Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT: MEANS-ENDS DIAGRAMS ACES Workshop 2014 Christy Ihlo,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable Development and Evolution of the Criteria and Indicators.
Advertisements

Marmot Creek Research Basin 50 th Anniversary Workshop March , 2013 John Diiwu Forest Management Branch Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource.
Ecological Systems Maintaining and Enhancing Natural Features and Minimizing Adverse Impacts of Infrastructure Projects Course Review.
River Pathways An Introduction to Riparian Areas.
Ecosystem-based adaptation helps to build the resilience of natural habitat and communities to climate change impacts and thereby reduce their vulnerability.
Fuel Management Objectives within Dry Forest Landscapes on the Okanogan-Wenatchee NF Dr. Richy J. Harrod Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest.
Land. Land Use in the World US Public Lands Types of Forests 1) Old-growth (primary) forests – uncut or regenerated forest not hugely impacted by.
Roles for Commodity Production in Sustaining Forests & Rangelands J. Keith Gilless Professor of Forest Economics UC Berkeley.
Uses of Plants Plant Biology Mr. Dotson. Uses of Plants Food – Although some 3,000 species of plants have been used as food by humans, 90 percent of the.
Science & Monitoring Team Meeting Sept 23rd. Agenda Introductions Overview of CPRW & CO Conservation Exchange Review draft charter/workplan Watershed.
Restoring Ecological Health of America’s Forests Wally Covington Regents’ Professor, School of Forestry and Executive Director, Ecological Restoration.
Fire and Water Dr. Carolyn Hunsaker Pacific Southwest Research Station, Fresno, CA.
Disturbance regimes in restoration ecology: novel effects and ecological complexity Sarah Marcinko November 11, 2005.
 Timber, wood fiber, fuel wood  Gas regulation and climate control  Carbon sequestration  Watershed services (water supply and quality)  Clean air.
Ecosystem Services Analysis Tues, Jan ES 281.
Range Practices 1 Objectives and Range Practices under FRPA & Objectives & Objectives The Focus is on Results.
Most Common Conservation Practices Forestry Illinois.
Stimson Lumber Company’s Fee Land Management System
Adaptation The evidence for the role of using protected areas in ecosystem-based adaptation strategies sue stolton equilibrium research.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Srdjan Stankovic, PhD student
A Campaign for Forest Management. FUEL FOR THOUGHT Forest Density has Increased 30% Since 1953 Forest Mortality at a 50 Year High 73.5% of NFS Lands Need.
Dr. Howard Nelson Biodiversity Specialist Ministry of Planning, Housing and the Environment Trinidad and Tobago.
Eftec Economics for the Environment Consultancy Using ecosystem services for cost benefit analysis of forestry decisions Roundtable on Cost / Benefit of.
The Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
Managing and Protecting Forests.   More than a third of the land in the U.S. consists of publicly owned national forests, resource lands, parks, wildlife.
National Forest Projects West Virginia GIS Conference June 7 – 10, 2010 Huntington, WV Marshall University West Virginia GIS Conference June 7 – 10, 2010.
Starter – Define the following words using your textbook: Pulpwood Hardwood Conifers Evergreen Deciduous Softwood Veneer Forest Silviculture.
1. Natural Resources Conservation Service Strategic Plan Strategic Plan
The Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com ASSESSMENT.
Montana Forest Stewardship “Empowerment of Forest Owners through Personal Involvement”
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Investment in Sustainable Natural Resource Management (focus: Agriculture) increases in agricultural productivity have come in part at the expense of deterioration.
The Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com.
Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com The Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook LINKING.
The Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com.
The Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com.
Impacts from a warming climate can cascade downstream Increase fire intensity Increase erosion and sedimentation Decrease summer flows and increase stream.
The Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com.
Forestry and Resource Management
Fire in Florida. Themes l The Natural Role of Fire in Florida l Two Kinds of Fire in Florida l Prescribed Fire l Protecting Florida Homes from Fire.
Fig. 10-4, p. 193 Support energy flow and chemical cycling Reduce soil erosion Absorb and release water Purify water and air Influence local and regional.
Sharon Stanton & FIA National Indicator Leads RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENHANCED FOREST INDICATORS.
Forestry Chapter 10.
Land, Public and Private Chapter 10. Human Activities Affecting Land and Environment  Extensive logging – mudslides  Deforestation – climate change.
Integrating Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity Conservation Dick Cameron Senior Conservation Planner The Nature Conservancy, California Program 1.
George Peacock, Team Leader Grazing Lands Technology Development Team Central National Technology Support Center 2010 Southern Regional Cooperative Soil.
WESTAR Critical Loads Workshop: Summing Up Ira Domsky, Deputy Director Arizona Depart of Environmental Quality November 16, 2005.
Alachua County Forever Timber Harvesting Business Plan June 28, 2011.
Agenda item 4.B Green Infrastructure CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature 8 th meeting – 22/06/10.
Ron Torgerson – FFSL Central Area Manager Nick Mustoe – Central Area Forester Fred Johnson – Fire Management Officer.
So to review, for a disease to have an impact on a forest three elements must be present. These are …
Land, Public and Private. Human Activities Affecting Land and Environment  Extensive logging – mudslides  Deforestation – climate change  Paving –
State of Natural Resources Report Ruth Jenkins. Sustainable management of natural resources State of Natural Resources Report (SoNaRR) State of Natural.
World Land Use Types of Protected Lands Department of the Interior: Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Forests.
Restoration Under a Future Climate Understanding and managing climate change effects on federal lands Dr. Cynthia West, Director Office of Sustainability.
Recap from the 2005 workshop, “Managing Northern Spotted Owl Habitat in Dry Forest Ecosystems” Silvicultural Practices Supporting Northern Spotted Owl.
Forestry Part 4.
23rd London Group Meeting San Jose Costa Rica, th October 2017
Chapter 17 Land Resources.
Mapping and assessment of ecosystem and their services
Nick Grayson – Climate Change & Sustainability Manager
DG Environment, Nature Protection Unit (D3)
Green Infrastructure and Natura 2000
Communication on Green Infrastructure
Responding to Changing Climate Washington State Department of Ecology
a) Thematic presentations: part 1: biophysical benefits
Floodplains: important ecosystems and mitigators of flood risks
Presentation transcript:

Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT: MEANS-ENDS DIAGRAMS ACES Workshop 2014 Christy Ihlo, MEM Research Assistant, Ecosystem Services Program Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions Duke University The Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook

Linking Management, Project, or Policy Choices to Ecosystem Service Provision Means-Ends Diagrams National Ecosystem Services Partnership Christy M. Ihlo, Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions at Duke University

What Are Means-Ends Diagrams?  Visual mapping tools  AKA path models, influence diagrams, causal chains, and belief networks  In the FRMES guidebook, they assess how management, project, or policy options change the provision of ecosystem services through ecological pathways

Management alternatives or project options Alternatives matrix comparing options Set of desired outcomes and key indicators Data on actions and outcomes How Do Means-Ends Fit Into the Framework?

What Are the Means and the Ends? M EANS : management, project, or policy choices (at various locations) E NDS : what people care about (ecosystem services)

How Are These Diagrams Useful?  Identify the cascade of ecological interactions caused by a management, project, or policy  Identify indicators to measure those changes  Provide a visual representation of benefits and tradeoffs  Show analysis steps and data/models needed  Highlight what is known and not known integrating data and models

How Do They Enable Comparisons? Ecosystem Service Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Service 1IncreaseDecrease Service 2DecreaseIncrease Service 3Increase Service 4IncreaseDecrease Service 5Decrease Alternative 1 Ecological Changes Ecosystem Service 1 Ecosystem Service 2 Ecosystem Service 3 Ecosystem Service 4 Ecosystem Service 5 Alternative 2 Ecological Changes Ecosystem Service 1 Ecosystem Service 2 Ecosystem Service 3 Ecosystem Service 4 Ecosystem Service 5 But what about space? Isn’t spatial context important?

