far as it is reasonable to ask developer to provide. Information for assessment to be based on best scientific knowledge. (Requirements “excellence, independence and transparency.”)

Affected environment different for each The environment which will likely be affected may possibly be unknown when the project is proposed. The aspects of the site to be protected will be ascertainable from the conservation objectives specific to the site which reflect the “ecological requirements of the natural habitat types and species in Annex 1 and 11”.

Consultation Public consultation mandatory EIA Directive Arts.4.4, 5.2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11. Aarhus. Public consultation “if appropriate” for Stage 2 Art.6.3. Required if Aarhus applies

Must the assessment be written? No explicit requirement for written assessment of EIS but ECJ implies it English and Irish courts say reasoned decision on conclusions of the AA required.Methological Guidelines say yes.

Outcomes of assessment In principle projects can be authorised even if there are better alternatives. In principle, plans and projects adversely affecting site integrity of site cannot be approved. Article 6.3 Unless ROPI

Alternatives Only alternatives considered need to described but some competent authorities have invented ways of requiring a proper examination of alternatives Project cannot be allowed unless there is NO alternative and unless there are reasons of overriding public interest.

Compensatory measures No obligation on Member State/developer to take compensatory measures if significant adverse effects on the environment. Obligation on Member State “to take all compensatory measures to ensure that the overall coherence of Natura 2000 is protected”

Obligation to consult Commission Obligation to inform Commission of reasons for exemption from EIA under Art.2.4 No obligation to justify negative screenings in Habitats Directive to Commission.

Procedures Procedures for EIS and EIA prescribed in detail No prescribed procedures for AA

Aarhus Convention is part of the acquis Picture of a brown bear!

Transboundary issues EIA Directive requirement to involve other Member States significantly affected by project Aarhus rights of public participation, access to information and access to justice Espoo No requirement in Habitats Directive to involve other MS. But.. Aarhus rights to be implied

Some remedies EIA Directive, Complaint against State to Espoo Compliance committee but..MOX Directive obligations can be enforced in domestic courts Complaint to EU Commission Habitats Anyone in any State party or NGO can complain against another State party to Aarhus Compliance committee Directive obligations can be enforced in domestic courts Complaint to Commission

Publicity for decisions and reasons Obligation to publish screening decision, final decision and reasons and considerations for it. Aarhus and Art 10 A No express requirement to publish decisions but implied. Aarhus

Obligation to implement Aarhus requirements on access to justice EIA Directive, 10A Aarhus doesn’t apply to Habitats but CJEU has stated that it should!

EU Commission No requirement to get Commission’s consent for permitting significant adverse effects on environment Obligation to notify compensatory measures Obligation to get EU Commission’s “opinion” on the reasons of OPI justifying plan or project affecting priority site or priority species. Art.6.4