Considering Space Nelson et al. 2009

Creating Means-Ends Diagrams

Hypothetical Example POTENTIAL MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES ALT. 1ALT. 2ALT. 3ALT. 4ALT. 5ALT. 6 Mechanical Thinning Prescribed Burning Mechanical Thinning Prescribed Burning Chemical Cheatgrass Removal (Site A - Lowland) (Site B - Upland) (Site C)(Site D) Fuel conditions result in a low threat to community Visibility and healthy air maintained Riparian areas resilient to fire Hunting/wildlife watching opportunities improved Hiking/camping opportunities maintained Timber harvest sustained Habitats/species protected Task: reduce risk of catastrophic wildfire to urban areas and improve air quality

Hypothetical Example POTENTIAL MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES ALT. 1ALT. 2ALT. 3ALT. 4ALT. 5ALT. 6 Mechanical Thinning Prescribed Burning Mechanical Thinning Prescribed Burning Chemical Cheatgrass Removal (Site A - Lowland) (Site B - Upland) (Site C)(Site D) Fuel conditions result in a low threat to community Visibility and healthy air maintained Riparian areas resilient to fire Hunting/wildlife watching opportunities improved Hiking/camping opportunities maintained Timber harvest sustained Habitats/species protected Task: reduce risk of catastrophic wildfire to urban areas and improve air quality

Hypothetical Example POTENTIAL MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES ALT. 1ALT. 2ALT. 3ALT. 4ALT. 5ALT. 6 Mechanical Thinning Prescribed Burning Mechanical Thinning Prescribed Burning Chemical Cheatgrass Removal (Site A - Lowland) (Site B - Upland) (Site C)(Site D) Fuel conditions result in a low threat to community Visibility and healthy air maintained Riparian areas resilient to fire Hunting/wildlife watching opportunities improved Hiking/camping opportunities maintained Timber harvest sustained Habitats/species protected Task: reduce risk of catastrophic wildfire to urban areas and improve air quality

Hypothetical Example Task: reduce risk of catastrophic wildfire to urban areas and improve air quality POTENTIAL MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES ALT. 1ALT. 2ALT. 3ALT. 4ALT. 5ALT. 6 Mechanical Thinning Prescribed Burning Mechanical Thinning Prescribed Burning Chemical Cheatgrass Removal (Site A - Lowland) (Site B - Upland) (Site C)(Site D) Fuel conditions result in a low threat to community Visibility and healthy air maintained Riparian areas resilient to fire Hunting/wildlife watching opportunities improved Hiking/camping opportunities maintained Timber harvest sustained Habitats/species protected

Hypothetical Example POTENTIAL MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES ALT. 1ALT. 2ALT. 3ALT. 4ALT. 5ALT. 6 Mechanical Thinning Prescribed Burning Mechanical Thinning Prescribed Burning Chemical Cheatgrass Removal (Site A - Lowland) (Site B - Upland) (Site C)(Site D) Fuel conditions result in a low threat to community Visibility and healthy air maintained Riparian areas resilient to fire Hunting/wildlife watching opportunities improved Hiking/camping opportunities maintained Timber harvest sustained Habitats/species protected Task: reduce risk of catastrophic wildfire to urban areas and improve air quality

Building a Means-Ends Diagram M ANAGEMENT A LTERNATIVE Mechanical Thinning (Site A – Lowland) E COLOGICAL C HANGES Respiratory Health Reduction of Fire Risk Camping Hiking Recreational Hunting Wildlife Watching Biodiversity Existence Timber Commuter Visibility Building a Means-Ends Diagram Increase Decrease Increase or Decrease E COSYSTEM S ERVICES

Building a Means-Ends Diagram M ANAGEMENT A LTERNATIVE Mechanical Thinning (Site A – Lowland) E COLOGICAL C HANGES FireAir Quality Respiratory Health Reduction of Fire Risk Camping Hiking Recreational Hunting Wildlife Watching Biodiversity Existence Timber Commuter Visibility Building a Means-Ends Diagram Increase Decrease Increase or Decrease E COSYSTEM S ERVICES

Building a Means-Ends Diagram M ANAGEMENT A LTERNATIVE Mechanical Thinning (Site A – Lowland) E COLOGICAL C HANGES Forest StructureFireAir Quality Respiratory Health Reduction of Fire Risk Camping Hiking Recreational Hunting Wildlife Watching Biodiversity Existence Timber Commuter Visibility Increase Decrease Increase or Decrease Building a Means-Ends Diagram E COSYSTEM S ERVICES

Building a Means-Ends Diagram M ANAGEMENT A LTERNATIVE Mechanical Thinning (Site A – Lowland) E COLOGICAL C HANGES Understory Density Horizontal Connectivity Total Forest Area Forest Structure Fire Severity (% Mortality) Fire Return Interval Fire Burnt Area Fire Particulates Visibility Air Quality Respiratory Health Reduction of Fire Risk Camping Hiking Recreational Hunting Wildlife Watching Biodiversity Existence Timber Commuter Visibility Increase Decrease Increase or Decrease Building a Means-Ends Diagram E COSYSTEM S ERVICES

Building a Means-Ends Diagram M ANAGEMENT A LTERNATIVE Mechanical Thinning (Site A – Lowland) E COLOGICAL C HANGES Understory Density Horizontal Connectivity Total Forest Area Forest Structure Fire Severity (% Mortality) Fire Return Interval Fire Burnt Area Fire Particulates Visibility Air Quality Habitat Suitability Contiguous Habitat Area Terr. Sp. Habitats Population Estimates Terr. Sp. Pop. Respiratory Health Reduction of Fire Risk Camping Hiking Recreational Hunting Wildlife Watching Biodiversity Existence Timber Commuter Visibility Increase Decrease Increase or Decrease Building a Means-Ends Diagram E COSYSTEM S ERVICES

Building a Means-Ends Diagram M ANAGEMENT A LTERNATIVE Mechanical Thinning (Site A – Lowland) E COLOGICAL C HANGES Understory Density Horizontal Connectivity Total Forest Area Forest Structure Soil Compaction Litter Depth Forest Floor Structure Fire Severity (% Mortality) Fire Return Interval Fire Burnt Area Fire Particulates Visibility Air Quality Habitat Suitability Contiguous Habitat Area Terr. Sp. Habitats Outbreak Susceptibility Outbreak Area Outbreak Intensity Pests/Pathogens Population Estimates Terr. Sp. Pop. Respiratory Health Reduction of Fire Risk Camping Hiking Recreational Hunting Wildlife Watching Biodiversity Existence Timber Commuter Visibility Increase Decrease Increase or Decrease Building a Means-Ends Diagram E COSYSTEM S ERVICES

Building a Means-Ends Diagram M ANAGEMENT A LTERNATIVE Mechanical Thinning (Site A – Lowland) E COLOGICAL C HANGES Understory Density Horizontal Connectivity Total Forest Area Forest Structure Soil Compaction Litter Depth Forest Floor Structure Fire Severity (% Mortality) Fire Return Interval Fire Burnt Area Fire Particulates Visibility Air Quality Habitat Suitability Contiguous Habitat Area Terr. Sp. Habitats Outbreak Susceptibility Outbreak Area Outbreak Intensity Pests/Pathogens Population Estimates Terr. Sp. Pop. Sediment Load Water Quality Runoff Erosion Potential Respiratory Health Reduction of Fire Risk Camping Hiking Recreational Hunting Wildlife Watching Biodiversity Existence Fishing Timber Commuter Visibility Habitat Suitability Aq. Sp. Habitat Population Estimates Fish Populations Increase Decrease Increase or Decrease Building a Means-Ends Diagram E COSYSTEM S ERVICES

Building a Means-Ends Diagram M ANAGEMENT A LTERNATIVE Mechanical Thinning (Site A – Lowland) E COLOGICAL C HANGES Understory Density Horizontal Connectivity Total Forest Area Forest Structure Soil Compaction Litter Depth Forest Floor Structure Fire Severity (% Mortality) Fire Return Interval Fire Burnt Area Fire Standing Carbon Stocks Rate of Carbon Seq. Carbon Seq. in Forest Products Carbon Particulates Visibility Air Quality Habitat Suitability Contiguous Habitat Area Terr. Sp. Habitats Outbreak Susceptibility Outbreak Area Outbreak Intensity Pests/Pathogens Population Estimates Terr. Sp. Pop. Water Volume Water Timing (Consistency) Water Yield Sediment Load Water Quality Runoff Erosion Potential Respiratory Health Reduction of Fire Risk Climate Stability Camping Hiking Recreational Hunting Wildlife Watching Biodiversity Existence Boating Fishing Timber Commuter Visibility Habitat Suitability Aq. Sp. Habitat Population Estimates Fish Populations Increase Decrease Increase or Decrease Building a Means-Ends Diagram E COSYSTEM S ERVICES

Building a Means-Ends Diagram M ANAGEMENT A LTERNATIVE Mechanical Thinning (Site A – Lowland) E COLOGICAL C HANGES Understory Density Horizontal Connectivity Total Forest Area Forest Structure Soil Compaction Litter Depth Forest Floor Structure Fire Severity (% Mortality) Fire Return Interval Fire Burnt Area Fire Standing Carbon Stocks Rate of Carbon Seq. Carbon Seq. in Forest Products Carbon Particulates Visibility Air Quality Habitat Suitability Contiguous Habitat Area Terr. Sp. Habitats Outbreak Susceptibility Outbreak Area Outbreak Intensity Pests/Pathogens Population Estimates Terr. Sp. Pop. Water Volume Water Timing (Consistency) Water Yield Sediment Load Water Quality Runoff Erosion Potential Respiratory Health Reduction of Fire Risk Climate Stability Camping Hiking Recreational Hunting Wildlife Watching Biodiversity Existence Boating Fishing Timber E COSYSTEM S ERVICES Commuter Visibility Habitat Suitability Aq. Sp. Habitat Population Estimates Fish Populations Increase Decrease Increase or Decrease Building a Means-Ends Diagram

Qualitative versus Quantitative Diagrams

Building a Means-Ends Diagram M ANAGEMENT A LTERNATIVE Mechanical Thinning (Site A – Lowland) E COLOGICAL C HANGES Understory Density Horizontal Connectivity Total Forest Area Forest Structure Soil Compaction Litter Depth Forest Floor Structure Fire Severity (% Mortality) Fire Return Interval Fire Burnt Area Fire Standing Carbon Stocks Rate of Carbon Seq. Carbon Seq. in Forest Products Carbon Particulates Visibility Air Quality Habitat Suitability Contiguous Habitat Area Terr. Sp. Habitats Outbreak Susceptibility Outbreak Area Outbreak Intensity Pests/Pathogens Population Estimates Terr. Sp. Pop. Water Volume Water Timing (Consistency) Water Yield Sediment Load Water Quality Runoff Erosion Potential Respiratory Health Reduction of Fire Risk Climate Stability Camping Hiking Recreational Hunting Wildlife Watching Biodiversity Existence Boating Fishing Timber Commuter Visibility Habitat Suitability Aq. Sp. Habitat Population Estimates Fish Populations Increase Decrease Increase or Decrease Selecting Indicators for Social Analysis E COSYSTEM S ERVICES

Comparing Alternatives Ecosystem Service Mechanical Thinning (Upland) Mechanical Thinning (Lowland) Prescribed Burning (Lowland) Respiratory Health +++ Commuter Visibility +++ Fire Risk Reduction +++ Climate Stability +++ Timber ++ No change Hiking +++ Camping +++ Recreational Hunting +/- Wildlife Watching +/- Biodiversity Existence +++ Boating +++ FishingNo change --

How Are These Diagrams Useful?  Identify the cascade of ecological interactions caused by a management, project, or policy  Identify indicators to measure those changes  Provide a visual representation of benefits and tradeoffs  Show analysis steps and data/models needed  Highlight what is known and not known integrating data and models

Group Exercise Create a means-ends diagram for one of the examples using the given alternative and background materials Great Dismal Swamp: Hydrological Restoration The Marsh Project: Prescribed Burning National Ecosystem Services Partnership

nespguidebook.com For more information, contact Lydia Olander: Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com